Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Maternal and Child Health Journal 6/2014

01-08-2014 | Notes from the Field

Measuring Quality in Pediatrics: Florida’s Early Experiences with the CHIPRA Core Measure Set

Authors: Caprice Knapp, Hua Wang, Kimberly Baker

Published in: Maternal and Child Health Journal | Issue 6/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Enacted in 2009, the Children’s Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act (CHIPRA) aims, among other things, to increase state’s accountability for providing quality health care to all children in the United States. Although it is important for states to report on the measures, learning from their successes and failures is critical in producing the measures so that states will be prepared for future regulations. Florida covered roughly 2.59 million children in 2010. Administrative, medical record, registry, and survey data were used to report on 20 of the 24 CHIPRA core measures. Technical specifications from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services were used. Approximately 10 months were needed to identify, collect, safeguard, and process the required data. Florida was able to build on its past experiences with performance measurement reporting and surveying. Conducting medical record reviews at the state level and producing measures that required registry data proved to be challenging. Although Florida was successful in its first year of reporting the CHIPRA core measures, certain populations were not included in some of the measures. The next phase of Florida’s CHIPRA project will focus on developing and implementing a dissemination plan and creating opportunities to improve the measures. Florida has made significant progress in the early phases of reporting the CHIPRA measures. As Florida gains more experience in reporting the measures, and results from other states are released, it will be easier to put the statewide measure results into context. Once meaningful comparisons can be made, Florida will be able to better plan for the future of child health and health outcomes.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Mangione-Smith, R., Schiff, J., & Dougherty, D. (2011). Identifying children’s health care quality measures for Medicaid and CHIP: An evidence-informed, publicly transparent expert process. Academic Pediatrics, 11(suppl 3), S11–S21.PubMedCrossRef Mangione-Smith, R., Schiff, J., & Dougherty, D. (2011). Identifying children’s health care quality measures for Medicaid and CHIP: An evidence-informed, publicly transparent expert process. Academic Pediatrics, 11(suppl 3), S11–S21.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference National Commission on Quality Assurance. (2007). HEDIS ® technical specifications, 2008. Washington, DC: National Commission on Quality Assurance. National Commission on Quality Assurance. (2007). HEDIS ® technical specifications, 2008. Washington, DC: National Commission on Quality Assurance.
7.
go back to reference Gandhi, T. K., Cook, F. E., Puopolo, A. L., Burstin, H. R., Haas, J. S., & Brennan, T. A. (2002). Assessing the comparability of various measures of the quality of ambulatory care. Medical Care, 40(2), 155–165.PubMedCrossRef Gandhi, T. K., Cook, F. E., Puopolo, A. L., Burstin, H. R., Haas, J. S., & Brennan, T. A. (2002). Assessing the comparability of various measures of the quality of ambulatory care. Medical Care, 40(2), 155–165.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference McAlindon, T. E., Formica, M., Palmer, J. R., Lafyatis, R., & Rosenberg, L. (2003). Assessment of strategies for identifying diagnosed cases of systemic lupus erythematosus through self-report. Lupus, 12(10), 754–759.PubMedCrossRef McAlindon, T. E., Formica, M., Palmer, J. R., Lafyatis, R., & Rosenberg, L. (2003). Assessment of strategies for identifying diagnosed cases of systemic lupus erythematosus through self-report. Lupus, 12(10), 754–759.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Knapp, C. A., Madden, V. L., Curtis, C., Sloyer, P. J., & Shenkman, E. A. (2010). Assessing non response bias in pediatric palliative care research. Palliative Medicine, 24(3), 340–347.PubMedCrossRef Knapp, C. A., Madden, V. L., Curtis, C., Sloyer, P. J., & Shenkman, E. A. (2010). Assessing non response bias in pediatric palliative care research. Palliative Medicine, 24(3), 340–347.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference National Committee for Quality Assurance. (2010). HEDIS 2011, Vol. 2: Technical specifications for health plans. Washington DC: National Committee for Quality Assurance. National Committee for Quality Assurance. (2010). HEDIS 2011, Vol. 2: Technical specifications for health plans. Washington DC: National Committee for Quality Assurance.
16.
go back to reference Pawlson, L. G., Scholle, S. H., & Powers, A. (2007). Comparison of administrative-only verses administrative plus chart review data for reporting HEDIS hybrid. American Journal of Managed Care, 13(10), 553–558.PubMed Pawlson, L. G., Scholle, S. H., & Powers, A. (2007). Comparison of administrative-only verses administrative plus chart review data for reporting HEDIS hybrid. American Journal of Managed Care, 13(10), 553–558.PubMed
17.
go back to reference Fairbrother, G., & Simpson, L. A. (2011). Measuring and reporting quality of health care for children: CHIPRA and Beyond. Academic Pediatrics, 11(3 Suppl), S77–S84.PubMedCrossRef Fairbrother, G., & Simpson, L. A. (2011). Measuring and reporting quality of health care for children: CHIPRA and Beyond. Academic Pediatrics, 11(3 Suppl), S77–S84.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Delone, S. E., & Hess, C. A. (2011). Medicaid and CHIP children’s healthcare quality measures: What states use and what they want. Academic Pediatrics, 11(3 Suppl), S68–S76.PubMedCrossRef Delone, S. E., & Hess, C. A. (2011). Medicaid and CHIP children’s healthcare quality measures: What states use and what they want. Academic Pediatrics, 11(3 Suppl), S68–S76.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Friedberg, M. W., & Damberg, C. L. (2012). A five-point checklist to help performance reports incentivize improvement and effectively guide patients. Health Affairs, 31(3), 612–618.PubMedCrossRef Friedberg, M. W., & Damberg, C. L. (2012). A five-point checklist to help performance reports incentivize improvement and effectively guide patients. Health Affairs, 31(3), 612–618.PubMedCrossRef
22.
23.
go back to reference Friedberg, M. W., Coltin, K. L., Safran, D. G., Dresser, M., & Schneider, E. C. (2010). Medical home capabilities of primary care practices that serve sociodemographically vulnerable neighborhoods. Archives of Internal Medicine, 170(11), 938–944.PubMedCrossRef Friedberg, M. W., Coltin, K. L., Safran, D. G., Dresser, M., & Schneider, E. C. (2010). Medical home capabilities of primary care practices that serve sociodemographically vulnerable neighborhoods. Archives of Internal Medicine, 170(11), 938–944.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Friedberg, M. W., Safran, D. G., Coltin, K. L., Dresser, M., & Schneider, E. C. (2010). Paying for performance in primary care: Potential impact on practices and disparities. Health Affairs, 29(5), 926–932.PubMedCrossRef Friedberg, M. W., Safran, D. G., Coltin, K. L., Dresser, M., & Schneider, E. C. (2010). Paying for performance in primary care: Potential impact on practices and disparities. Health Affairs, 29(5), 926–932.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Friedberg, M. W., Hussey, P. S., & Schneider, E. C. (2010). Primary care: A critical review of the evidence on the quality and costs of health care. Health Affairs, 29(5), 766–772.PubMedCrossRef Friedberg, M. W., Hussey, P. S., & Schneider, E. C. (2010). Primary care: A critical review of the evidence on the quality and costs of health care. Health Affairs, 29(5), 766–772.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Friedberg, M. W., Coltin, K. L., Safran, D. G., Dresser, M., Zaslavsky, A. M., & Schneider, E. C. (2009). Associations between structural capabilities of primary care practices and performance on selected quality measures. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(7), 456–463.PubMedCrossRef Friedberg, M. W., Coltin, K. L., Safran, D. G., Dresser, M., Zaslavsky, A. M., & Schneider, E. C. (2009). Associations between structural capabilities of primary care practices and performance on selected quality measures. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(7), 456–463.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Friedberg, M. W., Safran, D. G., Coltin, K. L., Dresser, M., & Schneider, E. C. (2009). Readiness for the patient-centered medical home: Capabilities of Massachusetts primary care practices. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 24(2), 162–169.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Friedberg, M. W., Safran, D. G., Coltin, K. L., Dresser, M., & Schneider, E. C. (2009). Readiness for the patient-centered medical home: Capabilities of Massachusetts primary care practices. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 24(2), 162–169.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Knapp, C., Wang, H., Baker, K., & Kaufmann, M. (2012). Pediatric performance Measurement in Florida’s CHIPRA demonstration grant, contract period 2011. Gainesville, FL: Institute for Child Health Policy. Knapp, C., Wang, H., Baker, K., & Kaufmann, M. (2012). Pediatric performance Measurement in Florida’s CHIPRA demonstration grant, contract period 2011. Gainesville, FL: Institute for Child Health Policy.
Metadata
Title
Measuring Quality in Pediatrics: Florida’s Early Experiences with the CHIPRA Core Measure Set
Authors
Caprice Knapp
Hua Wang
Kimberly Baker
Publication date
01-08-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Maternal and Child Health Journal / Issue 6/2014
Print ISSN: 1092-7875
Electronic ISSN: 1573-6628
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-013-1379-6

Other articles of this Issue 6/2014

Maternal and Child Health Journal 6/2014 Go to the issue