Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Public Health
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2014

Open Access 01-12-2014 | Research article

Mass fatality preparedness among medical examiners/coroners in the United States: a cross-sectional study

Authors: Robyn RM Gershon, Mark G Orr, Qi Zhi, Jacqueline A Merrill, Daniel Y Chen, Halley EM Riley, Martin F Sherman

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In the United States (US), Medical Examiners and Coroners (ME/Cs) have the legal authority for the management of mass fatality incidents (MFI). Yet, preparedness and operational capabilities in this sector remain largely unknown. The purpose of this study was twofold; first, to identify appropriate measures of preparedness, and second, to assess preparedness levels and factors significantly associated with preparedness.

Methods

Three separate checklists were developed to measure different aspects of preparedness: MFI Plan Elements, Operational Capabilities, and Pre-existing Resource Networks. Using a cross-sectional study design, data on these and other variables of interest were collected in 2014 from a national convenience sample of ME/C using an internet-based, anonymous survey. Preparedness levels were determined and compared across Federal Regions and in relation to the number of Presidential Disaster Declarations, also by Federal Region. Bivariate logistic and multivariable models estimated the associations between organizational characteristics and relative preparedness.

Results

A large proportion (42%) of respondents reported that less than 25 additional fatalities over a 48-hour period would exceed their response capacities. The preparedness constructs measured three related, yet distinct, aspects of preparedness, with scores highly variable and generally suboptimal. Median scores for the three preparedness measures also varied across Federal Regions and as compared to the number of Presidential Declared Disasters, also by Federal Region. Capacity was especially limited for activating missing persons call centers, launching public communications, especially via social media, and identifying temporary interment sites. The provision of staff training was the only factor studied that was significantly (positively) associated (p < .05) with all three preparedness measures. Although ME/Cs ranked local partners, such as Offices of Emergency Management, first responders, and funeral homes, as the most important sources of assistance, a sizeable proportion (72%) expected federal assistance.

Conclusions

The three measures of MFI preparedness allowed for a broad and comprehensive assessment of preparedness. In the future, these measures can serve as useful benchmarks or criteria for assessing ME/Cs preparedness. The study findings suggest multiple opportunities for improvement, including the development and implementation of national strategies to ensure uniform standards for MFI management across all jurisdictions.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Batni S, Gursky EA: Historical perspectives in mass fatality. Death in Large Numbers: the Science, Policy, and Management of Mass Fatality Events. Edited by: Gursky EA, Fierro MF. 2012, Chicago, IL: American Medical Association, 25-1
2.
3.
4.
Morgan OW, Sribanditmongkol P, Perera C, Sulasmi Y, Van Alphen D, Sondorp E: Mass fatality management following the South Asian tsunami disaster: case studies in Thailand, Indonesia, and Sri Lanka. PLoS Med. 2006, 3 (6): e195-10.1371/journal.pmed.0030195.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Scanlon J, McMahon T, Van Haastert C: Handling mass death by integrating the management of disasters and pandemics: lessons from the Indian Ocean tsunami, the Spanish Flu and other incidents. J Contingencies Crisis Manage. 2007, 15 (2): 80-94. 10.1111/j.1468-5973.2007.00511.x.CrossRef
6.
Weisler RH, Barbee JG, Townsend MH: Mental health and recovery in the Gulf Coast after Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. JAMA. 2006, 296 (5): 585-588. 10.1001/jama.296.5.585.CrossRefPubMed
7.
National response framework. Edited by: U.S. Department of Homeland Security. 2008, Washington, DC: FEMA Publications Warehouse
8.
Hanzlick R: Medical examiners, coroners, and public health: a review and update. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2006, 130 (9): 1274-1282.PubMed
9.
Hickman MJ, Hughes KA, Strom KJ, Ropero-Miller JD: Bureau of justice statistics special report: medical examiners and coroners' offices, 2004. Edited by: U.S. Department of Justice. 2004, Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, Office of Justice Program, 8-
10.
Greenberger M, Henson T, Kates S, Major A: Legal issues in mass fatality events. Death in Large Numbers: the Science, Policy, and Management of Mass Fatality Events. Edited by: Gursky EA, Fierro MF. 2012, Chicago, IL: The American Medical Association, 20-
11.
Target capabilities list. Edited by: U.S. Department of Homeland Security. 2007
12.
Gursky EA: A working group consensus statement on mass-fatality planning for pandemics and disasters. J Homeland Secur. 2007
13.
National preparedness report. Edited by: U.S. Department of Homeland Security. 2013, Washington, DC
14.
International mass fatality management conference. The City of New York Office of Medical Examiner, Regional Catastrophic Planning Team. 2012
15.
16.
Emergency support function #8 - public health and medical services annex. Edited by: U.S. Department of Homeland Security. 2008, Washington, DC: FEMA Publications Warehouse
17.
Terbush JW, Huckaby GC, Luke M: Civil-military integration for mass-fatality events. Death in Large Numbers: the Science, Policy, and Management of Mass Fatality Events. Edited by: Gursky EA, Fierro MF. 2012, Chicago, IL: American Medical Association, 14-1
18.
SurveyMonkey Inc.: SurveyMonkey. 1999, Palo Alto, California
19.
20.
Woody AC, Boyer DA: Mass fatality management: local & regional planning. Texas Emergency Management Conference. 2013, Texas, 45-
21.
22.
Boyer DA, Smith GS, Woody AC: Regional mass fatality management - concept of operations. Edited by: Regional Catastrophic Preparedness Grant Program. 2009
23.
New York State guidance - county mass fatality annex with emphasis on pandemic influenza preparedness. Edited by: New York State Office of Emergency Management. 2011
24.
Hirsch CS: All hazards mass fatality management plan. Edited by: The City of New York Office of Chief Medical Examiner. 2009
25.
Ohio emergency operations plan - acute mass fatalities incident response plan. Edited by: Ohio Department of Health. 2012
26.
Regional catastrophic incident mass fatality plan. Edited by: California Emergency Management Agency. 2011
27.
Emergency Management BC: BC coroners service mass fatality response plan. 2014, British Columbia: Emergency Management BC
28.
Mass fatality management planning toolkit. 2010, Texas Department of State Health Services
29.
Fatality management toolkit. Edited by: State of Alabama Department of Public Health. 2009
30.
Kincaid JP, Fishburne RP, Rogers RL, Chissom BS: Derivation of new readability formulas (Automated Readability Index, Fog Count and Flesch Reading Ease Formula) for navy enlisted personnel. 1975, Millington, TN: U.S. Department of Commerce - National Technical Information Service, 51-
31.
Qureshi K, Gershon RR, Sherman MF, Straub T, Gebbie E, McCollum M, Erwin MJ, Morse SS: Health care workers' ability and willingness to report to duty during catastrophic disasters. J Urban Health. 2005, 82 (3): 378-388. 10.1093/jurban/jti086.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
Gershon RR, Magda LA, Qureshi KA, Riley HE, Scanlon E, Carney MT, Richards RJ, Sherman MF: Factors associated with the ability and willingness of essential workers to report to duty during a pandemic. J Occup Environ Med. 2010, 52 (10): 995-1003. 10.1097/JOM.0b013e3181f43872.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Gershon RR, Magda LA, Canton AN, Riley HE, Wiggins F, Young W, Sherman MF: Pandemic-related ability and willingness in home healthcare workers. Am J Disaster Med. 2010, 5 (1): 15-26. 10.5055/ajdm.2010.0002.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Gershon RR, Magda LA, Riley HE, Merrill JA: Mass fatality preparedness in the death care sector. J Occup Environ Med. 2011, 53 (10): 1179-1186. 10.1097/JOM.0b013e31822cfe76.CrossRefPubMed
35.
36.
37.
38.
R Development Core Team: R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Volume 3.1.0. Auckland, New Zealand: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2014
39.
40.
ESRI: ArcGIS Desktop 10.2.2. 2014, Redlands, CA: Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI)
41.
42.
43.
44.
McCabe OL, Barnett DJ, Taylor HG, Links JM: Ready, willing, and able: a framework for improving the public health emergency preparedness system. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2010, 4 (2): 161-168. 10.1001/dmp-v4n2-hcn10003.CrossRefPubMed
45.
Blake ES, Kimberlain TB, Berg RJ, Cangialosi JP, Beven JL: Tropical cyclone report hurricane sandy. National Hurricane Center, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). 2013, Miami, FL: National Hurricane Center
46.
Maron DF: How social media is changing disaster response. Scientific American. 2013, Magzine Scientific American
47.
Using social media for enhanced situational awareness and decision support. Edited by: Security USDOH. 2014
48.
Ghuman SJ, Brackbill RM, Stellman SD, Farfel MR, Cone JE: Unmet mental health care need 10-11 years after the 9/11 terrorist attacks: 2011-2012 results from the World Trade Center Health Registry. BMC Public Health. 2014, 14: 491-10.1186/1471-2458-14-491.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
49.
50.
51.
National preparedness report. Edited by: U.S. Department of Homeland Security. 2012, Washington, DC
52.
National preparedness goa. Edited by: U.S. Department of Homeland Security. 2011, Washington, DC
53.
National preparedness report. Edited by: U.S. Department of Homeland Security. 2014, Washington, DC: FEMA Publications Warehouse
54.
LaDue LR, Herrmann J: Fatalities management strategies. Medical Surge Capacity: Workshop Summary. Edited by: Altevogt BM, Stroud C, Nadig L, Hougan M. 2010, Chicago, IL: The National Academies Press, 14-
55.
Gavin CS, Nesler JT: Critical aspects of mass fatality planning for state and local governments. Death in Large Numbers: the Science, Policy, and Management of Mass Fatality Events. Edited by: Gursky EA, Fierro MF. 2012, Chicago, IL: American Medical Association, 21-1
56.
57.
Capstone Document: Mass fatality management for incidents involving weapons of mass destruction. Edited by: U.S. Army Research Development and Engineering Command - Military Improved Response Program, Department of Justice - Office of Justice Programs & Office for Domestic Preparedness. 2005
58.
Blakeney RL: Providing relief to families after a mass fatality: roles of the medical examiner's office and the family assistance center. Office Victims Crime Bull. 2002, 2002: 19-
59.
Metadata
Title
Mass fatality preparedness among medical examiners/coroners in the United States: a cross-sectional study
Authors
Robyn RM Gershon
Mark G Orr
Qi Zhi
Jacqueline A Merrill
Daniel Y Chen
Halley EM Riley
Martin F Sherman
Publication date
01-12-2014
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2014
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-1275

Other articles of this Issue 1/2014

BMC Public Health 1/2014 Go to the issue

Research article

Validity of the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ) in assessing levels and change in moderate-vigorous physical activity and sedentary behaviour

Research article

An exploration of Early Childhood Education students’ knowledge and preparation to facilitate physical activity for preschoolers: a cross-sectional study

Research article

Is the association between high strain work and depressive symptoms modified by private life social support: a cohort study of 1,074 Danish employees?

Research article

An exploratory study of the socio-cultural risk influences for cigarette smoking among Southern Nigerian youth

Research article

Knowledge and perceptions of brucellosis in the pastoral communities adjacent to Lake Mburo National Park, Uganda

Research article

Characterizing Influenza surveillance systems performance: application of a Bayesian hierarchical statistical model to Hong Kong surveillance data