Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Magnetic Resonance Imaging | Research article

Weight-bearing MRI with a knee flexion angle of 20°: a study on additional MRI investigation modalities to support a more accurate understanding of patellofemoral instability

Authors: J. Leiprecht, F. Mauch, J. Huth, L. P. Ambros, R. Best

Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Diagnosing patellofemoral instability disorders correctly, weight-bearing MRI (WB-MRI) has become an option. Aiming for a best possible accuracy in displaying potentially underlying causes, the named MRI modalities were sporadically even investigated in different knee flexion angles. However, despite confirmed MRI-outcome-differences between WB-MRI and non-WB-MRI, none of the described MRI modalities have so far established themselves. Mainly this is due to an unfeasibility in daily clinical routine in regard to time and economic aspects. Thus, we intended to evaluate an additional but reduced patellofemoral MR-imaging solely in a relevant 20° of knee flexion under WB- and non-WB-MRI conditions.

Methods

Seventy-three subjects with and without patellofemoral instability were investigated under supine as well as under WB-MRI conditions in a 20° of knee flexion angle. Patellofemoral risk indices in the sagittal plane (Insall-Salvati-Index, Caton-Deschamps-Index, Patellotrochlear Index) and the axial plane (Patella tilt of Fulkerson and Sasaki) were detected and compared between the different MRI conditions. Significance, reliability and Cohen’s effect size was calculated.

Results

Nearly all assessed indices showed significant differences between patients and controls in the different MRI positions. Comparing pairwise, all measured indices failed to show significant differences between the two MRI positions. However, patella tilt angles of the patient group showed an elevation from supine to WB-MRI (14.00 ± 7.54° to 15.97 ± 9.10° and 16.34 ± 7.84° to 18.54 ± 9.43°). Here, Cohen’s d showed small to medium effects between supine and WB-MRI.

Conclusion

In comparison to standard MRI in supine position, axial risk indices seem to be accentuated under WB-MRI and a knee flexion angle of 20°. In particular, symptomatic cases with inconspicuous conventional MRI imaging, additional MRI imaging only in the axial plane in a 20° of knee flexion could be beneficious and useful in clinical daily routine.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Becher C, Fleischer B, Rase M, et al. Effects of upright weight bearing and the knee flexion angle on patellofemoral indices using magnetic resonance imaging in patients with patellofemoral instability. Knee Surg Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017;25:2405–13.CrossRef Becher C, Fleischer B, Rase M, et al. Effects of upright weight bearing and the knee flexion angle on patellofemoral indices using magnetic resonance imaging in patients with patellofemoral instability. Knee Surg Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017;25:2405–13.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Draper CE, Besier TF, Fredericson M, et al. Differences in patellofemoral kinematics between weight-bearing and non weight-bearing conditions in patients with patellofemoral pain. J Orthop Res. 2011;29:312–7.CrossRef Draper CE, Besier TF, Fredericson M, et al. Differences in patellofemoral kinematics between weight-bearing and non weight-bearing conditions in patients with patellofemoral pain. J Orthop Res. 2011;29:312–7.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Fulkerson JP. Diagnosis and treatment of patients with patellofemoral pain. Am J Sports Med. 2002;30(3):447–56.CrossRef Fulkerson JP. Diagnosis and treatment of patients with patellofemoral pain. Am J Sports Med. 2002;30(3):447–56.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Mariani S, La Marra A, Arrigoni F, et al. Dynamic measurement of patellofemoral joint alignment using weight-bearing magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI). Eur J Radiol. 2015;84:2571–8.CrossRef Mariani S, La Marra A, Arrigoni F, et al. Dynamic measurement of patellofemoral joint alignment using weight-bearing magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI). Eur J Radiol. 2015;84:2571–8.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Fredericson M, Yoon K. Physical examination and patellofemoral pain syndrome. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;85(3):234–43.CrossRef Fredericson M, Yoon K. Physical examination and patellofemoral pain syndrome. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;85(3):234–43.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Balcarek P, Oberthür S, Hopfensitz S, et al. Which patella is likely to redislocate? Knee Surg Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014;22(10):2308–14.CrossRef Balcarek P, Oberthür S, Hopfensitz S, et al. Which patella is likely to redislocate? Knee Surg Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014;22(10):2308–14.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Becher C, Schumacher T, Fleischer B, et al. The effects of a dynamic patellar realignment brace on disease determinants for patellofemoral instability in upright weight-bearing condition. J Orthop Surg Res. 2015;10:126.CrossRef Becher C, Schumacher T, Fleischer B, et al. The effects of a dynamic patellar realignment brace on disease determinants for patellofemoral instability in upright weight-bearing condition. J Orthop Surg Res. 2015;10:126.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Hingelbaum S, Best R, Huth J, et al. The TT-TG index: a knee size adjusted measure method to determine the TTTG distance. Knee Surg Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014;22(10):2388–95.CrossRef Hingelbaum S, Best R, Huth J, et al. The TT-TG index: a knee size adjusted measure method to determine the TTTG distance. Knee Surg Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014;22(10):2388–95.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Liebensteiner MC, Dirisamer F, Balcarek P, et al. Guidelines for treatment of lateral patella dislocations in skeletally mature patients. Am J Orthop. 2017;46(2):E86–96.PubMed Liebensteiner MC, Dirisamer F, Balcarek P, et al. Guidelines for treatment of lateral patella dislocations in skeletally mature patients. Am J Orthop. 2017;46(2):E86–96.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Bruno F, Barile A, Arrigoni F, et al. Weight-bearing MRI of the knee: a review of adavantages and limits. Acta Biomed. 2018;89(1-S):78–88.PubMedPubMedCentral Bruno F, Barile A, Arrigoni F, et al. Weight-bearing MRI of the knee: a review of adavantages and limits. Acta Biomed. 2018;89(1-S):78–88.PubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Pal S, Besier TF, Draper CE, et al. Patellar tilt correlates with vastus lateralis: vastus medialis activation ratio in maltracking patellofemoral pain patients. J Orthop Res. 2012;30(6):927–33.CrossRef Pal S, Besier TF, Draper CE, et al. Patellar tilt correlates with vastus lateralis: vastus medialis activation ratio in maltracking patellofemoral pain patients. J Orthop Res. 2012;30(6):927–33.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Senavongse W, Amis AA. The effects of articular, retinacular or muscular deficiencies on patellofemoral joint stability: a biomechanical study in vitro. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87(4):577–82.CrossRef Senavongse W, Amis AA. The effects of articular, retinacular or muscular deficiencies on patellofemoral joint stability: a biomechanical study in vitro. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87(4):577–82.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Hirschmann A, Buck FM, Herschel R, et al. Upright weight-bearing CT of the knee during flexion: changes of the patellofemoral and tibiofemoral articulations between 0° and 120°. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017;25(3):853–62.CrossRef Hirschmann A, Buck FM, Herschel R, et al. Upright weight-bearing CT of the knee during flexion: changes of the patellofemoral and tibiofemoral articulations between 0° and 120°. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017;25(3):853–62.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Hirschmann A, Buck FM, Fucentese SF, et al. Upright CT of the knee: the effect of weight-bearing on joint aligment. Eur Radiol. 2015;25(11):3398–404.CrossRef Hirschmann A, Buck FM, Fucentese SF, et al. Upright CT of the knee: the effect of weight-bearing on joint aligment. Eur Radiol. 2015;25(11):3398–404.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Insall J, Salvati E. Patella position in the normal knee joint. Radiology. 1971;101(1):101–4.CrossRef Insall J, Salvati E. Patella position in the normal knee joint. Radiology. 1971;101(1):101–4.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Caton J, Deschamps G, Chambat P, et al. Patella infera. Apropos of 128 cases. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1982;68(5):317–25.PubMed Caton J, Deschamps G, Chambat P, et al. Patella infera. Apropos of 128 cases. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1982;68(5):317–25.PubMed
17.
go back to reference Biedert RM, Albrecht S. The patellotrochlear index: a new index for assessing patellar height. Knee Surg Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006;14(8):707–12.CrossRef Biedert RM, Albrecht S. The patellotrochlear index: a new index for assessing patellar height. Knee Surg Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006;14(8):707–12.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Lin YF, Jan MH, Lin DH, et al. Different effects of femoral and tibial rotation on the different measurements of patella tilting: an axial computed tomography study. J Orthop Surg Res. 2008;3:5.CrossRef Lin YF, Jan MH, Lin DH, et al. Different effects of femoral and tibial rotation on the different measurements of patella tilting: an axial computed tomography study. J Orthop Surg Res. 2008;3:5.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Sasaki T, Yagi T. Subluxation of the patella: investigation by computed tomography. Int Orthop. 1986;10(2):115–20.CrossRef Sasaki T, Yagi T. Subluxation of the patella: investigation by computed tomography. Int Orthop. 1986;10(2):115–20.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Cohen J. Some statistical issues in psychological research. In: Wolman BB, editor. Handbook of Clinical Psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1965. p. 95–121. Cohen J. Some statistical issues in psychological research. In: Wolman BB, editor. Handbook of Clinical Psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1965. p. 95–121.
21.
go back to reference Sullivan GM, Feinn R. Using effect size – or why the P value is not enough. J Grad Med Educ. 2012;4(3):279–82.CrossRef Sullivan GM, Feinn R. Using effect size – or why the P value is not enough. J Grad Med Educ. 2012;4(3):279–82.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Cicchetti DV. Multiple comparison methods: establishing guidelines for their valid application in neuropsychological research. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1994;16(1):155–61.CrossRef Cicchetti DV. Multiple comparison methods: establishing guidelines for their valid application in neuropsychological research. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1994;16(1):155–61.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Izadpanah K, Weitzel E, Vicari M, et al. Influence of knee flexion angle and weight bearing on the Tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove (TTTG) distance for evaluation of patellofemoral alignment. Knee Surg Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014;22:2655–61.CrossRef Izadpanah K, Weitzel E, Vicari M, et al. Influence of knee flexion angle and weight bearing on the Tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove (TTTG) distance for evaluation of patellofemoral alignment. Knee Surg Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014;22:2655–61.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Weight-bearing MRI with a knee flexion angle of 20°: a study on additional MRI investigation modalities to support a more accurate understanding of patellofemoral instability
Authors
J. Leiprecht
F. Mauch
J. Huth
L. P. Ambros
R. Best
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2474
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04733-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 1/2021 Go to the issue