Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research

Manual wheelchair downhill stability: an analysis of factors affecting tip probability

Authors: Louise Thomas, Jaimie Borisoff, Carolyn J. Sparrey

Published in: Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

For people who use manual wheelchairs, tips and falls can result in serious injuries including bone fractures, concussions, and traumatic brain injury. We aimed to characterize how wheelchair configuration changes (including on-the-fly adjustments), user variables, and usage conditions affected dynamic tip probability while rolling down a slope and contacting a small block.

Methods

Rigid body dynamic models of a manual wheelchair and test dummy were created using multi-body software (Madymo, TASS International, Livonia, MI), and validated with 189 experiments. Dynamic stability was assessed for a range of seat angles (0 to 20° below horizontal), backrest angles (0 to 20°), rear axle positions (0 to 20 cm from base of backrest), ground slopes (0 to 15°), bump heights (0 to 4 cm), wheelchair speeds (0 to 20 km/hr), user masses (50 to 115 kg), and user positions (0 to 10 cm from base of backrest). The tip classifications (forward tip, backward tip, rolled over bump, or stopped by bump) were investigated using a nominal logistic regression analysis.

Results

Faster wheelchair speeds significantly increased the probability of tipping either forward or backward rather than stopping, but also increased the probability of rolling over the bump (p < 0.001). When the rear axle was positioned forward, this increased the risk of a backward tip compared to all other outcomes (p < 0.001), but also reduced the probability of being stopped by the bump (p < 0.001 compared to forward tip, p < 0.02 compared to rolling over). Reclining the backrest reduced the probability of a forward tip compared to all other outcomes (p < 0.001), and lowering the seat increased the probability of either rolling over the bump or tipping backwards rather than tipping forward (p < 0.001). In general, the wheelchair rolled over bumps < 1.5 cm, and forwards tipping was avoided by reducing the speed to 1 km/hr.

Conclusions

The probability of forward tipping, corresponding to the greatest risk of injury, was significantly reduced for decreased speeds, smaller bumps, a reclined backrest, and a lower rear seat height. For wheelchairs with dynamic seating adjustability, when travelling downhill, on-the-fly adjustments to the seat or backrest can increase the likelihood of safely rolling over a bump.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Van Drongelen A, Roszek B, Hilbers-Modderman E, Kallewaard M, Wassenaar C. Wheelchair incidents. In: RIVM repos; 2002. Van Drongelen A, Roszek B, Hilbers-Modderman E, Kallewaard M, Wassenaar C. Wheelchair incidents. In: RIVM repos; 2002.
6.
go back to reference ISO - International Organization for Standardization. ISO 7176-1: 2014 Wheelchairs - part 1 determination of static stability. 2014. ISO - International Organization for Standardization. ISO 7176-1: 2014 Wheelchairs - part 1 determination of static stability. 2014.
7.
go back to reference Kirby RL, McLean AD, Eastwood BJ. Influence of caster diameter on the static and dynamic forward stability of occupied wheelchairs. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992;73:73–7.CrossRef Kirby RL, McLean AD, Eastwood BJ. Influence of caster diameter on the static and dynamic forward stability of occupied wheelchairs. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992;73:73–7.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Majaess GG, Kirby RL, Ackroyd-Stolarz SA, Charlebois PB. Influence of seat position on the static and dynamic forward and rear stability of occupied wheelchairs. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;74:977–82.PubMed Majaess GG, Kirby RL, Ackroyd-Stolarz SA, Charlebois PB. Influence of seat position on the static and dynamic forward and rear stability of occupied wheelchairs. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;74:977–82.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Silva MPT, Ambrosio JAC, Pereira MS. Biomechanical model with joint resistance for impact simulation. Multibody Syst Dyn. 1997;1:65–84.CrossRef Silva MPT, Ambrosio JAC, Pereira MS. Biomechanical model with joint resistance for impact simulation. Multibody Syst Dyn. 1997;1:65–84.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Schiehlen W. Multibody system dynamics: roots and perspectives. Multibody Syst Dyn. 1997;1:149–88.CrossRef Schiehlen W. Multibody system dynamics: roots and perspectives. Multibody Syst Dyn. 1997;1:149–88.CrossRef
12.
13.
go back to reference Kirby RL, Smith C, Parker K, MacLeod D, McAllister M. Rushton P., editors. In: Wheelchair skills training program (WSTP) manual; 2016.CrossRef Kirby RL, Smith C, Parker K, MacLeod D, McAllister M. Rushton P., editors. In: Wheelchair skills training program (WSTP) manual; 2016.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Brubaker CE. Wheelchair prescription: an analysis of factors that affect mobility and performance. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1986;23:19–26.PubMed Brubaker CE. Wheelchair prescription: an analysis of factors that affect mobility and performance. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1986;23:19–26.PubMed
17.
go back to reference Thomas L, Borisoff J, Sparrey C. Quantifying the effects of on-the-Fly changes of seating configuration on the stability of a manual wheelchair. In: The 39th annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society; 2017. Thomas L, Borisoff J, Sparrey C. Quantifying the effects of on-the-Fly changes of seating configuration on the stability of a manual wheelchair. In: The 39th annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society; 2017.
18.
go back to reference ISO - International Organization for Standardization. ISO 7176-11: 2012 Wheelchairs - part 11 test dummies. 2012. ISO - International Organization for Standardization. ISO 7176-11: 2012 Wheelchairs - part 11 test dummies. 2012.
19.
go back to reference Bertocci GE, Esteireiro J, Cooper RA, Young TM, Thomas C. Testing and evaluation of wheelchair caster assemblies subjected to dynamic crash loading. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1999;36:32–41.PubMed Bertocci GE, Esteireiro J, Cooper RA, Young TM, Thomas C. Testing and evaluation of wheelchair caster assemblies subjected to dynamic crash loading. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1999;36:32–41.PubMed
20.
go back to reference US Department of Justice. ADA Standards for Accessible Design. 2010. US Department of Justice. ADA Standards for Accessible Design. 2010.
22.
go back to reference Gaal RP, Rebholtz N, Hotchkiss RD, Pfaelzer PF. Wheelchair rider injuries: causes and consequences for wheelchair design and selection. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1996;34:58–71. Gaal RP, Rebholtz N, Hotchkiss RD, Pfaelzer PF. Wheelchair rider injuries: causes and consequences for wheelchair design and selection. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1996;34:58–71.
23.
go back to reference Kirby RL, Atkinson SM, MacKay EA. Static and dynamic forward stability of occupied wheelchairs: influence of elevated footrests and forward stabilizers. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1988;70:681–6. Kirby RL, Atkinson SM, MacKay EA. Static and dynamic forward stability of occupied wheelchairs: influence of elevated footrests and forward stabilizers. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1988;70:681–6.
24.
go back to reference Medola FO, Elui VMC, Santana C d S, Fortulan CA. Aspects of manual wheelchair configuration affecting mobility: a review. J Phys Ther Sci. 2014;26:313–8.CrossRef Medola FO, Elui VMC, Santana C d S, Fortulan CA. Aspects of manual wheelchair configuration affecting mobility: a review. J Phys Ther Sci. 2014;26:313–8.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Kirby RL, Sampson MT, Thoren FA, MacLeod DA. Wheelchair stability: effect of body position. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1995;32:367–72.PubMed Kirby RL, Sampson MT, Thoren FA, MacLeod DA. Wheelchair stability: effect of body position. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1995;32:367–72.PubMed
30.
go back to reference Thomas L, Borisoff J, Sparrey C. Defining the stability limits of a manual wheelchair with adjustable seat and backrest. In: Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive Technology Society of North America Conference. New Orleans, LA; 2017. Thomas L, Borisoff J, Sparrey C. Defining the stability limits of a manual wheelchair with adjustable seat and backrest. In: Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive Technology Society of North America Conference. New Orleans, LA; 2017.
31.
go back to reference Sauret C, Vaslin P, Lavaste F, de Saint Remy N, Cid M. Effects of user’s actions on rolling resistance and wheelchair stability during handrim wheelchair propulsion in the field. Med Eng Phys. 2013;35:289–97.CrossRef Sauret C, Vaslin P, Lavaste F, de Saint Remy N, Cid M. Effects of user’s actions on rolling resistance and wheelchair stability during handrim wheelchair propulsion in the field. Med Eng Phys. 2013;35:289–97.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Arva J, Schmeler M, Lange M, Lipka D, Rosen L. RESNA position on the application of seat-elevating devices for wheelchair users. Assist Technol. 2009;21:69–72.CrossRef Arva J, Schmeler M, Lange M, Lipka D, Rosen L. RESNA position on the application of seat-elevating devices for wheelchair users. Assist Technol. 2009;21:69–72.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Manual wheelchair downhill stability: an analysis of factors affecting tip probability
Authors
Louise Thomas
Jaimie Borisoff
Carolyn J. Sparrey
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1743-0003
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-018-0450-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 1/2018 Go to the issue