Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 5/2017

01-11-2017 | Maternal-Fetal Medicine

Major underestimation and overestimation of visual blood loss during cesarean deliveries: can they be predicted?

Authors: Ohad Gluck, Yossi Mizrachi, Michal Kovo, Michael Divon, Jacob Bar, Eran Weiner

Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Issue 5/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The surgeons’ visual estimation is the most widely used method for estimating blood loss (BL) while performing cesarean deliveries (CDs). Major BL underestimation may adversely influence obstetric decision making, and result in delaying interventions. Major BL overestimation may result in unnecessary costly interventions. Therefore, we aimed to identify independent predictors for major BL underestimation and overestimation during CDs.

Methods

All CDs performed between 11/2008 and 6/2016, in a university-affiliated hospital, were reviewed for demographic and surgical data, including the surgeons’ reported estimated BL (EBL). Calculated BL (CBL) was calculated by multiplying the calculated maternal blood volume by the percent of hematocrit decrease. Multivariate logistic regressions were performed to identify independent risk factors for major BL underestimation (CBL−EBL ≥ 400 ml) and overestimation (EBL−CBL ≥ 400 ml).

Results

During the study period, 3655 CDs were analyzed, of which 420 met the criterion for major BL underestimation and 1214 for major BL overestimation. Urgent surgery (aOR = 2.83; 95% CI 2.06–3.89), general anesthesia (aOR = 2.39; 95% CI 1.71–3.33), and higher surgeon experience (aOR = 1.03; 95% CI 1.01–1.06) were found to be independent risk factors for major BL underestimation, while any previous CD (aOR = 0.47; 95% CI 0.33–0.67) decreased the risk of underestimation. Any previous CD (aOR = 1.29; 95% CI 1.05–1.58) and intra-abdominal adhesions (aOR = 1.37; 95% CI 1.11–1.70) were found to be independent risk factors for major BL overestimation, while urgent CD (aOR = 0.50; 95% CI 0.41–0.60) decreased the risk of overestimation.

Conclusion

Various factors can predict major underestimation and overestimation of BL during CDs. Recognizing these factors can assist in the interpretation of visual EBL and improve obstetric decision making.
Literature
1.
go back to reference American College of O (2006) Gynecologists: ACOG practice bulletin: clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists Number 76, October 2006: postpartum hemorrhage. Obstet Gynecol 108:1039–1047 American College of O (2006) Gynecologists: ACOG practice bulletin: clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists Number 76, October 2006: postpartum hemorrhage. Obstet Gynecol 108:1039–1047
2.
go back to reference Khan KS, Wojdyla D, Say L, Gulmezoglu AM, Van Look PF (2006) WHO analysis of causes of maternal death: a systematic review. Lancet 367:1066–1074CrossRefPubMed Khan KS, Wojdyla D, Say L, Gulmezoglu AM, Van Look PF (2006) WHO analysis of causes of maternal death: a systematic review. Lancet 367:1066–1074CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Sloan NL, Durocher J, Aldrich T, Blum J, Winikoff B (2010) What measured blood loss tells us about postpartum bleeding: a systematic review. BJOG 117:788–800CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sloan NL, Durocher J, Aldrich T, Blum J, Winikoff B (2010) What measured blood loss tells us about postpartum bleeding: a systematic review. BJOG 117:788–800CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Stafford I, Dildy GA, Clark SL, Belfort MA (2008) Visually estimated and calculated blood loss in vaginal and cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 199(519):e511–e517 Stafford I, Dildy GA, Clark SL, Belfort MA (2008) Visually estimated and calculated blood loss in vaginal and cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 199(519):e511–e517
6.
go back to reference Duthie SJ, Ven D, Yung GL, Guang DZ, Chan SY, Ma HK (1991) Discrepancy between laboratory determination and visual estimation of blood loss during normal delivery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 38:119–124CrossRefPubMed Duthie SJ, Ven D, Yung GL, Guang DZ, Chan SY, Ma HK (1991) Discrepancy between laboratory determination and visual estimation of blood loss during normal delivery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 38:119–124CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Larsson C, Saltvedt S, Wiklund I, Pahlen S, Andolf E (2006) Estimation of blood loss after cesarean section and vaginal delivery has low validity with a tendency to exaggeration. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 85:1448–1452CrossRefPubMed Larsson C, Saltvedt S, Wiklund I, Pahlen S, Andolf E (2006) Estimation of blood loss after cesarean section and vaginal delivery has low validity with a tendency to exaggeration. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 85:1448–1452CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Rothermel LD, Lipman JM (2016) Estimation of blood loss is inaccurate and unreliable. Surgery 160:946–953CrossRefPubMed Rothermel LD, Lipman JM (2016) Estimation of blood loss is inaccurate and unreliable. Surgery 160:946–953CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Withanathantrige M, Goonewardene M, Dandeniya R, Gunatilake P, Gamage S (2016) Comparison of four methods of blood loss estimation after cesarean delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 135:51–55CrossRefPubMed Withanathantrige M, Goonewardene M, Dandeniya R, Gunatilake P, Gamage S (2016) Comparison of four methods of blood loss estimation after cesarean delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 135:51–55CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Ali Algadiem E, Aleisa AA, Alsubaie HI, Buhlaiqah NR, Algadeeb JB, Alsneini HA (2016) Blood loss estimation using gauze visual analogue. Trauma Mon 21:e34131CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ali Algadiem E, Aleisa AA, Alsubaie HI, Buhlaiqah NR, Algadeeb JB, Alsneini HA (2016) Blood loss estimation using gauze visual analogue. Trauma Mon 21:e34131CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Zuckerwise LC, Pettker CM, Illuzzi J, Raab CR, Lipkind HS (2014) Use of a novel visual aid to improve estimation of obstetric blood loss. Obstet Gynecol 123:982–986CrossRefPubMed Zuckerwise LC, Pettker CM, Illuzzi J, Raab CR, Lipkind HS (2014) Use of a novel visual aid to improve estimation of obstetric blood loss. Obstet Gynecol 123:982–986CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Al Kadri HM, Al Anazi BK, Tamim HM (2011) Visual estimation versus gravimetric measurement of postpartum blood loss: a prospective cohort study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 283:1207–1213CrossRefPubMed Al Kadri HM, Al Anazi BK, Tamim HM (2011) Visual estimation versus gravimetric measurement of postpartum blood loss: a prospective cohort study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 283:1207–1213CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Maslovitz S, Barkai G, Lessing JB, Ziv A, Many A (2008) Improved accuracy of postpartum blood loss estimation as assessed by simulation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 87:929–934CrossRefPubMed Maslovitz S, Barkai G, Lessing JB, Ziv A, Many A (2008) Improved accuracy of postpartum blood loss estimation as assessed by simulation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 87:929–934CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Dildy GA 3rd, Paine AR, George NC, Velasco C (2004) Estimating blood loss: can teaching significantly improve visual estimation? Obstet Gynecol 104:601–606CrossRefPubMed Dildy GA 3rd, Paine AR, George NC, Velasco C (2004) Estimating blood loss: can teaching significantly improve visual estimation? Obstet Gynecol 104:601–606CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Prasertcharoensuk W, Swadpanich U, Lumbiganon P (2000) Accuracy of the blood loss estimation in the third stage of labor. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 71:69–70CrossRefPubMed Prasertcharoensuk W, Swadpanich U, Lumbiganon P (2000) Accuracy of the blood loss estimation in the third stage of labor. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 71:69–70CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Razvi K, Chua S, Arulkumaran S, Ratnam SS (1996) A comparison between visual estimation and laboratory determination of blood loss during the third stage of labour. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 36:152–154CrossRefPubMed Razvi K, Chua S, Arulkumaran S, Ratnam SS (1996) A comparison between visual estimation and laboratory determination of blood loss during the third stage of labour. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 36:152–154CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Cheerranichanunth P, Poolnoi P (2012) Using blood loss pictogram for visual blood loss estimation in cesarean section. J Med Assoc Thai 95:550–556PubMed Cheerranichanunth P, Poolnoi P (2012) Using blood loss pictogram for visual blood loss estimation in cesarean section. J Med Assoc Thai 95:550–556PubMed
18.
go back to reference Yoong W, Karavolos S, Damodaram M, Madgwick K, Milestone N, Al-Habib A, Fakokunde A, Okolo S (2010) Observer accuracy and reproducibility of visual estimation of blood loss in obstetrics: how accurate and consistent are health-care professionals? Arch Gynecol Obstet 281:207–213CrossRefPubMed Yoong W, Karavolos S, Damodaram M, Madgwick K, Milestone N, Al-Habib A, Fakokunde A, Okolo S (2010) Observer accuracy and reproducibility of visual estimation of blood loss in obstetrics: how accurate and consistent are health-care professionals? Arch Gynecol Obstet 281:207–213CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Guasch E, Gilsanz F (2016) Massive obstetric hemorrhage: current approach to management. Med Intensiva 40:298–310CrossRefPubMed Guasch E, Gilsanz F (2016) Massive obstetric hemorrhage: current approach to management. Med Intensiva 40:298–310CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Berg CJ, Harper MA, Atkinson SM, Bell EA, Brown HL, Hage ML, Mitra AG, Moise KJ Jr, Callaghan WM (2005) Preventability of pregnancy-related deaths: results of a state-wide review. Obstet Gynecol 106:1228–1234CrossRefPubMed Berg CJ, Harper MA, Atkinson SM, Bell EA, Brown HL, Hage ML, Mitra AG, Moise KJ Jr, Callaghan WM (2005) Preventability of pregnancy-related deaths: results of a state-wide review. Obstet Gynecol 106:1228–1234CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Bouvier-Colle MH, Ould El Joud D, Varnoux N, Goffinet F, Alexander S, Bayoumeu F, Beaumont E, Fernandez H, Lansac J, Levy G et al (2001) Evaluation of the quality of care for severe obstetrical haemorrhage in three French regions. BJOG 108:898–903PubMed Bouvier-Colle MH, Ould El Joud D, Varnoux N, Goffinet F, Alexander S, Bayoumeu F, Beaumont E, Fernandez H, Lansac J, Levy G et al (2001) Evaluation of the quality of care for severe obstetrical haemorrhage in three French regions. BJOG 108:898–903PubMed
22.
go back to reference Aksoy H, Aksoy U, Yucel B, Ozyurt SS, Acmaz G, Babayigit MA, Gokahmetoglu G, Aydin T (2015) Blood loss in elective cesarean section: is there a difference related to the type of anesthesia? A randomized prospective study. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc 16:158–163CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Aksoy H, Aksoy U, Yucel B, Ozyurt SS, Acmaz G, Babayigit MA, Gokahmetoglu G, Aydin T (2015) Blood loss in elective cesarean section: is there a difference related to the type of anesthesia? A randomized prospective study. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc 16:158–163CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Butwick AJ, Carvalho B, El-Sayed YY (2014) Risk factors for obstetric morbidity in patients with uterine atony undergoing caesarean delivery. Br J Anaesth 113:661–668CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Butwick AJ, Carvalho B, El-Sayed YY (2014) Risk factors for obstetric morbidity in patients with uterine atony undergoing caesarean delivery. Br J Anaesth 113:661–668CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Heesen M, Hofmann T, Klohr S, Rossaint R, van de Velde M, Deprest J, Straube S (2013) Is general anaesthesia for caesarean section associated with postpartum haemorrhage? Systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 57:1092–1102CrossRefPubMed Heesen M, Hofmann T, Klohr S, Rossaint R, van de Velde M, Deprest J, Straube S (2013) Is general anaesthesia for caesarean section associated with postpartum haemorrhage? Systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 57:1092–1102CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Weiner E, Bar J, Fainstein N, Ben-Haroush A, Sadan O, Golan A, Kovo M (2014) The effect of a program to shorten the decision-to-delivery interval for emergent cesarean section on maternal and neonatal outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 210(224):e221–e226 Weiner E, Bar J, Fainstein N, Ben-Haroush A, Sadan O, Golan A, Kovo M (2014) The effect of a program to shorten the decision-to-delivery interval for emergent cesarean section on maternal and neonatal outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 210(224):e221–e226
26.
go back to reference Jacob M, Conzen P, Finsterer U, Krafft A, Becker BF, Rehm M (1985) Technical and physiological background of plasma volume measurement with indocyanine green: a clarification of misunderstandings. J Appl Physiol 2007(102):1235–1242 Jacob M, Conzen P, Finsterer U, Krafft A, Becker BF, Rehm M (1985) Technical and physiological background of plasma volume measurement with indocyanine green: a clarification of misunderstandings. J Appl Physiol 2007(102):1235–1242
Metadata
Title
Major underestimation and overestimation of visual blood loss during cesarean deliveries: can they be predicted?
Authors
Ohad Gluck
Yossi Mizrachi
Michal Kovo
Michael Divon
Jacob Bar
Eran Weiner
Publication date
01-11-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Issue 5/2017
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-017-4506-6

Other articles of this Issue 5/2017

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 5/2017 Go to the issue