Top

Conflict and Health

Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Review

Measurement of perceived needs in humanitarian contexts using the HESPER scale: a scoping study with reflections on the collaboration between researchers and humanitarian actors

Author: Karin Hugelius

Published in: Conflict and Health | Issue 1/2022

Abstract

Background

Needs assessment is one of the fundamental humanitarian responses to sudden-onset or long-lasting emergencies. The Humanitarian Emergency Settings Perceived Needs Scale (HESPER)/ HESPER Web are valid scales for identifying perceived needs among humanitarian or disaster-affected populations, both in humanitarian practice and in science. This scoping review aimed to determine the scientific use of HESPER or HESPER Web, report on previously published perceived needs in humanitarian emergencies, and discuss how scientific and humanitarian actors can work together in a partnership in needs assessment in humanitarian settings.

Results

In all, eight papers were found in which the HESPER or HESPER Web had been used in conflict- or post-conflict settings or natural disasters. The study samples varied from 85 to 1000 participants (mean 440). The mean number of perceived needs in all studies was 8, varying from 4.25 to 12.18. The top three needs varied in all the studies. A high number of perceived needs was associated with mental health problems. No paper has reported on how the assessment outcomes were shared between the researchers and humanitarian actors.

Conclusion

Inventorying the needs from the perspective of the affected population is important to tailor the response to each humanitarian emergency. The HESPER scale and the HESPER Web are multisectoral tools that can be used to take inventory of the perceived needs and indicate the mental health problems that arise in conflict-ridden and natural disaster contexts. It is essential that results from a scientific needs inventory are shared with adequate humanitarian stakeholders to not only facilitate a proper response, but also to foster a closer collaboration between scientists, humanitarians, and the affected population. Doing so would increase the development and use of evidence in practice when providing humanitarian aid.

(ACAPS) Humanitarian needs assessment. the good enough guide. Rugby, UK: Practical Action Publishing; 2014.

Darcy J, Hoffman C. According to need? Needs assessment and decision-making in the humanitarian sector. Vol. 15. London, UK: Humanitarian Policy Group (HPG); 2003.

Inter-Agency Standing Committee. Multi-Sector Initial Rapid Assessment Guidance—Revision July 2015. Published August 13, 2015. Available at: https://www.humanitarianresponse.info/en/programme-cycle/space/document/multi-sector-initial-rapid-assessment-guidance-revision-july-2015. Assessed: August 18, 2022.

Humanitarian Response. Humanitarian Programme Cycle. https://www.humanitarianresponse.info/en/programme-cycle/space. Accessed: June, 01. 2022.

World Health Organization (WHO). The humanitarian emergency settings perceived needs scale (HESPER): manual with scale. Geneva;2011.

Semrau M, van Ommeren M, Blagescu MA, Griekspoor A, Howard LM, Jordans M, Lempp H, Marini A, Pedersen J, Pilotte I. The development and psychometric properties of the humanitarian emergency settings percieved needs (HESPER) scale. Am J Public Health. 2012;102(10): e55.CrossRef

Hugelius K, Semrau M, Holmefur M. HESPER web-development and reliability evaluation of a web-based version of the humanitarian emergency settings perceived needs scale. BMC Public Health. 2020;12(1):323–33.CrossRef

Hugelius K, Nandain C, Semrau M, Holmefur M. The reliability and feasibility of the HESPER web to assess perceived needs in a population affected by a humanitarian emergency a humanitarian emergency. Int J Environ Res. 2021;18(4):1399.

CHS Alliance: Core humanitarian standard on quality and accountability. 2014.

10.

Beogo I, Darboe A, Oluwafunmilade Adesanya A, Mendez Rojas B. Critical assessment of refugees’ needs in post-emergency context: the case of Malian war refugees settled in Northern Burkina Faso. BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2018;18(1):38.CrossRef

11.

Eriksson A, Gerdin Wärnberg M, Tylleskär T, von Schreeb J. Predicting the unpredictable–harder than expected. Prehos Disaster Med. 2020;35(2):174–83.CrossRef

12.

Arksey H, O'Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol 2005;8(1).

13.

Jordans M, Semrau M, Thornicroft G, van Ommeren M. Role of current perceived needs in explaining the association between past trauma exposure and distress in humanitarian settings in Jordan and Nepal. BJPsych. 2012;201(4):276–81.PubMed

14.

Ayazi T, Swartz L, Eide AH, Lien L, Hauff E. Perceived current needs, psychological distress and functional impairment in a war-affected setting: a cross-sectional study in South Sudan. BMJ Open. 2015;5(8):e007534.CrossRef

15.

Falb KL, Blackwell A, Stennes J, Hussein M, Annan J. Depressive symptoms among women in Raqqa Governorate, Syria: associations with intimate partner violence, food insecurity, and perceived needs. GMH. 2019;6: e22.PubMedPubMedCentral

16.

Bapolisi AM, Song SJ, Kesande C, Rukundo GZ, Ashaba S. Post-traumatic stress disorder, psychiatric comorbidities and associated factors among refugees in Nakivale camp in southwestern Uganda. BMC Psychol. 2020;20(1):53.

17.

Kane JC, Luitel NP, Jordans M, Kohrt BA, Weissbecker I, Tol WA. Mental health and psychosocial problems in the aftermath of the Nepal earthquakes: findings from a representative cluster sample survey. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2018;27(3):301–10.CrossRef

18.

Gonzalez GNGR, Da Silva I, Oppenheimer L, Aranda S, Torres E, Abreu R, Pérez A, Rodriguez G, Miranda Valentin E, Serrano Rivera H, Jiménez-Velazquez IZ. The impact of Hurricane Maria on perceived needs of Puerto Ricans 65 years and older at risk for dementia using the HESPER scale. Alzheimer’s. 2019;15(7):P479.CrossRef

19.

Hugelius K, Semrau M, Holmefur M. Perceived needs among asylum seekers in Sweden: a mixed methods study. Int J Environ Res 2020;17(14).

20.

Stallings RA. Methodological issues. In: Handbook of disaster research. 1 edn. Edited by Rodriguez HQEL, Dynes RR. New York, USA: Springer Science;2007:55–82.

21.

Guha-Sapir D, Scales SE. Challenges in public health and epidemiology research in humanitarian settings: experiences from the field. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):1761.CrossRef

22.

Ahmed R, Aktar B, Farnaz N, Ray P, Awal A, Hassan R, Shafique SB, Hasan MT, Quayyum Z, Jafarovna MB, et al. Challenges and strategies in conducting sexual and reproductive health research among Rohingya refugees in Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh. Confl Health. 2020;14(1):83.CrossRef

23.

Puri J, Aladysheva A, Iversen V, Ghorpade Y, Bruck T. What methods may be used in impact evaluations of humanitarian assistance? New Dehli. India: International Initiative for Impact Evaluation; 2014.CrossRef

24.

Alexander J, Cosgrave, J. ALNAP discussion series improving the quality of EHA evidence. Method note 1. Publication date: February, 2014.

25.

Vahedi L, Qushua N, Seff I, Doering M, Stoll C, Bartels SA, Stark L. Methodological and ethical implications of using remote data collection tools to measure sexual and reproductive health and gender-based violence outcomes among women and girls in humanitarian and fragile settings: a mixed methods systematic review of peer-reviewed research. TVA 2022: 15248380221097439.

26.

Celestina M. Between trust and distrust in research with participants in conflict context. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2018;21(3):373–83.CrossRef

27.

Leresche E, Hossain M, Rossi R, Truppa C, Barth CA, Mactaggart I, Leaning J, Singh N. Do we really want to know? The journey to implement empirical research recommendations in ICRC's responses in Myanmar and Lebanon. Disasters 2022.

28.

Waldman RJ, Toole MJ. Where is the science in humanitarian health? Lancet. 2017;390(10109):2224–6.CrossRef

29.

Blanchet K, Ramesh A, Frison S, Warren E, Hossain M, Smith J, Knight A, Post N, Lewis C, Woodward A, et al. Evidence on public health interventions in humanitarian crises. Lancet. 2017;390(10109):2287–96.CrossRef

30.

Pautasso M. Ten simple rules for writing a literature review. PLoS Comput Biol. 2013;9(7):e1003149.CrossRef

Title: Measurement of perceived needs in humanitarian contexts using the HESPER scale: a scoping study with reflections on the collaboration between researchers and humanitarian actors
Author: Karin Hugelius
Publication date: 01-12-2022
Publisher: BioMed Central
Published in: Conflict and Health / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1752-1505
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13031-022-00478-6

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Measurement of perceived needs in humanitarian contexts using the HESPER scale: a scoping study with reflections on the collaboration between researchers and humanitarian actors

Abstract

Background

Results

Conclusion

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Results

Conclusion

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

Facilitating hand hygiene in displacement camps during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative assessment of a novel handwashing stand and hygiene promotion package

Inclusive education in a refugee camp for children with disabilities: How are school setting and children’s behavioral functioning related?

Determinants of health among people who use illicit drugs in the conflict-affected countries of Afghanistan, Colombia and Myanmar: a systematic review of epidemiological evidence

Transactional sex work and HIV among women in conflict-affected Northeastern Uganda: a population-based study

Implementation of maternal and perinatal death surveillance and response (MPDSR) in humanitarian settings: insights and experiences of humanitarian health practitioners and global technical expert meeting attendees

Conflict, epidemic and faith communities: church-state relations during the fight against Covid-19 in north-eastern DR Congo