Top

Clinical Oral Investigations

Published in:

Open Access 01-03-2021 | Original Article

Measuring the polymerization stress of self-adhesive resin composite cements by crack propagation

Authors: Felicitas Wiedenmann, Fabian Becker, Marlis Eichberger, Bogna Stawarczyk

Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Issue 3/2021

Abstract

Objectives

To test the polymerization stress of nine self-adhesive resin composite cements (G-CEM, iCEM, Bifix SE, Maxcem Elite, PANAVIA SA, SoloCem, SmartCem 2, SpeedCEM, RelyX Unicem 2) and one glass ionomer cement (control group; Ketac Cem).

Materials and methods

The crack propagation of a feldspar ceramic (n = 130) was determined by measuring crack lengths that originated from Vickers indentations, prior to and after the application and polymerization of the self-adhesive resin cements. Results for crack propagation were converted to polymerization stress values, and statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA followed by Scheffé post hoc test.

Results

SmartCem 2 presented higher stress values than iCEM, SoloCem, and Ketac Cem, while Ketac Cem showed lower values than Bifix SE, Maxcem Elite, SmartCem 2, SpeedCEM, and RelyX Unicem 2.

Conclusions

Self-adhesive resin composite cements differ in their polymerization stress, which may affect the durability of the restoration. For restorations made from ceramics with lower flexural strength, such as feldspar ceramics, resin composite cement materials with less polymerization stress should be preferred.

Clinical Relevance

As a high polymerization shrinkage may increase crack propagation, the determination of the polymerization stress of self-adhesive resin composite cements employed for fixing all-ceramic restorations is an important factor.

Edelhoff D, Ozcan M (2007) To what extent does the longevity of fixed dental prostheses depend on the function of the cement? Working group 4 materials: cementation. Clin Oral Implants Res 18(Suppl 3):193–204. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01442.xCrossRefPubMed

Abad-Coronel C, Naranjo B, Valdiviezo P (2019) Adhesive systems used in indirect restorations cementation: review of the literature. Dent J (Basel):7. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj7030071

Pameijer CH (2012) A review of luting agents. Int J Dent 2012:752861–752867. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/752861CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Ferracane JL, Stansbury JW, Burke FJ (2011) Self-adhesive resin cements - chemistry, properties and clinical considerations. J Oral Rehabil 38:295–314. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02148.xCrossRefPubMed

Makkar S, Malhotra N (2013) Self-adhesive resin cements: a new perspective in luting technology. Dent Update 40:758–760, 763-4, 767-8. https://doi.org/10.12968/denu.2013.40.9.758CrossRefPubMed

Frassetto A, Navarra CO, Marchesi G, Turco G, Di Lenarda R, Breschi L, Ferracane JL, Cadenaro M (2012) Kinetics of polymerization and contraction stress development in self-adhesive resin cements. Dent Mater 28:1032–1039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.06.003CrossRefPubMed

Kitzmuller K, Graf A, Watts D, Schedle A (2011) Setting kinetics and shrinkage of self-adhesive resin cements depend on cure-mode and temperature. Dent Mater 27:544–551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.02.004CrossRefPubMed

Spinell T, Schedle A, Watts DC (2009) Polymerization shrinkage kinetics of dimethacrylate resin-cements. Dent Mater 25:1058–1066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.04.008CrossRefPubMed

Ferracane JL (2005) Developing a more complete understanding of stresses produced in dental composites during polymerization. Dent Mater 21:36–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2004.10.004CrossRefPubMed

10.

Mantri SP, Mantri SS (2013) Management of shrinkage stresses in direct restorative light-cured composites: a review. J Esthet Restor Dent 25:305–313. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12047CrossRefPubMed

11.

Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E (2004) Determinants of in vitro gap formation of resin composites. J Dent 32:109–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2003.08.008CrossRefPubMed

12.

Davidson CL, de Gee AJ (1984) Relaxation of polymerization contraction stresses by flow in dental composites. J Dent Res 63:146–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345840630021001CrossRefPubMed

13.

Irie M, Tanaka J, Maruo Y, Nishigawa G (2014) Vertical and horizontal polymerization shrinkage in composite restorations. Dent Mater 30:e189–e198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2014.02.018CrossRefPubMed

14.

Tantbirojn D, Versluis A, Pintado MR, DeLong R, Douglas WH (2004) Tooth deformation patterns in molars after composite restoration. Dent Mater 20:535–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2003.05.008CrossRefPubMed

15.

Yamamoto T, Ferracane JL, Sakaguchi RL, Swain MV (2009) Calculation of contraction stresses in dental composites by analysis of crack propagation in the matrix surrounding a cavity. Dent Mater 25:543–550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2008.10.008CrossRefPubMed

16.

Baroudi K, Saleh AM, Silikas N, Watts DC (2007) Shrinkage behaviour of flowable resin-composites related to conversion and filler-fraction. J Dent 35:651–655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2007.05.001CrossRefPubMed

17.

Goncalves F, Kawano Y, Braga RR (2010) Contraction stress related to composite inorganic content. Dent Mater 26:704–709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.03.015CrossRefPubMed

18.

Kramer N, Reinelt C, Richter G, Petschelt A, Frankenberger R (2009) Nanohybrid vs. fine hybrid composite in class II cavities: clinical results and margin analysis after four years. Dent Mater 25:750–759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2008.12.003CrossRefPubMed

19.

Meredith N, Setchell DJ (1997) In vitro measurement of cuspal strain and displacement in composite restored teeth. J Dent 25:331–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0300-5712(96)00047-4CrossRefPubMed

20.

Calheiros FC, Sadek FT, Braga RR, Cardoso PE (2004) Polymerization contraction stress of low-shrinkage composites and its correlation with microleakage in class V restorations. J Dent 32:407–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2004.01.014CrossRefPubMed

21.

Davidson CL, de Gee AJ, Feilzer A (1984) The competition between the composite-dentin bond strength and the polymerization contraction stress. J Dent Res 63:1396–1399. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345840630121101CrossRefPubMed

22.

de Gee AJ, Davidson CL, Smith A (1981) A modified dilatometer for continuous recording of volumetric polymerization shrinkage of composite restorative materials. J Dent 9:36–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(81)90033-6CrossRefPubMed

23.

Watts DC, Cash AJ (1991) Determination of polymerization shrinkage kinetics in visible-light-cured materials: methods development. Dent Mater 7:281–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(05)80030-2CrossRefPubMed

24.

Sun J, Lin-Gibson S (2008) X-ray microcomputed tomography for measuring polymerization shrinkage of polymeric dental composites. Dent Mater 24:228–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2007.05.001CrossRefPubMed

25.

Kirsten M, Matta RE, Belli R, Lohbauer U, Wichmann M, Petschelt A, Zorzin J (2018) Hygroscopic expansion of self-adhesive resin cements and the integrity of all-ceramic crowns. Dent Mater 34:1102–1111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2018.04.008CrossRefPubMed

26.

Sokolowski G, Szczesio A, Bociong K, Kaluzinska K, Lapinska B, Sokolowski J, Domarecka M, Lukomska-Szymanska M (2018) Dental resin cements-the influence of water sorption on contraction stress changes and hydroscopic expansion. Materials (Basel) 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11060973

27.

Hattar S, Hatamleh M, Khraisat A, Al-Rabab'ah M (2014) Shear bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to base metal alloy. J Prosthet Dent 111:411–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.06.022CrossRefPubMed

28.

Lee S-EB J-H, Choi J-W, Jeon Y-C, Jeong C-M, Yoon M-J, Huh J-B (2015) Comparative shear-bond strength of six dental self-adhesive resin cements to zirconia. Materials 8(6):3306–3315CrossRef

29.

Flury S, Lussi A, Peutzfeldt A, Zimmerli B (2010) Push-out bond strength of CAD/CAM-ceramic luted to dentin with self-adhesive resin cements. Dent Mater 26:855–863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.05.001CrossRefPubMed

30.

Aschenbrenner CM, Lang R, Handel G, Behr M (2012) Analysis of marginal adaptation and sealing to enamel and dentin of four self-adhesive resin cements. Clin Oral Investig 16:191–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-010-0501-zCrossRefPubMed

31.

Dukic W (2019) Radiopacity of composite luting cements using a digital technique. J Prosthodont 28:e450–e459. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12578CrossRefPubMed

32.

Liebermann A, Roos M, Stawarczyk B (2017) The effect of different storage media on color stability of self-adhesive composite resin cements for up to one year. Materials (Basel) 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10030300

33.

Faria-e-Silva A, Boaro L, Braga R, Piva E, Arias V, Martins L (2011) Effect of immediate or delayed light activation on curing kinetics and shrinkage stress of dual-cure resin cements. Oper Dent 36:196–204. https://doi.org/10.2341/10-153-LCrossRefPubMed

34.

Ehlers V, Kampf G, Stender E, Willershausen B, Ernst CP (2015) Effect of thermocycling with or without 1 year of water storage on retentive strengths of luting cements for zirconia crowns. J Prosthet Dent 113:609–615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.12.001CrossRefPubMed

35.

Luthy H, Loeffel O, Hammerle CH (2006) Effect of thermocycling on bond strength of luting cements to zirconia ceramic. Dent Mater 22:195–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.04.016CrossRefPubMed

36.

Abo-Hamar SE, Hiller KA, Jung H, Federlin M, Friedl KH, Schmalz G (2005) Bond strength of a new universal self-adhesive resin luting cement to dentin and enamel. Clin Oral Investig 9:161–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-005-0308-5CrossRefPubMed

37.

Kim MJ, Kim YK, Kim KH, Kwon TY (2011) Shear bond strengths of various luting cements to zirconia ceramic: surface chemical aspects. J Dent 39:795–803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2011.08.012CrossRefPubMed

38.

Selz CF, Strub JR, Vach K, Guess PC (2014) Long-term performance of posterior InCeram Alumina crowns cemented with different luting agents: a prospective, randomized clinical split-mouth study over 5 years. Clin Oral Investig 18:1695–1703. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-1137-6CrossRefPubMed

39.

Luhrs AK, Guhr S, Gunay H, Geurtsen W (2010) Shear bond strength of self-adhesive resins compared to resin cements with etch and rinse adhesives to enamel and dentin in vitro. Clin Oral Investig 14:193–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-009-0279-zCrossRefPubMed

40.

Stawarczyk B, Beuer F, Ender A, Roos M, Edelhoff D, Wimmer T (2013) Influence of cementation and cement type on the fracture load testing methodology of anterior crowns made of different materials. Dent Mater J 32:888–895. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2013-147CrossRefPubMed

41.

Arrais CAG, Giannini M, Rueggeberg FA, Pashley DH (2007) Effect of curing mode on microtensile bond strength to dentin of two dual-cured adhesive systems in combination with resin luting cements for indirect restorations. Oper Dent 32:37–44CrossRef

Title: Measuring the polymerization stress of self-adhesive resin composite cements by crack propagation
Authors: Felicitas Wiedenmann
Fabian Becker
Marlis Eichberger
Bogna Stawarczyk
Publication date: 01-03-2021
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations / Issue 3/2021
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Electronic ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03391-5

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Measuring the polymerization stress of self-adhesive resin composite cements by crack propagation

Abstract

Objectives

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusions

Clinical Relevance

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Objectives

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusions

Clinical Relevance

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 3/2021

Effectiveness of a nutraceutical agent in the non-surgical periodontal therapy: a randomized, controlled clinical trial

Influence of bone density, drill diameter, drilling speed, and irrigation on temperature changes during implant osteotomies: an in vitro study

Diagnostic accuracy of periapical radiograph, cone beam computed tomography, and intrasurgical linear measurement techniques for assessing furcation defects: a longitudinal randomised controlled trial

Efficacy of Er,Cr:YSGG laser–assisted delivery of topical anesthesia in the oral mucosa

Effects of diabetes on oxidative stress, periodontal ligament fiber orientation, and matrix metalloproteinase 8 and 9 expressions during orthodontic tooth movement

The effect of keratinized mucosa on the severity of peri-implant mucositis differs between periodontally healthy subjects and the general population: a cross-sectional study