Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Health Services Research
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research article

Making patient centered care a reality: a survey of patient educational programs in Italian Cancer Research and Care Institutes

Authors: C. Cipolat Mis, I. Truccolo, V. Ravaioli, S. Cocchi, L. Gangeri, P. Mosconi, C. Drace, L. Pomicino, A. Paradiso, P. De Paoli

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Educational intervention represents an essential element of care for cancer patients; while several single institutions develop their own patient education (PE) programs on cancer, little information is available on the effective existence of PE programs at the level of research and care institutes. In Italy such institutes - Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico - are appointed by the Ministry of Health, and 11 (Cancer Research & Care Istitute-CRCI) of the 48 are specific for cancer on the basis of specific requirements regarding cancer care, research and education. Therefore, they represent an ideal and homogeneous model through which to investigate PE policies and activities throughout the country. The objective of this study was to assess PE activities in Italian CRCI.

Methods

We carried out a survey on PE strategies and services through a questionnaire. Four key points were investigated: a) PE as a cancer care priority, b) activities that are routinely part of PE, c) real involvement of the patients, and d) involvement of healthcare workers in PE activities.

Results

Most CRCI (85 %) completed the survey. All reported having ongoing PE activities, and 4 of the 11 considered PE an institutional activity. More than 90 % of CRCI organize classes and prepare PE handouts, while other PE activities (e.g., Cancer Information Services, mutual support groups) are less frequently part of institutional PE programs. Patients are frequently involved in the organization and preparation of educational activities on the basis of their own needs. Various PE activities are carried out for caregivers in 8 (73 %) out of 11 institutes. Finally, health care workers have an active role in the organization of PE programs, although nurses take part in these activities in only half of CRCI and pharmacists are seldom included.

Conclusions

The information arising from our research constitutes a necessary framework to identify areas of development and to design new strategies and standards to disseminate the culture of PE. This may ultimately help and stimulate the establishment of institutional integrated PE programs, including policies and interventions that can benefit a significant proportion of cancer patients.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
2.
Stevenson E, Crossan K. Patient education: history, development and current directions of the American Cancer Society and National Cancer Institute. Semin Oncol Nurs. 1991;7:135–42.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Shields CG, Coker CJ, Poulsen SS, Doyle JM, Fiscella K, Epstein RM, et al. Patient-centered communication and prognosis discussions with cancer patients. Patient Educ Couns. 2009;77:437–42.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Aujoulat I, d’Hoore W, Deccache A. Patient empowerment in theory and practice: polysemy or cacophony? Patient Educ Couns. 2007;66:13–20.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Hoving C, Visser A, Mullen PD, van den Borne B. A history of patient education by health professionals in Europe and North America: from authority to shared decision making education. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;78:275–81.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Deccache A, van Ballekom K. From patient compliance to empowerment and consumer’s choice: evolution or regression? An overview of patient education in French speaking European countries. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;78:282–7.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Anderson RM, Funnell MM. Patient empowerment: myths and misconceptions. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;79:277–82.CrossRefPubMed
8.
9.
Workman T, Maurer M, Carman K. Unresolved tensions in consumer engagement in CER: a US research perspective. J Comp Eff Res. 2013;2:127–34.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Barello S, Graffigna G. Engaging patients to recover life projectuality: an Italian cross-disease framework. Qual Life Res. 2015;24:1087–96.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Graffigna G, Barello S, Libreri C, Bosio CA. How to engage type-2 diabetic patients in their own health management: implications for clinical practice. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:648.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
Hoerger M, Epstein RM, Winters PC, Fiscella K, Duberstein PR, Gramling R, et al. Values and options in cancer care (VOICE): study design and rationale for a patient-centered communication and decision-making intervention for physicians, patients with advanced cancer, and their caregivers. BMC Cancer. 2013;13:188.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Chelf JH, Agre P, Axelrod A, Cheney L, Cole DD, Conrad K, et al. Cancer-related patient education: an overview of the last decade of evaluation and research. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2001;28:1139–47.PubMed
14.
Stepan KA, Gonzalez AP, Pyle ND, Villejo LA, Cantor SB. Initiative to standardize a clinical trial educational program. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2010;37:535–9.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Ellis PM, Butow PN, Tattersall MH. Informing breast cancer patients about clinical trials: a randomized clinical trial of an educational booklet. Ann Oncol. 2002;13:1414–23.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Friedman AJ, Jones JM, Nyhof-Young J, Wiljer D, Catton P: Surveying the landscape: the status of cancer patient education in Canada. Longwoods Rev 2005 Feb:1–7.
17.
Falvo DR. Effective Patient Education. A guide to increased compliance. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Jones & Bartlett Pub; 2011.
18.
19.
20.
Mullins CD, Abdulhalim AM, Lavallee DC. Continuous patient engagement in comparative effectiveness research. JAMA. 2012;307:1587–8.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Mercieca C, Cassar S, Borg AA. Listening to patients: improving the outpatient service. Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2014;27:44–53.CrossRefPubMed
22.
23.
Deriu PL, La PL, Pierotti M, Collazzo R, Paradiso A, Belardelli F, et al. Accreditation for excellence of cancer research institutes: recommendations from the Italian Network of Comprehensive Cancer Centers. Tumori. 2013;99:293e–8.PubMed
24.
Colombo C, Moja L, Gonzalez-Lorenzo M, Liberati A, Mosconi P. Patient empowerment as a component of health system reforms: rights, benefits and vested interests. Intern Emerg Med. 2012;7:183–7.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Mayor S: OECI accreditation: is yours a top-class cancer centre? Cancerworld 2012;7:37–41.
26.
Truccolo I, Bianchet K, Capello F, Russell-Edu W, Dal Maso L, Colombatti A, et al. A pilot project of a cancer patient library in Italy: results of a customer-satisfaction survey and its products. Health Info Libr J. 2006;23:266–74.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Jones JM, Papadakos J, Bennett C, Blacker S, Catton P, Harth T, et al. Maximizing your Patient Education Skills (MPES): a multi-site evaluation of an innovative patient education skills training course for oncology health care professionals. Patient Educ Couns. 2011;84:176–84.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Papadakos J, Bussiere-Cote S, Abdelmutti N, Catton P, Friedman AJ, Massey C, et al. Informational needs of gynecologic cancer survivors. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;124:452–7.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Ness SM, Kokal J. Cancer Patient Education Network (CPEN) Celebrates 25 Years. J Cancer Educ. 2015;30:207–8.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Goss C, Mosconi P, Renzi C, Deledda G. Participation of patients and citizens in healthcare decisions in Italy. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2011;105:277–82.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Nemetz S, Giarelli E. Improving the quality of life through education: a pilot program of symptom management classes for oncology patients. Am J Nurs. 2002;102 Suppl 4:40–2.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Davey HM, Armstrong BK, Butow PN. An exploratory study of cancer patients’ views on doctor-provided and independent written prognostic information. Patient Educ Couns. 2005;56:349–55.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Rutten LJ, Arora NK, Bakos AD, Aziz N, Rowland J. Information needs and sources of information among cancer patients: a systematic review of research (1980–2003). Patient Educ Couns. 2005;57:250–61.CrossRefPubMed
34.
The librarian’s role in the provision of consumer health information and patient education. Medical Library Association. Consumer and Patient Health Information Section (CAPHIS/MLA). Bull Med Libr Assoc 1996, 84:238–239.
35.
Holmberg SB. Cancer information for the public and for health personnel. Nord Med. 1990;105:158–9.PubMed
36.
Morra ME, van Nevel JP, Nealon EO, Mazan KD, Thomsen C. History of the Cancer Information Service. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1993;14:7–33.PubMed
37.
Truccolo I, Bufalino R, Annunziata MA, Caruso A, Costantini A, Cognetti G, et al. National Cancer Information Service in Italy: an information points network as a new model for providing information for cancer patients. Tumori. 2011;97:510–6.PubMed
38.
Bernhard J, Butow P, Aldridge J, Juraskova I, Ribi K, Brown R. Communication about standard treatment options and clinical trials: can we teach doctors new skills to improve patient outcomes? Psychooncology. 2012;21:1265–74.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Anderson RT, Kimmick GG, McCoy TP, Hopkins J, Levine E, Miller G, et al. A randomized trial of exercise on well-being and function following breast cancer surgery: the RESTORE trial. J Cancer Surviv. 2012;6:172–81.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Matzat J. Self-help meets science: Patient participation in guideline development. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2013;107:314–9.CrossRefPubMed
41.
Beishon M. Jan Geissler: We, the patients [Cover Story]. Cancerworld. 2010;34:4–11.
42.
Groene O, Klazinga N, Wagner C, Arah OA, Thompson A, Bruneau C, et al. Investigating organizational quality improvement systems, patient empowerment, organizational culture, professional involvement and the quality of care in European hospitals: the ‘Deepening our Understanding of Quality Improvement in Europe (DUQuE)’ project. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10:281.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
43.
Truccolo I, Cipolat MC, Cervo S, Dal ML, Bongiovanni M, Bearz A, et al. Patient-Centered Cancer Care Programs in Italy: Benchmarking Global Patient Education Initiatives. J Cancer Educ 2015 [Epub ahead of print].
44.
Balogh EP, Ganz PA, Murphy SB, Nass SJ, Ferrell BR, Stovall E. Patient-centered cancer treatment planning: improving the quality of oncology care. Summary of an Institute of Medicine workshop. Oncologist. 2011;16:1800–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
45.
Lamiani G, Barello S, Vegni E, Moja EA. “Diabetes is for me …”: the health care workers perspective. Assist Inferm Ric. 2009;28:138–46.PubMed
46.
Behar-Horenstein LS, Guin P, Gamble K, Hurlock G, Leclear E, Philipose M, et al. Improving patient care through patient-family education programs. Hosp Top. 2005;83:21–7.CrossRefPubMed
47.
Kuhrik M, Kuhrik NS, Deshields TL, O’Neill J, Zubal B. Developing and implementing a local education and support program for patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). J Cancer Educ. 2010;25:543–7.CrossRefPubMed
48.
Kaye J, Curren L, Anderson N, Edwards K, Fullerton SM, Kanellopoulou N, et al. From patients to partners: participant-centric initiatives in biomedical research. Nat Rev Genet. 2012;13:371–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
49.
Giacalone A, Talamini R, Fratino L, Simonelli C, Bearz A, Spina M, et al. Cancer in the elderly: the caregivers’ perception of senior patients’ informational needs. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2009;49:e121–5.CrossRefPubMed
50.
Leveque D, Delpeuch A, Gourieux B. New anticancer agents: role of clinical pharmacy services. Anticancer Res. 2014;34:1573–8.PubMed
51.
Hutchison C, Cowan C, Paul J. Patient understanding of research: developing and testing of a new questionnaire. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2007;16:187–95.CrossRef
52.
Barello S, Graffigna G, Vegni E, Savarese M, Lombardi F, Bosio AC. ‘Engage me in taking care of my heart’: a grounded theory study on patient-cardiologist relationship in the hospital management of heart failure. BMJ Open. 2015;5:e005582.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
53.
Spencer J. Patients in health professional education: so much known, so much yet to understand. Med Educ. 2010;44:9–11.CrossRefPubMed
54.
55.
Fox N, Ward K. Health identities: from expert patient to resisting consumer. Health (London). 2006;10:461–79.CrossRef
56.
Schulz PJ, Nakamoto K. Patient behavior and the benefits of artificial intelligence: the perils of “dangerous” literacy and illusory patient empowerment. Patient Educ Couns. 2013;92:223–8.CrossRefPubMed
57.
Towle A, Bainbridge L, Godolphin W, Katz A, Kline C, Lown B, et al. Active patient involvement in the education of health professionals. Med Educ. 2010;44:64–74.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Making patient centered care a reality: a survey of patient educational programs in Italian Cancer Research and Care Institutes
Authors
C. Cipolat Mis
I. Truccolo
V. Ravaioli
S. Cocchi
L. Gangeri
P. Mosconi
C. Drace
L. Pomicino
A. Paradiso
P. De Paoli
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-0962-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

BMC Health Services Research 1/2015 Go to the issue

Research article

Barriers to and delays in accessing breast cancer care among New Zealand women: disparities by ethnicity

Research article

Economic valuation and determinants of informal care to disabled people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)

Research article

Household perceptions towards a redistributive policy across health insurance funds in Tanzania

Research article

Consensus building to improve the physical health of people with severe mental illness: a qualitative outcome mapping study

Debate

Admissions for chronic ambulatory care sensitive conditions - a useful measure of potentially preventable admission?

Research article

Historical account of the national health insurance formulation in Kenya: experiences from the past decade