Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 11/2010

01-11-2010

Management of esophageal perforations

Authors: Sven Christian Schmidt, Stefan Strauch, Thomas Rösch, Wilfried Veltzke-Schlieker, Sven Jonas, Johann Pratschke, Henning Weidemann, Peter Neuhaus, Guido Schumacher

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 11/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Esophageal perforations remain a life-threatening event requiring rapid diagnosis and treatment. Surgical repair and interventional endoscopic or conservative treatment are the common treatment methods.

Methods

From 1998 to 2006, the authors retrospectively analyzed 62 patients treated for esophageal perforation. Data were evaluated for cause of perforation, symptoms, therapeutic regimen, complications, and mortality.

Results

The causes of perforation were iatrogenic or suicidal (n = 33) or spontaneous (n = 29). In the first group, the causes were dilation of stenosis (n = 16), endoscopy (n = 7), transesophageal echography (n = 4), ingestion of acid or leach (n = 2), intubation (n = 2), ingestion of a foreign body (n = 1), and migration of a screw after osteosynthesis (n = 1). The spontaneous perforations were caused by tumors (n = 19), Boerhaave syndrome (n = 6), unknown origin (n = 3), and Barrett’s ulcer (n = 1). The most frequent symptoms were dysphagia (n = 50), pain (n = 35), fever (n = 24), and vomiting (n = 18). At the time of perforation, 28 patients presented with cancer. Of these 28 patients, 18 had esophageal cancer. The treatment included surgery (n = 32), which consisted of double-layer suture (n = 26) or esophageal resection (n = 6). A total of 30 patients were treated interventionally with a stent (n = 21), clips (n = 1), or without further measures (n = 8). The patients in the surgery group presented with severe primary and postoperative general conditions including renal failure (25%), respiratory insufficiency (65.5%), and need for catecholamines (62.5%). This multiorgan involvement was found only occasionally in the conservative group. The overall hospital mortality rate was 14.5%, involving 9 patients (5 in the surgery group and 4 in the conservative group). Early treatment led to better survival than late treatment with a delay exceeding 24 h.

Conclusion

The treatment method still must be chosen on an individual basis. It appears that surgical treatment is necessary in cases of severe general conditions. The data from this study show that surgical repair and conservative treatment may be used successfully. The best outcome was obtained after immediate treatment.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Jones WG II, Ginsberg RJ (1992) Esophageal perforation: a continuing challenge. Ann Thorac Surg 53:534–543CrossRefPubMed Jones WG II, Ginsberg RJ (1992) Esophageal perforation: a continuing challenge. Ann Thorac Surg 53:534–543CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Brinster CJ, Singhal S, Lee L, Marshall MB, Kaiser LR, Kucharczuk JC (2004) Evolving options in the management of esophageal perforation. Ann Thorac Surg 77:1475–1483CrossRefPubMed Brinster CJ, Singhal S, Lee L, Marshall MB, Kaiser LR, Kucharczuk JC (2004) Evolving options in the management of esophageal perforation. Ann Thorac Surg 77:1475–1483CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Kollmar O, Lindemann W, Richter S, Steffen I, Pistorius G, Schilling MK (2003) Boerhaave’s syndrome: primary repair vs esophageal resection: case reports and metaanalysis of the literature. J Gastrointest Surg 7:726–734CrossRefPubMed Kollmar O, Lindemann W, Richter S, Steffen I, Pistorius G, Schilling MK (2003) Boerhaave’s syndrome: primary repair vs esophageal resection: case reports and metaanalysis of the literature. J Gastrointest Surg 7:726–734CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Okten I, Cangir AK, Ozdemir N, Kavukcu S, Akay H, Yavuzer S (2001) Management of esophageal perforation. Surg Today 31:36–39CrossRefPubMed Okten I, Cangir AK, Ozdemir N, Kavukcu S, Akay H, Yavuzer S (2001) Management of esophageal perforation. Surg Today 31:36–39CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Vogel SB, Rout WR, Martin TD, Abbitt PL (2005) Esophageal perforation in adults: aggressive conservative treatment lowers morbidity and mortality. Ann Surg 241:1016–1021 discussion 1021–1013CrossRefPubMed Vogel SB, Rout WR, Martin TD, Abbitt PL (2005) Esophageal perforation in adults: aggressive conservative treatment lowers morbidity and mortality. Ann Surg 241:1016–1021 discussion 1021–1013CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Leers JM, Vivaldi C, Schafer H, Bludau M, Brabender J, Lurje G, Herbold T, Holscher AH, Metzger R (2009) Endoscopic therapy for esophageal perforation or anastomotic leak with a self-expandable metallic stent. Surg Endosc 23:2258–2262CrossRefPubMed Leers JM, Vivaldi C, Schafer H, Bludau M, Brabender J, Lurje G, Herbold T, Holscher AH, Metzger R (2009) Endoscopic therapy for esophageal perforation or anastomotic leak with a self-expandable metallic stent. Surg Endosc 23:2258–2262CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Freeman RK, Van Woerkom JM, Ascioti AJ (2007) Esophageal stent placement for the treatment of iatrogenic intrathoracic esophageal perforation. Ann Thorac Surg 83:2003–2007 discussion 2007–2008CrossRefPubMed Freeman RK, Van Woerkom JM, Ascioti AJ (2007) Esophageal stent placement for the treatment of iatrogenic intrathoracic esophageal perforation. Ann Thorac Surg 83:2003–2007 discussion 2007–2008CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Miller RE, Bossart PW, Tiszenkel HI (1987) Surgical management of complications of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and esophageal dilation including laser therapy. Am Surg 53:667–671PubMed Miller RE, Bossart PW, Tiszenkel HI (1987) Surgical management of complications of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and esophageal dilation including laser therapy. Am Surg 53:667–671PubMed
10.
go back to reference Wu JT, Mattox KL, Wall MJ Jr (2007) Esophageal perforations: new perspectives and treatment paradigms. J Trauma 63:1173–1184CrossRefPubMed Wu JT, Mattox KL, Wall MJ Jr (2007) Esophageal perforations: new perspectives and treatment paradigms. J Trauma 63:1173–1184CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Habr-Gama A, Waye JD (1989) Complications and hazards of gastrointestinal endoscopy. World J Surg 13:193–201CrossRefPubMed Habr-Gama A, Waye JD (1989) Complications and hazards of gastrointestinal endoscopy. World J Surg 13:193–201CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Meyer JP, Barrett JA, Schuler JJ, Flanigan DP (1987) Mandatory vs selective exploration for penetrating neck trauma: a prospective assessment. Arch Surg 122:592–597PubMed Meyer JP, Barrett JA, Schuler JJ, Flanigan DP (1987) Mandatory vs selective exploration for penetrating neck trauma: a prospective assessment. Arch Surg 122:592–597PubMed
13.
go back to reference Gimenez A, Franquet T, Erasmus JJ, Martinez S, Estrada P (2002) Thoracic complications of esophageal disorders. Radiographics 22(Spec no.):S247–S258PubMed Gimenez A, Franquet T, Erasmus JJ, Martinez S, Estrada P (2002) Thoracic complications of esophageal disorders. Radiographics 22(Spec no.):S247–S258PubMed
14.
go back to reference Srinivasan R, Haywood T, Horwitz B, Buckman RF, Fisher RS, Krevsky B (2000) Role of flexible endoscopy in the evaluation of possible esophageal trauma after penetrating injuries. Am J Gastroenterol 95:1725–1729CrossRefPubMed Srinivasan R, Haywood T, Horwitz B, Buckman RF, Fisher RS, Krevsky B (2000) Role of flexible endoscopy in the evaluation of possible esophageal trauma after penetrating injuries. Am J Gastroenterol 95:1725–1729CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Eroglu A, Can Kurkcuogu I, Karaoganogu N, Tekinbas C, Yimaz O, Basog M (2004) Esophageal perforation: the importance of early diagnosis and primary repair. Dis Esophagus 17:91–94CrossRefPubMed Eroglu A, Can Kurkcuogu I, Karaoganogu N, Tekinbas C, Yimaz O, Basog M (2004) Esophageal perforation: the importance of early diagnosis and primary repair. Dis Esophagus 17:91–94CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Bufkin BL, Miller JI Jr, Mansour KA (1996) Esophageal perforation: emphasis on management. Ann Thorac Surg 61:1447–1451 discussion 1451–1442CrossRefPubMed Bufkin BL, Miller JI Jr, Mansour KA (1996) Esophageal perforation: emphasis on management. Ann Thorac Surg 61:1447–1451 discussion 1451–1442CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Salo JA, Isolauri JO, Heikkila LJ, Markkula HT, Heikkinen LO, Kivilaakso EO, Mattila SP (1993) Management of delayed esophageal perforation with mediastinal sepsis. Esophagectomy or primary repair? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 106:1088–1091PubMed Salo JA, Isolauri JO, Heikkila LJ, Markkula HT, Heikkinen LO, Kivilaakso EO, Mattila SP (1993) Management of delayed esophageal perforation with mediastinal sepsis. Esophagectomy or primary repair? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 106:1088–1091PubMed
18.
go back to reference Bladergroen MR, Lowe JE, Postlethwait RW (1986) Diagnosis and recommended management of esophageal perforation and rupture. Ann Thorac Surg 42:235–239CrossRefPubMed Bladergroen MR, Lowe JE, Postlethwait RW (1986) Diagnosis and recommended management of esophageal perforation and rupture. Ann Thorac Surg 42:235–239CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Kim-Deobald J, Kozarek RA (1992) Esophageal perforation: an 8-year review of a multispecialty clinic’s experience. Am J Gastroenterol 87:1112–1119PubMed Kim-Deobald J, Kozarek RA (1992) Esophageal perforation: an 8-year review of a multispecialty clinic’s experience. Am J Gastroenterol 87:1112–1119PubMed
Metadata
Title
Management of esophageal perforations
Authors
Sven Christian Schmidt
Stefan Strauch
Thomas Rösch
Wilfried Veltzke-Schlieker
Sven Jonas
Johann Pratschke
Henning Weidemann
Peter Neuhaus
Guido Schumacher
Publication date
01-11-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 11/2010
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1054-6

Other articles of this Issue 11/2010

Surgical Endoscopy 11/2010 Go to the issue