Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 9/2020

01-09-2020 | Mastectomy | ASO Author Reflections

ASO Author Reflections: Machine Learning Strategies Can Aid Patient Selection in Microvascular Breast Reconstruction

Author: Anne C. O’Neill, MBBCh, PhD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 9/2020

Login to get access

Excerpt

Although there are many effective options for post mastectomy breast reconstruction, microvascular autologous techniques are widely considered to be the “gold standard”, because they offer excellent aesthetic results and long-term patient satisfaction.1 However, like all microvascular procedures, there is an inherent risk of flap failure with rates of 1–2% reported in most high-volume specialist centres. Preoperative identification of patients who are at increased risk for failure would allow surgeons to recommend an alternative reconstructive technique. Traditional approaches for the identification of significant preoperative risk factors centre on the use of logistic regression models. However, these strategies often are ineffective when the outcome of interest is rare. Previous studies have failed to identify consistent predictors of flap failure in post mastectomy breast reconstruction.2
Literature
1.
go back to reference Santosa KB, Qi J, Kim HM, et al. Long-term patient reported outcomes in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. JAMA Surg. 2018;153:891–9.CrossRef Santosa KB, Qi J, Kim HM, et al. Long-term patient reported outcomes in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. JAMA Surg. 2018;153:891–9.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference O’Neill AC, Haykal S, Bagher S, et al. Predictors and consequences of intraoperative microvascular problems in autologous breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesth Surg JPRAS. 2016;69:1349–55.CrossRef O’Neill AC, Haykal S, Bagher S, et al. Predictors and consequences of intraoperative microvascular problems in autologous breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesth Surg JPRAS. 2016;69:1349–55.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Kruppa J, Ziegler A, Konig IR. Risk estimation and risk prediction using machine learning methods. Hum Genet. 2012;131:1639–54.CrossRef Kruppa J, Ziegler A, Konig IR. Risk estimation and risk prediction using machine learning methods. Hum Genet. 2012;131:1639–54.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Roy M, Sebastiampillai S, Zhong T, et al. Synergistic interaction increases complication rates following microvascular breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;144:1e–8e.CrossRef Roy M, Sebastiampillai S, Zhong T, et al. Synergistic interaction increases complication rates following microvascular breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;144:1e–8e.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
ASO Author Reflections: Machine Learning Strategies Can Aid Patient Selection in Microvascular Breast Reconstruction
Author
Anne C. O’Neill, MBBCh, PhD
Publication date
01-09-2020
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Keyword
Mastectomy
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 9/2020
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-08352-6

Other articles of this Issue 9/2020

Annals of Surgical Oncology 9/2020 Go to the issue