Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Children's Orthopaedics 3/2016

Open Access 01-06-2016 | Original Clinical Article

Malunion of the distal radius in children: accurate prediction of the expected remodeling

Authors: J. A. van der Sluijs, J. L. Bron

Published in: Journal of Children's Orthopaedics | Issue 3/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Malunions of fractures in children have a natural tendency to remodel. However, quantitative data of this well-known process are scarce. The extent of the correction depends inter alia on the type of bone and the location of the deformity and growth remaining. The aim of this study was to quantify the remodeling process of distal radius malunions in children to allow better future prediction.

Methods

Data were derived from two published patient series. Analysis included 63 malunions of distal radius fractures in 62 children (38 boys), with a mean age of 8.5 years (range 2–14.5 years).

Results

The mean initial dorsovolar angulation was 25º [standard deviation (SD) 7.8°], remodeling time 22 (SD 18) months, and angulation at follow-up 6.7° (SD 5.8°). Based on these findings, the remodeling process can be described as an exponential function with angulation (A 0) as a factor and the remodeling time (RT) as a negative exponent of e (R 2 = 0.47). The function allows accurate prediction of the expected correction in over 76 % of the malunions. From this model, a formula was derived for calculation of the time needed for complete remodeling, but this formula lacked precision when compared to findings in the literature and needs to be validated.

Conclusions

The remodeling of distal radius malunions can be described as an exponential function with starting speed dependent on the initial angulation. The current model proves to be more accurate than models described previously in the literature. These findings allow for better patient information and optimal planning of eventual surgical intervention. The postulated model could serve as a basis for the description of correction of other malunions by adaptation of the coefficients in this model.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Do TT, Strub WM, Foad SL, Mehlman CT, Crawford AH (2003) Reduction versus remodeling in pediatric distal forearm fractures: a preliminary cost analysis. J Pediatr Orthop B 12(2):109–115PubMed Do TT, Strub WM, Foad SL, Mehlman CT, Crawford AH (2003) Reduction versus remodeling in pediatric distal forearm fractures: a preliminary cost analysis. J Pediatr Orthop B 12(2):109–115PubMed
2.
go back to reference Johari AN, Sinha M (1999) Remodeling of forearm fractures in children. J Pediatr Orthop B 8:84–87PubMed Johari AN, Sinha M (1999) Remodeling of forearm fractures in children. J Pediatr Orthop B 8:84–87PubMed
4.
go back to reference Gandhi RK, Wilson P, Mason Brown JJ, Macleod W (1962) Spontaneous correction of deformity following fractures of the forearm in children. Br J Surg 50:5–10CrossRefPubMed Gandhi RK, Wilson P, Mason Brown JJ, Macleod W (1962) Spontaneous correction of deformity following fractures of the forearm in children. Br J Surg 50:5–10CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Qairul IH, Kareem BA, Tan AB, Harwant S (2001) Early remodeling in children’s forearm fractures. Med J Malaysia 56 Suppl D:34–37PubMed Qairul IH, Kareem BA, Tan AB, Harwant S (2001) Early remodeling in children’s forearm fractures. Med J Malaysia 56 Suppl D:34–37PubMed
8.
go back to reference Hansen BA, Greiff J, Bergmann F (1976) Fractures of the tibia in children. Acta Orthop Scand 47:448–453CrossRefPubMed Hansen BA, Greiff J, Bergmann F (1976) Fractures of the tibia in children. Acta Orthop Scand 47:448–453CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Malunion of the distal radius in children: accurate prediction of the expected remodeling
Authors
J. A. van der Sluijs
J. L. Bron
Publication date
01-06-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Journal of Children's Orthopaedics / Issue 3/2016
Print ISSN: 1863-2521
Electronic ISSN: 1863-2548
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11832-016-0741-9

Other articles of this Issue 3/2016

Journal of Children's Orthopaedics 3/2016 Go to the issue