Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2024

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Research

Measuring performance in allied health professional role substitution models of care: a clinician survey

Authors: Rumbidzai N. Mutsekwa, Katrina L. Campbell, Russell Canavan, Rebecca L. Angus, Liza-Jane McBride, Joshua M. Byrnes

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Professional role substitution models of care have emerged as a key strategy to address increasing healthcare demand. Gaining insights from those actively engaged in the process of these models’ implementation and evaluation is pivotal to ensuring sustainability and further successful implementation. The purpose of this study was to describe allied-health clinicians’ perceptions, practice, and experiences of healthcare performance evaluation in professional role substitution models of care.

Methods

Data were collected via an online platform between 22 June − 22 July 2022 using a combination of convenience and network-based sampling of allied-health clinicians involved or interested in the implementation and evaluation of professional role substitution models of care. Clinicians answered 25 questions which consisted of demographic and targeted questions regarding performance evaluation across six domains of healthcare quality (effectiveness, safety, appropriateness, access & equity, continuity of care, and cost, efficiency, productivity & sustainability).

Results

A total of 102 clinicians accessed the survey, with 72 providing complete survey data. Eleven allied-health professions were represented, working across twelve specialities in thirteen hospital and health services. Whilst most allied-health clinicians (93–100%) supported measuring performance in each of the six healthcare quality domains, only 26–58% were measuring these domains in practice. Allied-health leadership support (62.5%), clinician drive (62.5%), consumer engagement (50%) and medical support (46%) were enablers whilst a lack of resources (human, time, financial (47%)), healthcare performance frameworks and/or policies (40%) were identified as barriers. Given the opportunity, clinicians would invest the most financial resources in digital solutions as a core strategy to improve performance evaluation.

Conclusions

Allied-health professionals expressed strong support for principles of performance evaluation, however in practice, performance evaluation is still in its infancy in professional role substitution models of care. Organisations can implement strategies that maximise the enablers whilst addressing barriers identified to improve performance evaluation in these models of care.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
3.
4.
go back to reference Porter ME, Lee TH. The strategy that will fix health care. Harv Bus Rev. 2013;91(10):1–19. Porter ME, Lee TH. The strategy that will fix health care. Harv Bus Rev. 2013;91(10):1–19.
5.
go back to reference Baker A. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century: BMJ. 2001. Baker A. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century: BMJ. 2001.
6.
go back to reference Owens DK, Qaseem A, Chou R, Shekelle P. High-value, cost-conscious health care: concepts for clinicians to evaluate the benefits, harms, and costs of medical interventions. Ann Intern Med. 2011;154(3):174–80.CrossRefPubMed Owens DK, Qaseem A, Chou R, Shekelle P. High-value, cost-conscious health care: concepts for clinicians to evaluate the benefits, harms, and costs of medical interventions. Ann Intern Med. 2011;154(3):174–80.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Mutsekwa RN, Wright C, Byrnes JM, Canavan R, Angus RL, Spencer A, et al. Measuring performance of professional role substitution models of care against traditional medical care in healthcare—A systematic review. J Eval Clin Pract. 2022;28(2):208–17.CrossRefPubMed Mutsekwa RN, Wright C, Byrnes JM, Canavan R, Angus RL, Spencer A, et al. Measuring performance of professional role substitution models of care against traditional medical care in healthcare—A systematic review. J Eval Clin Pract. 2022;28(2):208–17.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Saxon RL, Gray MA, Oprescu FI. Extended roles for allied health professionals: an updated systematic review of the evidence. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2014;7:479–88.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Saxon RL, Gray MA, Oprescu FI. Extended roles for allied health professionals: an updated systematic review of the evidence. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2014;7:479–88.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference McPherson K, Kersten P, George S, Lattimer V, Breton A, Ellis B, et al. A systematic review of evidence about extended roles for allied health professionals. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2006;11(4):240–7.CrossRefPubMed McPherson K, Kersten P, George S, Lattimer V, Breton A, Ellis B, et al. A systematic review of evidence about extended roles for allied health professionals. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2006;11(4):240–7.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Mutsekwa RN, Campbell KL, Canavan R, Mulhern B, Angus RL, Byrnes JM. Patient preferences for attributes that characterise alternative models of care in gastroenterology: a discrete choice experiment. Patient. 2023:1–13. Mutsekwa RN, Campbell KL, Canavan R, Mulhern B, Angus RL, Byrnes JM. Patient preferences for attributes that characterise alternative models of care in gastroenterology: a discrete choice experiment. Patient. 2023:1–13.
12.
go back to reference Levesque J-F, Sutherland K. Combining patient, clinical and system perspectives in assessing performance in healthcare: an integrated measurement framework. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20(1):1–14.CrossRef Levesque J-F, Sutherland K. Combining patient, clinical and system perspectives in assessing performance in healthcare: an integrated measurement framework. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20(1):1–14.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Mutsekwa RN, Byrnes JM, Larkins V, Canavan R, Angus RL, Campbell KL. Role substitution of specialist medical doctors with allied-health professionals: a qualitative exploration of patients’ experiences and perceptions of healthcare quality. J Eval Clin Pract. 2022;28(6):1096–105.CrossRefPubMed Mutsekwa RN, Byrnes JM, Larkins V, Canavan R, Angus RL, Campbell KL. Role substitution of specialist medical doctors with allied-health professionals: a qualitative exploration of patients’ experiences and perceptions of healthcare quality. J Eval Clin Pract. 2022;28(6):1096–105.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Artino AR Jr, La Rochelle JS, Dezee KJ, Gehlbach H. Developing questionnaires for educational research: AMEE Guide No. 87. Med Teach. 2014;36(6):463–74.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Artino AR Jr, La Rochelle JS, Dezee KJ, Gehlbach H. Developing questionnaires for educational research: AMEE Guide No. 87. Med Teach. 2014;36(6):463–74.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference McKenzie JF, Wood ML, Kotecki JE, Clark JK, Brey RA. Establishing content validity: using qualitative and quantitative steps. Am J Health Behav. 1999. McKenzie JF, Wood ML, Kotecki JE, Clark JK, Brey RA. Establishing content validity: using qualitative and quantitative steps. Am J Health Behav. 1999.
19.
go back to reference DeCastellarnau A. A classification of response scale characteristics that affect data quality: a literature review. Qual Quant. 2018;52(4):1523–59.CrossRefPubMed DeCastellarnau A. A classification of response scale characteristics that affect data quality: a literature review. Qual Quant. 2018;52(4):1523–59.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Sharma A, Minh Duc NT, Luu Lam Thang T, Nam NH, Ng SJ, Abbas KS, et al. A consensus-based checklist for reporting of survey studies (CROSS). J Gen Intern Med. 2021;36(10):3179–87.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sharma A, Minh Duc NT, Luu Lam Thang T, Nam NH, Ng SJ, Abbas KS, et al. A consensus-based checklist for reporting of survey studies (CROSS). J Gen Intern Med. 2021;36(10):3179–87.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Adair CE, Simpson E, Casebeer AL, Birdsell JM, Hayden KA, Lewis S. Performance measurement in healthcare: part II–state of the science findings by stage of the performance measurement process. Healthc Policy. 2006;2(1):56.PubMedPubMedCentral Adair CE, Simpson E, Casebeer AL, Birdsell JM, Hayden KA, Lewis S. Performance measurement in healthcare: part II–state of the science findings by stage of the performance measurement process. Healthc Policy. 2006;2(1):56.PubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Geddes EL, Gill C. Annual performance appraisal: one organization’s process and retrospective analysis of outcomes. Healthc Q. 2012;15(1):59–63.CrossRefPubMed Geddes EL, Gill C. Annual performance appraisal: one organization’s process and retrospective analysis of outcomes. Healthc Q. 2012;15(1):59–63.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Kollberg B, Elg M, Lindmark J. Design and implementation of a performance measurement system in Swedish health care services: a multiple case study of 6 development teams. Qual Manag Healthc. 2005;14(2):95–111.CrossRef Kollberg B, Elg M, Lindmark J. Design and implementation of a performance measurement system in Swedish health care services: a multiple case study of 6 development teams. Qual Manag Healthc. 2005;14(2):95–111.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Lizarondo L, Grimmer K, Kumar S. Assisting allied health in performance evaluation: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14(1):1–12.CrossRef Lizarondo L, Grimmer K, Kumar S. Assisting allied health in performance evaluation: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14(1):1–12.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Crawford MJ, Rutter D, Manley C, Weaver T, Bhui K, Fulop N, et al. Systematic review of involving patients in the planning and development of health care. BMJ. 2002;325(7375):1263.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Crawford MJ, Rutter D, Manley C, Weaver T, Bhui K, Fulop N, et al. Systematic review of involving patients in the planning and development of health care. BMJ. 2002;325(7375):1263.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
27.
go back to reference Loeb JM. The current state of performance measurement in health care. Int J Qual Health Care. 2004;16(suppl1):i5–i9.CrossRefPubMed Loeb JM. The current state of performance measurement in health care. Int J Qual Health Care. 2004;16(suppl1):i5–i9.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Stute M, Moretto N, Waters R, Raymer M, Sam S, Bhagwat M, et al. Allied health primary contact services: results of a 2-year follow-up study of clinical effectiveness, safety, wait times and impact on medical specialist out-patient waitlists. Aust Health Rev. 2020;45(3):344–52.CrossRef Stute M, Moretto N, Waters R, Raymer M, Sam S, Bhagwat M, et al. Allied health primary contact services: results of a 2-year follow-up study of clinical effectiveness, safety, wait times and impact on medical specialist out-patient waitlists. Aust Health Rev. 2020;45(3):344–52.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JM, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. Br Med J. 1996;71:2. Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JM, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. Br Med J. 1996;71:2.
30.
go back to reference Tooker J. The importance of measuring quality and performance in healthcare. Medscape Gen Med. 2005;7(2):49. Tooker J. The importance of measuring quality and performance in healthcare. Medscape Gen Med. 2005;7(2):49.
Metadata
Title
Measuring performance in allied health professional role substitution models of care: a clinician survey
Authors
Rumbidzai N. Mutsekwa
Katrina L. Campbell
Russell Canavan
Rebecca L. Angus
Liza-Jane McBride
Joshua M. Byrnes
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-10556-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

BMC Health Services Research 1/2024 Go to the issue