Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 9/2021

01-09-2021 | Magnetic Resonance Imaging | Breast Oncology

Radial Scars and Complex Sclerosing Lesions of the Breast: Prevalence of Malignancy and Natural History Under Active Surveillance

Authors: Elizabeth Kraft, MD, Jessica N. Limberg, MD, Katerina Dodelzon, MD, Lisa A. Newman, MD, FACS, Rache Simmons, MD, Alexander Swistel, MD, Paula S. Ginter, MD, Jennifer L. Marti, MD, FACS

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 9/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

When needle core biopsies (NCBs) of the breast reveal radial scar or complex sclerosing lesions (RSLs), excision is often recommended despite a low risk of malignancy in the modern era. The optimal management of NCBs revealing RSLs is controversial, and understanding of the natural history of unresected RSLs is limited.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed pathology and imaging data from 148 patients with NCB revealing RSL without atypia from 2015 to 2019 to determine the prevalence of malignancy and the behavior of RSLs undergoing active surveillance (AS).

Results

The mean age of patients was 52 years, and most lesions were screen-detected (91%). The median lesion size was 6.0 mm (range 2–39). Most patients (66%, n = 98) underwent immediate surgery, while 34% (n = 50) of patients underwent AS, with a median follow-up of 16 months (range 6–51). Of the excised RSLs, 99% (n = 97) were benign and 1% (n = 1) revealed ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). In 17% (n = 17) of cases, additional high-risk lesions were discovered upon excision. Among the 50 patients undergoing AS, no lesions progressed on interval imaging.

Conclusions

In this cohort, 99% of RSLs undergoing excision were benign, 1% revealed DCIS, and there were no invasive cancers. In the first study of patients with RSLs undergoing AS, we found that all lesions either remained stable or resolved. We propose that the vast majority of patients with RSL on NCB can be safely offered AS, and that routine excision is a low-value intervention.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Davies JD. Diagnostic histopathology of the breast. O. L. Page and T. J. Anderson, with several contributors. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, 1987. No. of pages: 362. Price: £65.00. ISBN: 0 443 02240 2. J Pathol. 1988;156(3):271–72. Davies JD. Diagnostic histopathology of the breast. O. L. Page and T. J. Anderson, with several contributors. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, 1987. No. of pages: 362. Price: £65.00. ISBN: 0 443 02240 2. J Pathol. 1988;156(3):271–72.
2.
go back to reference Eusebi V, Millis RR. Epitheliosis, infiltrating epitheliosis, and radial scar. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2010;27(1):5–12.CrossRef Eusebi V, Millis RR. Epitheliosis, infiltrating epitheliosis, and radial scar. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2010;27(1):5–12.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Nielsen M, Jensen J, Andersen JA. An autopsy study of radial scar in the female breast. Histopathology. 1985;9(3):287–95.CrossRef Nielsen M, Jensen J, Andersen JA. An autopsy study of radial scar in the female breast. Histopathology. 1985;9(3):287–95.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Becker L, et al. Management of radial scars found at percutaneous breast biopsy. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2006;57(2):72–8.PubMed Becker L, et al. Management of radial scars found at percutaneous breast biopsy. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2006;57(2):72–8.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Bianchi S, et al. Radial scar without associated atypical epithelial proliferation on image-guided 14-gauge needle core biopsy: analysis of 49 cases from a single-centre and review of the literature. Breast. 2012;21(2):159–64.CrossRef Bianchi S, et al. Radial scar without associated atypical epithelial proliferation on image-guided 14-gauge needle core biopsy: analysis of 49 cases from a single-centre and review of the literature. Breast. 2012;21(2):159–64.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference El-Sayed ME, et al. Predictive value of needle core biopsy diagnoses of lesions of uncertain malignant potential (B3) in abnormalities detected by mammographic screening. Histopathology. 2008;53(6):650–7.CrossRef El-Sayed ME, et al. Predictive value of needle core biopsy diagnoses of lesions of uncertain malignant potential (B3) in abnormalities detected by mammographic screening. Histopathology. 2008;53(6):650–7.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Rakha EA, et al. Characterization and outcome of breast needle core biopsy diagnoses of lesions of uncertain malignant potential (B3) in abnormalities detected by mammographic screening. Int J Cancer. 2011;129(6):1417–24.CrossRef Rakha EA, et al. Characterization and outcome of breast needle core biopsy diagnoses of lesions of uncertain malignant potential (B3) in abnormalities detected by mammographic screening. Int J Cancer. 2011;129(6):1417–24.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Leong RY, et al. Radial scar at percutaneous breast biopsy that does not require surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2016;223(5):712–6.CrossRef Leong RY, et al. Radial scar at percutaneous breast biopsy that does not require surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2016;223(5):712–6.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Li Z, Ranade A, Zhao C. Pathologic findings of follow-up surgical excision for radial scar on breast core needle biopsy. Hum Pathol. 2016;48:76–80.CrossRef Li Z, Ranade A, Zhao C. Pathologic findings of follow-up surgical excision for radial scar on breast core needle biopsy. Hum Pathol. 2016;48:76–80.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Phantana-Angkool A, et al. Rate of radial scars by core biopsy and upgrading to malignancy or high-risk lesions before and after introduction of digital breast tomosynthesis. Breast cancer research and treatment. 2019;173(1):23–9.CrossRef Phantana-Angkool A, et al. Rate of radial scars by core biopsy and upgrading to malignancy or high-risk lesions before and after introduction of digital breast tomosynthesis. Breast cancer research and treatment. 2019;173(1):23–9.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Farshid G, Buckley E. Meta-analysis of upgrade rates in 3163 radial scars excised after needle core biopsy diagnosis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019;174(1):165–77.CrossRef Farshid G, Buckley E. Meta-analysis of upgrade rates in 3163 radial scars excised after needle core biopsy diagnosis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019;174(1):165–77.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference The American Society of Breast Surgeons. Consensus guideline on concordance assessment of image-guided breast biopsies and management of borderline or high-risk Lesions. Columbia: American Society of Breast Surgeons; 2016. p. 1–13. The American Society of Breast Surgeons. Consensus guideline on concordance assessment of image-guided breast biopsies and management of borderline or high-risk Lesions. Columbia: American Society of Breast Surgeons; 2016. p. 1–13.
13.
go back to reference Eisenhauer EA, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(2):228–47.CrossRef Eisenhauer EA, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(2):228–47.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Chou WYY, Veis DJ, Aft R. Radial scar on image-guided breast biopsy: is surgical excision necessary? Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018;170(2):313–20.CrossRef Chou WYY, Veis DJ, Aft R. Radial scar on image-guided breast biopsy: is surgical excision necessary? Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018;170(2):313–20.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Kalife ET, et al. Clinical and radiologic follow-up study for biopsy diagnosis of radial scar/radial Sclerosing lesion without other Atypia. Breast J. 2016;22(6):637–44.CrossRef Kalife ET, et al. Clinical and radiologic follow-up study for biopsy diagnosis of radial scar/radial Sclerosing lesion without other Atypia. Breast J. 2016;22(6):637–44.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Mesa-Quesada J, et al. Radial scars without atypia in percutaneous biopsy specimens: can they obviate surgical biopsy? Radiologia. 2017;59(6):523–30.CrossRef Mesa-Quesada J, et al. Radial scars without atypia in percutaneous biopsy specimens: can they obviate surgical biopsy? Radiologia. 2017;59(6):523–30.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Nakhlis F, et al. Complex sclerosing lesions and radial sclerosing lesions on core needle biopsy: Low risk of carcinoma on excision in cases with clinical and imaging concordance. Breast J. 2018;24(2):133–8.CrossRef Nakhlis F, et al. Complex sclerosing lesions and radial sclerosing lesions on core needle biopsy: Low risk of carcinoma on excision in cases with clinical and imaging concordance. Breast J. 2018;24(2):133–8.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Resetkova E, et al. Management of radial sclerosing lesions of the breast diagnosed using percutaneous vacuum-assisted core needle biopsy: recommendations for excision based on seven years’ of experience at a single institution. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011;127(2):335–43.CrossRef Resetkova E, et al. Management of radial sclerosing lesions of the breast diagnosed using percutaneous vacuum-assisted core needle biopsy: recommendations for excision based on seven years’ of experience at a single institution. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011;127(2):335–43.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Thomas ET, Del Mar C, Glasziou P, Wright G, Barratt A, Bell KJL. Prevalence of incidental breast cancer and precursor lesions in autopsy studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cancer. 2017;17(1):808.CrossRef Thomas ET, Del Mar C, Glasziou P, Wright G, Barratt A, Bell KJL. Prevalence of incidental breast cancer and precursor lesions in autopsy studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cancer. 2017;17(1):808.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Radial Scars and Complex Sclerosing Lesions of the Breast: Prevalence of Malignancy and Natural History Under Active Surveillance
Authors
Elizabeth Kraft, MD
Jessica N. Limberg, MD
Katerina Dodelzon, MD
Lisa A. Newman, MD, FACS
Rache Simmons, MD
Alexander Swistel, MD
Paula S. Ginter, MD
Jennifer L. Marti, MD, FACS
Publication date
01-09-2021
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 9/2021
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-09713-5

Other articles of this Issue 9/2021

Annals of Surgical Oncology 9/2021 Go to the issue