Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 3/2022

Open Access 28-02-2022 | Mastectomy | Original Article

Impact on Patient’s Appearance Perception of Autologous and Implant Based Breast Reconstruction Following Mastectomy Using BREAST-Q

Authors: Paolo Persichetti, Mauro Barone, Rosa Salzillo, Annalisa Cogliandro, Beniamino Brunetti, Silvia Ciarrocchi, Mario Alessandri Bonetti, Stefania Tenna, Michail Sorotos, Fabio Santanelli Di Pompeo

Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Issue 3/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

The purpose of this study is to determine if there is a better quality of life with one of the two techniques and if the results are in line with those already present in the literature. The hypothesis from which we started is to demonstrate that cancer patients who undergo a deep inferior epigastric perforator flap (DIEP) breast reconstruction surgery are more satisfied and have a higher level of quality of life compared to those subjected to an intervention of reconstruction with prosthesis.

Materials and Methods

All patients undergoing reconstruction from January 2010 to July 2018 were eligible for inclusion. This is a retrospective cohort study carried out using the patients of two plastic surgery departments who have undergone monolateral or bilateral implant-based or DIEP flap breast reconstruction. We administered BREAST-Q questionnaire electronically almost 2 year after surgery. Patients were divided into two groups: implant-based and autologous breast reconstruction with DIEP flaps. Baseline demographics and patient characteristics were analyzed using a Students t-test (continuous variables) or Chi-square/Fisher’s exact test (categorical variables). Mean standard deviation BREAST-Q scores were reported for the overall cohort and by modality for the postoperative period. The linear regression model was applied to all BREAST-Q score with all predictor factors.

Results

Of the 1125 patients involved, only 325 met the inclusion criteria and were enrolled in this study; specifically, 133 (41%) DIEP and 192 (59%) prosthetic reconstructions. We summarized the results of the principal scales of BREAST-Q module: satisfaction with breast, psychosocial well-being, satisfaction with outcome, and sexual well-being in which the autologous group was always more satisfied. We reported results of all linear regression models with higher values for the DIEP group independently from predictors.

Conclusion

This is the first study performed on the Italian population that compares autologous surgical techniques with the implantation of breast implants. In this population, DIEP is considered the technique that leads to the highest satisfaction in all BREAST-Q scores.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.​springer.​com/​00266.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Momoh AO, Griffith KA, Hawley ST, Morrow M, Ward KC, Hamilton AS, Shumway D, Katz SJ, Jagsi R (2020) Postmastectomy breast reconstruction: exploring plastic surgeon practice patterns and perspectives. Plast Reconstr Surg 145(4):865–876CrossRef Momoh AO, Griffith KA, Hawley ST, Morrow M, Ward KC, Hamilton AS, Shumway D, Katz SJ, Jagsi R (2020) Postmastectomy breast reconstruction: exploring plastic surgeon practice patterns and perspectives. Plast Reconstr Surg 145(4):865–876CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Razdan SN, Cordeiro PG, Albornoz CR, Ro T, Cohen WA, Mehrara BJ, McCarthy CM, Disa JJ, Pusic AL, Matros E (2016) Cost-effectiveness analysis of breast reconstruction options in the setting of postmastectomy radiotherapy using the BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg 137(3):510e–517eCrossRef Razdan SN, Cordeiro PG, Albornoz CR, Ro T, Cohen WA, Mehrara BJ, McCarthy CM, Disa JJ, Pusic AL, Matros E (2016) Cost-effectiveness analysis of breast reconstruction options in the setting of postmastectomy radiotherapy using the BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg 137(3):510e–517eCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Barone M, Cogliandro A, Signoretti M, Persichetti P (2018) Analysis of symmetry stability following implant-based breast reconstruction and contralateral management in 582 patients with long-term outcomes. Aesth Plast Surg 42(4):936–940CrossRef Barone M, Cogliandro A, Signoretti M, Persichetti P (2018) Analysis of symmetry stability following implant-based breast reconstruction and contralateral management in 582 patients with long-term outcomes. Aesth Plast Surg 42(4):936–940CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Barone M, Cogliandro A, Grasso A, Altomare V, Persichetti P (2018) Direct-to-implant versus two-stage tissue expander/implant reconstruction: 2-year risks and patient-reported outcomes from a prospective. Multicenter Study Plast Reconstr Surg 142(1):89e–91eCrossRef Barone M, Cogliandro A, Grasso A, Altomare V, Persichetti P (2018) Direct-to-implant versus two-stage tissue expander/implant reconstruction: 2-year risks and patient-reported outcomes from a prospective. Multicenter Study Plast Reconstr Surg 142(1):89e–91eCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Cordeiro PG, Albornoz CR, McCormick B, Hudis CA, Hu Q, Heerdt A, Matros E (2015) What is the optimum timing of postmastectomy radiotherapy in two-stage prosthetic reconstruction: radiation to the tissue expander or permanent implant? Plast Reconstr Surg 135(6):1509–1517CrossRef Cordeiro PG, Albornoz CR, McCormick B, Hudis CA, Hu Q, Heerdt A, Matros E (2015) What is the optimum timing of postmastectomy radiotherapy in two-stage prosthetic reconstruction: radiation to the tissue expander or permanent implant? Plast Reconstr Surg 135(6):1509–1517CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Schover LR (1991) The impact of breast cancer on sexuality, body image, and intimate relationships. CA Cancer J Clin 41(2):112–120CrossRef Schover LR (1991) The impact of breast cancer on sexuality, body image, and intimate relationships. CA Cancer J Clin 41(2):112–120CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Persichetti P, Cagli B, Simone P, Cogliandro A, Fortunato L, Altomare V, Trodella L (2009) Implant breast reconstruction after salvage mastectomy in previously irradiated patients. Ann Plast Surg 62(4):350–354CrossRef Persichetti P, Cagli B, Simone P, Cogliandro A, Fortunato L, Altomare V, Trodella L (2009) Implant breast reconstruction after salvage mastectomy in previously irradiated patients. Ann Plast Surg 62(4):350–354CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Barone M, Cogliandro A, Persichetti P (2013) Role of aesthetic surgery in improving the quality of life: only vanity or a solution to physical and psychorelational problems? Plast Reconstr Surg 132(3):477e-e478CrossRef Barone M, Cogliandro A, Persichetti P (2013) Role of aesthetic surgery in improving the quality of life: only vanity or a solution to physical and psychorelational problems? Plast Reconstr Surg 132(3):477e-e478CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Cohen JB, Myckatyn TM, Brandt K (2017) The importance of patient satisfaction: a blessing, a curse, or simply irrelevant? Plast Reconstr Surg 139:257–261CrossRef Cohen JB, Myckatyn TM, Brandt K (2017) The importance of patient satisfaction: a blessing, a curse, or simply irrelevant? Plast Reconstr Surg 139:257–261CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Cogliandro A, Barone M, Cassotta G, Tenna S, Cagli B, Persichetti P (2017) Patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes following 414 breast reductions: application of BREAST-Q. Aesth Plast Surg 41:245CrossRef Cogliandro A, Barone M, Cassotta G, Tenna S, Cagli B, Persichetti P (2017) Patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes following 414 breast reductions: application of BREAST-Q. Aesth Plast Surg 41:245CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Klassen AF, Cano SJ, Scott A, Snell L, Pusic AL (2010) Measuring patient-reported outcomes in facial aesthetic patients: development of the FACE-Q. Facial Plast Surg 26:303–309CrossRef Klassen AF, Cano SJ, Scott A, Snell L, Pusic AL (2010) Measuring patient-reported outcomes in facial aesthetic patients: development of the FACE-Q. Facial Plast Surg 26:303–309CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Lasch KE, Marquis P, Vigneux M, Abetz L, Arnould B, Bayliss M, Crawford B, Rosa K (2010) PRO development: rigorous qualitative research as the crucial foundation. Qual Life Res 19:1087–1096CrossRef Lasch KE, Marquis P, Vigneux M, Abetz L, Arnould B, Bayliss M, Crawford B, Rosa K (2010) PRO development: rigorous qualitative research as the crucial foundation. Qual Life Res 19:1087–1096CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Pusic AL, Chen CM, Cano S, Klassen A, McCarthy C, Collins ED, Cordeiro PG (2007) Measuring quality of life in cosmetic and reconstructive breast surgery: a systematic review of patient-reported outcomes instruments. Plast Reconstr Surg 120:823–837CrossRef Pusic AL, Chen CM, Cano S, Klassen A, McCarthy C, Collins ED, Cordeiro PG (2007) Measuring quality of life in cosmetic and reconstructive breast surgery: a systematic review of patient-reported outcomes instruments. Plast Reconstr Surg 120:823–837CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Pusic AL, Klassen AF, Scott AM, Klok JA, Cordeiro PG, Cano SJ (2009) Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure for breast surgery: The BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg 124:345–353CrossRef Pusic AL, Klassen AF, Scott AM, Klok JA, Cordeiro PG, Cano SJ (2009) Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure for breast surgery: The BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg 124:345–353CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Toyserkani NM, Jørgensen MG, Tabatabaeifar S, Damsgaard T, Sørensen JA (2020) Autologous versus implant-based breast reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of BREAST-Q patient-reported outcomes. J Plast Reconstr Aesth Surg 73(2):278–285CrossRef Toyserkani NM, Jørgensen MG, Tabatabaeifar S, Damsgaard T, Sørensen JA (2020) Autologous versus implant-based breast reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of BREAST-Q patient-reported outcomes. J Plast Reconstr Aesth Surg 73(2):278–285CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Alshammari SM, Aldossary MY, Almutairi K, Almulhim A, Alkhazmari G, Alyaqout M, Abrar H (2019) Patient-reported outcomes after breast reconstructive surgery: a prospective cross-sectional study. Ann Med Surg 39:22–25CrossRef Alshammari SM, Aldossary MY, Almutairi K, Almulhim A, Alkhazmari G, Alyaqout M, Abrar H (2019) Patient-reported outcomes after breast reconstructive surgery: a prospective cross-sectional study. Ann Med Surg 39:22–25CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Dean NR, Crittenden T (2016) A five year experience of measuring clinical effectiveness in a breast reconstruction service using the BREAST-Q patient reported outcomes measure: a cohort study. J Plast Reconstr Aesth Surg 69:1469–1477CrossRef Dean NR, Crittenden T (2016) A five year experience of measuring clinical effectiveness in a breast reconstruction service using the BREAST-Q patient reported outcomes measure: a cohort study. J Plast Reconstr Aesth Surg 69:1469–1477CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Lagendijk M, van Egdom LSE, Richel C, van Leeuwen N, Verhoef C, Lingsma HF, Koppert LB (2018) Patient reported outcome measures in breast cancer patients. Eur J Surg Oncol 44:963–968CrossRef Lagendijk M, van Egdom LSE, Richel C, van Leeuwen N, Verhoef C, Lingsma HF, Koppert LB (2018) Patient reported outcome measures in breast cancer patients. Eur J Surg Oncol 44:963–968CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Liu C, Zhuang Y, Momeni A, Luan J, Chung MT, Wright E, Lee GK (2014) Quality of life and patient satisfaction after microsurgical abdominal flap versus staged expander/implant breast reconstruction: a critical study of unilateral immediate breast reconstruction using patient-reported outcomes instrument BREAST-Q. Breast Cancer Res Treat 146:117–126CrossRef Liu C, Zhuang Y, Momeni A, Luan J, Chung MT, Wright E, Lee GK (2014) Quality of life and patient satisfaction after microsurgical abdominal flap versus staged expander/implant breast reconstruction: a critical study of unilateral immediate breast reconstruction using patient-reported outcomes instrument BREAST-Q. Breast Cancer Res Treat 146:117–126CrossRef
21.
go back to reference McCarthy CM, Mehrara BJ, Long T et al (2014) Chest and upper body morbidity following immediate postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol 21:107–112CrossRef McCarthy CM, Mehrara BJ, Long T et al (2014) Chest and upper body morbidity following immediate postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol 21:107–112CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Moberg IO, Schou Bredal I, Schneider MR, Tønseth KA, Schlichting E (2018) Complications, risk factors, and patients-reported outcomes after skin-sparing mastectomy followed by breast reconstruction in women with BRCA mutations. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 52:234–239CrossRef Moberg IO, Schou Bredal I, Schneider MR, Tønseth KA, Schlichting E (2018) Complications, risk factors, and patients-reported outcomes after skin-sparing mastectomy followed by breast reconstruction in women with BRCA mutations. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 52:234–239CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Pirro O, Mestak O, Vindigni V, Sukop A, Hromadkova V, Nguyenova A, Vitova L, Bassetto F (2017) Comparison of patient-reported outcomes after implant versus autologous tissue breast reconstruction using the BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 5:e1217CrossRef Pirro O, Mestak O, Vindigni V, Sukop A, Hromadkova V, Nguyenova A, Vitova L, Bassetto F (2017) Comparison of patient-reported outcomes after implant versus autologous tissue breast reconstruction using the BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 5:e1217CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Santosa KB, Qi J, Kim HM, Hamill JB, Wilkins EG, Pusic AL (2018) Long-term patient-reported outcomes in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. JAMA Surg 153:891–899CrossRef Santosa KB, Qi J, Kim HM, Hamill JB, Wilkins EG, Pusic AL (2018) Long-term patient-reported outcomes in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. JAMA Surg 153:891–899CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Weichman KE, Broer PN, Thanik VD, Wilson SC, Tanna N, Levine JP, Choi M, Karp NS, Hazen A (2015) Patient-reported satisfaction and quality of life following breast reconstruction in thin patients: a comparison between microsurgical and prosthetic implant recipients. Plast Reconstr Surg 136:213–220CrossRef Weichman KE, Broer PN, Thanik VD, Wilson SC, Tanna N, Levine JP, Choi M, Karp NS, Hazen A (2015) Patient-reported satisfaction and quality of life following breast reconstruction in thin patients: a comparison between microsurgical and prosthetic implant recipients. Plast Reconstr Surg 136:213–220CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Fischer JP, Fox JP, Nelson JA, Kovach SJ, Serletti JM (2015) A longitudinal assessment of outcomes and healthcare resource utilization after immediate breast reconstruction-comparing implant and autologous-based breast reconstruction. Ann Surg 262(4):692–699CrossRef Fischer JP, Fox JP, Nelson JA, Kovach SJ, Serletti JM (2015) A longitudinal assessment of outcomes and healthcare resource utilization after immediate breast reconstruction-comparing implant and autologous-based breast reconstruction. Ann Surg 262(4):692–699CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Hu ES, Pusic AL, Waljee JF, Kuhn L, Hawley ST, Wilkins E, Alderman AK (2009) Patient-reported aesthetic satisfaction with breast reconstruction during the long-term survivorship period. Plast Reconstr Surg 124(1):1–8CrossRef Hu ES, Pusic AL, Waljee JF, Kuhn L, Hawley ST, Wilkins E, Alderman AK (2009) Patient-reported aesthetic satisfaction with breast reconstruction during the long-term survivorship period. Plast Reconstr Surg 124(1):1–8CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Nelson JA, Allen RJ Jr, Polanco T, Shamsunder M, Patel AR, McCarthy CM, Matros E, Dayan JH, Disa JJ, Cordeiro PG, Mehrara BJ, Pusic AL (2019) Long-term patient-reported outcomes following postmastectomy breast reconstruction: an 8-year examination of 3268 patients. Ann Surg 270(3):473–483CrossRef Nelson JA, Allen RJ Jr, Polanco T, Shamsunder M, Patel AR, McCarthy CM, Matros E, Dayan JH, Disa JJ, Cordeiro PG, Mehrara BJ, Pusic AL (2019) Long-term patient-reported outcomes following postmastectomy breast reconstruction: an 8-year examination of 3268 patients. Ann Surg 270(3):473–483CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Barone M, Cogliandro A, Salzillo R, Tambone V, Persichetti P (2018) The role of appearance: definition of appearance-pain (app-pain) and systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures used in literature. Aesth Plast Surg 42(5):1399–1409CrossRef Barone M, Cogliandro A, Salzillo R, Tambone V, Persichetti P (2018) The role of appearance: definition of appearance-pain (app-pain) and systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures used in literature. Aesth Plast Surg 42(5):1399–1409CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Impact on Patient’s Appearance Perception of Autologous and Implant Based Breast Reconstruction Following Mastectomy Using BREAST-Q
Authors
Paolo Persichetti
Mauro Barone
Rosa Salzillo
Annalisa Cogliandro
Beniamino Brunetti
Silvia Ciarrocchi
Mario Alessandri Bonetti
Stefania Tenna
Michail Sorotos
Fabio Santanelli Di Pompeo
Publication date
28-02-2022
Publisher
Springer US
Keyword
Mastectomy
Published in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Issue 3/2022
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-022-02776-z

Other articles of this Issue 3/2022

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 3/2022 Go to the issue