Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 3/2017

01-06-2017 | Invited Mini Review

Management of Reproductive Tract Anomalies

Authors: Garima Kachhawa, Alka Kriplani

Published in: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India | Issue 3/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Reproductive tract malformations are rare in general population but are commonly encountered in women with infertility and recurrent pregnancy loss. Obstructive anomalies present around menarche causing extreme pain and adversely affecting the life of the young women. The clinical signs, symptoms and reproductive problems depend on the anatomic distortions, which may range from congenital absence of the vagina to complex defects in the lateral and vertical fusion of the Müllerian duct system. Identification of symptoms and timely diagnosis are an important key to the management of these defects. Although MRI being gold standard in delineating uterine anatomy, recent advances in imaging technology, specifically 3-dimensional ultrasound, achieve accurate diagnosis. Surgical management depend on the type of anomaly, its complexity and the proper embryological interpretation of the anomaly and involves multiple specialties; thus, patients should be referred to centres with experience in the treatment of complex genital malformations.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Christopoulos P, Fotopoulou G, Gazouli M, et al. Genetic basis for the development of Mullerian abnormalities: a review of current evidence. Eur J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;5:7–12. Christopoulos P, Fotopoulou G, Gazouli M, et al. Genetic basis for the development of Mullerian abnormalities: a review of current evidence. Eur J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;5:7–12.
2.
go back to reference Acie´n P, Acie´n MI. The history of female genital tract malformation classifications and proposal of an updated system. Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17(5):693–705.CrossRef Acie´n P, Acie´n MI. The history of female genital tract malformation classifications and proposal of an updated system. Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17(5):693–705.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Vallerie A, Breech L. Update in Mullerian anomalies: diagnosis, management, and outcomes. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2010;22:381–7.CrossRefPubMed Vallerie A, Breech L. Update in Mullerian anomalies: diagnosis, management, and outcomes. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2010;22:381–7.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Saravelos SH, Cocksedge KA, Li TC. Prevalence and diagnosis of congenital uterine anomalies in women with reproductive failure: a critical appraisal. Hum Reprod Update. 2008;14(5):415–29.CrossRefPubMed Saravelos SH, Cocksedge KA, Li TC. Prevalence and diagnosis of congenital uterine anomalies in women with reproductive failure: a critical appraisal. Hum Reprod Update. 2008;14(5):415–29.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Chan YY, Jayaprakasan K, Zamora J, et al. The prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies in unselected and high-risk populations: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17:761–71.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chan YY, Jayaprakasan K, Zamora J, et al. The prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies in unselected and high-risk populations: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17:761–71.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Grimbizis GF, Gordts G, Di Spiezio SA, et al. The ESHRE/ESGE consensus on the classification of female genital tract congenital malformations. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:2032–44.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Grimbizis GF, Gordts G, Di Spiezio SA, et al. The ESHRE/ESGE consensus on the classification of female genital tract congenital malformations. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:2032–44.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Grimbizis GF, Gordts S, Di Spiezio Sardo A, et al. The ESHRE-ESGE consensus on the classification of female genital tract congenital anomalies. Gynecol Surg. 2013;10:199–212.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Grimbizis GF, Gordts S, Di Spiezio Sardo A, et al. The ESHRE-ESGE consensus on the classification of female genital tract congenital anomalies. Gynecol Surg. 2013;10:199–212.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Bocca S, Abuhamad A. Use of 3-dimensional sonography to assess uterine anomalies. J Ultrasound Med. 2013;32:1–6.CrossRefPubMed Bocca S, Abuhamad A. Use of 3-dimensional sonography to assess uterine anomalies. J Ultrasound Med. 2013;32:1–6.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Berger A, Batzer F, Lev-Toaff A, et al. Diagnostic imaging modalities for mullerian anomalies: the case for a new gold standard. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014;21:335–45.CrossRefPubMed Berger A, Batzer F, Lev-Toaff A, et al. Diagnostic imaging modalities for mullerian anomalies: the case for a new gold standard. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014;21:335–45.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Ercan CM, Karasahin KE, Alanbay I, et al. Imperforate hymen causing hematocolpos and acute urinary retention in an adolescent girl. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;50(1):118–20.CrossRefPubMed Ercan CM, Karasahin KE, Alanbay I, et al. Imperforate hymen causing hematocolpos and acute urinary retention in an adolescent girl. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;50(1):118–20.CrossRefPubMed
12.
13.
go back to reference van Bijsterveldt C, Willemsen W. Treatment of patients with a congenital transversal vaginal septum or a partial aplasia of the vagina. The vaginal pull-through versus the push-through technique. JPAG. 2009;22:157–61. van Bijsterveldt C, Willemsen W. Treatment of patients with a congenital transversal vaginal septum or a partial aplasia of the vagina. The vaginal pull-through versus the push-through technique. JPAG. 2009;22:157–61.
14.
go back to reference Acien P, Acien M, Sanchez-Ferrer ML. Mullerian anomalies ‘‘without a classification’’: from the didelphys-unicollis uterus to the bicervical uterus with or without septate vagina. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:2369–75.CrossRefPubMed Acien P, Acien M, Sanchez-Ferrer ML. Mullerian anomalies ‘‘without a classification’’: from the didelphys-unicollis uterus to the bicervical uterus with or without septate vagina. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:2369–75.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Smith NA, Laufer MR. Obstructed hemivagina and ipsilateral renal anomaly (OHVIRA) syndrome: management and follow-up. Fertil Steril. 2007;87:918–22.CrossRefPubMed Smith NA, Laufer MR. Obstructed hemivagina and ipsilateral renal anomaly (OHVIRA) syndrome: management and follow-up. Fertil Steril. 2007;87:918–22.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Quint EH, Mccarthy JD, Smith YR. Vaginal surgery for congenital anomalies. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2010;53(1):115–24.CrossRefPubMed Quint EH, Mccarthy JD, Smith YR. Vaginal surgery for congenital anomalies. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2010;53(1):115–24.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Ismail-Pratt IS, Bikoo M, Liao LM, et al. Normalization of the vagina by dilator treatment alone in complete androgen insensitivity syndrome and Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser Syndrome. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:2020–4.CrossRefPubMed Ismail-Pratt IS, Bikoo M, Liao LM, et al. Normalization of the vagina by dilator treatment alone in complete androgen insensitivity syndrome and Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser Syndrome. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:2020–4.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Giannesi Α, Marchiole P, Benchaib M, et al. Sexuality after laparoscopic Davydov in patients affected by congenital complete vaginal agenesis associated with uterine agenesis or hypoplasia. Hum Reprod. 2005;10:2954–7.CrossRef Giannesi Α, Marchiole P, Benchaib M, et al. Sexuality after laparoscopic Davydov in patients affected by congenital complete vaginal agenesis associated with uterine agenesis or hypoplasia. Hum Reprod. 2005;10:2954–7.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Brucker SY, Gegusch M, Zubke W, et al. Neovagina creation in vaginal agenesis: development of a new laparoscopic Vecchietti-based procedure and optimized instruments in a prospective comparative interventional study in 101 patients. Fertil Steril. 2008;90:1940–52.CrossRefPubMed Brucker SY, Gegusch M, Zubke W, et al. Neovagina creation in vaginal agenesis: development of a new laparoscopic Vecchietti-based procedure and optimized instruments in a prospective comparative interventional study in 101 patients. Fertil Steril. 2008;90:1940–52.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Daraï E, Ballester M, Bazot M, et al. Laparoscopic-assisted uterovaginal anastomosis for uterine cervix atresia with partial vaginal aplasia. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2009;16:92–4.CrossRefPubMed Daraï E, Ballester M, Bazot M, et al. Laparoscopic-assisted uterovaginal anastomosis for uterine cervix atresia with partial vaginal aplasia. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2009;16:92–4.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Nguyen DH, Lee CL, Wu KY, et al. A novel approach to cervical reconstruction using vaginal mucosa-lined polytetrafluoroethylene graft in congenital agenesis of the cervix. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:2433.e5–8.CrossRef Nguyen DH, Lee CL, Wu KY, et al. A novel approach to cervical reconstruction using vaginal mucosa-lined polytetrafluoroethylene graft in congenital agenesis of the cervix. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:2433.e5–8.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Kriplani A, Kachhawa G, Awasthi D, et al. Laparoscopic-assisted uterovaginal anastomosis in congenital atresia of uterine cervix: follow-up study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2012;19(4):477–84.CrossRefPubMed Kriplani A, Kachhawa G, Awasthi D, et al. Laparoscopic-assisted uterovaginal anastomosis in congenital atresia of uterine cervix: follow-up study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2012;19(4):477–84.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Venetis CA, Papadopoulos SP, Campo R, et al. Clinical implications of congenital uterine anomalies: a meta-analysis of comparative studies. Reprod BioMed Online. 2014;29:665–83.CrossRefPubMed Venetis CA, Papadopoulos SP, Campo R, et al. Clinical implications of congenital uterine anomalies: a meta-analysis of comparative studies. Reprod BioMed Online. 2014;29:665–83.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Hua M, Odibo A, Longman R, et al. Congenital uterine anomalies and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;204:S334–5.CrossRef Hua M, Odibo A, Longman R, et al. Congenital uterine anomalies and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;204:S334–5.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Pang LH, Li MJ, Li M, et al. Not every subseptate uterus requires surgical correction to reduce poor reproductive outcome. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2011;115:260–3.CrossRef Pang LH, Li MJ, Li M, et al. Not every subseptate uterus requires surgical correction to reduce poor reproductive outcome. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2011;115:260–3.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Management of Reproductive Tract Anomalies
Authors
Garima Kachhawa
Alka Kriplani
Publication date
01-06-2017
Publisher
Springer India
Published in
The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India / Issue 3/2017
Print ISSN: 0971-9202
Electronic ISSN: 0975-6434
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-017-1001-8

Other articles of this Issue 3/2017

The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 3/2017 Go to the issue