Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Oral Health 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Research article

Maxillary and mandibular dental arch forms in a Jordanian population with normal occlusion

Authors: M. Aljayousi, S. Al-Khateeb, S. Badran, E. S. Abu Alhaija

Published in: BMC Oral Health | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Ethnic background has been claimed to affect arch form. The purpose of this study was to describe and elucidate the maxillary and mandibular arch forms in Jordanian population and to develop a classification method for these forms which could be employed to construct orthodontic archwires accordingly.

Methods

The sample was comprised of study casts of five hundred and twenty subjects (231 males and 289 females with a mean age of 15.4 ± 1.02 years). All subjects had permanent dentition with normal occlusion. A mathematical method associated with a polynomial function of 6th degree was employed to assess the dental arch forms. The resultant arch forms were classified into 5 groups for both the maxilla and mandible utilizing a computer software with special code designed for this study. Each group was subdivided into 3 subgroup sizes namely: small, medium, and large.

Results

Catenary arch form was found in 47% and 41.2% (p ˂ 0.01) of maxilla and mandible arch forms, respectively. Form 2 (which is halfway between ellipse and U-shaped arch form) was found in 27.7% and 26.7%. Medium size arch form was found in 55.4% of the maxillary and 65.6% of the mandibular arch forms.

Conclusion

Catenary arch form was the most prevalent arch form, followed by wide elliptical form. The other forms, which included tudor arch, tapered equilateral and quadrangular forms were less frequent. Regarding size, the medium size was the most prevalent among the studied samples.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Felton M, Sinclair PM, Jones D, Alexander R. A computerized analysis of the shape and stability of mandibular arch form. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1987;92:478–83.CrossRef Felton M, Sinclair PM, Jones D, Alexander R. A computerized analysis of the shape and stability of mandibular arch form. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1987;92:478–83.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Bonwill WGA. Geometrical and mechanical laws of articulation: anatomical articulation. Trans Odont Soc Penns. 1885;109–33. Bonwill WGA. Geometrical and mechanical laws of articulation: anatomical articulation. Trans Odont Soc Penns. 1885;109–33.
3.
go back to reference Hawley CA. Determination of the normal arch and its application to orthodontia. Dent Cosm. 1905;47:541–52. Hawley CA. Determination of the normal arch and its application to orthodontia. Dent Cosm. 1905;47:541–52.
4.
go back to reference Black GV. Descriptive anatomy of the human teeth. 5th ed. Philadelphia: S.S. White Dental Manufacturing Co.; 1902. p. 130–52. Black GV. Descriptive anatomy of the human teeth. 5th ed. Philadelphia: S.S. White Dental Manufacturing Co.; 1902. p. 130–52.
5.
go back to reference Angle EH. Treatment of malocclusion of the teeth: angle’s system. 7th ed. Philadelphia: S.S. White Dental Manufacturing Co.; 1907. Angle EH. Treatment of malocclusion of the teeth: angle’s system. 7th ed. Philadelphia: S.S. White Dental Manufacturing Co.; 1907.
6.
go back to reference MacConaill MA, Scher EA. The ideal form of the human dental arcade, with some prosthetic application. Dent Rec (London). 1949;69:285–302. MacConaill MA, Scher EA. The ideal form of the human dental arcade, with some prosthetic application. Dent Rec (London). 1949;69:285–302.
7.
8.
go back to reference Burdi AR, Lillie JH. A catenary analysis of the maxillary dental arch during human embryogenesis. Anat Rec. 1966;154:13–20.CrossRef Burdi AR, Lillie JH. A catenary analysis of the maxillary dental arch during human embryogenesis. Anat Rec. 1966;154:13–20.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Sicher H. Oral anatomy. 2nd ed. St. Louis: The C.V. Mosby Company; 1952. p. 262–3. Sicher H. Oral anatomy. 2nd ed. St. Louis: The C.V. Mosby Company; 1952. p. 262–3.
10.
go back to reference Triviño T, Siqueira DF, Scanavini MA. A new concept of mandibular dental arch forms with normal occlusion. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2008;133(10):e15-10.e22. Triviño T, Siqueira DF, Scanavini MA. A new concept of mandibular dental arch forms with normal occlusion. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2008;133(10):e15-10.e22.
11.
go back to reference Linder-Aronson S. Adenoids. Their effect on mode of breathing and nasal airflow and their relationship to characteristics of the facial skeleton and dentition. A biometric, rhino-manometric and cephalometro-radiographic study on children with and without adenoids. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 1970;265:1–132.PubMed Linder-Aronson S. Adenoids. Their effect on mode of breathing and nasal airflow and their relationship to characteristics of the facial skeleton and dentition. A biometric, rhino-manometric and cephalometro-radiographic study on children with and without adenoids. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 1970;265:1–132.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Omar H, Alhajrasi M, Felemban N, Hassan A. Dental arch dimensions, form and tooth size ratio among a Saudi sample. Saudi Med J. 2018;39:86–91.CrossRef Omar H, Alhajrasi M, Felemban N, Hassan A. Dental arch dimensions, form and tooth size ratio among a Saudi sample. Saudi Med J. 2018;39:86–91.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Proffit WR, Fields HW, Nixon RM. Occlusal forces in normal and long face adults. J Dent Res. 1983;62:566–71.CrossRef Proffit WR, Fields HW, Nixon RM. Occlusal forces in normal and long face adults. J Dent Res. 1983;62:566–71.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Kook YA, Nojima K, Moon HB, McLaughlin RP, Sinclair PM. Comparison of arch forms between Korean and North American white populations. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2004;126:680–6.CrossRef Kook YA, Nojima K, Moon HB, McLaughlin RP, Sinclair PM. Comparison of arch forms between Korean and North American white populations. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2004;126:680–6.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Lombardo L, Fattori L, Molinari C, Mirabella D, Siciliani G. Dental and alveolar arch forms in a Caucasian population compared with commercially available archwires. Int Orthod. 2013;11:389–421.PubMed Lombardo L, Fattori L, Molinari C, Mirabella D, Siciliani G. Dental and alveolar arch forms in a Caucasian population compared with commercially available archwires. Int Orthod. 2013;11:389–421.PubMed
16.
go back to reference Celebi AA, Keklik H, Tan E, Ucar FI. Comparison of arch forms between Turkish and North American. Dent Press J Orthod. 2016;21:51–8.CrossRef Celebi AA, Keklik H, Tan E, Ucar FI. Comparison of arch forms between Turkish and North American. Dent Press J Orthod. 2016;21:51–8.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Oliva B, Sferra S, Greco AL, Valente F, Grippaudo C. Three-dimensional analysis of dental arch forms in Italian population. Prog Orthod. 2018;19:34.CrossRef Oliva B, Sferra S, Greco AL, Valente F, Grippaudo C. Three-dimensional analysis of dental arch forms in Italian population. Prog Orthod. 2018;19:34.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Dahlberg G. Statistical methods for medical and biological students. New York: Interscience Publications; 1940. p. 122–32. Dahlberg G. Statistical methods for medical and biological students. New York: Interscience Publications; 1940. p. 122–32.
19.
go back to reference Houston WJ. The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurements. Am J Orthod. 1983;83:382–90.CrossRef Houston WJ. The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurements. Am J Orthod. 1983;83:382–90.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Bishara SE, Jakobsen JR, Treder J, Nowak A. Arch width changes from 6 weeks to 45 years of age. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1997;111:401–9.CrossRef Bishara SE, Jakobsen JR, Treder J, Nowak A. Arch width changes from 6 weeks to 45 years of age. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1997;111:401–9.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Baluta J, Lavelle CLB. An analysis of dental arch form. Eur J Orthod. 1987;9:165–71.CrossRef Baluta J, Lavelle CLB. An analysis of dental arch form. Eur J Orthod. 1987;9:165–71.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Burris BG, Harris EF. Maxillary arch size and shape in American Blacks and Whites. Angle Orthod. 2000;70:297–302.PubMed Burris BG, Harris EF. Maxillary arch size and shape in American Blacks and Whites. Angle Orthod. 2000;70:297–302.PubMed
23.
go back to reference Ronay V, Miner RM, Will LA, Arai K. Mandibular arch form: The relationship between dental and basal anatomy. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2008;134:430–8.CrossRef Ronay V, Miner RM, Will LA, Arai K. Mandibular arch form: The relationship between dental and basal anatomy. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2008;134:430–8.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Raberin M, Laumon B, Martin JL, Brunner F. Dimensions and form of dental arches in subjects with normal occlusions. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1993;104:67–72.CrossRef Raberin M, Laumon B, Martin JL, Brunner F. Dimensions and form of dental arches in subjects with normal occlusions. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1993;104:67–72.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference De la Cruz A, Sampson P, Little RM, Artun J, Shapiro PA. Long-term changes in arch form after orthodontic treatment and retention. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1995;107(5):518–30.CrossRef De la Cruz A, Sampson P, Little RM, Artun J, Shapiro PA. Long-term changes in arch form after orthodontic treatment and retention. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1995;107(5):518–30.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Miani AJ, Tartaglia G. Mathematical definition of the shape of dental arches in human permanent healthy dentitions. Eur J Orthod. 1994;16:287–94.CrossRef Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Miani AJ, Tartaglia G. Mathematical definition of the shape of dental arches in human permanent healthy dentitions. Eur J Orthod. 1994;16:287–94.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference McLaughlin R, Bennett J, Trevisi H. MBT™ arch form and archwire sequencing—part 2. Rev Dent Press Ortodon Ortopedi Facial. 1998;3:39–48. McLaughlin R, Bennett J, Trevisi H. MBT™ arch form and archwire sequencing—part 2. Rev Dent Press Ortodon Ortopedi Facial. 1998;3:39–48.
28.
go back to reference Telles FS. Contour diagrams: presentation of a new contour diagram. Rev Soc Parana Ortodon. 1995/96;1:29–36. Telles FS. Contour diagrams: presentation of a new contour diagram. Rev Soc Parana Ortodon. 1995/96;1:29–36.
29.
go back to reference Ricketts RM. Provocations and perceptions in cranio-facial orthopaedics: dental science and facial art. Denver: Rocky Mountain Orthod; 1989. p. 686–711. Ricketts RM. Provocations and perceptions in cranio-facial orthopaedics: dental science and facial art. Denver: Rocky Mountain Orthod; 1989. p. 686–711.
30.
go back to reference Triviño T, Vilella OV. Forms and dimensions of the lower dental arch. Rev Soc Bras Ortodon. 2005;5:19–28. Triviño T, Vilella OV. Forms and dimensions of the lower dental arch. Rev Soc Bras Ortodon. 2005;5:19–28.
31.
go back to reference Staley RN, Stuntz WR, Peterson LC. Comparison of arch widths in adults with normal occlusions and adults with Classe If, Division I malocclusion. Am J Oorthod. 1985;88:163–9. Staley RN, Stuntz WR, Peterson LC. Comparison of arch widths in adults with normal occlusions and adults with Classe If, Division I malocclusion. Am J Oorthod. 1985;88:163–9.
32.
go back to reference Ling JY, Wong RW. Dental arch width of Southern Chinese. Angle Orthod. 2009;79:54–63.CrossRef Ling JY, Wong RW. Dental arch width of Southern Chinese. Angle Orthod. 2009;79:54–63.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Maxillary and mandibular dental arch forms in a Jordanian population with normal occlusion
Authors
M. Aljayousi
S. Al-Khateeb
S. Badran
E. S. Abu Alhaija
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Oral Health / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6831
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01461-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BMC Oral Health 1/2021 Go to the issue