Published in:
06-08-2022 | Mastectomy | Reconstructive Oncology
Impact of Patient Primary Language upon Immediate Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy
Authors:
Alison P. Woods, MD, Marianna V. Papageorge, MD, Susanna W. L. de Geus, MD, PhD, Andrea Alonso, MD, Andrea Merrill, MD, Michael R. Cassidy, MD, Daniel S. Roh, MD, PhD, Teviah E. Sachs, MD, MPH, David McAneny, MD, Frederick Thurston Drake, MD, MPH
Published in:
Annals of Surgical Oncology
|
Issue 13/2022
Login to get access
Abstract
Background
Preoperative decision-making in patients who speak a primary language other than English is understudied. We investigated whether patient primary language is associated with differences in immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) after mastectomy.
Patients and Methods
This retrospective observational study analyzed female patients undergoing mastectomy in the New Jersey State Inpatient Database (2009–2014). The primary outcome was the odds of IBR with a prespecified subanalysis of autologous tissue-based IBR. We used multivariable logistic regression and hierarchical generalized linear mixed models to control for patient characteristics and nesting within hospitals.
Results
Of 13,846 discharges, 12,924 (93.3%) specified English as the patient’s primary language, while 922 (6.7%) specified a language other than English. Among English-speaking patients, 6178 (47.8%) underwent IBR, including 2310 (17.9%) autologous reconstructions. Among patients with a primary language other than English, 339 (36.8%) underwent IBR, including 93 (10.1%) autologous reconstructions. Unadjusted results showed reduced odds of IBR overall [odds ratio (OR) 0.64, 95% CI 0.55–0.73], and autologous reconstruction specifically (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.41–0.64) among patients with a primary language other than English. After adjustment for patient factors, this difference persisted among the autologous subgroup (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.51–0.80) but not for IBR overall. A hierarchical model incorporating both patient characteristics and hospital-level effects continued to show a difference among the autologous subgroup (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.58–0.97).
Conclusions
Primary language other than English was an independent risk factor for lower odds of autologous IBR after adjustments for patient and hospital effects. Focused efforts should be made to ensure that patients who speak a primary language other than English have access to high-quality shared decision-making for postmastectomy IBR.