Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Methodology

Mapping upper-limb motor performance after stroke - a novel method with utility for individualized motor training

Authors: Orna Rosenthal, Alan M. Wing, Jeremy L. Wyatt, David Punt, R. Chris Miall

Published in: Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Chronic upper limb motor impairment is a common outcome of stroke. Therapeutic training can reduce motor impairment. Recently, a growing interest in evaluating motor training provided by robotic assistive devices has emerged. Robot-assisted therapy is attractive because it provides a means of increasing practice intensity without increasing the workload of physical therapists. However, movements practised through robotic assistive devices are commonly pre-defined and fixed across individuals. More optimal training may result from individualizing the selection of the trained movements based on the individual’s impairment profile. This requires quantitative assessment of the degree of the motor impairment prior to training, in relevant movement tasks. However, standard clinical measures for profiling motor impairment after stroke are often subjective and lack precision. We have developed a novel robot-mediated method for systematic and fine-grained mapping (or profiling) of individual performance across a wide range of planar arm reaching movements. Here we describe and demonstrate this mapping method and its utilization for individualized training. We also present a novel principle for the individualized selection of training movements based on the performance maps.

Methods and Results

To demonstrate the utility of our method we present examples of 2D performance maps produced from the kinetic and kinematics data of two individuals with stroke-related upper limb hemiparesis. The maps outline distinct regions of high motor impairment. The procedure of map-based selection of training movements and the change in motor performance following training is demonstrated for one participant.

Conclusions

The performance mapping method is feasible to produce (online or offline). The 2D maps are easy to interpret and to be utilized for selecting individual performance-based training. Different performance maps can be easily compared within and between individuals, which potentially has diagnostic utility.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Dobkin BH. Impairments, disabilities, and bases for neurological rehabilitation after stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 1997;6(4):221–6.CrossRefPubMed Dobkin BH. Impairments, disabilities, and bases for neurological rehabilitation after stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 1997;6(4):221–6.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Lai SM, Studenski S, Duncan PW, Perera S. Persisting consequences of stroke measured by the Stroke Impact Scale. Stroke. 2002;33(7):1840–4.CrossRefPubMed Lai SM, Studenski S, Duncan PW, Perera S. Persisting consequences of stroke measured by the Stroke Impact Scale. Stroke. 2002;33(7):1840–4.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Lawrence ES, Coshall C, Dundas R, Stewart J, Rudd AG, Howard R, Wolfe CD. Estimates of the prevalence of acute stroke impairments and disability in a multiethnic population. Stroke. 2001;32(6):1279–84.CrossRefPubMed Lawrence ES, Coshall C, Dundas R, Stewart J, Rudd AG, Howard R, Wolfe CD. Estimates of the prevalence of acute stroke impairments and disability in a multiethnic population. Stroke. 2001;32(6):1279–84.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Langhorne P, Coupar F, Pollock A. Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8(8):741–54.CrossRefPubMed Langhorne P, Coupar F, Pollock A. Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8(8):741–54.CrossRefPubMed
5.
6.
go back to reference Pollock A, Farmer SE, Brady MC, Langhorne P, Mead GE, Mehrholz J, van Wijck F: Interventions for improving upper limb function after stroke. In: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. edn.; 2014: CD010820. Pollock A, Farmer SE, Brady MC, Langhorne P, Mead GE, Mehrholz J, van Wijck F: Interventions for improving upper limb function after stroke. In: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. edn.; 2014: CD010820.
7.
go back to reference Van Peppen RP, Kwakkel G, Wood-Dauphinee S, Hendriks HJ, Van der Wees PJ, Dekker J. The impact of physical therapy on functional outcomes after stroke: what's the evidence? Clin Rehabil. 2004;18(8):833–62.CrossRefPubMed Van Peppen RP, Kwakkel G, Wood-Dauphinee S, Hendriks HJ, Van der Wees PJ, Dekker J. The impact of physical therapy on functional outcomes after stroke: what's the evidence? Clin Rehabil. 2004;18(8):833–62.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Twisk JW, Lankhorst GJ, Koetsier JC. Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middle-cerebral-artery stroke: a randomised trial. Lancet. 1999;354(9174):191–6.CrossRefPubMed Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Twisk JW, Lankhorst GJ, Koetsier JC. Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middle-cerebral-artery stroke: a randomised trial. Lancet. 1999;354(9174):191–6.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Lo AC, Guarino PD, Richards LG, Haselkorn JK, Wittenberg GF, Federman DG, Ringer RJ, Wagner TH, Krebs HI, Volpe BT, et al. Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke. 2010;362 Lo AC, Guarino PD, Richards LG, Haselkorn JK, Wittenberg GF, Federman DG, Ringer RJ, Wagner TH, Krebs HI, Volpe BT, et al. Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke. 2010;362
10.
go back to reference Norouzi-Gheidari N, Archambault PS, Fung J. Effects of robot-assisted therapy on stroke rehabilitation in upper limbs: systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2012;49(4):479–96.CrossRefPubMed Norouzi-Gheidari N, Archambault PS, Fung J. Effects of robot-assisted therapy on stroke rehabilitation in upper limbs: systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2012;49(4):479–96.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Winstein C, Wing AW, Whitall J. Motor control and learning principles for rehabilitation of upper limb movements after brain injury. In: Grafman JR, Robertson IH, editors. Handbook of Neuropsychology, vol. 9. 2nd ed. New York: Elsevier Science; 2003. p. 77–137. Winstein C, Wing AW, Whitall J. Motor control and learning principles for rehabilitation of upper limb movements after brain injury. In: Grafman JR, Robertson IH, editors. Handbook of Neuropsychology, vol. 9. 2nd ed. New York: Elsevier Science; 2003. p. 77–137.
12.
go back to reference Lohse KR, Lang CE, Boyd LA. Is more better? Using metadata to explore dose-response relationships in stroke rehabilitation. Stroke. 2014;45(7):2053–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lohse KR, Lang CE, Boyd LA. Is more better? Using metadata to explore dose-response relationships in stroke rehabilitation. Stroke. 2014;45(7):2053–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Lang CE, Lohse KR, Birkenmeier RL. Dose and timing in neurorehabilitation: prescribing motor therapy after stroke. Curr Opin Neurol. 2015;28(6):549–55.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lang CE, Lohse KR, Birkenmeier RL. Dose and timing in neurorehabilitation: prescribing motor therapy after stroke. Curr Opin Neurol. 2015;28(6):549–55.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Han C, Wang Q, Meng PP, Qi MZ. Effects of intensity of arm training on hemiplegic upper extremity motor recovery in stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2013;27(1):75–81.CrossRefPubMed Han C, Wang Q, Meng PP, Qi MZ. Effects of intensity of arm training on hemiplegic upper extremity motor recovery in stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2013;27(1):75–81.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, Krebs HI. Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008;22(2):111–21.CrossRefPubMed Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, Krebs HI. Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008;22(2):111–21.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Krebs HI, Palazzolo JJ, Dipietro L, Volpe BT, Hogan N. Rehabilitation robotics: Performance-based progressive robot-assisted therapy. Auton Robot. 2003;15(1):7–20.CrossRef Krebs HI, Palazzolo JJ, Dipietro L, Volpe BT, Hogan N. Rehabilitation robotics: Performance-based progressive robot-assisted therapy. Auton Robot. 2003;15(1):7–20.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Burgar CG, Lum PS, Scremin AM, Garber SL, Van der Loos HF, Kenney D, Shor P. Robot-assisted upper-limb therapy in acute rehabilitation setting following stroke: Department of Veterans Affairs multisite clinical trial. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2011;48(4):445–58.CrossRefPubMed Burgar CG, Lum PS, Scremin AM, Garber SL, Van der Loos HF, Kenney D, Shor P. Robot-assisted upper-limb therapy in acute rehabilitation setting following stroke: Department of Veterans Affairs multisite clinical trial. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2011;48(4):445–58.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Liao WW, Wu CY, Hsieh YW, Lin KC, Chang WY. Effects of robot-assisted upper limb rehabilitation on daily function and real-world arm activity in patients with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2012;26(2):111–20.CrossRefPubMed Liao WW, Wu CY, Hsieh YW, Lin KC, Chang WY. Effects of robot-assisted upper limb rehabilitation on daily function and real-world arm activity in patients with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2012;26(2):111–20.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Guadagnoli MA, Lee TD. Challenge point: a framework for conceptualizing the effects of various practice conditions in motor learning. J Mot Behav. 2004;36(2):212–24.CrossRefPubMed Guadagnoli MA, Lee TD. Challenge point: a framework for conceptualizing the effects of various practice conditions in motor learning. J Mot Behav. 2004;36(2):212–24.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Alaverdashvili M, Foroud A, Lim DH, Whishaw IQ. Learned baduse limits recovery of skilled reaching for food after forelimb motor cortex stroke in rats: a new analysis of the effect of gestures on success. Behav Brain Res. 2008;188(2):281–90.CrossRefPubMed Alaverdashvili M, Foroud A, Lim DH, Whishaw IQ. Learned baduse limits recovery of skilled reaching for food after forelimb motor cortex stroke in rats: a new analysis of the effect of gestures on success. Behav Brain Res. 2008;188(2):281–90.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Sanger TD. Failure of motor learning for large initial errors. Neural Comput. 2004;16(9):1873–86.CrossRefPubMed Sanger TD. Failure of motor learning for large initial errors. Neural Comput. 2004;16(9):1873–86.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Sergio LE, Hamel-Paquet C, Kalaska JF. Motor cortex neural correlates of output kinematics and kinetics during isometric-force and arm-reaching tasks. J Neurophysiol. 2005;94(4):2353–78.CrossRefPubMed Sergio LE, Hamel-Paquet C, Kalaska JF. Motor cortex neural correlates of output kinematics and kinetics during isometric-force and arm-reaching tasks. J Neurophysiol. 2005;94(4):2353–78.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Kettner RE, Schwartz AB, Georgopoulos AP. Primate motor cortex and free arm movements to visual targets in three-dimensional space. III. Positional gradients and population coding of movement direction from various movement origins. J Neurosci. 1988;8(8):2938–47.PubMed Kettner RE, Schwartz AB, Georgopoulos AP. Primate motor cortex and free arm movements to visual targets in three-dimensional space. III. Positional gradients and population coding of movement direction from various movement origins. J Neurosci. 1988;8(8):2938–47.PubMed
24.
go back to reference Lacquaniti F, Guigon E, Bianchi L, Ferraina S, Caminiti R. Representing spatial information for limb movement: role of area 5 in the monkey. Cereb Cortex. 1995;5(5):391–409.CrossRefPubMed Lacquaniti F, Guigon E, Bianchi L, Ferraina S, Caminiti R. Representing spatial information for limb movement: role of area 5 in the monkey. Cereb Cortex. 1995;5(5):391–409.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Hamel-Paquet C, Sergio LE, Kalaska JF. Parietal area 5 activity does not reflect the differential time-course of motor output kinetics during arm-reaching and isometric-force tasks. J Neurophysiol. 2006;95(6):3353–70.CrossRefPubMed Hamel-Paquet C, Sergio LE, Kalaska JF. Parietal area 5 activity does not reflect the differential time-course of motor output kinetics during arm-reaching and isometric-force tasks. J Neurophysiol. 2006;95(6):3353–70.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Ghez C, Scheidt R, Heijink H. Different learned coordinate frames for planning trajectories and final positions in reaching. J Neurophysiol. 2007;98(6):3614–26.CrossRefPubMed Ghez C, Scheidt R, Heijink H. Different learned coordinate frames for planning trajectories and final positions in reaching. J Neurophysiol. 2007;98(6):3614–26.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Engineer ND, Engineer CT, Reed AC, Pandya PK, Jakkamsetti V, Moucha R, Kilgard MP. Inverted-U function relating cortical plasticity and task difficulty. Neuroscience. 2012;205:81–90.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Engineer ND, Engineer CT, Reed AC, Pandya PK, Jakkamsetti V, Moucha R, Kilgard MP. Inverted-U function relating cortical plasticity and task difficulty. Neuroscience. 2012;205:81–90.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
go back to reference Howard IS, Ingram JN, Wolpert DM. A modular planar robotic manipulandum with end-point torque control. J Neurosci Methods. 2009;181(2):199–211.CrossRefPubMed Howard IS, Ingram JN, Wolpert DM. A modular planar robotic manipulandum with end-point torque control. J Neurosci Methods. 2009;181(2):199–211.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Ferraro M, Palazzolo JJ, Krol J, Krebs HI, Hogan N, Volpe BT. Robot-aided sensorimotor arm training improves outcome in patients with chronic stroke. Neurology. 2003;61(11):1604–7.CrossRefPubMed Ferraro M, Palazzolo JJ, Krol J, Krebs HI, Hogan N, Volpe BT. Robot-aided sensorimotor arm training improves outcome in patients with chronic stroke. Neurology. 2003;61(11):1604–7.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Fasoli SE, Krebs HI, Stein J, Frontera WR, Hughes R, Hogan N. Robotic therapy for chronic motor impairments after stroke: Follow-up results. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(7):1106–11.CrossRefPubMed Fasoli SE, Krebs HI, Stein J, Frontera WR, Hughes R, Hogan N. Robotic therapy for chronic motor impairments after stroke: Follow-up results. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(7):1106–11.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Kamper DG, McKenna-Cole AN, Kahn LE, Reinkensmeyer DJ. Alterations in reaching after stroke and their relation to movement direction and impairment severity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83(5):702–7.CrossRefPubMed Kamper DG, McKenna-Cole AN, Kahn LE, Reinkensmeyer DJ. Alterations in reaching after stroke and their relation to movement direction and impairment severity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83(5):702–7.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Beer RF, Dewald JP, Dawson ML, Rymer WZ. Target-dependent differences between free and constrained arm movements in chronic hemiparesis. Exp Brain Res. 2004;156(4):458–70.CrossRefPubMed Beer RF, Dewald JP, Dawson ML, Rymer WZ. Target-dependent differences between free and constrained arm movements in chronic hemiparesis. Exp Brain Res. 2004;156(4):458–70.CrossRefPubMed
34.
36.
go back to reference Flash T, Hogan N. The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model. J Neurosci. 1985;5(7):1688–703.PubMed Flash T, Hogan N. The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model. J Neurosci. 1985;5(7):1688–703.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Mapping upper-limb motor performance after stroke - a novel method with utility for individualized motor training
Authors
Orna Rosenthal
Alan M. Wing
Jeremy L. Wyatt
David Punt
R. Chris Miall
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1743-0003
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-017-0335-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 1/2017 Go to the issue