Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Plastic Surgery 4/2020

01-08-2020 | Mastectomy | Original Paper

Early experience with lightweight breast implants in breast reconstruction and massive weight loss patients

Authors: Stefano Pompei, Ornella Abate, Caravelli Guido

Published in: European Journal of Plastic Surgery | Issue 4/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The B-Lite® lightweight breast implant (LWBI) weighs ~ 30% less than traditional silicone implants for a given volume. Since weight is a persistent and unrelenting stress on the soft breast tissues, a lightweight implant is expected to reduce complications, particularly in challenging cases where there is very thin or ‘at risk’ breast tissue. The study determined the clinical outcomes of women who underwent B-Lite implantation surgery following mastectomy or massive weight loss (MWL) after bariatric surgery.

Methods

Retrospective review of all cases from January 2017 to June 2018. Candidates underwent standard surgical procedures with the LWBI, either one-stage implantation DTI or two-stage implantation, with surgical mesh or fat grafting.

Results

Eleven women (8 following mastectomy and 3 following MWL) aged 47.5 ± 9.1 years with a BMI of 20 ± 1.4 underwent the procedures with a total of 15 implants. At one-month follow-up, complications were rare with no adverse events including no cases of infection, hematoma, seroma or red breast syndrome. The only complications involved two cases who developed necrosis that was clearly related to the mastectomy. The necrosis was consequently, conservatively treated with local debridement. The current follow-up duration is 26 ± 7 months (21–31) with no further complications noted and excellent clinical outcomes. The cosmetic result is exceptional with minimal scarring from the vertical incision.

Conclusions

The B-Lite results are preliminary but suggest a safety profile similar or better than traditional implants with a promising benefit in challenging cases.
Level of evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Govrin-Yehudain J, Dvir H, Preise D, Govrin-Yehudain O, Govreen-Segal D (2015) Lightweight breast implants: a novel solution for breast augmentation and reconstruction mammaplasty. Aesthet Surg J 35(8):965–971CrossRef Govrin-Yehudain J, Dvir H, Preise D, Govrin-Yehudain O, Govreen-Segal D (2015) Lightweight breast implants: a novel solution for breast augmentation and reconstruction mammaplasty. Aesthet Surg J 35(8):965–971CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Govrin-Yehudain O, Ascherman JA (2019) Breast implant weight versus volume: reappraising breast implant compatibility with tissue characteristics. Plast Reconstr Surg 143(4):901e–902eCrossRef Govrin-Yehudain O, Ascherman JA (2019) Breast implant weight versus volume: reappraising breast implant compatibility with tissue characteristics. Plast Reconstr Surg 143(4):901e–902eCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Vegas MR, Martin del Yerro JL (2013) Stiffness, compliance, resilience, and creep deformation: understanding implant-soft tissue dynamics in the augmented breast: fundamentals based on materials science. Aesthet Plast Surg 37(5):922–930CrossRef Vegas MR, Martin del Yerro JL (2013) Stiffness, compliance, resilience, and creep deformation: understanding implant-soft tissue dynamics in the augmented breast: fundamentals based on materials science. Aesthet Plast Surg 37(5):922–930CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Bennett KG, Qi J, Kim HM, Hamill JB, Pusic AL, Wilkins EG (2018) Comparison of 2-year complication rates among common techniques for postmastectomy breast reconstruction. JAMA Surg 153(10):901–908CrossRef Bennett KG, Qi J, Kim HM, Hamill JB, Pusic AL, Wilkins EG (2018) Comparison of 2-year complication rates among common techniques for postmastectomy breast reconstruction. JAMA Surg 153(10):901–908CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Sigalove S (2019) Prepectoral breast reconstruction and radiotherapy - a closer look. Gland Surg 8(1):67–74CrossRef Sigalove S (2019) Prepectoral breast reconstruction and radiotherapy - a closer look. Gland Surg 8(1):67–74CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Sue GR, Long C, Lee GK (2017) Management of mastectomy skin necrosis in implant based breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 78:S208–S211CrossRef Sue GR, Long C, Lee GK (2017) Management of mastectomy skin necrosis in implant based breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 78:S208–S211CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Schmauss D, Machens H-G, Harder Y (2016) Breast reconstruction after mastectomy. Front Surg 2:71CrossRef Schmauss D, Machens H-G, Harder Y (2016) Breast reconstruction after mastectomy. Front Surg 2:71CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Qin Q, Tan Q, Lian B et al (2018) Postoperative outcomes of breast reconstruction after mastectomy. A retrospective study. Medicine 97(5):e9766CrossRef Qin Q, Tan Q, Lian B et al (2018) Postoperative outcomes of breast reconstruction after mastectomy. A retrospective study. Medicine 97(5):e9766CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Ilonzo N, Tsang A, Tsantes S, Estabrook A, Thu Ma AM (2017) Breast reconstruction after mastectomy: a ten-year analysis of trends and immediate postoperative outcomes. Breast 32:7–12CrossRef Ilonzo N, Tsang A, Tsantes S, Estabrook A, Thu Ma AM (2017) Breast reconstruction after mastectomy: a ten-year analysis of trends and immediate postoperative outcomes. Breast 32:7–12CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Chang JM, Kosiorek HE, Dueck AC, Casey WJ, Rebecca AM, Mahabir R, Patel SH, Keole SR, Wong WW, Vargas CE, Halyard MY, Gray RJ, Wasif N, Stucky CH, Pockaj BA (2016) Trends in mastectomy and reconstruction for breast cancer; a twelve year experience from a tertiary care center. Am J Surg 212(6):1201–1210CrossRef Chang JM, Kosiorek HE, Dueck AC, Casey WJ, Rebecca AM, Mahabir R, Patel SH, Keole SR, Wong WW, Vargas CE, Halyard MY, Gray RJ, Wasif N, Stucky CH, Pockaj BA (2016) Trends in mastectomy and reconstruction for breast cancer; a twelve year experience from a tertiary care center. Am J Surg 212(6):1201–1210CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Heneghan HM, Prichard RS, Lyons R, Regan PJ, Kelly JL, Malone C, McLaughlin R, Sweeney KJ, Kerin MJ (2011) Quality of life after immediate breast reconstruction and skin-sparing mastectomy—a comparison with patients undergoing breast conserving surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol 37:937–943CrossRef Heneghan HM, Prichard RS, Lyons R, Regan PJ, Kelly JL, Malone C, McLaughlin R, Sweeney KJ, Kerin MJ (2011) Quality of life after immediate breast reconstruction and skin-sparing mastectomy—a comparison with patients undergoing breast conserving surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol 37:937–943CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Robertson S, Wengströ Y, Eriksen C et al (2012) Breast surgeons performing immediate breast reconstruction with implants - assessment of resource-use and patient-reported outcome measures. Breast 21(4):590–596CrossRef Robertson S, Wengströ Y, Eriksen C et al (2012) Breast surgeons performing immediate breast reconstruction with implants - assessment of resource-use and patient-reported outcome measures. Breast 21(4):590–596CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Noone RB (2009) Thirty-five years of breast reconstruction: eleven lessons to share. Plast Reconstr Surg 124:1820–1827CrossRef Noone RB (2009) Thirty-five years of breast reconstruction: eleven lessons to share. Plast Reconstr Surg 124:1820–1827CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Nava MB, Blondeel P, Botti G, Casabona F, Catanuto G, Clemens MW, de Fazio D, de Vita R, Grotting J, Hammond DC, Harris P, Montemurro P, Mendonça Munhoz A, Nahabedian M, Pompei S, Rancati A, Rigotti G, Salgarello M, Scaperrotta G, Spano A, Stan C, Rocco N (2019) International expert panel consensus on fat grafting of the breast. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 7(10):e2426CrossRef Nava MB, Blondeel P, Botti G, Casabona F, Catanuto G, Clemens MW, de Fazio D, de Vita R, Grotting J, Hammond DC, Harris P, Montemurro P, Mendonça Munhoz A, Nahabedian M, Pompei S, Rancati A, Rigotti G, Salgarello M, Scaperrotta G, Spano A, Stan C, Rocco N (2019) International expert panel consensus on fat grafting of the breast. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 7(10):e2426CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Basta MN, Gereti PA, Serletti JM et al (2015) A systematic review and head-to-head meta-analysis of outcomes following direct-to-implant versus conventional two-stage implant reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 136:1135–1144CrossRef Basta MN, Gereti PA, Serletti JM et al (2015) A systematic review and head-to-head meta-analysis of outcomes following direct-to-implant versus conventional two-stage implant reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 136:1135–1144CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Clarke-Pearson EM, Lin AM, Hertl C, Austen WG, Colwell AS (2016) Revisions in implant-based breast reconstruction: how does direct-to-implant measure up? Plast Reconstr Surg 137:1690–1699CrossRef Clarke-Pearson EM, Lin AM, Hertl C, Austen WG, Colwell AS (2016) Revisions in implant-based breast reconstruction: how does direct-to-implant measure up? Plast Reconstr Surg 137:1690–1699CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Srinivasa DR, Garvey PB, Qi J, Hamill JB, Kim HM, Pusic AL, Kronowitz SJ, Wilkins EG, Butler CE, Clemens MW (2017) Direct-to-implant versus two-stage tissue expander/implant reconstruction: 2-year risks and patient-reported outcomes from a prospective, multicenter study. Plast Recontr Surg 140(5):869–877CrossRef Srinivasa DR, Garvey PB, Qi J, Hamill JB, Kim HM, Pusic AL, Kronowitz SJ, Wilkins EG, Butler CE, Clemens MW (2017) Direct-to-implant versus two-stage tissue expander/implant reconstruction: 2-year risks and patient-reported outcomes from a prospective, multicenter study. Plast Recontr Surg 140(5):869–877CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Storm-Dickerson T, Sigalove N (2017) Prepectoral breast reconstruction: the breast surgeon’s perspective. Plast Reconstr Surg 140:43S–48SCrossRef Storm-Dickerson T, Sigalove N (2017) Prepectoral breast reconstruction: the breast surgeon’s perspective. Plast Reconstr Surg 140:43S–48SCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Sbitany H (2017) Important considerations for performing prepectoral breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 140:7S–13SCrossRef Sbitany H (2017) Important considerations for performing prepectoral breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 140:7S–13SCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Lohsiriwat V, Rotmensz N, Botteri E et al (2013) Do clinicopathological features of the cancer patient relate with nipple areolar complex necrosis in nipple-sparing mastectomy? Ann Surg Oncol 20(3):990–996CrossRef Lohsiriwat V, Rotmensz N, Botteri E et al (2013) Do clinicopathological features of the cancer patient relate with nipple areolar complex necrosis in nipple-sparing mastectomy? Ann Surg Oncol 20(3):990–996CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Gschwantler-Kaulich D, Leser C, Salama M, Singer CF (2018) Direct-to-implant breast reconstruction: higher complication rate vs cosmetic benefits. Breast J 24(6):957–964CrossRef Gschwantler-Kaulich D, Leser C, Salama M, Singer CF (2018) Direct-to-implant breast reconstruction: higher complication rate vs cosmetic benefits. Breast J 24(6):957–964CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Piper M, Peled AW, Foster RD, Moore DH, Esserman LJ (2013) Total skin-sparing mastectomy: a systematic review of oncologic outcomes and postoperative complications. Ann Plast Surg 70(4):435–437CrossRef Piper M, Peled AW, Foster RD, Moore DH, Esserman LJ (2013) Total skin-sparing mastectomy: a systematic review of oncologic outcomes and postoperative complications. Ann Plast Surg 70(4):435–437CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Gould DJ, Hunt KK, Liu J et al (2013) Impact of surgical techniques, biomaterials, and patient variables on rate of nipple necrosis after nipple-sparing mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 132(3):330e–338eCrossRef Gould DJ, Hunt KK, Liu J et al (2013) Impact of surgical techniques, biomaterials, and patient variables on rate of nipple necrosis after nipple-sparing mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 132(3):330e–338eCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Stolier AJ, Levine EA (2013) Reducing the risk of nipple necrosis: technical observations in 340 nipple-sparing mastectomies. Breast J 19(2):173–179CrossRef Stolier AJ, Levine EA (2013) Reducing the risk of nipple necrosis: technical observations in 340 nipple-sparing mastectomies. Breast J 19(2):173–179CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Nahabedian MY (2018) Current approaches to prepectoral breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 142:871–880CrossRef Nahabedian MY (2018) Current approaches to prepectoral breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 142:871–880CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Nahabedian MY, Jacobson SR (2019) Two-stage prepectoral breast reconstruction. Gland Surg 8(1):43–52CrossRef Nahabedian MY, Jacobson SR (2019) Two-stage prepectoral breast reconstruction. Gland Surg 8(1):43–52CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Okada A, Saito FL, Hiraki PY et al (2012) Mastopexy after massive weight loss: dermal suspension, parenchymal reshaping, and augmentation with autologous tissue. Rev Bras Cir Plást 27(2):283–289CrossRef Okada A, Saito FL, Hiraki PY et al (2012) Mastopexy after massive weight loss: dermal suspension, parenchymal reshaping, and augmentation with autologous tissue. Rev Bras Cir Plást 27(2):283–289CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Giordano S (2015) Removal of excess skin after massive weight loss: challenges and solutions. Open Access Surgery 8:51–60CrossRef Giordano S (2015) Removal of excess skin after massive weight loss: challenges and solutions. Open Access Surgery 8:51–60CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Cogliandro A, Barone M, Cassotta G, Salzillo R, Persichetti P (2018) Mastopexy on reconstructed breast following massive weight loss: an innovative technique using dermo-capsular flaps. Aesthet Plast Surg 42(2):396–399CrossRef Cogliandro A, Barone M, Cassotta G, Salzillo R, Persichetti P (2018) Mastopexy on reconstructed breast following massive weight loss: an innovative technique using dermo-capsular flaps. Aesthet Plast Surg 42(2):396–399CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Scheflan M, Grinberg-Rashi H, Hod K (2018) Bovine acellular dermal matrix in immediate breast reconstruction: a retrospective, observational study with SurgiMend. Plast Reconstr Surg 141:1e–10eCrossRef Scheflan M, Grinberg-Rashi H, Hod K (2018) Bovine acellular dermal matrix in immediate breast reconstruction: a retrospective, observational study with SurgiMend. Plast Reconstr Surg 141:1e–10eCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Early experience with lightweight breast implants in breast reconstruction and massive weight loss patients
Authors
Stefano Pompei
Ornella Abate
Caravelli Guido
Publication date
01-08-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Journal of Plastic Surgery / Issue 4/2020
Print ISSN: 0930-343X
Electronic ISSN: 1435-0130
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-020-01657-5

Other articles of this Issue 4/2020

European Journal of Plastic Surgery 4/2020 Go to the issue