Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery 4/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Original Article

Mechanical evaluation of newly developed mouthpiece using polyethylene terephthalate glycol for transoral robotic surgery

Authors: Kazunori Fujiwara, Takahiro Fukuhara, Koji Niimi, Takahiro Sato, Hideyuki Kataoka, Hiroya Kitano, Hiromi Takeuchi

Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery | Issue 4/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Transoral robotic surgery (TORS), performed with the da Vinci surgical system (da Vinci), has been classified as a surgical approach for benign and malignant lesions of the oral cavity and laryngopharynx. It provides several unique advantages, which include a three-dimensional magnified view, ability to see and work around curves or angles, and the availability of two or three robotic arms. At present, however, the da Vinci surgical system does not provide haptic feedback. The potential risks specific to the transoral use of the da Vinci include tooth injury, mucosal laceration, ocular injury, and mandibular fracture. To prevent such intra-operative tooth injuries, we created a mouthpiece made of polyethylene terephthalate glycol (PETG) individually shaped for the patient’s teeth. We compared the safety and efficacy of the PETG mouthpiece with those of a conventional mouthpiece made of ethylene–vinyl acetate (EVA). To determine the difference in tooth injury resulting from the two types of mouthpiece, we constructed an experimental system to measure load and strain. We measured the dynamic load and the strain from the rod to the tooth using the PETG and EVA mouthpiece. The rod was pressed against the tooth model outfitted with two types of mouthpiece and the dynamic load was measured with a load cell and the strain with a strain gage. The maximum dynamic load was 1.29 ± 0.03 kgf for the PETG mouthpiece and 2.24 ± 0.05 kgf for the EVA mouthpiece. The load against the tooth was thus less for the EVA mouthpiece. The strain was −166.84 ± 3.94 and 48.24 ± 7.77 με, respectively, while the load direction was parallel to that of the tooth axis for the PETG mouthpiece and perpendicular to the tooth axis for the EVA mouthpiece. The PETG mouthpiece reduced the tooth load compared with the EVA mouthpiece and the load direction was in parallel to the tooth axis. The PETG mouthpiece thus enhances tooth safety for TORS.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Yuh B, Artibani W, Heidenreich A, Kimm S, Menon M, Navara G, Tewari A, Touijer K, Wilson T, Zorn KC, Eggener SE (2014) The role of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection in the management of high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review. Eur Urol 65:918–927CrossRefPubMed Yuh B, Artibani W, Heidenreich A, Kimm S, Menon M, Navara G, Tewari A, Touijer K, Wilson T, Zorn KC, Eggener SE (2014) The role of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection in the management of high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review. Eur Urol 65:918–927CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Moore EJ, Olsen KD, Kasperbauer JL (2009) Transoral robotic surgery for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective study of feasibility and functional outcomes. Laryngoscope 119(11):2156–2164CrossRefPubMed Moore EJ, Olsen KD, Kasperbauer JL (2009) Transoral robotic surgery for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective study of feasibility and functional outcomes. Laryngoscope 119(11):2156–2164CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Weinstein GS, O’Malley BW Jr, Magnuson JS, Carroll WR, Olsen KD, Daio L, Moore EJ, Holsinger FC (2012) Transoral robotic surgery: a multicenter study to assess feasibility, safety, and surgical margins. Laryngoscope 122:1701–1707CrossRefPubMed Weinstein GS, O’Malley BW Jr, Magnuson JS, Carroll WR, Olsen KD, Daio L, Moore EJ, Holsinger FC (2012) Transoral robotic surgery: a multicenter study to assess feasibility, safety, and surgical margins. Laryngoscope 122:1701–1707CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Genden EM, Shaun Desai BA et al (2009) Transoral robotic surgery for the management of head and neck cancer: preliminary experience. Head Neck 31:283–289CrossRefPubMed Genden EM, Shaun Desai BA et al (2009) Transoral robotic surgery for the management of head and neck cancer: preliminary experience. Head Neck 31:283–289CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Weinstein GS, O’Malley BW, Cohen MA et al (2010) Transoral robotic surgery for advanced oropharyngeal carcinoma. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 136:1079–1085CrossRefPubMed Weinstein GS, O’Malley BW, Cohen MA et al (2010) Transoral robotic surgery for advanced oropharyngeal carcinoma. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 136:1079–1085CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Dowthwaite SA, Franklin JH, Palma DA et al (2012) The role of transoral robotic surgery in the management of oropharyngeal cancer: a review of the literature. ISRN Oncol. doi:10.5402/2012/945162 Dowthwaite SA, Franklin JH, Palma DA et al (2012) The role of transoral robotic surgery in the management of oropharyngeal cancer: a review of the literature. ISRN Oncol. doi:10.​5402/​2012/​945162
7.
go back to reference Weinstein GS, O’Malley BW, Snyder W, Sherman E, Quon H (2007) Transoral robotic surgery: radical tonsillectomy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 133(12):1220–1226CrossRefPubMed Weinstein GS, O’Malley BW, Snyder W, Sherman E, Quon H (2007) Transoral robotic surgery: radical tonsillectomy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 133(12):1220–1226CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference O’Malley BW, Weinstein GS, Snyder W, Hockstein NG (2006) Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for base of tongue neoplasms. Laryngoscope 116(8):1465–1472CrossRefPubMed O’Malley BW, Weinstein GS, Snyder W, Hockstein NG (2006) Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for base of tongue neoplasms. Laryngoscope 116(8):1465–1472CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Cohen MA, Weinstein GS, O’Malley BW Jr, Feldman M, Quon H (2011) Transoral robotic surgery and human papillomavirus status: oncologic results. Head Neck 33(4):573–580CrossRefPubMed Cohen MA, Weinstein GS, O’Malley BW Jr, Feldman M, Quon H (2011) Transoral robotic surgery and human papillomavirus status: oncologic results. Head Neck 33(4):573–580CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Kypson AP, Nifong LW, Chitwood WR Jr (2003) Robotic mitral valve surgery. Surg Clin N Am 83:1387–1403CrossRefPubMed Kypson AP, Nifong LW, Chitwood WR Jr (2003) Robotic mitral valve surgery. Surg Clin N Am 83:1387–1403CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Menon M, Tewari A, Peabody JO et al (2004) Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy, a technique of robotic radical prostatectomy for management of localized carcinoma of the prostate: experience of over 1100 cases. Urol Clin N Am 31:701–717CrossRef Menon M, Tewari A, Peabody JO et al (2004) Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy, a technique of robotic radical prostatectomy for management of localized carcinoma of the prostate: experience of over 1100 cases. Urol Clin N Am 31:701–717CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Chia SH, Gross ND, Richmon JD (2013) Surgeon experience and complications with transoral robotic surgery (TORS). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 149(6):885–892CrossRefPubMed Chia SH, Gross ND, Richmon JD (2013) Surgeon experience and complications with transoral robotic surgery (TORS). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 149(6):885–892CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Kohda N, Iijima M, Muguruma T, Brantley WA, Ahluwalia KS, Mizoguchi I (2013) Effects of mechanical properties of thermoplastic materials on the initial force of thermoplastic appliance. Angle Orthod 83(3):476–483CrossRefPubMed Kohda N, Iijima M, Muguruma T, Brantley WA, Ahluwalia KS, Mizoguchi I (2013) Effects of mechanical properties of thermoplastic materials on the initial force of thermoplastic appliance. Angle Orthod 83(3):476–483CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Hahn W, Dathe H, Fialka-Fricke J, Fricke-Zech S, Zapf A, Kubein-Meesenburg D, Sadat-Khonsari R (2009) Influence of thermoplastic appliance thickness on the magnitude of force delivered to a maxillary central incisor during tipping. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 136(12):1–7 Hahn W, Dathe H, Fialka-Fricke J, Fricke-Zech S, Zapf A, Kubein-Meesenburg D, Sadat-Khonsari R (2009) Influence of thermoplastic appliance thickness on the magnitude of force delivered to a maxillary central incisor during tipping. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 136(12):1–7
15.
go back to reference Hahn W, Engelke B, Jung K, Dathe H, Kramer FJ, Rodig T, Kubein-Meesenburug D, Gryber RM (2011) The influence of occlusal forces on force delivery properties of aligners during rotation of an upper central incisor. Angle Orthod 81(6):1057–1063CrossRefPubMed Hahn W, Engelke B, Jung K, Dathe H, Kramer FJ, Rodig T, Kubein-Meesenburug D, Gryber RM (2011) The influence of occlusal forces on force delivery properties of aligners during rotation of an upper central incisor. Angle Orthod 81(6):1057–1063CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Mechanical evaluation of newly developed mouthpiece using polyethylene terephthalate glycol for transoral robotic surgery
Authors
Kazunori Fujiwara
Takahiro Fukuhara
Koji Niimi
Takahiro Sato
Hideyuki Kataoka
Hiroya Kitano
Hiromi Takeuchi
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Journal of Robotic Surgery / Issue 4/2015
Print ISSN: 1863-2483
Electronic ISSN: 1863-2491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-015-0539-7

Other articles of this Issue 4/2015

Journal of Robotic Surgery 4/2015 Go to the issue