Top

Published in:

01-10-2015

Maybe Small Is Too Small a Term: Introduction to Advancing Small Sample Prevention Science

Authors: Carlotta Ching Ting Fok, David Henry, James Allen

Published in: Prevention Science | Issue 7/2015

Abstract

Prevention research addressing health disparities often involves work with small population groups experiencing such disparities. The goals of this special section are to (1) address the question of what constitutes a small sample; (2) identify some of the key research design and analytic issues that arise in prevention research with small samples; (3) develop applied, problem-oriented, and methodologically innovative solutions to these design and analytic issues; and (4) evaluate the potential role of these innovative solutions in describing phenomena, testing theory, and evaluating interventions in prevention research. Through these efforts, we hope to promote broader application of these methodological innovations. We also seek whenever possible, to explore their implications in more general problems that appear in research with small samples but concern all areas of prevention research. This special section includes two sections. The first section aims to provide input for researchers at the design phase, while the second focuses on analysis. Each article describes an innovative solution to one or more challenges posed by the analysis of small samples, with special emphasis on testing for intervention effects in prevention research. A concluding article summarizes some of their broader implications, along with conclusions regarding future directions in research with small samples in prevention science. Finally, a commentary provides the perspective of the federal agencies that sponsored the conference that gave rise to this special section.

Allen, M. J., & Yen, W. M. (2001). Introduction to measurement theory. Long Grove: Waveland Press Inc.

Anderson, J. (2005). Unraveling health disparities: Examining the dimensions of hypertension and diabetes through community engagement. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 16, 91–117. doi:10.1353/hpu.2005.0121.CrossRefPubMed

Boomsma, A. (1983). On the robustness of LISREL (maximum likelihood estimation) against small sample size and nonnormality. Amsterdam: Sociometric Research Foundation.

Castro, F., & Coe, K. (2007). Traditions and alcohol use: A mixed-methods analysis. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 13, 269–84. doi:10.1037/1099-9809.13.4.269.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2011). CDC Health Disparities and Inequalities Report – United States. MMWR 2011; 60 (Supplement): 1–114.

de Jong, R., & Spiess, M. (2015). Robust multiple imputation. In U. Engel, B. Jann, P. Lynn, A. Scherpenzeel, & P. Sturgis (Eds.), Improving survey methods: Lessons from recent research (pp. 397–411). New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

Fok, C. C. T., & Henry, D. (2015). Increasing the sensitivity of measures to change. Prevention Science. doi:10.1007/s11121-015-0545-z.

Fok, C. C. T., Henry, D., & Allen, J. (2015). Research designs for intervention research with small samples II: Stepped wedge and interrupted time-series designs. Prevention Science. doi:10.1007/s11121-015-0572-9.

Forero, C., & Maydeu-Olivares, A. (2009). Estimation of IRT graded response models: Limited versus full information methods. Psychological Methods, 14, 275–299. doi:10.1037/a0015825.CrossRefPubMed

Giger, J. N., & Davidhizar, R. (2007). Promoting culturally appropriate interventions among vulnerable populations. Annual Review of Nursing Research, 25, 293–316.PubMed

Hedeker, D. (2015). Methods for multilevel ordinal data in prevention research. Prevention Science. doi:10.1007/s11121-014-0495-x.

Henry, D., Tolan, P. H., & Gorman-Smith, D. (2005). Cluster analysis in family psychology research. Journal of Family Psychology, 19, 121–132. doi:10.1002/jclp.20464.CrossRefPubMed

Henry, D., Pavuluri, M. N., Youngstrom, E., & Birmaher, B. (2008). Accuracy of brief and full forms of the Child Mania Rating Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 64, 1–14. doi:10.1002/jclp.20464.CrossRef

Henry, D., Dymnicki, A. B., Mohatt, N., Allen, J., & Kelly, J. G. (2015). Clustering methods with qualitative data: A mixed methods approach for prevention research with small samples. Prevention Science. doi:10.1007/s11121-015-0561-z.

Hopkin, C. R., Hoyle, R. H., & Gottfredson, N. C. (2015). Maximizing the yield of small samples in prevention research: A review of general strategies and best practices. Prevention Science. doi:10.1007/s11121-014-0542-7.PubMed

Hoyle, R. H. (1999). Statistical strategies for small sample research. London: Sage Publications.

Hoyle, R. H., & Gottfredson, N. C. (2015). Sample size considerations in prevention research applications of multilevel modeling and structural equation modeling. Prevention Science. doi:10.1007/s11121-014-0489-8.PubMed

Institute of Medicine (IOM). (2002). Unequal treatment: Confronting racial and ethnic disparities in health care. Washington: The National Academies Press.

Kadane, J. B. (2015). Bayesian methods for prevention research. Prevention Science. doi:10.1007/s11121-014-0531-x.

Kaplan, D. (2014). Bayesian statistics for the social sciences. New York: Guilford.

Kenny, D. A., Mannetti, L., Pierro, A., Livi, S., & Kashy, D. A. (2002). The statistical analysis of data from small groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 126–37. doi:10.1037/gdn0000022.CrossRefPubMed

Lord, F. M. (1980). Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Murray, C. J. L., Kulkarni, S. C., Michaud, C., Tomijima, N., Bulzacchelli, M. T., Iandiorio, T. J., & Ezzati, M. (2006). Eight Americas: Investigating mortality disparities across races, counties, and race-counties in the United States. PLoS Medicine, 3, e545. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0030545.PubMedCentralCrossRef

Prentice, D., & Miller, D. T. (1992). When small effects are impressive. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 160–164. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.160.CrossRef

Samejima, F. (1996). Graded response model. In W. J. van der Linden & R. K. Hambleton (Eds.), Handbook of modern item response theory (pp. 85–100). New York: Springer Publishing Company.

Tanaka, J. S. (1987). ‘How big is big enough?’: Sample size and goodness of fit in structural equation models with latent variables. Child Development, 58, 134–46. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1987.tb03495.x.CrossRef

van Buuren, S. (2011). Multiple imputation of multilevel data. In J. Hox & J. K. Roberts (Eds.), Handbook for advanced multilevel analysis (pp. 173–196). New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

Wyman, P. A., Henry, D., Knoblauch, S., & Brown, C. H. (2015). Designs for testing group-based interventions with limited number of social units: The dynamic wait-listed and regression point displacement designs. Prevention Science. doi:10.1007/s11121-014-0535-6.PubMed

Title: Maybe Small Is Too Small a Term: Introduction to Advancing Small Sample Prevention Science
Authors: Carlotta Ching Ting Fok
David Henry
James Allen
Publication date: 01-10-2015
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Prevention Science / Issue 7/2015
Print ISSN: 1389-4986
Electronic ISSN: 1573-6695
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-015-0584-5

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Maybe Small Is Too Small a Term: Introduction to Advancing Small Sample Prevention Science

Abstract

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 7/2015

Methods for Multilevel Ordinal Data in Prevention Research

Why Small is Too Small a Term: Prevention Science for Health Disparities, Culturally Distinct Groups, and Community-Level Intervention

Designs for Testing Group-Based Interventions with Limited Numbers of Social Units: The Dynamic Wait-Listed and Regression Point Displacement Designs

The Revised Quality Standards: “A Man’s Reach Should Exceed His Grasp” or “A Bridge Too Far”: Which is the Case?

Sample Size Considerations in Prevention Research Applications of Multilevel Modeling and Structural Equation Modeling

Bayesian Methods for Prevention Research