Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Skeletal Radiology 11/2010

Open Access 01-11-2010 | Scientific Article

Measuring hindfoot alignment radiographically: the long axial view is more reliable than the hindfoot alignment view

Authors: Mikel L. Reilingh, Lijkele Beimers, Gabriëlle J. M. Tuijthof, Sjoerd A. S. Stufkens, Mario Maas, C. Niek van Dijk

Published in: Skeletal Radiology | Issue 11/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Hindfoot malalignment is a recognized cause of foot and ankle disability. For preoperative planning and clinical follow-up, reliable radiographic assessment of hindfoot alignment is important. The long axial radiographic view and the hindfoot alignment view are commonly used for this purpose. However, their comparative reliabilities are unknown. As hindfoot varus or valgus malalignment is most pronounced during mid-stance of gait, a unilateral weight-bearing stance, in comparison with a bilateral stance, could increase measurement reliability. The purpose of this study was to compare the intra- and interobserver reliability of hindfoot alignment measurements of both radiographic views in bilateral and unilateral stance.

Materials and methods

A hindfoot alignment view and a long axial view were acquired from 18 healthy volunteers in bilateral and unilateral weight-bearing stances. Hindfoot alignment was defined as the angular deviation between the tibial anatomical axis and the calcaneus longitudinal axis from the radiographs. Repeat measurements of hindfoot alignment were performed by nine orthopaedic examiners.

Results

Measurements from the hindfoot alignment view gave intra- and interclass correlation coefficients (CCs) of 0.72 and 0.58, respectively, for bilateral stance and 0.91 and 0.49, respectively, for unilateral stance. The long axial view showed, respectively, intra- and interclass CCs of 0.93 and 0.79 for bilateral stance and 0.91 and 0.58 for unilateral stance.

Conclusion

The long axial view is more reliable than the hindfoot alignment view or the angular measurement of hindfoot alignment. Although intra-observer reliability is good/excellent for both methods, only the long axial view leads to good interobserver reliability. A unilateral weight-bearing stance does not lead to greater reliability of measurement.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hayashi K, Tanaka Y, Kumai T, Sugimoto K, Takakura Y. Correlation of compensatory alignment of the subtalar joint to the progression of primary osteoarthritis of the ankle. Foot Ankle Int. 2008;29:400–6.CrossRefPubMed Hayashi K, Tanaka Y, Kumai T, Sugimoto K, Takakura Y. Correlation of compensatory alignment of the subtalar joint to the progression of primary osteoarthritis of the ankle. Foot Ankle Int. 2008;29:400–6.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Takakura Y, Takaoka T, Tanaka Y, Yajima H, Tamai S. Results of opening-wedge osteotomy for the treatment of a post-traumatic varus deformity of the ankle. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 1998;80:213–18. Takakura Y, Takaoka T, Tanaka Y, Yajima H, Tamai S. Results of opening-wedge osteotomy for the treatment of a post-traumatic varus deformity of the ankle. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 1998;80:213–18.
3.
go back to reference Hintermann B, Knupp M, Barg A. Osteotomies of the distal tibia and hindfoot for ankle realignment. Orthopade. 2008;37:212–13.CrossRefPubMed Hintermann B, Knupp M, Barg A. Osteotomies of the distal tibia and hindfoot for ankle realignment. Orthopade. 2008;37:212–13.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Stamatis ED, Myerson MS. Supramalleolar osteotomy: indications and technique. Foot Ankle Clin. 2003;8:317–33.CrossRefPubMed Stamatis ED, Myerson MS. Supramalleolar osteotomy: indications and technique. Foot Ankle Clin. 2003;8:317–33.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Tanaka Y, Takakura Y, Hayashi K, Taniguchi A, Kumai T, Sugimoto K. Low tibial osteotomy for varus-type osteoarthritis of the ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88:909–13.CrossRefPubMed Tanaka Y, Takakura Y, Hayashi K, Taniguchi A, Kumai T, Sugimoto K. Low tibial osteotomy for varus-type osteoarthritis of the ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88:909–13.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Stamatis ED, Cooper PS, Myerson MS. Supramalleolar osteotomy for the treatment of distal tibial angular deformities and arthritis of the ankle joint. Foot Ankle Int. 2003;24:754–64.PubMed Stamatis ED, Cooper PS, Myerson MS. Supramalleolar osteotomy for the treatment of distal tibial angular deformities and arthritis of the ankle joint. Foot Ankle Int. 2003;24:754–64.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Sen C, Kocaoglu M, Eralp L, Cinar M. Correction of ankle and hindfoot deformities by supramalleolar osteotomy. Foot Ankle Int. 2003;24:22–8.PubMed Sen C, Kocaoglu M, Eralp L, Cinar M. Correction of ankle and hindfoot deformities by supramalleolar osteotomy. Foot Ankle Int. 2003;24:22–8.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Trnka HJ, Easley ME, Myerson MS. The role of calcaneal osteotomies for correction of adult flatfoot. Clin Orthop. 1999;365:50–64.CrossRefPubMed Trnka HJ, Easley ME, Myerson MS. The role of calcaneal osteotomies for correction of adult flatfoot. Clin Orthop. 1999;365:50–64.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Dierauer S, Schafer D, Hefti F. Osteotomies of the mid- and back-foot in recurrent club foot. Orthopade. 1999;28:117–24.PubMed Dierauer S, Schafer D, Hefti F. Osteotomies of the mid- and back-foot in recurrent club foot. Orthopade. 1999;28:117–24.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Catanzariti AR, Mendicino RW, King GL, Neerings B. Double calcaneal osteotomy: realignment considerations in eight patients. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2005;95:53–9.PubMed Catanzariti AR, Mendicino RW, King GL, Neerings B. Double calcaneal osteotomy: realignment considerations in eight patients. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2005;95:53–9.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Johnson JE, Lamdan R, Granberry WF, Harris GF, Carrera GF. Hindfoot coronal alignment: a modified radiographic method. Foot Ankle Int. 1999;20:818–25.PubMed Johnson JE, Lamdan R, Granberry WF, Harris GF, Carrera GF. Hindfoot coronal alignment: a modified radiographic method. Foot Ankle Int. 1999;20:818–25.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Saltzman CL, el-Khoury GY. The hindfoot alignment view. Foot Ankle Int. 1995;16:572–6.PubMed Saltzman CL, el-Khoury GY. The hindfoot alignment view. Foot Ankle Int. 1995;16:572–6.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Cobey JC. Posterior roentgenogram of the foot. Clin Orthop. 1976;118:202–7.PubMed Cobey JC. Posterior roentgenogram of the foot. Clin Orthop. 1976;118:202–7.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Buck P, Morrey BF, Chao EY. The optimum position of arthrodesis of the ankle. A gait study of the knee and ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987;69:1052–62.PubMed Buck P, Morrey BF, Chao EY. The optimum position of arthrodesis of the ankle. A gait study of the knee and ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987;69:1052–62.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Lamm BM, Mendicino RW, Catanzariti AR, Hillstrom HJ. Static rearfoot alignment: a comparison of clinical and radiographic measures. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2005;95:26–33.PubMed Lamm BM, Mendicino RW, Catanzariti AR, Hillstrom HJ. Static rearfoot alignment: a comparison of clinical and radiographic measures. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2005;95:26–33.PubMed
16.
go back to reference Mendicino RW, Catanzariti AR, Reeves CL, King GL. A systematic approach to evaluation of the rearfoot, ankle, and leg in reconstructive surgery. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2005;95:2–12.PubMed Mendicino RW, Catanzariti AR, Reeves CL, King GL. A systematic approach to evaluation of the rearfoot, ankle, and leg in reconstructive surgery. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2005;95:2–12.PubMed
17.
go back to reference Kleiger B, Mankin HJ. A roentgenographic study of development of the calcaneus by means of the posterior tangential view. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1961;43:961–9. Kleiger B, Mankin HJ. A roentgenographic study of development of the calcaneus by means of the posterior tangential view. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1961;43:961–9.
18.
go back to reference Torburn L, Perry J, Gronley JK. Assessment of rearfoot motion: passive positioning, one-legged standing, gait. Foot Ankle Int. 1998;19:688–93.PubMed Torburn L, Perry J, Gronley JK. Assessment of rearfoot motion: passive positioning, one-legged standing, gait. Foot Ankle Int. 1998;19:688–93.PubMed
19.
go back to reference Pierrynowski MR, Smith SB. Rear foot inversion/eversion during gait relative to the subtalar joint neutral position. Foot Ankle Int. 1996;17:406–12.PubMed Pierrynowski MR, Smith SB. Rear foot inversion/eversion during gait relative to the subtalar joint neutral position. Foot Ankle Int. 1996;17:406–12.PubMed
20.
go back to reference Smith-Oricchio K, Harris BA. Interrater reliability of subtalar neutral, calcaneal inversion and eversion. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1990;12:10–5.PubMed Smith-Oricchio K, Harris BA. Interrater reliability of subtalar neutral, calcaneal inversion and eversion. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1990;12:10–5.PubMed
21.
go back to reference Walter SD, Eliasziw M, Donner A. Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies. Stat Med. 1998;17:101–10.CrossRefPubMed Walter SD, Eliasziw M, Donner A. Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies. Stat Med. 1998;17:101–10.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Mendicino RW, Catanzariti AR, John S, Child B, Lamm BM. Long leg calcaneal axial and hindfoot alignment radiographic views for frontal plane assessment. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2008;98:75–8.PubMed Mendicino RW, Catanzariti AR, John S, Child B, Lamm BM. Long leg calcaneal axial and hindfoot alignment radiographic views for frontal plane assessment. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2008;98:75–8.PubMed
23.
go back to reference Strash WW, Berardo P. Radiographic assessment of the hindfoot and ankle. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2004;21:295–304. v.CrossRefPubMed Strash WW, Berardo P. Radiographic assessment of the hindfoot and ankle. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2004;21:295–304. v.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Tuijthof GJ, Herder JL, Scholten PE, van Dijk CN, Pistecky PV. Measuring alignment of the hindfoot. J Biomech Eng. 2004;126:357–62.CrossRefPubMed Tuijthof GJ, Herder JL, Scholten PE, van Dijk CN, Pistecky PV. Measuring alignment of the hindfoot. J Biomech Eng. 2004;126:357–62.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Robinson I, Dyson R, Halson-Brown S. Reliability of clinical and radiographic measurement or rearfoot alignment in a patient population. The Foot. 2001;11:238–48.CrossRef Robinson I, Dyson R, Halson-Brown S. Reliability of clinical and radiographic measurement or rearfoot alignment in a patient population. The Foot. 2001;11:238–48.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Muller R, Buttner P. A critical discussion of intraclass correlation coefficients. Stat Med. 1994;13:2465–76.CrossRefPubMed Muller R, Buttner P. A critical discussion of intraclass correlation coefficients. Stat Med. 1994;13:2465–76.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Deyo RA, Diehr P, Patrick DL. Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures. Statistics and strategies for evaluation. Control Clin Trials. 1991;12(4 Suppl):142S–58.CrossRefPubMed Deyo RA, Diehr P, Patrick DL. Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures. Statistics and strategies for evaluation. Control Clin Trials. 1991;12(4 Suppl):142S–58.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Sell KE, Verity TM, Worrell TW, Pease BJ, Wigglesworth J. Two measurement techniques for assessing subtalar joint position: a reliability study. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1994;19:162–7.PubMed Sell KE, Verity TM, Worrell TW, Pease BJ, Wigglesworth J. Two measurement techniques for assessing subtalar joint position: a reliability study. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1994;19:162–7.PubMed
29.
go back to reference Hamill J, Bates BT, Knutzen KM, Kirkpatrick GM. Relationship between selected static and dynamic lower extremity measures. Clin Biomech. 1989;4:217–25.CrossRef Hamill J, Bates BT, Knutzen KM, Kirkpatrick GM. Relationship between selected static and dynamic lower extremity measures. Clin Biomech. 1989;4:217–25.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Measuring hindfoot alignment radiographically: the long axial view is more reliable than the hindfoot alignment view
Authors
Mikel L. Reilingh
Lijkele Beimers
Gabriëlle J. M. Tuijthof
Sjoerd A. S. Stufkens
Mario Maas
C. Niek van Dijk
Publication date
01-11-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Skeletal Radiology / Issue 11/2010
Print ISSN: 0364-2348
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2161
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-009-0857-9

Other articles of this Issue 11/2010

Skeletal Radiology 11/2010 Go to the issue