Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 11/2014

01-11-2014 | Original Article

Measurement of the number of lumbar spinal movements in the sagittal plane in a 24-hour period

Authors: Antonius Rohlmann, Tobias Consmüller, Marcel Dreischarf, Maxim Bashkuev, Alexander Disch, Esther Pries, Georg N. Duda, Hendrik Schmidt

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 11/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Little is known about the number of spinal movements in the sagittal plane in daily life, mainly due to the lack of adequate techniques to assess these movements. Our aim was to measure these movements in asymptomatic volunteers.

Methods

Two sensor strips based on strain gauge technology (Epionics SPINE system) were fixed on the skin surface of the back parallel to the spine on a total of 208 volunteers without back pain. First, the lordosis angle was determined during relaxed standing. The volunteers were then released to daily life. The increases and decreases in the back lumbar lordosis angle over a period of 24 h were determined and classified into 5° increments. Changes in the lordosis angle greater than 5° were considered.

Results

The median number of spinal movements performed within 24 h was approximately 4,400. Of these movements, 66 % were between 5° and 10°. The proportions of higher-magnitude lordosis angle changes were much lower (e.g., 3 % for the 20–25° movement bin). Surprisingly, the median total number of movements was significantly higher (29 %) in women than in men. Large inter-individual differences were observed in the number of movements performed. The volunteers spent a median of 4.9 h with the lumbar spine flexed between 20° and 30° and only 24 min with the spine extended relative to the reference standing position. A median of 50 movements reached or exceeded full-flexion angle and zero movements full-extension angle.

Conclusions

These data illustrate the predominantly small range of movement of the spine during daily activities and the small amount of time spent in extension. These unique data strongly contribute to the understanding of patients’ everyday behavior, which might affect the development and testing of spinal implants and the evaluation of surgical and nonsurgical treatments.
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference White AA 3rd, Panjabi MM (1990) Clinical biomechanics of the spine. J. B. Lippincott Company, Philadelphia-Toronto White AA 3rd, Panjabi MM (1990) Clinical biomechanics of the spine. J. B. Lippincott Company, Philadelphia-Toronto
4.
go back to reference Abenhaim L, Rossignol M, Valat JP, Nordin M, Avouac B, Blotman F, Charlot J, Dreiser RL, Legrand E, Rozenberg S, Vautravers P (2000) The role of activity in the therapeutic management of back pain. Report of the International Paris Task Force on Back Pain. Spine 25:1S–33SPubMedCrossRef Abenhaim L, Rossignol M, Valat JP, Nordin M, Avouac B, Blotman F, Charlot J, Dreiser RL, Legrand E, Rozenberg S, Vautravers P (2000) The role of activity in the therapeutic management of back pain. Report of the International Paris Task Force on Back Pain. Spine 25:1S–33SPubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Bravata DM, Smith-Spangler C, Sundaram V, Gienger AL, Lin N, Lewis R, Stave CD, Olkin I, Sirard JR (2007) Using pedometers to increase physical activity and improve health: a systematic review. JAMA 298:2296–2304PubMedCrossRef Bravata DM, Smith-Spangler C, Sundaram V, Gienger AL, Lin N, Lewis R, Stave CD, Olkin I, Sirard JR (2007) Using pedometers to increase physical activity and improve health: a systematic review. JAMA 298:2296–2304PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Motl RW, Weikert M, Suh Y, Sosnoff JJ, Pula J, Soaz C, Schimpl M, Lederer C, Daumer M (2012) Accuracy of the actibelt(®) accelerometer for measuring walking speed in a controlled environment among persons with multiple sclerosis. Gait Posture 35:192–196PubMedCrossRef Motl RW, Weikert M, Suh Y, Sosnoff JJ, Pula J, Soaz C, Schimpl M, Lederer C, Daumer M (2012) Accuracy of the actibelt(®) accelerometer for measuring walking speed in a controlled environment among persons with multiple sclerosis. Gait Posture 35:192–196PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Marras WS, Knapik GG, Ferguson S (2009) Lumbar spine forces during manoeuvring of ceiling-based and floor-based patient transfer devices. Ergonomics 52:384–397PubMedCrossRef Marras WS, Knapik GG, Ferguson S (2009) Lumbar spine forces during manoeuvring of ceiling-based and floor-based patient transfer devices. Ergonomics 52:384–397PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Allread WG, Marras WS, Burr DL (2000) Measuring trunk motions in industry: variability due to task factors, individual differences, and the amount of data collected. Ergonomics 43:691–701PubMedCrossRef Allread WG, Marras WS, Burr DL (2000) Measuring trunk motions in industry: variability due to task factors, individual differences, and the amount of data collected. Ergonomics 43:691–701PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Busser HJ, de Korte WG, Glerum EB, van Lummel RC (1998) Method for objective assessment of physical work load at the workplace. Ergonomics 41:1519–1526PubMedCrossRef Busser HJ, de Korte WG, Glerum EB, van Lummel RC (1998) Method for objective assessment of physical work load at the workplace. Ergonomics 41:1519–1526PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Wunderlich M, Eger T, Rüther T, Leyk D (2010) Analysis of spine loads in dentistry—impact of an altered sitting position of the dentist. J Biomed Sci Eng 3:664–671CrossRef Wunderlich M, Eger T, Rüther T, Leyk D (2010) Analysis of spine loads in dentistry—impact of an altered sitting position of the dentist. J Biomed Sci Eng 3:664–671CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Adams MA, Bogduk N, Burton K, Dolan P (2002) The Biomechanics of back pain. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, London, New York Adams MA, Bogduk N, Burton K, Dolan P (2002) The Biomechanics of back pain. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, London, New York
18.
go back to reference Zhu QA, Park YB, Sjovold SG, Niosi CA, Wilson DC, Cripton PA, Oxland TR (2008) Can extra-articular strains be used to measure facet contact forces in the lumbar spine? An in vitro biomechanical study. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 222:171–184PubMedCrossRef Zhu QA, Park YB, Sjovold SG, Niosi CA, Wilson DC, Cripton PA, Oxland TR (2008) Can extra-articular strains be used to measure facet contact forces in the lumbar spine? An in vitro biomechanical study. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 222:171–184PubMedCrossRef
19.
22.
go back to reference Stokes IA, Bevins TM, Lunn RA (1987) Back surface curvature and measurement of lumbar spinal motion. Spine 12:355–361PubMedCrossRef Stokes IA, Bevins TM, Lunn RA (1987) Back surface curvature and measurement of lumbar spinal motion. Spine 12:355–361PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Measurement of the number of lumbar spinal movements in the sagittal plane in a 24-hour period
Authors
Antonius Rohlmann
Tobias Consmüller
Marcel Dreischarf
Maxim Bashkuev
Alexander Disch
Esther Pries
Georg N. Duda
Hendrik Schmidt
Publication date
01-11-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 11/2014
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3588-0

Other articles of this Issue 11/2014

European Spine Journal 11/2014 Go to the issue