Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
Published in: BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research article

Making sense of “alternative”, “complementary”, “unconventional” and “integrative” medicine: exploring the terms and meanings through a textual analysis

Authors: Jeremy Y. Ng, Heather S. Boon, Alison K. Thompson, Cynthia R. Whitehead

Published in: BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Medical pluralism has flourished throughout the Western world in spite of efforts to legitimize Western biomedical healthcare as “conventional medicine” and thereby relegate all non-physician-related forms of healthcare to an “other” category. These “other” practitioners have been referred to as “unconventional”, “alternative” and “complementary”, among other terms throughout the past half century.

Methods

This study investigates the discourses surrounding the changes in the terms, and their meanings, used to describe unconventional medicine in North America. Terms identified by the literature as synonymous to unconventional medicine were searched using the Scopus database. A textual analysis following the method described by Kripendorff 2013 was subsequently performed on the five most highly-cited unconventional medicine-related peer-reviewed literature published between 1970 and 2013.

Results

Five commonly-used, unconventional medicine-related terms were identified. Authors using “complementary and alternative”, “complementary”, “alternative”, or “unconventional” tended to define them by what they are not (e.g., therapies not taught/used in conventional medicine, therapy demands not met by conventional medicine, and therapies that lack research on safety, efficacy and effectiveness). Authors defined “integrated/integrative” medicine by what it is (e.g., a new model of healthcare, the combining of both conventional and unconventional therapies, accounting for the whole person, and preventative maintenance of health). Authors who defined terms by “what is not” stressed that the purpose of conducting research in this area was solely to create knowledge. Comparatively, authors who defined terms by “what is” sought to advocate for the evidence-based combination of unconventional and conventional medicines. Both author groups used scientific rhetoric to define unconventional medical practices.

Conclusions

This emergence of two groups of authors who used two different sets of terms to refer to the concept of “unconventional medicine” may explain why some journals, practitioner associations and research/practice centres may choose to use both “what is not” and “what is” terms in their discourse to attract interest from both groups. Since each of the two groups of terms (and authors who use them) has different meanings and goals, the evolution of this discourse will continue to be an interesting phenomenon to explore in the future.
Literature
1.
Dalen JE. Conventional and Unconventional Medicine: Can They Be Integrated? Arch Intern Med. 1998;158(20):2179–81.CrossRefPubMed
2.
3.
4.
5.
Eisenberg DM, Kessler RC, Foster C, Norlock FE, Calkins DR, Delbanco TL. Unconventional medicine in the United States--prevalence, costs, and patterns of use. N Engl J Med. 1993;328(4):246–52.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Gevitz N. Alternative medicine and the orthodox canon. Mt Sinai J Med. 1995;62(2):127–31. discussion 159–162.PubMed
7.
Boon H, Verhoef M, O'Hara D, Findlay B, Majid N. Integrative healthcare: arriving at a working definition. Altern Ther Health Med. 2003;10(5):48–56.
8.
Rosenthal B, Lisi AJ. A qualitative analysis of various definitions of integrative medicine and health. Top Integr Health Care. 2014; 5(4).
9.
Snyderman R, Weil AT. Integrative medicine: bringing medicine back to its roots. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162(4):395–7.CrossRefPubMed
10.
11.
12.
Wieland LS, Manheimer E, Berman BM. Development and classification of an operational definition of complementary and alternative medicine for the Cochrane collaboration. Altern Ther Health Med. 2011;17(2):50–9.PubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Gieryn TF. Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. Am Sociol Rev. 1983;48(6):781–95.CrossRef
14.
Johnson S. The ghost map: The story of London's most terrifying epidemic--and how it changed science, cities, and the modern world. London: Penguin Group; 2006.
15.
Upshur RE, VanDenKerkhof EG, Goel V. Meaning and measurement: an inclusive model of evidence in health care. J Eval Clin Pract. 2001;7(2):91–6.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Tesch R. Qualitative research: Analysis types and software tools. Bristol: Falmer Press; 1990.
17.
Weber RP. Basic content analysis. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications; 1990.
18.
Budd RW, Thorp RK, Donohew L. Content analysis of communications. New York: ollier Macmillan Ltd; 1967.
19.
Lindkvist K. Approaches to textual analysis. In: Rosengren KE, editor. Advances in content analysis. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications; 1981. p. 23–41.
20.
McTavish DG, Pirro EB. Contextual content analysis. Quality and Quantity. 1990;24(3):245–65.CrossRef
21.
Hall S. Introduction. In: Smith ACH, Immirizi E, Blackwell T, editors. Paper voices: The popular press and social change, 1935–1965. London: Chatto & Windus; 1975. p. 11–24.
22.
Krippendorff K. Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications; 2013.
23.
Huckin T. Critical discourse analysis. In: Miller T, editor. Functional approaches to written text: Classroom applications. Washington, DC: United States Information Agency; 1995. p. 78–92.
24.
25.
Salisbury L. Web of Science and Scopus: A comparative review of content and searching capabilities. Charleston Adv. 2009;11(1):5–18.
26.
Rigby B. Alternative medicine: transcendental meditation. Nursing Times. 1975;71(32):1240.PubMed
27.
Grumet BR. Just What the Doctor Ordered: The Role of Unconventional Therapy in the Treatment of Cancer in Minors. Fam Law Quart. 1980;14(2):63–98.
28.
L'Etang H. Colloquium on conventional medicine and complementary therapies. J R Soc Med. 1984;77(12):1055.PubMedCentral
29.
Gates B. The use of complementary and alternative therapies in health care: a selective review of the literature and discussion of the implications for nurse practitioners and health‐care managers. J Clin Nurs. 1994;3(1):43–7.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Sommer S. Myth, magic and meaning. Integrative medicine – the way of the future. The Lamp. 1995;52(7):31–5.PubMed
31.
Barnes PM, Powell-Griner E, McFann K, Nahin RL. Complementary and alternative medicine use among adults: United States, 2002. Semin Integr Med. 2004;2(2):54–71.CrossRef
32.
Angell M, Kassirer JP. Alternative medicine-the risks of untested and unregulated remedies. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:839–40.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Astin JA. Why patients use alternative medicine: results of a national study. JAMA. 1998;279(19):1548–53.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Astin JA, Marie A, Pelletier KR, Hansen E, Haskell WL. A review of the incorporation of complementary and alternative medicine by mainstream physicians. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158(21):2303–10.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Boon H, Stewart M, Kennard MA, Gray R, Sawka C, Brown JB, McWilliam C, Gavin A, Baron RA, Aaron D, Haines-Kamka T. Use of complementary/alternative medicine by breast cancer survivors in Ontario: prevalence and perceptions. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18(13):2515–21.
36.
Blumberg DL, Grant WD, Hendricks SR, Kamps CA, Dewan MJ. The physician and unconventional medicine. Altern Ther Health Med. 1995;1(3):31–5.PubMed
37.
Eisenberg DM, Davis RB, Ettner SL, Appel S, Wilkey S, Van Rompay M, Kessler RC. Trends in alternative medicine use in the United States, 1990–1997: results of a follow-up national survey. JAMA. 1998;280(18):1569–75.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Eisenberg DM, Kessler RC, Van Rompay MI, Kaptchuk TJ, Wilkey SA, Appel S, Davis RB. Perceptions about complementary therapies relative to conventional therapies among adults who use both: results from a national survey. Ann Intern Med. 2001;135(5):344–51.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Fairfield KM, Eisenberg DM, Davis RB, Libman H, Phillips RS. Patterns of use, expenditures, and perceived efficacy of complementary and alternative therapies in HIV-infected patients. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158(20):2257–64.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Söllner W, Maislinger S, DeVries A, Steixner E, Rumpold G, Lukas P. Use of complementary and alternative medicine by cancer patients is not associated with perceived distress or poor compliance with standard treatment but with active coping behavior. Cancer. 2000;89(4):873–80.CrossRefPubMed
41.
Sparber A, Bauer L, Curt G, Eisenberg D, Levin T, Parks S, Steinberg SM, Wootton J. Use of complementary medicine by adult patients participating in cancer clinical trials. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2000;27(4):623–30.PubMed
42.
Vincent C, Furnham A. Why do patients turn to complementary medicine? An empirical study. Br J Clin Psychol. 1996;35(1):37–48.CrossRefPubMed
43.
Wetzel MS, Eisenberg DM, Kaptchuk TJ. Courses involving complementary and alternative medicine at US medical schools. JAMA. 1998;280(9):784–7.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Ernst E, Cassileth BR. The prevalence of complementary/alternative medicine in cancer. Cancer. 1998;83(4):777–82.CrossRefPubMed
45.
Ernst E, Rand JI, Stevinson C. Complementary therapies for depression: an overview. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1998;55(11):1026–32.CrossRefPubMed
46.
Ernst E. Prevalence of use of complementary/alternative medicine: a systematic review. Bull World Health Organ. 2000;78(2):258–66.
47.
Molassiotis A, Fernadez-Ortega P, Pud D, Ozden G, Scott JA, Panteli V, Margulies A, Browall M, Magri M, Selvekerova S, Madsen E, Milovics L, Bruyns I, Gudmundsdottir G, Hummerston S, Ahmad AM, Platin N, Kearney N, Patiraki E. Use of complementary and alternative medicine in cancer patients: a European survey. Ann Oncol. 2005;16(4):655–63.CrossRefPubMed
48.
Ernst E, Resch K, Mills S, Hill R, Mitchell A, Willoughby M, White A. Complementary medicine—a definition. Br J Gen Pract. 1995;45(398):506.PubMedCentral
49.
Kappauf H, Leykauf-Ammon D, Bruntsch U, Horneber M, Kaiser G, Büschel G, Gallmeier WM. Use of and attitudes held towards unconventional medicine by patients in a department of internal medicine/oncology and haematology. Support Care Cancer. 2000;8(4):314–22.CrossRefPubMed
50.
Weil A. The significance of integrative medicine for the future of medical education. Am J Med. 2000;108(5):441–3.CrossRefPubMed
51.
52.
Bell IR, Caspi O, Schwartz GE, Grant KL, Gaudet TW, Rychener D, Maizes V, Weil A. Integrative medicine and systemic outcomes research: issues in the emergence of a new model for primary health care. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162(2):133–40.CrossRefPubMed
53.
Maizes V, Rakel D, Niemiec C. Integrative medicine and patient-centered care. Explore. 2009;5(5):277–89.CrossRefPubMed
54.
Frenk J, Chen L, Bhutta ZA, Cohen J, Crisp N, Evans T, Fineberg H, García PJ, Ke Y, Kelley P. Health professionals for a new century: transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world. Lancet. 2010;28(2):337–41.
55.
Van Lerberghe W. The world health report 2008: Primary health care (Now more than ever). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008.
56.
Metadata
Title
Making sense of “alternative”, “complementary”, “unconventional” and “integrative” medicine: exploring the terms and meanings through a textual analysis
Authors
Jeremy Y. Ng
Heather S. Boon
Alison K. Thompson
Cynthia R. Whitehead
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 2662-7671
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-016-1111-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies 1/2016 Go to the issue

Research article

Assessment of antioxidant, anticancer and antimicrobial activity of two vegetable species of Amaranthus in Bangladesh

Research article

Antibacterial and cytotoxic cytochalasins from the endophytic fungus Phomopsis sp. harbored in Garcinia kola (Heckel) nut

Research article

In vitro anti-HIV and antioxidant activity of Hoodia gordonii (Apocynaceae), a commercial plant product

Research article

Pharmacological effects of the phytochemicals of Anethum sowa L. root extracts

Research article

Suppression of neuropeptide production by quercetin in allergic rhinitis model rats

Research article

Antibacterial and antifungal potentials of the solvents extracts from Eryngium caeruleum, Notholirion thomsonianum and Allium consanguineum