Top

International Journal of Behavioral Medicine

Published in:

Open Access 01-09-2012

Measuring Engagement at Work: Validation of the Chinese Version of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale

Authors: Ted Chun-tat Fong, Siu-man Ng

Published in: International Journal of Behavioral Medicine | Issue 3/2012

Abstract

Background

Work engagement is a positive work-related state of fulfillment characterized by vigor, dedication, and absorption. Previous studies have operationalized the construct through development of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale. Apart from the original three-factor 17-item version of the instrument (UWES-17), there exists a nine-item shortened revised version (UWES-9).

Purpose

The current study explored the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale in terms of factorial validity, scale reliability, descriptive statistics, and construct validity.

Method

A cross-sectional questionnaire survey was conducted in 2009 among 992 workers from over 30 elderly service units in Hong Kong.

Results

Confirmatory factor analyses revealed a better fit for the three-factor model of the UWES-9 than the UWES-17 and the one-factor model of the UWES-9. The three factors showed acceptable internal consistency and strong correlations with factors in the original versions. Engagement was negatively associated with perceived stress and burnout while positively with age and holistic care climate.

Conclusion

The UWES-9 demonstrates adequate psychometric properties, supporting its use in future research in the Chinese context.

Seligman MEP, Csikszentmihalyi M. Positive psychology: an introduction. Am Psychol. 2000;55:5–14.PubMedCrossRef

Luthans F. The need for and meaning of positive organizational behavior. J Organ Behav. 2002;23(6):695–706.CrossRef

Schaufeli WB, Salanova M, Gonzalez-Roma V, Bakker AB. The measurement of engagement and burnout: a two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies. 2002;3:71–92.CrossRef

Schaufeli WB, Bakker AB. Utrecht Work Engagement Scale: preliminary manual. Utrecht: Occupational Health Psychology Unit, Utrecht University; 2003.

Schaufeli WB, Bakker AB, Salanova M. The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire—a cross-national study. Educ Psychol Meas. 2006;66(4):701–16.CrossRef

Schaufeli WB, Bakker AB. Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: a multi-sample study. J Organ Behav. 2004;25(3):293–315.CrossRef

van Doornen LJP, Houtveen JH, Langelaan S, Bakker AB, van Rhenen W, Schaufeli WB. Burnout versus work engagement in their effects on 24-hour ambulatory monitored cardiac autonomic function. Stress Heal. 2009;25(4):323–31.CrossRef

Nerstad CGL, Richardsen AM, Martinussen M. Factorial validity of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES) across occupational groups in Norway. Scand J Psychol. 2010;51(4):326–33.PubMed

Shimazu A, Schaufeli WB, Kosugi S, et al. Work engagement in Japan: validation of the Japanese version of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale. Appl Psychol Int Rev. 2008;57(3):510–23.CrossRef

10.

Bakker AB, Demerouti E. The job demands–resources model: state of the art. J Manag Psychol. 2007;22(3):309–28.CrossRef

11.

Halbesleben JRB. A meta-analysis of work engagement: relationships with burnout, demands, resources, and consequences. In: Bakker AB, Leiter MP, editors. Work engagement: a handbook of essential theory and research. New York: Psychology Press; 2010. p. 102–17.

12.

Hakanen JJ, Bakker AB, Schaufeli WB. Burnout and work engagement among teachers. J Sch Psychol. 2006;43:495–513.CrossRef

13.

Balducci C, Fraccaroli F, Schaufeli WB. Psychometric properties of the Italian version of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES-9): a cross-cultural analysis. Eur J Psychol Assess. 2010;26(2):143–9.CrossRef

14.

Zhang YW, Gan YQ. The Chinese version of Utrecht Work Engagement Scale: an examination of reliability and validity. Chin J Clin Psychol. 2005;13(3):268–70. In Chinese.

15.

Lin CP. Modeling corporate citizenship, organizational trust, and work engagement based on attachment theory. J Bus Ethics. 2010;94(4):517–31.CrossRef

16.

Maslach C, Jackson SE, Leiter MP. Maslach burnout inventory manual. 3rd ed. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press; 1996.

17.

Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983;24(4):385–96.PubMedCrossRef

18.

Ng SM, Fong TCT, Wang XL. The role of holistic care culture in mitigating burnout and enhancing engagement: a study among elderly service workers in Hong Kong. Aging Ment Health. 2011. doi:10.1080/13607863.2011.556602.

19.

Muthen LK, Muthen BO. Mplus user’s guide. 5th ed. Los Angeles, CA: Muthen & Muthen; 1998–2007.

20.

Hu L, Bentler PM. Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychol Meth. 1998;3:424–53.CrossRef

21.

Schermelleh-Engel K, Moosbrugger H, Muller H. Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Meth Psychol Res. 2003;8:23–74.

22.

Akaike H. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Autom Control. 1974;AC19(6):716–23.CrossRef

23.

Satorra A. Scaled and adjusted restricted tests in multi-sample analysis of moment structures. In: Heijmans RDH, Pollock DSG, Satorra A, editors. Innovations in multivariate statistical analysis. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2000.

24.

Nunnaly JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric theory. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994.

25.

Schaufeli WB, Taris TW, Van Rhenen W. Workaholism, burnout, and work engagement: three of a kind or three different kinds of employee well-being? Appl Psychol. 2008;57(2):173–203.CrossRef

Title: Measuring Engagement at Work: Validation of the Chinese Version of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale
Authors: Ted Chun-tat Fong
Siu-man Ng
Publication date: 01-09-2012
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: International Journal of Behavioral Medicine / Issue 3/2012
Print ISSN: 1070-5503
Electronic ISSN: 1532-7558
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-011-9173-6

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Measuring Engagement at Work: Validation of the Chinese Version of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale

Abstract

Background

Purpose

Method

Results

Conclusion

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Purpose

Method

Results

Conclusion

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 3/2012

HIV Risk Reduction Intervention Among Medically Circumcised Young Men in South Africa: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Agreement in Regard to Total Sleep Time During a Nap Obtained Via a Sleep Polygraph and Accelerometer: A Comparison of Different Sensitivity Thresholds of the Accelerometer

Dyadic Goal Appraisal During Treatment for Infertility: How Do Different Perspectives Relate to Partners' Adjustment?

Effects of Working Memory Load on Performance and Cardiovascular Activity in Younger and Older Workers

An Exploratory Analysis of Fear of Recurrence among African-American Breast Cancer Survivors

Associated Trends in Sedentary Behavior and BMI Among Chinese School Children and Adolescents in Seven Diverse Chinese Provinces