Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Insights into Imaging 3/2011

Open Access 01-06-2011 | Original Article

Measuring Consultant Radiologist workload: method and results from a national survey

Author: Adrian P. Brady

Published in: Insights into Imaging | Issue 3/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

The role of the Consultant Radiologist has changed substantially in recent decades, yet manpower planning is often based on older inappropriate methods of measuring Radiologist workload. We report a nationwide survey of Consultant Radiologist workload in Ireland in 2009.

Methods

Relative value units (RVUs) were assigned to easily countable studies. Hospitals’ activity was collated for the full calendar year of 2009. Radiologist time engaged in activities not easily counted (interventional and procedural work, multi-disciplinary meetings, teaching, administration, etc.) was separately measured.

Results

Data were obtained from 28 of 38 public hospital radiology departments. Mean Consultant Radiologist workload across all hospitals was 57,659.1 crude RVUs/WTE and 103,987 net RVUs/WTE. A mean of 32.47% of WTEs are engaged in non-countable activity. Means of 85.35% and 65.73% of the required numbers of WTEs were available in 2009 to achieve respectively annual crude and net RVU/WTE figures of 45,000. Excluding Specialist Centres, plain films accounted for 28–41% of recorded activity, mammography for 0.8–5.8%, US for 16–20%, CT for 27–32% and MR for 5.9–15.8%.

Conclusions

Irish Consultant Radiologist staffing levels are well below appropriate international benchmarks for the current workload. Approximately one-third of radiologist time is engaged in activity not easily counted in study numbers.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Pitman AG, Jones DN (2006) Radiologist workloads in teaching hospital departments: Measuring the workload. Australas Radiol 50:12–20CrossRefPubMed Pitman AG, Jones DN (2006) Radiologist workloads in teaching hospital departments: Measuring the workload. Australas Radiol 50:12–20CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Pitman AG, Jones DN, Stuart D, Lloydhope K, Mallitt K, O’Rourke P (2009) The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists (RANZCR) relative value unit workload model, its limitations and the evolution to a safety, quality and performance framework. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 53:450–458CrossRefPubMed Pitman AG, Jones DN, Stuart D, Lloydhope K, Mallitt K, O’Rourke P (2009) The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists (RANZCR) relative value unit workload model, its limitations and the evolution to a safety, quality and performance framework. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 53:450–458CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Bhargavan M, Kaye AH, Forman HP, Sunshine JH (2009) Workload of radiologists in United States in 2006–2007 and trends since 1991–1992. Radiology 252(2):458–67CrossRefPubMed Bhargavan M, Kaye AH, Forman HP, Sunshine JH (2009) Workload of radiologists in United States in 2006–2007 and trends since 1991–1992. Radiology 252(2):458–67CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Royal College of Radiologists (1999) Workload and manpower in clinical radiology. BFCR(99)5. Royal College of Radiologists (1999) Workload and manpower in clinical radiology. BFCR(99)5.
8.
go back to reference Nakajima Y, Yamada K, Imamura K, Kobayashi K (2008) Radiologist supply and workload: international comparison-Working Group of Japanese College of Radiology. Radiat Med 455–465. Nakajima Y, Yamada K, Imamura K, Kobayashi K (2008) Radiologist supply and workload: international comparison-Working Group of Japanese College of Radiology. Radiat Med 455–465.
9.
go back to reference Gale B, Safriel Y, Lukban A, Kalowitz J, Fleischer J, Gordon D (2001) Radiology report production times: voice recognition vs transcription. Radiol Manage 23:18–22PubMed Gale B, Safriel Y, Lukban A, Kalowitz J, Fleischer J, Gordon D (2001) Radiology report production times: voice recognition vs transcription. Radiol Manage 23:18–22PubMed
10.
go back to reference Glaser C, Trumm C, Nissen-Meyer S, Francke M, Küttner B, Reiser M (2005) Speech recognition: impact on workflow and report availability (article in German). Radiologe 45:735–742CrossRefPubMed Glaser C, Trumm C, Nissen-Meyer S, Francke M, Küttner B, Reiser M (2005) Speech recognition: impact on workflow and report availability (article in German). Radiologe 45:735–742CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Jamadar DA, Carlos R, Caoili EM, Pernicano PG, Jacobson JA, Patel S et al (2005) Estimating the effects of informal radiology resident teaching on radiologist productivity: what is the cost of teaching? Acad Radiol 12:123–128CrossRefPubMed Jamadar DA, Carlos R, Caoili EM, Pernicano PG, Jacobson JA, Patel S et al (2005) Estimating the effects of informal radiology resident teaching on radiologist productivity: what is the cost of teaching? Acad Radiol 12:123–128CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Allen B Jr (2007) Valuing the professional work of diagnostic radiology services. J Am Coll Radiol 4:106–114CrossRefPubMed Allen B Jr (2007) Valuing the professional work of diagnostic radiology services. J Am Coll Radiol 4:106–114CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Measuring Consultant Radiologist workload: method and results from a national survey
Author
Adrian P. Brady
Publication date
01-06-2011
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Insights into Imaging / Issue 3/2011
Electronic ISSN: 1869-4101
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-011-0094-3

Other articles of this Issue 3/2011

Insights into Imaging 3/2011 Go to the issue