Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research 1/2016

Open Access 01-01-2016

Measuring Mental Health Recovery: An Application of Rasch Modeling to the Consumer Recovery Measure

Authors: Kathryn KD Lusczakoski, PhD, P. Antonio Olmos-Gallo, PhD, William Milnor, MA, Christopher J. McKinney, PhD

Published in: The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

As the need for recovery-oriented outcomes increases, it is critical to understand how numeric recovery scores are developed. In the current article, the modern Rasch modeling techniques were applied to establish numeric scores of consumers’ perceptions of recovery. A sample of 1,973 adult consumers at a community-based mental health center (57.5% male; average age of 47 years old) completed the 15-item Consumer Recovery Measure. A confirmatory factor analysis revealed the unidimensional nature of the Consumer Recovery Measure and provided construct validity evidence. The Rasch analysis displayed that the items produced acceptable model fit, reliability, and identified the difficulty of the items. The conclusion emphasizes the value of Rasch modeling regarding the measurement of recovery and its relevance to consumer-derived assessments in the clinical decision-making process.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Young SL, Ensing DS. Exploring recovery from the perspective of people with psychiatric disabilities. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal. 1999; 22: 219–231.CrossRef Young SL, Ensing DS. Exploring recovery from the perspective of people with psychiatric disabilities. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal. 1999; 22: 219–231.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Onken SJ, Craig CM, Ridgway P, et al. An analysis of the definitions and elements of recovery: A review of the literature. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal. 2007; 31: 9–22.PubMedCrossRef Onken SJ, Craig CM, Ridgway P, et al. An analysis of the definitions and elements of recovery: A review of the literature. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal. 2007; 31: 9–22.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Bullock WA, Smith MK, O’Rourke M. Recovery outcomes of the Illness Management and Recovery Program. Presented at the 16th annual conference on State Mental Health Agency Services Research, Program Evaluation, and Policy, Baltimore, MD, February, 2006. Bullock WA, Smith MK, O’Rourke M. Recovery outcomes of the Illness Management and Recovery Program. Presented at the 16th annual conference on State Mental Health Agency Services Research, Program Evaluation, and Policy, Baltimore, MD, February, 2006.
4.
go back to reference Young SL, Bullock WA. The mental health recovery measure. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco, CA, 2003. Young SL, Bullock WA. The mental health recovery measure. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco, CA, 2003.
5.
go back to reference Corrigan PW, Salzer M, Ralph, RO. Examining the factor structure of the recovery assessment scale. Schizophrenia Bulletin. 2004; 30: 1035–1041.PubMedCrossRef Corrigan PW, Salzer M, Ralph, RO. Examining the factor structure of the recovery assessment scale. Schizophrenia Bulletin. 2004; 30: 1035–1041.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Salyers MP, Tsai J, Stultz TA. Measuring recovery orientation in a hospital setting. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal. 2007; 31(2): 131–137.PubMedCrossRef Salyers MP, Tsai J, Stultz TA. Measuring recovery orientation in a hospital setting. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal. 2007; 31(2): 131–137.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Ridgway P, Press A, Ratzlaff S, et al. Report on field testing the recovery enhancing environment measure. Lawrence, KS: School of Social Welfare, Office of Mental Health Research and Training, 2003. Ridgway P, Press A, Ratzlaff S, et al. Report on field testing the recovery enhancing environment measure. Lawrence, KS: School of Social Welfare, Office of Mental Health Research and Training, 2003.
8.
go back to reference Bedregal LE, O’Connell M, Davidson L. The Recovery Knowledge Inventory. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal. 2006; 30: 96–103.PubMedCrossRef Bedregal LE, O’Connell M, Davidson L. The Recovery Knowledge Inventory. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal. 2006; 30: 96–103.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Jerrell JM, Cousin VC, Roberts KM. Psychometric of the Recovery Process Inventory. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research. 2006; 33: 464–473.PubMedCrossRef Jerrell JM, Cousin VC, Roberts KM. Psychometric of the Recovery Process Inventory. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research. 2006; 33: 464–473.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Andresen R, Caputi P, Oades L. Stages of recovery instrument: Development of a measure of recovery from serious mental illness. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry. 2006; 40: 972–980.PubMedCrossRef Andresen R, Caputi P, Oades L. Stages of recovery instrument: Development of a measure of recovery from serious mental illness. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry. 2006; 40: 972–980.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Betemps EJ, Smith RM, Baker DG, et al. Measurement precision of the Clinician Administered PTSD scale (CAPS): A Rasch model analysis. Journal of Applied Measurement. 2004; 4: 59–69. Betemps EJ, Smith RM, Baker DG, et al. Measurement precision of the Clinician Administered PTSD scale (CAPS): A Rasch model analysis. Journal of Applied Measurement. 2004; 4: 59–69.
12.
go back to reference Elliott R, Fox CM, Beltyukova SA, et al. Deconstructing therapy outcome measurement with Rasch analysis of a measure of general clinical distress: The symptom checklist-90-revised. Psychological Assessment. 2006; 18: 359–372.PubMedCrossRef Elliott R, Fox CM, Beltyukova SA, et al. Deconstructing therapy outcome measurement with Rasch analysis of a measure of general clinical distress: The symptom checklist-90-revised. Psychological Assessment. 2006; 18: 359–372.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kahler CQ, Strong DR, Read JP. Toward efficient and comprehensive measurement of the alcohol problems continuum in college students: The Brief Young Adult Alcohol Consequences questionnaire. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research. 2005; 7: 1180–1189.CrossRef Kahler CQ, Strong DR, Read JP. Toward efficient and comprehensive measurement of the alcohol problems continuum in college students: The Brief Young Adult Alcohol Consequences questionnaire. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research. 2005; 7: 1180–1189.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Zelinski EM, Gilewski MJ. A 10-item Rasch modeled memory self-efficacy scale. Aging and Mental Health. 2004; 8: 293–306.PubMedCrossRef Zelinski EM, Gilewski MJ. A 10-item Rasch modeled memory self-efficacy scale. Aging and Mental Health. 2004; 8: 293–306.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Mental Health Center of Denver. The recovery initiative at the Mental Health Center of Denver. Denver, CO: The Recovery Committee, 2005. Mental Health Center of Denver. The recovery initiative at the Mental Health Center of Denver. Denver, CO: The Recovery Committee, 2005.
16.
go back to reference Olmos-Gallo PA, Starks R, Lusczakoski KD, et al. Seven key strategies that work together to create recovery based transformation. Community Mental Health Journal. 2012; 48:294–301.PubMedCrossRef Olmos-Gallo PA, Starks R, Lusczakoski KD, et al. Seven key strategies that work together to create recovery based transformation. Community Mental Health Journal. 2012; 48:294–301.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Bond TG, Fox CM. Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in human sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2001. Bond TG, Fox CM. Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in human sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2001.
18.
go back to reference Embretson SE, Reise SP. Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2000. Embretson SE, Reise SP. Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2000.
19.
go back to reference Hambleton RK, Swaminathan H, Roger HJ. Fundamentals of Item Response theory. In: RM Jaeger (Ed). Measurement methods for the social sciences series. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1991. Hambleton RK, Swaminathan H, Roger HJ. Fundamentals of Item Response theory. In: RM Jaeger (Ed). Measurement methods for the social sciences series. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1991.
20.
go back to reference Center for Psychiatric Rehabilitation. Measuring outcomes for quality and accountability. Recovery and Rehabilitation. 2007; 3: 1–4. Center for Psychiatric Rehabilitation. Measuring outcomes for quality and accountability. Recovery and Rehabilitation. 2007; 3: 1–4.
21.
go back to reference Clark CR, Olmos-Gallo PA. Performance measurement: A signature approach to outcomes measurement improves recovery. National Council Magazine. 2007; 3: 26–28. Clark CR, Olmos-Gallo PA. Performance measurement: A signature approach to outcomes measurement improves recovery. National Council Magazine. 2007; 3: 26–28.
22.
go back to reference Betemps E, Baker DG. Evaluation of the Mississippi PTSD Scale–revised using Rasch measurement. Mental Health Service Research. 2004; 6: 117–125.CrossRef Betemps E, Baker DG. Evaluation of the Mississippi PTSD Scale–revised using Rasch measurement. Mental Health Service Research. 2004; 6: 117–125.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Prieto L, Alonso J, Lamarca R. Classical Test theory versus Rasch analysis for quality of life questionnaire reduction. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 2003; 1: 1–27.CrossRef Prieto L, Alonso J, Lamarca R. Classical Test theory versus Rasch analysis for quality of life questionnaire reduction. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 2003; 1: 1–27.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Wainer H, Dorans NJ, Flaugher, et al. Computer adaptive testing: a primer. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2000. Wainer H, Dorans NJ, Flaugher, et al. Computer adaptive testing: a primer. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2000.
25.
go back to reference Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for Fit Indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling. 1999; 6(1): 1–55.CrossRef Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for Fit Indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling. 1999; 6(1): 1–55.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1994. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1994.
27.
go back to reference SPSS Inc. SPSS (version 15.0) [Computer software]. Chicago IL, 2006. SPSS Inc. SPSS (version 15.0) [Computer software]. Chicago IL, 2006.
28.
go back to reference Linacre JM. Winsteps (version 3.0) [Computer software]. Chicago, IL, 2004. Linacre JM. Winsteps (version 3.0) [Computer software]. Chicago, IL, 2004.
29.
go back to reference Jöreskog K, Sörbom D. LISREL (version 8.80) [Computer Software]. Scientific Software International, Inc. Skokie, IL, 2007. Jöreskog K, Sörbom D. LISREL (version 8.80) [Computer Software]. Scientific Software International, Inc. Skokie, IL, 2007.
30.
go back to reference Masters GN. A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika. 1982; 47: 149–174.CrossRef Masters GN. A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika. 1982; 47: 149–174.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Measuring Mental Health Recovery: An Application of Rasch Modeling to the Consumer Recovery Measure
Authors
Kathryn KD Lusczakoski, PhD
P. Antonio Olmos-Gallo, PhD
William Milnor, MA
Christopher J. McKinney, PhD
Publication date
01-01-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research / Issue 1/2016
Print ISSN: 1094-3412
Electronic ISSN: 2168-6793
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-014-9411-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research 1/2016 Go to the issue