Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Orthopaedics 6/2017

Open Access 01-06-2017 | Original Paper

Measurement considerations on examiner-dependent factors in the ultrasound assessment of developmental dysplasia of the hip

Authors: Alexander Kolb, Emir Benca, Madeleine Willegger, Stephan E. Puchner, Reinhard Windhager, Catharina Chiari

Published in: International Orthopaedics | Issue 6/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The standardized sonographic hip screening according to Graf has increased reliability and comparability of measurements in the screening of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). However, examiner dependent factors have been discussed to influence sonographic measurements. The objectives of this study were to examine the tolerance of the transducer positioning and to analyse the impact of transducer inclinations on Graf’s hip grading system.

Materials and methods

Twenty-four hips in consecutive newborns were screened sonographically in combination with an optoelectronic motion capture system to trace transducer positions in space. Subsequently five defined inclinations of the transducer relative to Graf’s neutral transducer position were analysed, giving a total of 144 sonographic images.

Results

We found a permissible transducer inclination in the axial plane of 8.8° to anterior and 8.1° to posterior. In the frontal plane we found a permissible inclination of 15.4° to caudal and 7.2° to cranial. The impact on the α-angle was significant for posterior-cranial (p < 0.001), cranial (p = 0.009), and caudal (p < 0.001) inclined transducer positions. The effect on the results according to Graf’s grading system was significant for the caudal inclination of the transducer position (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Our findings show that the standardized plane defined by Graf’s criteria allows notable inclinations of the transducer positions. Transducer inclinations show an impact on measurement results, which are clinically relevant. Those effects cannot be ruled out using Graf’s ultrasound criteria alone. The examiner should pay attention to avoid transducer inclinations in the frontal plane and a combination of posterior and cranial inclination.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Graf R (1983) New possibilities for the diagnosis of congenital hip joint dislocation by ultrasonography. J Pediatr Orthop 3:354–359CrossRefPubMed Graf R (1983) New possibilities for the diagnosis of congenital hip joint dislocation by ultrasonography. J Pediatr Orthop 3:354–359CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Rosendahl K, Toma P (2007) Ultrasound in the diagnosis of developmental dysplasia of the hip in newborns. The European approach. A review of methods, accuracy and clinical validity. Eur Radiol 17:1960–1967. doi:10.1007/s00330-006-0557-y CrossRefPubMed Rosendahl K, Toma P (2007) Ultrasound in the diagnosis of developmental dysplasia of the hip in newborns. The European approach. A review of methods, accuracy and clinical validity. Eur Radiol 17:1960–1967. doi:10.​1007/​s00330-006-0557-y CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Simon EA, Saur F, Buerge M et al (2004) Inter-observer agreement of ultrasonographic measurement of alpha and beta angles and the final type classification based on the Graf method. Swiss Med Wkly 134:671–677PubMed Simon EA, Saur F, Buerge M et al (2004) Inter-observer agreement of ultrasonographic measurement of alpha and beta angles and the final type classification based on the Graf method. Swiss Med Wkly 134:671–677PubMed
9.
go back to reference Graf R (1997) Hip ultrasonography. Basic principles and current aspects. Orthopade 26:14–24PubMed Graf R (1997) Hip ultrasonography. Basic principles and current aspects. Orthopade 26:14–24PubMed
10.
go back to reference Graf R, Mohajer M, Plattner F (2013) Hip sonography update. Quality-management, catastrophes - tips and tricks. Med Ultrason 15:299–303CrossRefPubMed Graf R, Mohajer M, Plattner F (2013) Hip sonography update. Quality-management, catastrophes - tips and tricks. Med Ultrason 15:299–303CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Kolb A, Schweiger N, Mailath-Pokorny M et al (2015) Low incidence of early developmental dysplasia of the hip in universal ultrasonographic screening of newborns: analysis and evaluation of risk factors. Int Orthop. doi:10.1007/s00264-015-2799-2 PubMed Kolb A, Schweiger N, Mailath-Pokorny M et al (2015) Low incidence of early developmental dysplasia of the hip in universal ultrasonographic screening of newborns: analysis and evaluation of risk factors. Int Orthop. doi:10.​1007/​s00264-015-2799-2 PubMed
12.
go back to reference Lehmann HP, Hinton R, Morello P, Santoli J (2000) Developmental dysplasia of the hip practice guideline: technical report. Committee on quality improvement, and subcommittee on developmental dysplasia of the hip. Pediatrics 105:E57 Lehmann HP, Hinton R, Morello P, Santoli J (2000) Developmental dysplasia of the hip practice guideline: technical report. Committee on quality improvement, and subcommittee on developmental dysplasia of the hip. Pediatrics 105:E57
13.
go back to reference Dorn U, Neumann D (2005) Ultrasound for screening developmental dysplasia of the hip: a European perspective. Curr Opin Pediatr 17:30–33CrossRefPubMed Dorn U, Neumann D (2005) Ultrasound for screening developmental dysplasia of the hip: a European perspective. Curr Opin Pediatr 17:30–33CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Tönnis D, Storch K, Ulbrich H (1990) Results of newborn screening for CDH with and without sonography and correlation of risk factors. J Pediatr Orthop 10:145–152CrossRefPubMed Tönnis D, Storch K, Ulbrich H (1990) Results of newborn screening for CDH with and without sonography and correlation of risk factors. J Pediatr Orthop 10:145–152CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Ortolani M (1976) Congenital hip dysplasia in the light of early and very early diagnosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 119:6–10 Ortolani M (1976) Congenital hip dysplasia in the light of early and very early diagnosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 119:6–10
17.
go back to reference Barlow M (1937) Un segno poco noto e sua importanza per la diagnosi precoce di prelussazione congenita dell’anca. Pediatria (Santiago) 45:129-136 Barlow M (1937) Un segno poco noto e sua importanza per la diagnosi precoce di prelussazione congenita dell’anca. Pediatria (Santiago) 45:129-136
18.
20.
go back to reference Roovers EA, Boere-Boonekamp MM, Geertsma TSA et al (2003) Ultrasonographic screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip in infants. Reproducibility of assessments made by radiographers. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85:726–730. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.85B5.13893 PubMed Roovers EA, Boere-Boonekamp MM, Geertsma TSA et al (2003) Ultrasonographic screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip in infants. Reproducibility of assessments made by radiographers. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85:726–730. doi:10.​1302/​0301-620X.​85B5.​13893 PubMed
Metadata
Title
Measurement considerations on examiner-dependent factors in the ultrasound assessment of developmental dysplasia of the hip
Authors
Alexander Kolb
Emir Benca
Madeleine Willegger
Stephan E. Puchner
Reinhard Windhager
Catharina Chiari
Publication date
01-06-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Orthopaedics / Issue 6/2017
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3455-9

Other articles of this Issue 6/2017

International Orthopaedics 6/2017 Go to the issue