Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2024

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Magnetic Resonance Imaging | Research

The influence of antenatal imaging on prenatal bonding in uncomplicated pregnancies: a mixed methods analysis

Authors: Emily Skelton, Daniel Cromb, Alison Smith, Gill Harrison, Mary Rutherford, Christina Malamateniou, Susan Ayers

Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Prenatal bonding describes the emotional connection expectant parents form to their unborn child. Research acknowledges the association between antenatal imaging and enhanced bonding, but the influencing factors are not well understood, particularly for fathers or when using advanced techniques like fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). This study aimed to identify variables which may predict increased bonding after imaging.

Methods

First-time expectant parents (mothers = 58, fathers = 18) completed a two-part questionnaire (QualtricsXM™) about their expectations and experiences of ultrasound (n = 64) or fetal MRI (n = 12) scans in uncomplicated pregnancies. A modified version of the Prenatal Attachment Inventory (PAI) was used to measure bonding. Qualitative data were collected through open-ended questions. Multivariate linear regression models were used to identify significant parent and imaging predictors for bonding. Qualitative content analysis of free-text responses was conducted to further understand the predictors’ influences.

Results

Bonding scores were significantly increased after imaging for mothers and fathers (p < 0.05). MRI-parents reported significantly higher bonding than ultrasound-parents (p = 0.02). In the first regression model of parent factors (adjusted R2 = 0.17, F = 2.88, p < 0.01), employment status (β = -0.38, p < 0.05) was a significant predictor for bonding post-imaging. The second model of imaging factors (adjusted R2 = 0.19, F = 3.85, p < 0.01) showed imaging modality (β = -0.53), imaging experience (β = 0.42) and parental excitement after the scan (β = 0.29) were significantly (p < 0.05) associated with increased bonding. Seventeen coded themes were generated from the qualitative content analysis, describing how scans offered reassurance about fetal wellbeing and the opportunity to connect with the baby through quality interactions with imaging professionals. A positive scan experience helped parents to feel excited about parenthood. Fetal MRI was considered a superior modality to ultrasound.

Conclusions

Antenatal imaging provides reassurance of fetal development which affirms parents’ emotional investment in the pregnancy and supports the growing connection. Imaging professionals are uniquely positioned to provide parent-centred experiences which may enhance parental excitement and facilitate bonding.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Aertsen M, Diogo MC, Dymarkowski S, Deprest J, Prayer D. Fetal MRI for dummies: what the fetal medicine specialist should know about acquisitions and sequences. Prenat Diagn. 2020;40:6–17.PubMedCrossRef Aertsen M, Diogo MC, Dymarkowski S, Deprest J, Prayer D. Fetal MRI for dummies: what the fetal medicine specialist should know about acquisitions and sequences. Prenat Diagn. 2020;40:6–17.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Leithner K, Pornbacker S, Assem-Hilger E, Krampl E, Ponocny-Seliger E, Prayer D. Psychological reactions in women undergoing fetal magnetic resonance imaging. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;11:396–402.CrossRef Leithner K, Pornbacker S, Assem-Hilger E, Krampl E, Ponocny-Seliger E, Prayer D. Psychological reactions in women undergoing fetal magnetic resonance imaging. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;11:396–402.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Skelton E, Webb R, Malamateniou C, Rutherford M, Ayers S. The impact of antenatal imaging on parent experience and prenatal attachment: a systematic review. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2022;00:1–23. Skelton E, Webb R, Malamateniou C, Rutherford M, Ayers S. The impact of antenatal imaging on parent experience and prenatal attachment: a systematic review. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2022;00:1–23.
7.
go back to reference Walsh TB, Tolman RM, Singh V, Davis MM, Davis RN. Expectant fathers’ presence at prenatal ultrasounds: an opportunity for engagement. Soc Work Res. 2017;41:181–5.CrossRef Walsh TB, Tolman RM, Singh V, Davis MM, Davis RN. Expectant fathers’ presence at prenatal ultrasounds: an opportunity for engagement. Soc Work Res. 2017;41:181–5.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Muller M, Mercer R. Development of the prenatal attachment inventory. West J Nurs Res. 1993;15:199–215.PubMedCrossRef Muller M, Mercer R. Development of the prenatal attachment inventory. West J Nurs Res. 1993;15:199–215.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Redshaw M, Martin C. Babies, ‘bonding’ and ideas about parental ‘attachment.’ J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2013;31:219–21.CrossRef Redshaw M, Martin C. Babies, ‘bonding’ and ideas about parental ‘attachment.’ J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2013;31:219–21.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Trombetta T, Giordano M, Santoniccolo F, Vismara L, Della Vedova AM, Rollè L. Pre-natal attachment and parent-to-infant attachment: A systematic review. Front Psychol. 2021;12:1–17.CrossRef Trombetta T, Giordano M, Santoniccolo F, Vismara L, Della Vedova AM, Rollè L. Pre-natal attachment and parent-to-infant attachment: A systematic review. Front Psychol. 2021;12:1–17.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Ramchandani PG, Domoney J, Sethna V, Psychogiou L, Vlachos H, Murray L. Do early father-infant interactions predict the onset of externalising behaviours in young children? Findings from a longitudinal cohort study. J Child Psychol Psychiatry Allied Discip. 2013;54:56–64.CrossRef Ramchandani PG, Domoney J, Sethna V, Psychogiou L, Vlachos H, Murray L. Do early father-infant interactions predict the onset of externalising behaviours in young children? Findings from a longitudinal cohort study. J Child Psychol Psychiatry Allied Discip. 2013;54:56–64.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Borg Cunen N, Jomeen J, Borg Xuereb R, Poat A. A narrative review of interventions addressing the parental–fetal relationship. Women and Birth. 2017;30:e141–51.PubMedCrossRef Borg Cunen N, Jomeen J, Borg Xuereb R, Poat A. A narrative review of interventions addressing the parental–fetal relationship. Women and Birth. 2017;30:e141–51.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Borg Cunen N, Jomeen J, Poat A, Borg XR. ‘A small person that we made’ - Parental conceptualisation of the unborn child: A constructivist grounded theory. Midwifery. 2022;104:103198.PubMedCrossRef Borg Cunen N, Jomeen J, Poat A, Borg XR. ‘A small person that we made’ - Parental conceptualisation of the unborn child: A constructivist grounded theory. Midwifery. 2022;104:103198.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Roberts J. ‘Wakey wakey baby’: Narrating four-dimensional (4D) bonding scans. Sociol Heal Illn. 2012;34:299–314.CrossRef Roberts J. ‘Wakey wakey baby’: Narrating four-dimensional (4D) bonding scans. Sociol Heal Illn. 2012;34:299–314.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Reed K, Kochetkova I, Molyneux-Hodgson S. ‘You’re looking for different parts in a jigsaw’: foetal MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) as an emerging technology in professional practice. Sociol Heal Illn. 2016;38:736–52.CrossRef Reed K, Kochetkova I, Molyneux-Hodgson S. ‘You’re looking for different parts in a jigsaw’: foetal MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) as an emerging technology in professional practice. Sociol Heal Illn. 2016;38:736–52.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Lie M, Graham R, Robson S, Griffiths P. “He looks gorgeous” - iuMR images and the transforming of foetal and parental identities. Sociol Health Illn. 2019;41:360–77.PubMedCrossRef Lie M, Graham R, Robson S, Griffiths P. “He looks gorgeous” - iuMR images and the transforming of foetal and parental identities. Sociol Health Illn. 2019;41:360–77.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Lagarto A, Duaso MJ. Fathers’ experiences of fetal attachment: A qualitative study. Infant Ment Health J. 2022;43:328–39.PubMedCrossRef Lagarto A, Duaso MJ. Fathers’ experiences of fetal attachment: A qualitative study. Infant Ment Health J. 2022;43:328–39.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Hodgson S, Painter J, Kilby L, Hirst J. The experiences of first-time fathers in perinatal services: Present but invisible. Healthc. 2021;9:1–12.CrossRef Hodgson S, Painter J, Kilby L, Hirst J. The experiences of first-time fathers in perinatal services: Present but invisible. Healthc. 2021;9:1–12.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbrouckef JP. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet. 2007;370:1453–7.CrossRef Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbrouckef JP. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet. 2007;370:1453–7.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Skelton E, Drey N, Rutherford M, Ayers S, Malamateniou C. Electronic consenting for conducting research remotely: A review of current practice and key recommendations for using e-consenting. Int J Med Inform. 2020;143:104271.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Skelton E, Drey N, Rutherford M, Ayers S, Malamateniou C. Electronic consenting for conducting research remotely: A review of current practice and key recommendations for using e-consenting. Int J Med Inform. 2020;143:104271.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Ranjbar F, Warmelink JC, Gharacheh M. Prenatal attachment in pregnancy following assisted reproductive technology: a literature review. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2020;38:86–108.PubMedCrossRef Ranjbar F, Warmelink JC, Gharacheh M. Prenatal attachment in pregnancy following assisted reproductive technology: a literature review. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2020;38:86–108.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Armstrong DS. Impact of prior perinatal loss on subsequent pregnancies. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2004;33:765–73.PubMedCrossRef Armstrong DS. Impact of prior perinatal loss on subsequent pregnancies. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2004;33:765–73.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Skelton E, Smith A, Harrison G, Rutherford M, Ayers S, Malamateniou C. The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on UK parent experience of pregnancy ultrasound scans and parent-fetal bonding: A mixed methods analysis. PLoS One. 2023;18(6):e0286578.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Skelton E, Smith A, Harrison G, Rutherford M, Ayers S, Malamateniou C. The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on UK parent experience of pregnancy ultrasound scans and parent-fetal bonding: A mixed methods analysis. PLoS One. 2023;18(6):e0286578.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Barkham M, Bewick B, Mullin T, et al. The CORE-10: A short measure of psychological distress for routine use in the psychological therapies. Couns Psychother Res. 2013;13:3–13.CrossRef Barkham M, Bewick B, Mullin T, et al. The CORE-10: A short measure of psychological distress for routine use in the psychological therapies. Couns Psychother Res. 2013;13:3–13.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Coates R, Ayers S, de Visser R, Thornton A. Evaluation of the CORE-10 to assess psychological distress in pregnancy. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2020;38:311–23.PubMedCrossRef Coates R, Ayers S, de Visser R, Thornton A. Evaluation of the CORE-10 to assess psychological distress in pregnancy. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2020;38:311–23.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Connell J, Barkham M. CORE-10 User Manual, Version 1.1. CORE system Trust & CORE Information Management Systems Ltd. 2007. Connell J, Barkham M. CORE-10 User Manual, Version 1.1. CORE system Trust & CORE Information Management Systems Ltd. 2007.
29.
go back to reference Ekelin M, Svalenius EC, Dykes A. Developing the PEER-U scale to measure parents’ expectations, experiences and reactions to routine ultrasound examinations during pregnancy. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2008;26:211–28.CrossRef Ekelin M, Svalenius EC, Dykes A. Developing the PEER-U scale to measure parents’ expectations, experiences and reactions to routine ultrasound examinations during pregnancy. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2008;26:211–28.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Righetti PL, Dell’Avanzo M, Grigio M, Nicolini U. Maternal/paternal antenatal attachment and fourth-dimensional ultrasound technique: A preliminary report. Br J Psychol. 2005;96:129–37.PubMedCrossRef Righetti PL, Dell’Avanzo M, Grigio M, Nicolini U. Maternal/paternal antenatal attachment and fourth-dimensional ultrasound technique: A preliminary report. Br J Psychol. 2005;96:129–37.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference de Jong-Pleij EAP, Ribbert LSM, Pistorius LR, Tromp E, Mulder EJH, Bilardo CM. Three-dimensional ultrasound and maternal bonding, a third trimester study and a review. Prenat Diagn. 2013;33:81–8.PubMedCrossRef de Jong-Pleij EAP, Ribbert LSM, Pistorius LR, Tromp E, Mulder EJH, Bilardo CM. Three-dimensional ultrasound and maternal bonding, a third trimester study and a review. Prenat Diagn. 2013;33:81–8.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Austin PC, Steyerberg EW. The number of subjects per variable required in linear regression analyses. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68:627–36.PubMedCrossRef Austin PC, Steyerberg EW. The number of subjects per variable required in linear regression analyses. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68:627–36.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Mishra P, Pandey C, Singh U, Gupta A, Sahu C, Keshri A. Descriptive statistics and normality tests for statistical data. Ann Card Anaesth. 2017;22:67–72. Mishra P, Pandey C, Singh U, Gupta A, Sahu C, Keshri A. Descriptive statistics and normality tests for statistical data. Ann Card Anaesth. 2017;22:67–72.
34.
go back to reference Alkharusi H. Categorical variables in regression analysis: A comparison of dummy and effect coding. Int J Educ. 2012;4:202.CrossRef Alkharusi H. Categorical variables in regression analysis: A comparison of dummy and effect coding. Int J Educ. 2012;4:202.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Kleinheksel AJ, Rockich-Winston N, Tawfik H, Wyatt TR. Qualitative research in pharmacy education: Demystifying content analysis. Am J Pharm Educ. 2020;84:127–37.CrossRef Kleinheksel AJ, Rockich-Winston N, Tawfik H, Wyatt TR. Qualitative research in pharmacy education: Demystifying content analysis. Am J Pharm Educ. 2020;84:127–37.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15:1277–88.PubMedCrossRef Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15:1277–88.PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Bengtsson M. How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. NursingPlus Open. 2016;2:8–14.CrossRef Bengtsson M. How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. NursingPlus Open. 2016;2:8–14.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Condon JT. The assessment of antenatal emotional attachment: Development of a questionnaire instrument. Br J Med Psychol. 1993;66:167–83.PubMedCrossRef Condon JT. The assessment of antenatal emotional attachment: Development of a questionnaire instrument. Br J Med Psychol. 1993;66:167–83.PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Kaur S, Sagar N. Comparative study to assess the maternal and paternal fetal attachment among the expectant mothers and fathers. Int J Reprod Contraception, Obstet Gynecol. 2017;6:3134.CrossRef Kaur S, Sagar N. Comparative study to assess the maternal and paternal fetal attachment among the expectant mothers and fathers. Int J Reprod Contraception, Obstet Gynecol. 2017;6:3134.CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Rowe H, Fisher J, Quinlivan J. Women who are well informed about prenatal genetic screening delay emotional attachment to their fetus. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol. 2009;30:34–41.CrossRef Rowe H, Fisher J, Quinlivan J. Women who are well informed about prenatal genetic screening delay emotional attachment to their fetus. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol. 2009;30:34–41.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Rothman B. The tentative pregnancy: Prenatal diagnosis and the future of motherhood. 1st ed. New York: Viking; 1986. Rothman B. The tentative pregnancy: Prenatal diagnosis and the future of motherhood. 1st ed. New York: Viking; 1986.
43.
go back to reference Thomas GM, Roberts J, Griffiths FE. Ultrasound as a technology of reassurance? How pregnant women and health care professionals articulate ultrasound reassurance and its limitations. Sociol Heal Illn. 2017;39:893–907.CrossRef Thomas GM, Roberts J, Griffiths FE. Ultrasound as a technology of reassurance? How pregnant women and health care professionals articulate ultrasound reassurance and its limitations. Sociol Heal Illn. 2017;39:893–907.CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Pilnick A, Zayts O. ‘It’s just a likelihood’: Uncertainty as topic and resource in conveying ‘positive’ results in an antenatal screening clinic. Symb Interact. 2014;37:187–208.CrossRef Pilnick A, Zayts O. ‘It’s just a likelihood’: Uncertainty as topic and resource in conveying ‘positive’ results in an antenatal screening clinic. Symb Interact. 2014;37:187–208.CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Harpel TS. Fear of the unknown: Ultrasound and anxiety about fetal health. Health (Irvine Calif). 2008;12:295–312. Harpel TS. Fear of the unknown: Ultrasound and anxiety about fetal health. Health (Irvine Calif). 2008;12:295–312.
46.
go back to reference Reed K, Kochetkova I, Whitby E. Visualising uncertainty: Examining women’s views on the role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in late pregnancy. Soc Sci Med. 2016;164:19–26.PubMedCrossRef Reed K, Kochetkova I, Whitby E. Visualising uncertainty: Examining women’s views on the role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in late pregnancy. Soc Sci Med. 2016;164:19–26.PubMedCrossRef
47.
go back to reference Close C, Bateson K, Douglas H. Does prenatal attachment increase over pregnancy? Br J Midwifery. 2020;28:436–41.CrossRef Close C, Bateson K, Douglas H. Does prenatal attachment increase over pregnancy? Br J Midwifery. 2020;28:436–41.CrossRef
48.
go back to reference van der Zande ISE, van der Graaf R, Hooft L, van Delden JJM. Facilitators and barriers to pregnant women’s participation in research: A systematic review. Women and Birth. 2018;31:350–61.PubMedCrossRef van der Zande ISE, van der Graaf R, Hooft L, van Delden JJM. Facilitators and barriers to pregnant women’s participation in research: A systematic review. Women and Birth. 2018;31:350–61.PubMedCrossRef
49.
go back to reference Williams C. Dilemmas in fetal medicine: Premature application of technology or responding to women’s choice? Sociol Heal Illn. 2006;28:1–20.CrossRef Williams C. Dilemmas in fetal medicine: Premature application of technology or responding to women’s choice? Sociol Heal Illn. 2006;28:1–20.CrossRef
50.
go back to reference Westerneng M, Diepeveen M, Witteveen AB, et al. Experiences of pregnant women with a third trimester routine ultrasound - A qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19:1–10.CrossRef Westerneng M, Diepeveen M, Witteveen AB, et al. Experiences of pregnant women with a third trimester routine ultrasound - A qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19:1–10.CrossRef
51.
go back to reference Walsh J. Definitions matter: If maternal-fetal relationships are not attachment, what are they? Arch Womens Ment Health. 2010;13:449–51.PubMedCrossRef Walsh J. Definitions matter: If maternal-fetal relationships are not attachment, what are they? Arch Womens Ment Health. 2010;13:449–51.PubMedCrossRef
52.
go back to reference Harwood K, McLean N, Durkin K. First-time mothers’ expectations of parenthood: What happens when optimistic expectations are not matched by later experiences? Dev Psychol. 2007;43:1–12.PubMedCrossRef Harwood K, McLean N, Durkin K. First-time mothers’ expectations of parenthood: What happens when optimistic expectations are not matched by later experiences? Dev Psychol. 2007;43:1–12.PubMedCrossRef
53.
go back to reference Kowalcek I, Huber G, Mühlhof A, Gembruch U. Prenatal medicine related to stress and depressive reactions of pregnant women and their partners. J Perinat Med. 2003;31:216–24.PubMedCrossRef Kowalcek I, Huber G, Mühlhof A, Gembruch U. Prenatal medicine related to stress and depressive reactions of pregnant women and their partners. J Perinat Med. 2003;31:216–24.PubMedCrossRef
54.
go back to reference Redshaw J, Henderson M. Fathers’ engagement in pregnancy and childbirth. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13:1–15.CrossRef Redshaw J, Henderson M. Fathers’ engagement in pregnancy and childbirth. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13:1–15.CrossRef
55.
go back to reference Thomson G, Balaam MC, Nowland R, Crossland N, Moncrieff G, Heys S, et al. Companionship for women/birthing people using antenatal and intrapartum care in England during COVID-19: A mixed-methods analysis of national and organisational responses and perspectives. BMJ Open. 2022;12:1–12.CrossRef Thomson G, Balaam MC, Nowland R, Crossland N, Moncrieff G, Heys S, et al. Companionship for women/birthing people using antenatal and intrapartum care in England during COVID-19: A mixed-methods analysis of national and organisational responses and perspectives. BMJ Open. 2022;12:1–12.CrossRef
56.
go back to reference Genesoni L, Tallandini MA. Men’s psychological transition to fatherhood: An analysis of the literature, 1989–2008. Birth. 2009;36:305–18.PubMedCrossRef Genesoni L, Tallandini MA. Men’s psychological transition to fatherhood: An analysis of the literature, 1989–2008. Birth. 2009;36:305–18.PubMedCrossRef
57.
go back to reference Finnbogadottir H, Svalenius EC, Persson EK. Expectant first-time fathers’ experiences of pregnancy. Midwifery. 2003;19:96–105.PubMedCrossRef Finnbogadottir H, Svalenius EC, Persson EK. Expectant first-time fathers’ experiences of pregnancy. Midwifery. 2003;19:96–105.PubMedCrossRef
58.
go back to reference Yogman M, Garfield CF. Fathers’ roles in the care and development of their children: The role of pediatricians. Pediatrics. 2016;138:1–15.CrossRef Yogman M, Garfield CF. Fathers’ roles in the care and development of their children: The role of pediatricians. Pediatrics. 2016;138:1–15.CrossRef
59.
go back to reference Dolan A, Coe C. Men, masculine identities and childbirth. Sociol Heal Illn. 2011;33:1019–34.CrossRef Dolan A, Coe C. Men, masculine identities and childbirth. Sociol Heal Illn. 2011;33:1019–34.CrossRef
61.
go back to reference Salzmann-Erikson M, Eriksson H. Fathers sharing about early parental support in health-care - virtual discussions on an Internet forum. Heal Soc Care Community. 2013;21:381–90.CrossRef Salzmann-Erikson M, Eriksson H. Fathers sharing about early parental support in health-care - virtual discussions on an Internet forum. Heal Soc Care Community. 2013;21:381–90.CrossRef
62.
go back to reference Chin R, Hall P, Daiches A. Fathers’ experiences of their transition to fatherhood: A metasynthesis. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2011;29:4–18.CrossRef Chin R, Hall P, Daiches A. Fathers’ experiences of their transition to fatherhood: A metasynthesis. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2011;29:4–18.CrossRef
63.
go back to reference Cuijlits I, van de Wetering AP, Endendijk JJ, van Baar AL, Potharst ES, Pop VJM. Risk and protective factors for pre- and postnatal bonding. Infant Ment Health J. 2019;40:768–85.PubMedCrossRef Cuijlits I, van de Wetering AP, Endendijk JJ, van Baar AL, Potharst ES, Pop VJM. Risk and protective factors for pre- and postnatal bonding. Infant Ment Health J. 2019;40:768–85.PubMedCrossRef
64.
go back to reference Widarsson M, Engström G, Tydén T, Lundberg P, Hammar LM. ‘Paddling upstream’: Fathers’ involvement during pregnancy as described by expectant fathers and mothers. J Clin Nurs. 2015;24:1059–68.PubMedCrossRef Widarsson M, Engström G, Tydén T, Lundberg P, Hammar LM. ‘Paddling upstream’: Fathers’ involvement during pregnancy as described by expectant fathers and mothers. J Clin Nurs. 2015;24:1059–68.PubMedCrossRef
65.
go back to reference Masroor I, Ahmed H, Ajmal F. Impact of prenatal ultrasound consultation on maternal anxiety. J Dow Univ Heal Sci. 2008;2:16–20. Masroor I, Ahmed H, Ajmal F. Impact of prenatal ultrasound consultation on maternal anxiety. J Dow Univ Heal Sci. 2008;2:16–20.
66.
go back to reference Skelton E, Harrison G, Rutherford M, Ayers S, Malamateniou C. UK obstetric sonographers ’ experiences of the COVID-19 pandemic : Burnout, role satisfaction and impact on clinical practice. Ultrasound. 2023;31(1):12–22. Skelton E, Harrison G, Rutherford M, Ayers S, Malamateniou C. UK obstetric sonographers ’ experiences of the COVID-19 pandemic : Burnout, role satisfaction and impact on clinical practice. Ultrasound. 2023;31(1):12–22.
67.
go back to reference Skelton E, Smith A, Harrison G, Rutherford M, Ayers S, Malamateniou C. “It has been the most difficult time in my career”: A qualitative exploration of UK obstetric sonographers’ experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic. Radiography. 2023;29:582–9.PubMedCrossRef Skelton E, Smith A, Harrison G, Rutherford M, Ayers S, Malamateniou C. “It has been the most difficult time in my career”: A qualitative exploration of UK obstetric sonographers’ experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic. Radiography. 2023;29:582–9.PubMedCrossRef
68.
go back to reference Condon JT, Corkindale C. The correlates of antenatal attachment in pregnant women. Br J Med Psychol. 1997;70:359–72.PubMedCrossRef Condon JT, Corkindale C. The correlates of antenatal attachment in pregnant women. Br J Med Psychol. 1997;70:359–72.PubMedCrossRef
69.
go back to reference Karaca PP, Koyucu RG, Aksu SÇ. The relatıonshıp between pregnant women’s anxıety levels about coronavırus and prenatal attachment. Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2022;36:78–84.PubMedCrossRef Karaca PP, Koyucu RG, Aksu SÇ. The relatıonshıp between pregnant women’s anxıety levels about coronavırus and prenatal attachment. Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2022;36:78–84.PubMedCrossRef
70.
go back to reference Göbel A, Stuhrmann LY, Harder S, Schulte-Markwort M, Mudra S. The association between maternal-fetal bonding and prenatal anxiety: An explanatory analysis and systematic review. J Affect Disord. 2018;239:313–27.PubMedCrossRef Göbel A, Stuhrmann LY, Harder S, Schulte-Markwort M, Mudra S. The association between maternal-fetal bonding and prenatal anxiety: An explanatory analysis and systematic review. J Affect Disord. 2018;239:313–27.PubMedCrossRef
71.
go back to reference van den Bergh B, Simons A. A review of scales to measure the mother-foetus relationship. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2009;27:114–26.CrossRef van den Bergh B, Simons A. A review of scales to measure the mother-foetus relationship. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2009;27:114–26.CrossRef
72.
go back to reference Yarcheski A, Mahon NE, Yarcheski TJ, Hanks MM, Cannella BL. A meta-analytic study of predictors of maternal-fetal attachment. Int J Nurs Stud. 2009;46:708–15.PubMedCrossRef Yarcheski A, Mahon NE, Yarcheski TJ, Hanks MM, Cannella BL. A meta-analytic study of predictors of maternal-fetal attachment. Int J Nurs Stud. 2009;46:708–15.PubMedCrossRef
74.
go back to reference Masroor I, Ahmed H, Ajmal F. Impact of prenatal ultrasound consultation on maternal anxiety. J Dow Univ Heal Sci. 2008;2:16–20. Masroor I, Ahmed H, Ajmal F. Impact of prenatal ultrasound consultation on maternal anxiety. J Dow Univ Heal Sci. 2008;2:16–20.
75.
go back to reference Pulliainen H, Niela-Vilén H, Ekholm E, Ahlqvist-Björkroth S. Experiences of interactive ultrasound examination among women at risk of preterm birth: A qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19:1–8.CrossRef Pulliainen H, Niela-Vilén H, Ekholm E, Ahlqvist-Björkroth S. Experiences of interactive ultrasound examination among women at risk of preterm birth: A qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19:1–8.CrossRef
76.
go back to reference Walsh TB. Your baby is so happy, active, uncooperative: How prenatal care providers contribute to parents’ mental representations of the baby. Midwifery. 2020;83:102630.PubMedCrossRef Walsh TB. Your baby is so happy, active, uncooperative: How prenatal care providers contribute to parents’ mental representations of the baby. Midwifery. 2020;83:102630.PubMedCrossRef
77.
go back to reference Kibiswa NK. Directed qualitative content analysis (DQlCA): A tool for conflict analysis. Qual Rep. 2019;24:2059–79. Kibiswa NK. Directed qualitative content analysis (DQlCA): A tool for conflict analysis. Qual Rep. 2019;24:2059–79.
78.
go back to reference Krumpal I. Determinants of social desirability bias in sensitive surveys: A literature review. Qual Quant. 2013;47:2025–47.CrossRef Krumpal I. Determinants of social desirability bias in sensitive surveys: A literature review. Qual Quant. 2013;47:2025–47.CrossRef
79.
go back to reference Darwin Z, Galdas P, Hinchliff S, Littlewood E, McMillan D, McGowan L, et al. Fathers’ views and experiences of their own mental health during pregnancy and the first postnatal year: A qualitative interview study of men participating in the UK Born and Bred in Yorkshire (BaBY) cohort. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17:1–15.CrossRef Darwin Z, Galdas P, Hinchliff S, Littlewood E, McMillan D, McGowan L, et al. Fathers’ views and experiences of their own mental health during pregnancy and the first postnatal year: A qualitative interview study of men participating in the UK Born and Bred in Yorkshire (BaBY) cohort. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17:1–15.CrossRef
80.
go back to reference Panter-Brick C, Burgess A, Eggerman M, McAllister F, Pruett K, Leckman JF. Practitioner review: Engaging fathers - Recommendations for a game change in parenting interventions based on a systematic review of the global evidence. J Child Psychol Psychiatry Allied Discip. 2014;55:1187–212.CrossRef Panter-Brick C, Burgess A, Eggerman M, McAllister F, Pruett K, Leckman JF. Practitioner review: Engaging fathers - Recommendations for a game change in parenting interventions based on a systematic review of the global evidence. J Child Psychol Psychiatry Allied Discip. 2014;55:1187–212.CrossRef
81.
go back to reference Thornton J. Clinical trials suspended in UK to prioritise covid-19 studies and free up staff. BMJ. 2020;368:m1172.PubMedCrossRef Thornton J. Clinical trials suspended in UK to prioritise covid-19 studies and free up staff. BMJ. 2020;368:m1172.PubMedCrossRef
82.
go back to reference Riley RD, Ensor J, Snell KIE, Harrell FE, Martin GP, Reitsma JB, et al. Calculating the sample size required for developing a clinical prediction model. BMJ. 2020;368:1–12. Riley RD, Ensor J, Snell KIE, Harrell FE, Martin GP, Reitsma JB, et al. Calculating the sample size required for developing a clinical prediction model. BMJ. 2020;368:1–12.
Metadata
Title
The influence of antenatal imaging on prenatal bonding in uncomplicated pregnancies: a mixed methods analysis
Authors
Emily Skelton
Daniel Cromb
Alison Smith
Gill Harrison
Mary Rutherford
Christina Malamateniou
Susan Ayers
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-024-06469-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2024 Go to the issue