Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Public Health 4/2011

Open Access 01-12-2011 | Proceedings

Measuring disability and monitoring the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: the work of the Washington Group on Disability Statistics

Authors: Jennifer H Madans, Mitchell E Loeb, Barbara M Altman

Published in: BMC Public Health | Special Issue 4/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

The Washington Group on Disability Statistics is a voluntary working group made up of representatives of over 100 National Statistical Offices and international, non-governmental and disability organizations that was organized under the aegis of the United Nations Statistical Division. The purpose of the Washington Group is to deal with the challenge of disability definition and measurement in a way that is culturally neutral and reasonably standardized among the UN member states. The work, which began in 2001, took on added importance with the passage and ratification of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities since the Convention includes a provision for monitoring whether those with and without disabilities have equal opportunities to participate in society and this will require the identification of persons with disabilities in each nation. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) developed by the World Health Organization provided a framework for conceptualizing disability. Operationalizing an ICF-based approach to disability has required the development of new measurement tools for use in both censuses and surveys. To date, a short set of six disability-related questions suitable for use in national censuses has been developed and adopted by the Washington Group and incorporated by the United Nations in their Principles and Recommendations for Population and Housing Censuses. A series of extended sets of questions is currently under development and some of the sets have been tested in several countries. The assistance of many National and International organizations has allowed for cognitive and field testing of the disability questionnaires in multiple languages and locations. This paper will describe the work of the Washington Group and explicate the applicability of its approach and the questions developed for monitoring the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Altman BM: Disability Definitions, Models, Classification Schemes and Applications. Handbook of Disability Studies. Edited by: Albrecht GL, Seelman KD and Bury M. 2001, New York: Sage Publications Ltd, 97-122.CrossRef Altman BM: Disability Definitions, Models, Classification Schemes and Applications. Handbook of Disability Studies. Edited by: Albrecht GL, Seelman KD and Bury M. 2001, New York: Sage Publications Ltd, 97-122.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Loeb ME, Eide AH: Paradigms lost: The changing face of disability in research. International views on disability measures: moving towards comparative measurement. (Research in Social Science and Disability). Edited by: Altman B and Barnartt S. 2006, Oxford: Elsevier Ltd, 4: 111-129.CrossRef Loeb ME, Eide AH: Paradigms lost: The changing face of disability in research. International views on disability measures: moving towards comparative measurement. (Research in Social Science and Disability). Edited by: Altman B and Barnartt S. 2006, Oxford: Elsevier Ltd, 4: 111-129.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference World Health Organization: International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF. 2001, Geneva: World Health Organization World Health Organization: International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF. 2001, Geneva: World Health Organization
7.
go back to reference Altman BM, Rasch EK, Madans JH: Disability Measurement Matrix:A tool for the coordination of measurement purpose and instrument development. International Views on Disability Measures: Moving toward comparative measurement. (Research in Social Science and Disability). Edited by: Altman BM and Barnartt SN. 2006, New York: Elsevier Ltd, 4: 263-84.CrossRef Altman BM, Rasch EK, Madans JH: Disability Measurement Matrix:A tool for the coordination of measurement purpose and instrument development. International Views on Disability Measures: Moving toward comparative measurement. (Research in Social Science and Disability). Edited by: Altman BM and Barnartt SN. 2006, New York: Elsevier Ltd, 4: 263-84.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Statistical Commission, Report on the Special Session. Economic and Social Council, Official Records. 1994, New York: United Nations, Series No. E/CN.3/1994/18. para.59, Supplement No.9 Statistical Commission, Report on the Special Session. Economic and Social Council, Official Records. 1994, New York: United Nations, Series No. E/CN.3/1994/18. para.59, Supplement No.9
9.
go back to reference Miller K, Mont D, Maitland A, Altman B, Madans J: Results of a Cross-National Structured Cognitive Interviewing Protocol to Test Measures of Disability. Quality and Quantity. Miller K, Mont D, Maitland A, Altman B, Madans J: Results of a Cross-National Structured Cognitive Interviewing Protocol to Test Measures of Disability. Quality and Quantity.
Metadata
Title
Measuring disability and monitoring the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: the work of the Washington Group on Disability Statistics
Authors
Jennifer H Madans
Mitchell E Loeb
Barbara M Altman
Publication date
01-12-2011
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue Special Issue 4/2011
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-S4-S4

Other articles of this Special Issue 4/2011

BMC Public Health 4/2011 Go to the issue