Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research article

Managed care and inpatient mortality in adults: effect of primary payer

Authors: Anika L. Hines, Susan O. Raetzman, Marguerite L. Barrett, Ernest Moy, Roxanne M. Andrews

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Because managed care is increasingly prevalent in health care finance and delivery, it is important to ascertain its effects on health care quality relative to that of fee-for-service plans. Some stakeholders are concerned that basing gatekeeping, provider selection, and utilization management on cost may lower quality of care. To date, research on this topic has been inconclusive, largely because of variation in research methods and covariates. Patient age has been the only consistently evaluated outcome predictor. This study provides a comprehensive assessment of the association between managed care and inpatient mortality for Medicare and privately insured patients.

Methods

A cross-sectional design was used to examine the association between managed care and inpatient mortality for four common inpatient conditions. Data from the 2009 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project State Inpatient Databases for 11 states were linked to data from the American Hospital Association Annual Survey Database. Hospital discharges were categorized as managed care or fee for service. A phased approach to multivariate logistic modeling examined the likelihood of inpatient mortality when adjusting for individual patient and hospital characteristics and for county fixed effects.

Results

Results showed different effects of managed care for Medicare and privately insured patients. Privately insured patients in managed care had an advantage over their fee-for-service counterparts in inpatient mortality for acute myocardial infarction, stroke, pneumonia, and congestive heart failure; no such advantage was found for the Medicare managed care population. To the extent that the study showed a protective effect of privately insured managed care, it was driven by individuals aged 65 years and older, who had consistently better outcomes than their non-managed care counterparts.

Conclusions

Privately insured patients in managed care plans, especially older adults, had better outcomes than those in fee-for-service plans. Patients in Medicare managed care had outcomes similar to those in Medicare FFS. Additional research is needed to understand the role of patient selection, hospital quality, and differences among county populations in the decreased odds of inpatient mortality among patients in private managed care and to determine why this result does not hold for Medicare.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
4.
go back to reference Carlisle DM, Siu AL, Keeler EB, McGlynn EA, Kahn KL, Rubenstein LV, et al. HMO versus fee-for-service care of older persons with acute myocardial infarction. Am J Public Health. 1992;82:1626–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Carlisle DM, Siu AL, Keeler EB, McGlynn EA, Kahn KL, Rubenstein LV, et al. HMO versus fee-for-service care of older persons with acute myocardial infarction. Am J Public Health. 1992;82:1626–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Smith MA, Frytak JR, Liou J, Finch MD. Rehospitalization and survival for stroke patients in managed care and traditional medicare plans. Med Care. 2005;43:902–10.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Smith MA, Frytak JR, Liou J, Finch MD. Rehospitalization and survival for stroke patients in managed care and traditional medicare plans. Med Care. 2005;43:902–10.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Angus DC, Linde-Zwirble WT, Sirio CA, Rotondi AJ, Chelluri L, Newbold 3rd RC, et al. The effect of managed care on ICU length of stay: implications for medicare. JAMA. 1996;276:1075–82.CrossRefPubMed Angus DC, Linde-Zwirble WT, Sirio CA, Rotondi AJ, Chelluri L, Newbold 3rd RC, et al. The effect of managed care on ICU length of stay: implications for medicare. JAMA. 1996;276:1075–82.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Schnitzler MA, Lambert DL, Mundy LM, Woodward RS. Variations in healthcare measures by insurance status for patients receiving ventilator support. Clin Perform Qual Health Care. 1998;6:17–22.PubMed Schnitzler MA, Lambert DL, Mundy LM, Woodward RS. Variations in healthcare measures by insurance status for patients receiving ventilator support. Clin Perform Qual Health Care. 1998;6:17–22.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Bennett KM, Scarborough JE, Pappas TN, Kepler TB. Patient socioeconomic status is an independent predictor of operative mortality. Ann Surg. 2010;252:552–7.PubMed Bennett KM, Scarborough JE, Pappas TN, Kepler TB. Patient socioeconomic status is an independent predictor of operative mortality. Ann Surg. 2010;252:552–7.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Ingram DD, Franco SJ. NCHS urban–rural classification scheme for counties. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat. 2012;2(154):1–65. Ingram DD, Franco SJ. NCHS urban–rural classification scheme for counties. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat. 2012;2(154):1–65.
11.
go back to reference Dowd B, Maciejewski ML, O’Connor H, Riley G, Geng Y. Health plan enrollment and mortality in the medicare program. Health Econ. 2011;20:645–59.CrossRefPubMed Dowd B, Maciejewski ML, O’Connor H, Riley G, Geng Y. Health plan enrollment and mortality in the medicare program. Health Econ. 2011;20:645–59.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Friedman B, Jiang HJ. Do medicare advantage enrollees tend to be admitted to hospitals with better or worse outcomes compared with fee-for-service enrollees? Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2010;10:171–85.CrossRefPubMed Friedman B, Jiang HJ. Do medicare advantage enrollees tend to be admitted to hospitals with better or worse outcomes compared with fee-for-service enrollees? Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2010;10:171–85.CrossRefPubMed
14.
15.
go back to reference Maeng DD, Martsolf GR. Comparing patient outcomes across payer types: implications for using hospital discharge records to assess quality. Health Serv Res. 2011;46:1720–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Maeng DD, Martsolf GR. Comparing patient outcomes across payer types: implications for using hospital discharge records to assess quality. Health Serv Res. 2011;46:1720–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Managed care and inpatient mortality in adults: effect of primary payer
Authors
Anika L. Hines
Susan O. Raetzman
Marguerite L. Barrett
Ernest Moy
Roxanne M. Andrews
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2062-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

BMC Health Services Research 1/2017 Go to the issue