Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 10/2020

01-10-2020 | Magnetic Resonance Imaging | Breast Oncology

The Waiting Game: How Long Are Breast Cancer Patients Waiting for Definitive Diagnosis?

Authors: Alexandra Kovar, MD, Michael Bronsert, PhD, MS, Kshama Jaiswal, MD, Colleen Murphy, MD, Dulcy Wolverton, MD, Gretchen Ahrendt, MD, Sarah Tevis, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 10/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Receiving a new breast cancer (BC) diagnosis can cause significant patient anxiety, which is amplified by delays in diagnosis. There is a lack of defined time periods for delays in the workup of BC. This study aims to evaluate national variations in timing from first abnormal mammogram to first biopsy and to determine independent predictors of delay in diagnosis.

Patients and Methods

Data were derived from SEER–Medicare linked claims database from 2007 to 2013. Time intervals from abnormal mammogram, either screening or diagnostic, to biopsy were assessed. The fourth quartile for timing from first mammogram to first biopsy was utilized to define delay in diagnosis. Multivariate analyses were used to evaluate the association between clinicopathologic variables and delays in diagnosis.

Results

We analyzed 53,758 patients with stage 0–II BC who underwent upfront surgery. Significant variations in timing of care were identified, with mean times from mammogram to biopsy, surgeon visit, and breast surgery of 23.3, 31.6, and 52.6 days, respectively. Over the study period, there was a decrease in delays from mammogram to biopsy. Non-White race, Northeast location, and earlier stage disease were found to be independent predictors of delays in the diagnosis of BC (p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

The study demonstrates significant variations in time to diagnostic biopsy. More efficient processes of care to address these delays should be implemented, and further studies are needed to determine whether improved efficiency decreases patient anxiety. The large variations in time to diagnosis speak to the need for consensus guidelines to establish a standard of care.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hislop TG, Harris SR, Jackson J, Thorne SE, Rousseau EJ, Coldman AJ, Vestrup JA, Wright CJ, Olivotto IA. Satisfaction and anxiety for women during investigation of an abnormal screening mammogram. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2002;76(3):245–54. Epub 2002/12/05. PubMed PMID: 12462385.CrossRef Hislop TG, Harris SR, Jackson J, Thorne SE, Rousseau EJ, Coldman AJ, Vestrup JA, Wright CJ, Olivotto IA. Satisfaction and anxiety for women during investigation of an abnormal screening mammogram. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2002;76(3):245–54. Epub 2002/12/05. PubMed PMID: 12462385.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Richards MA, Westcombe AM, Love SB, Littlejohns P, Ramirez AJ. Influence of delay on survival in patients with breast cancer: a systematic review. Lancet. 1999;353(9159):1119-26. Epub 1999/04/21. PubMed PMID: 10209974.CrossRef Richards MA, Westcombe AM, Love SB, Littlejohns P, Ramirez AJ. Influence of delay on survival in patients with breast cancer: a systematic review. Lancet. 1999;353(9159):1119-26. Epub 1999/04/21. PubMed PMID: 10209974.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Yoo TK, Han W, Moon HG, Kim J, Lee JW, Kim MK, Lee E, Kim J, Noh DY. Delay of treatment initiation does not adversely affect survival outcome in breast cancer. Cancer Res Treat. 2016;48(3):962-9. Epub 2015/10/30. https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2015.173. PubMed PMID: 26511801; PMCID: PMC4946375. Yoo TK, Han W, Moon HG, Kim J, Lee JW, Kim MK, Lee E, Kim J, Noh DY. Delay of treatment initiation does not adversely affect survival outcome in breast cancer. Cancer Res Treat. 2016;48(3):962-9. Epub 2015/10/30. https://​doi.​org/​10.​4143/​crt.​2015.​173. PubMed PMID: 26511801; PMCID: PMC4946375.
6.
go back to reference Montella M, Crispo A, D’Aiuto G, De Marco M, de Bellis G, Fabbrocini G, Pizzorusso M, Tamburini M, Silvestra P. Determinant factors for diagnostic delay in operable breast cancer patients. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2001;10(1):53-9. Epub 2001/03/27. PubMed PMID: 11263591.CrossRef Montella M, Crispo A, D’Aiuto G, De Marco M, de Bellis G, Fabbrocini G, Pizzorusso M, Tamburini M, Silvestra P. Determinant factors for diagnostic delay in operable breast cancer patients. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2001;10(1):53-9. Epub 2001/03/27. PubMed PMID: 11263591.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Bleicher RJ, Ruth K, Sigurdson ER, Ross E, Wong YN, Patel SA, Boraas M, Topham NS, Egleston BL. Preoperative delays in the US Medicare population with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(36):4485-92. Epub 2012/11/22. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2012.41.7972. PubMed PMID: 23169513; PMCID: PMC3518727. Bleicher RJ, Ruth K, Sigurdson ER, Ross E, Wong YN, Patel SA, Boraas M, Topham NS, Egleston BL. Preoperative delays in the US Medicare population with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(36):4485-92. Epub 2012/11/22. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1200/​jco.​2012.​41.​7972. PubMed PMID: 23169513; PMCID: PMC3518727.
9.
go back to reference Baena-Canada JM, Rodriguez-Perez L, Gamez-Casado S, Quilez-Cutillas A, Cortes-Carmona C, Rosado-Varela P, Estalella-Mendoza S, Ramirez-Daffos P, Jaen-Olasolo J, Benitez-Rodriguez E. Evaluation of waiting times for breast cancer diagnosis and surgical treatment. Clin Transl Oncol. 2018;20(10):1345-52. Epub 2018/04/11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-018-1867-7. PubMed PMID: 29633184. Baena-Canada JM, Rodriguez-Perez L, Gamez-Casado S, Quilez-Cutillas A, Cortes-Carmona C, Rosado-Varela P, Estalella-Mendoza S, Ramirez-Daffos P, Jaen-Olasolo J, Benitez-Rodriguez E. Evaluation of waiting times for breast cancer diagnosis and surgical treatment. Clin Transl Oncol. 2018;20(10):1345-52. Epub 2018/04/11. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s12094-018-1867-7. PubMed PMID: 29633184.
10.
go back to reference Administration USDoCEaS, cartographer Census Regions and Divisions of the United States. Administration USDoCEaS, cartographer Census Regions and Divisions of the United States.
11.
12.
go back to reference Mammography Quality Standards Act Regulations. In: Administration USFaD, editor. 2002. Mammography Quality Standards Act Regulations. In: Administration USFaD, editor. 2002.
13.
go back to reference Rauscher GH, Murphy AM, Orsi JM, Dupuy DM, Grabler PM, Weldon CB. Beyond the mammography quality standards act: measuring the quality of breast cancer screening programs. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014;202(1):145-51. Epub 2013/11/23. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.13.10806. PubMed PMID: 24261339; PMCID: PMC4113079. Rauscher GH, Murphy AM, Orsi JM, Dupuy DM, Grabler PM, Weldon CB. Beyond the mammography quality standards act: measuring the quality of breast cancer screening programs. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014;202(1):145-51. Epub 2013/11/23. https://​doi.​org/​10.​2214/​ajr.​13.​10806. PubMed PMID: 24261339; PMCID: PMC4113079.
14.
go back to reference Hay JL, Buckley TR, Ostroff JS. The role of cancer worry in cancer screening: a theoretical and empirical review of the literature. Psychooncology. 2005;14(7):517-34. Epub 2004/10/19. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.864. PubMed PMID: 15490428. Hay JL, Buckley TR, Ostroff JS. The role of cancer worry in cancer screening: a theoretical and empirical review of the literature. Psychooncology. 2005;14(7):517-34. Epub 2004/10/19. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​pon.​864. PubMed PMID: 15490428.
16.
Metadata
Title
The Waiting Game: How Long Are Breast Cancer Patients Waiting for Definitive Diagnosis?
Authors
Alexandra Kovar, MD
Michael Bronsert, PhD, MS
Kshama Jaiswal, MD
Colleen Murphy, MD
Dulcy Wolverton, MD
Gretchen Ahrendt, MD
Sarah Tevis, MD
Publication date
01-10-2020
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 10/2020
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-08484-9

Other articles of this Issue 10/2020

Annals of Surgical Oncology 10/2020 Go to the issue