Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Supportive Care in Cancer
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 2/2013

01-02-2013 | Original Article

Male coping processes as demonstrated in the context of a cancer-related social support group

Authors: Stephen K. Trapp, Jacqueline D. Woods, Alicia Grove, Marilyn Stern

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 2/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The coping styles of five adult men within the context of a cancer-related social support group and their preferences regarding group support were examined.

Methods

Considering the paucity of literature on male coping processes within a cancer-related social support group, qualitative methods were employed. Specifically, template analysis was used to analyze the range and quality of coping styles.

Results

In contrast to the commonly cited solitary and emotionally restricted coping qualities associated with the male gender role, an emphasis on seeking connection and emotional support in their coping efforts was discovered. Preferences of group qualities (e.g., participant characteristics and session topics) that emerged included an interest in connection, mixed sex groups, and groups composed of mixed diagnoses.

Conclusions

The findings of this study can contribute to the development of interventions aimed at increasing the effectiveness of male coping in group-focused supportive services in cancer care.
Literature
1.
Davison KP, Pennebaker JW, Dickerson SS (2000) Who talks? The social psychology of illness support groups. Am Psychol 55:205PubMedCrossRef
2.
Holland JC (2002) History of psycho-oncology: overcoming attitudinal and conceptual barriers. Psychosom Med 64:206–221PubMed
3.
Gottlieb BH, Wachala ED (2007) Cancer support groups: a critical review of empirical studies. Psychooncology 16:379–400PubMedCrossRef
4.
Grande GL, Myers LB, Sutton SR (2006) How do patients who participate in cancer support groups differ from those who do not? Psychooncology 15:321–334PubMedCrossRef
5.
Magen RH, Glajchen M (1999) Cancer support groups: client outcome and the context of group process. Res Social Work Prac 9:541–554CrossRef
6.
Spiegel D, Bloom JR, Yalom I (1981) Group support for patients with metastatic cancer: a randomized prospective outcome study. Arch Gen Psychiatry 38:527–533PubMedCrossRef
7.
Edelman SA, Craig A, Kidman AD (2000) Group interventions with cancer patients: efficacy of psychoeducational versus supportive groups. J Psychosoc Oncol 18:67–85CrossRef
8.
Lieberman MA (2008) Gender and online cancer support groups: issues facing male cancer patients. J Cancer Educ 23:167–171PubMed
9.
Keller M, Henrich G (1999) Illness-related distress: does it mean the same for men and women? Gender aspects in cancer patients' distress and adjustment. Acta Oncol 38:747–755PubMedCrossRef
10.
Moynihan C (2002) Men, women, gender and cancer. Eur J Cancer Care 11:166–172CrossRef
11.
Thaxton L, Emshof JG, Guessous O (2005) Prostate cancer support groups. J Psychosoc Oncol 23:25–40PubMedCrossRef
12.
Visser A, Van Andel G (2000) Education and counseling in cancer: the neglected case of the prostate cancer patients. Patient Educ Couns 40:197–199PubMedCrossRef
13.
Voerman B et al (2007) Determinants of participation in social support groups for prostate cancer patients. Psychooncology 16:1092–1099PubMedCrossRef
14.
Bloch S et al (2007) Psychological adjustment of men with prostate cancer: a review of the literature. BioPsychoSoc Med 1:1–14CrossRef
15.
Roesch SC et al (2005) Coping with prostate cancer: a meta-analytic review. J Behav Med 28:281–293PubMedCrossRef
16.
Harrison J, Maguire P, Pitceathly C (1995) Confiding in crisis: gender differences in pattern of confiding among cancer patients. Soc Sci Med 41:1255–1260PubMedCrossRef
17.
18.
Manii D, Ammerman D (2008) Men and cancer: a study of the needs of male cancer patients in treatment. J Psychosoc Oncol 26:87PubMedCrossRef
19.
Neumann M et al (2010) Barriers to using psycho-oncology services: a qualitative research into the perspectives of users, their relatives, non-users, physicians, and nurses. Support Care Cancer 18:1147–1156PubMedCrossRef
20.
21.
Kiss A, Meryn S (2001) Effect of sex and gender on psychosocial aspects of prostate and breast cancer. BMJ 323:1055–1058PubMedCrossRef
22.
Seale C, Ziebland S, Charteris-Black J (2006) Gender, cancer experience and internet use: a comparative keyword analysis of interviews and online cancer support groups. Soc Sci Med 62:2577–2590PubMedCrossRef
23.
Gray R et al (1996) Breast cancer and prostate cancer self-help groups: reflections on differences. Psychooncology 5:37–142
24.
Clarke JN (2004) A comparison of breast, testicular and prostate cancer in mass print media (1996-2001). Soc Sci Med 59:541–551PubMedCrossRef
25.
Hoyt MA (2009) Gender role conflict and emotional approach coping in men with cancer. Psychol Health 24:981–996PubMedCrossRef
26.
Guba EG, Lincoln YS (1994) Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (eds) Handbook of qualitative research, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 105–117
27.
Schwandt TA (2000) Three epistemological stances for qualitative inquiry. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (eds) Handbook of qualitative research, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 189–213
28.
Sciarra D (1999) The role of the qualitative researcher. In: Kopala M, Suzuki LA (eds) Using qualitative methods in psychology. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 37–48CrossRef
29.
Ponterotto JG (2005) Qualitative research in counseling psychology: a primer on research paradigms and philosophy of science. J Couns Psychol 52:126CrossRef
30.
Schwandt TA (1994) Constructivist, interpretivist approaches to human inquiry. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (eds) Handbook of qualitative research, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks
31.
Morrow SL (2005) Quality and trustworthiness in qualitative research in counseling psychology. J Couns Psychol 52:250CrossRef
32.
Ponterotto JG, Grieger I (2007) Effectively communicating qualitative research. Couns Psychol 35:404–430CrossRef
33.
Birks M, Chapman Y, Francis K (2008) Memoing in qualitative research. J Res Nurs 13:68CrossRef
34.
Daly J et al (2007) A hierarchy of evidence for assessing qualitative health research. J Clin Epidemiol 60:43–49PubMedCrossRef
35.
Owen JE et al (2007) Use of health-related and cancer-specific support groups among adult cancer survivors. Cancer 109:2580–2589PubMedCrossRef
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
Spencer S, Carver CS, Price A (1998) Psychological and social factors in adaptation. Psychooncology:211–222
41.
Creswell JW (2007) Qualitative inquiry & research design: choosing among five approaches. Sage, Thousand Oaks
42.
King N (1998) Template analysis. In: Symon G, Cassell C (eds) Qualitative methods and analysis in organizational research. Sage, London
43.
Patton MQ (2002) Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Sage, Thousand Oaks
44.
Denzin NK (2001) Interpretive interactionism, vol 16. Sage, Thousand Oaks
45.
Baumeister RF, Sommer KL (1997) What do men want? Gender differences and two spheres of belongingness: comment on Cross and Madson. Psychol Bull 122:38–44PubMedCrossRef
46.
Jordan JV (1991) Women's growth in connection: writings from the Stone Center. Guilford, New York
47.
48.
Nutt RL, Brooks GR (2008) Psychology of gender. In: Brown SD, Lent RW (eds) Handbook of counseling psychology. Wiley, Hoboken
49.
Scher M (2001) Male therapist, male client: reflections on critical dynamics. In: Brooks G, Good G (eds) The handbook of counseling and psychotherapy approaches for men. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
50.
Aziz NM (2007) Cancer survivorship research: state of knowledge, challenges and opportunities. Acta Oncol 46:417–432PubMedCrossRef
51.
Deimling GT et al (2006) Coping among older adult, long term cancer survivors. Psychooncology 15:143–159PubMedCrossRef
52.
Washington AE, Lipstein SH (2011) The patient-centered outcomes research institute—promoting better information, decisions, and health. New Engl J Med 365:e31PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Male coping processes as demonstrated in the context of a cancer-related social support group
Authors
Stephen K. Trapp
Jacqueline D. Woods
Alicia Grove
Marilyn Stern
Publication date
01-02-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 2/2013
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-012-1565-x

Other articles of this Issue 2/2013

Supportive Care in Cancer 2/2013 Go to the issue

Original Article

Overall survival and self-reported fatigue in patients with esophageal cancer

Original Article

Water versus land-based multimodal exercise program effects on body composition in breast cancer survivors: a controlled clinical trial

Original Article

Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) in the management of oncohematological patients submitted to autologous stem cell transplantation

Original Article

Symptom clusters and symptom interference of HCC patients undergoing TACE: a cross-sectional study in China

Original Article

Distressed family caregivers of lung cancer patients: an examination of psychosocial and practical challenges

Original Article

Maximal exercise performance in patients with postcancer fatigue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Watch now

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Image Credits