Skip to main content
Top

08-04-2024 | Mastectomy | Original Article

Nipple–areolar complex malposition in breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy: a multi-institutional retrospective observational study in Japan

Authors: Sayuri Kato, Hiroki Mori, Miho Saiga, Satoko Watanabe, Shinsuke Sasada, Ayano Sasaki, Akiko Ogiya, Mao Yamamoto, Kazutaka Narui, Junji Takano, Hirohito Seki, Naomi Nagura, Makoto Ishitobi, Tadahiko Shien, the Collaborative Study Group of Scientific Research of the Japanese Breast Cancer Society

Published in: Breast Cancer

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Position of the nipple–areolar complex (NAC) is an important factor in the esthetic impression of the breast, and NAC malposition is often an issue in breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the degree of NAC malposition depending on several factors using data quantified with the Mamma Balance application (Medic Engineering K.K., Kyoto, Japan).

Methods

Patients who underwent unilateral breast reconstruction after NSM at eight hospitals in Japan between 2007 and 2020 were retrospectively investigated. Using Mamma Balance, NAC malposition was quantified separately in horizontal and vertical directions using patient photographs from pre-operatively and 6–24 months post-operatively. The degree of malpositioning was then statistically compared using various factors.

Results

The NAC deviated more cranially and medially with implants than that with flaps. Cases with latissimus dorsi flap showed lateral malposition more often than cases with deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap. With flaps, lateral incisions showed more lateral malposition, and peri-areolar incisions tended to show more medial NAC malposition. In cases with severe post-operative infection of the implant, the NAC tended to deviate cranially. In radiation cases, the NAC deviated cranially. No significant difference was observed according to the degree of breast ptosis or use of the pull-down operation. Only a very weak correlation was observed between a larger amount of mastectomy and more cranial NAC malposition with both flaps and implants.

Conclusions

This study provides insights into the tendencies and characteristics of NAC malposition.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ogiya A, Nagura N, Shimo A, Nogi H, Narui K, Seki H, et al. Long-term outcomes of breast cancer patients with local recurrence after mastectomy undergoing immediate breast reconstruction: a retrospective multi-institutional study of 4153 cases. Ann Surg Oncol. 2023;30:6532–40.CrossRefPubMed Ogiya A, Nagura N, Shimo A, Nogi H, Narui K, Seki H, et al. Long-term outcomes of breast cancer patients with local recurrence after mastectomy undergoing immediate breast reconstruction: a retrospective multi-institutional study of 4153 cases. Ann Surg Oncol. 2023;30:6532–40.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Salgarello M, Visconti G, Barone-Adesi L. Nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate implant reconstruction: cosmetic outcomes and technical refinements. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126:1460–71.CrossRefPubMed Salgarello M, Visconti G, Barone-Adesi L. Nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate implant reconstruction: cosmetic outcomes and technical refinements. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126:1460–71.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Small K, Kelly KM, Swistel A, Dent BL, Taylor EM, Talmor M. Surgical treatment of nipple malposition in nipple-sparing mastectomy device-based reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;133:1053–62.CrossRefPubMed Small K, Kelly KM, Swistel A, Dent BL, Taylor EM, Talmor M. Surgical treatment of nipple malposition in nipple-sparing mastectomy device-based reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;133:1053–62.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Hart A, Doyle K, Losken A, Carlson GW. Nipple malposition after bilateral nipple-sparing mastectomy with implant-based reconstruction: Objective postoperative analysis utilizing BCCT.core computer software. Breast J. 2020;26:1270–5.CrossRefPubMed Hart A, Doyle K, Losken A, Carlson GW. Nipple malposition after bilateral nipple-sparing mastectomy with implant-based reconstruction: Objective postoperative analysis utilizing BCCT.core computer software. Breast J. 2020;26:1270–5.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Metcalfe KA, Cil TD, Semple JL, Li LD, Bagher S, Zhong T, et al. Long-term psychosocial functioning in women with bilateral prophylactic mastectomy: does preservation of the nipple-areolar complex make a difference? Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:3324–30.CrossRefPubMed Metcalfe KA, Cil TD, Semple JL, Li LD, Bagher S, Zhong T, et al. Long-term psychosocial functioning in women with bilateral prophylactic mastectomy: does preservation of the nipple-areolar complex make a difference? Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:3324–30.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Wellisch DK, Schain WS, Noone RB, Little JW 3rd. The psychological contribution of nipple addition in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1987;80:699–704.CrossRefPubMed Wellisch DK, Schain WS, Noone RB, Little JW 3rd. The psychological contribution of nipple addition in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1987;80:699–704.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Mori H, Uemura N, Okazaki M, et al. Nipple malposition after nipple-sparing mastectomy and expander-implant reconstruction. Breast Cancer. 2016;23:740–4.CrossRefPubMed Mori H, Uemura N, Okazaki M, et al. Nipple malposition after nipple-sparing mastectomy and expander-implant reconstruction. Breast Cancer. 2016;23:740–4.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Spear SL, Albino FP, Al-Attar A. Classification and management of the postoperative, high-riding nipple. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131:1413–21.CrossRefPubMed Spear SL, Albino FP, Al-Attar A. Classification and management of the postoperative, high-riding nipple. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131:1413–21.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Makiguchi T, Nakamura H, Fujii T, Yokoo S. Quantitative assessment and risk factors for nipple-areolar complex malposition after nipple-sparing mastectomy. Breast Cancer. 2019;26:58–64.CrossRefPubMed Makiguchi T, Nakamura H, Fujii T, Yokoo S. Quantitative assessment and risk factors for nipple-areolar complex malposition after nipple-sparing mastectomy. Breast Cancer. 2019;26:58–64.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Mukai Y, Watanabe S, Matsumoto M, Saiga M, Kimata Y. reliability and validity of mamma balance((R)): novel software to assess the symmetry of the nipple-areola-complex position. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2017;70:1147–9.CrossRefPubMed Mukai Y, Watanabe S, Matsumoto M, Saiga M, Kimata Y. reliability and validity of mamma balance((R)): novel software to assess the symmetry of the nipple-areola-complex position. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2017;70:1147–9.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Choi M, Frey JD, Salibian AA, Karp NS. Nipple-areola complex malposition in nipple-sparing mastectomy: a review of risk factors and corrective techniques from greater than 1000 reconstructions. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;140:247e-e257.CrossRefPubMed Choi M, Frey JD, Salibian AA, Karp NS. Nipple-areola complex malposition in nipple-sparing mastectomy: a review of risk factors and corrective techniques from greater than 1000 reconstructions. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;140:247e-e257.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Kim H, Park SJ, Woo KJ, Bang SI. Comparative study of nipple-areola complex position and patient satisfaction after unilateral mastectomy and immediate expander-implant reconstruction nipple-sparing mastectomy versus skin-sparing mastectomy. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2019;43:313–27.CrossRefPubMed Kim H, Park SJ, Woo KJ, Bang SI. Comparative study of nipple-areola complex position and patient satisfaction after unilateral mastectomy and immediate expander-implant reconstruction nipple-sparing mastectomy versus skin-sparing mastectomy. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2019;43:313–27.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Nahabedian MY, Tsangaris TN. Breast reconstruction following subcutaneous mastectomy for cancer: a critical appraisal of the nipple-areola complex. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117:1083–90.CrossRefPubMed Nahabedian MY, Tsangaris TN. Breast reconstruction following subcutaneous mastectomy for cancer: a critical appraisal of the nipple-areola complex. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117:1083–90.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Djohan R, Gage E, Gatherwright J, Pavri S, Firouz J, Bernard S, et al. Patient satisfaction following nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: an 8-year outcome study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125:818–29.CrossRefPubMed Djohan R, Gage E, Gatherwright J, Pavri S, Firouz J, Bernard S, et al. Patient satisfaction following nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: an 8-year outcome study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125:818–29.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Chu CK, Carlson GW. Techniques and outcomes of nipple sparing mastectomy in the surgical management of breast cancer. Curr Breast Cancer Rep. 2013;5:118–24.CrossRef Chu CK, Carlson GW. Techniques and outcomes of nipple sparing mastectomy in the surgical management of breast cancer. Curr Breast Cancer Rep. 2013;5:118–24.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Choi M, Frey JD. Optimizing aesthetic outcomes in breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy. Aesthet Surg J. 2020;40:S13–21.CrossRefPubMed Choi M, Frey JD. Optimizing aesthetic outcomes in breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy. Aesthet Surg J. 2020;40:S13–21.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Chu CK, Davis MJ, Abu-Ghname A, Winocour SJ, Losken A, Carlson GW. Implant reconstruction in nipple sparing mastectomy. Semin Plast Surg. 2019;33:247–57.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chu CK, Davis MJ, Abu-Ghname A, Winocour SJ, Losken A, Carlson GW. Implant reconstruction in nipple sparing mastectomy. Semin Plast Surg. 2019;33:247–57.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Reish RG, Lin A, Phillips NA, Winograd J, Liao EC, Cetrulo CL Jr, et al. Breast reconstruction outcomes after nipple-sparing mastectomy and radiation therapy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;135:959–66.CrossRefPubMed Reish RG, Lin A, Phillips NA, Winograd J, Liao EC, Cetrulo CL Jr, et al. Breast reconstruction outcomes after nipple-sparing mastectomy and radiation therapy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;135:959–66.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Mayer AP, Goodreau AM, Blanchet NP. Accurate nipple areolar positioning in nipple-sparing mastectomy reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019;7: e2064.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mayer AP, Goodreau AM, Blanchet NP. Accurate nipple areolar positioning in nipple-sparing mastectomy reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019;7: e2064.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Komiya T, Ojima Y, Ishikawa T, Matsumura H. Surgical techniques to prevent nipple-areola complex malposition in two-stage implant based breast reconstruction. Arch Plast Surg. 2022;49:580–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Komiya T, Ojima Y, Ishikawa T, Matsumura H. Surgical techniques to prevent nipple-areola complex malposition in two-stage implant based breast reconstruction. Arch Plast Surg. 2022;49:580–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Sowa Y, Kodama T, Fuchinoue Y, Inafuku N, Terao Y. Breast Splint for Prevention of Nipple-areolar Complex Malposition after Direct-to-implant Breast Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022;10: e3965.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sowa Y, Kodama T, Fuchinoue Y, Inafuku N, Terao Y. Breast Splint for Prevention of Nipple-areolar Complex Malposition after Direct-to-implant Breast Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022;10: e3965.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Nipple–areolar complex malposition in breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy: a multi-institutional retrospective observational study in Japan
Authors
Sayuri Kato
Hiroki Mori
Miho Saiga
Satoko Watanabe
Shinsuke Sasada
Ayano Sasaki
Akiko Ogiya
Mao Yamamoto
Kazutaka Narui
Junji Takano
Hirohito Seki
Naomi Nagura
Makoto Ishitobi
Tadahiko Shien
the Collaborative Study Group of Scientific Research of the Japanese Breast Cancer Society
Publication date
08-04-2024
Publisher
Springer Nature Singapore
Published in
Breast Cancer
Print ISSN: 1340-6868
Electronic ISSN: 1880-4233
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-024-01578-2
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine