Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Trials 1/2020

Open Access 01-12-2020 | Magnetic Resonance Imaging | Study protocol

Protocol for a randomized controlled trial examining multilevel prediction of response to behavioral activation and exposure-based therapy for generalized anxiety disorder

Authors: J. Santiago, E. Akeman, N. Kirlic, A. N. Clausen, K. T. Cosgrove, T. J. McDermott, B. Mathis, M. Paulus, M. G. Craske, J. Abelson, C. Martell, K. Wolitzky-Taylor, J. Bodurka, W. K. Thompson, Robin L. Aupperle

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Only 40–60% of patients with generalized anxiety disorder experience long-lasting improvement with gold standard psychosocial interventions. Identifying neurobehavioral factors that predict treatment success might provide specific targets for more individualized interventions, fostering more optimal outcomes and bringing us closer to the goal of “personalized medicine.” Research suggests that reward and threat processing (approach/avoidance behavior) and cognitive control may be important for understanding anxiety and comorbid depressive disorders and may have relevance to treatment outcomes. This study was designed to determine whether approach-avoidance behaviors and associated neural responses moderate treatment response to exposure-based versus behavioral activation therapy for generalized anxiety disorder.

Methods/design

We are conducting a randomized controlled trial involving two 10-week group-based interventions: exposure-based therapy or behavioral activation therapy. These interventions focus on specific and unique aspects of threat and reward processing, respectively. Prior to and after treatment, participants are interviewed and undergo behavioral, biomarker, and neuroimaging assessments, with a focus on approach and avoidance processing and decision-making. Primary analyses will use mixed models to examine whether hypothesized approach, avoidance, and conflict arbitration behaviors and associated neural responses at baseline moderate symptom change with treatment, as assessed using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder–7 item scale. Exploratory analyses will examine additional potential treatment moderators and use data reduction and machine learning methods.

Discussion

This protocol provides a framework for how studies may be designed to move the field toward neuroscience-informed and personalized psychosocial treatments. The results of this trial will have implications for approach-avoidance processing in generalized anxiety disorder, relationships between levels of analysis (i.e., behavioral, neural), and predictors of behavioral therapy outcome.

Trial registration

The study was retrospectively registered within 21 days of first participant enrollment in accordance with FDAAA 801 with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02807480. Registered on June 21, 2016, before results.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
11.
go back to reference Marciniak MD, Lage MJ, Dunayevich E, Russell JM, Bowman L, Landbloom RP, et al. The cost of treating anxiety: the medical and demographic correlates that impact total medical costs. Depress Anxiety. 2005;21(4):178–84.CrossRefPubMed Marciniak MD, Lage MJ, Dunayevich E, Russell JM, Bowman L, Landbloom RP, et al. The cost of treating anxiety: the medical and demographic correlates that impact total medical costs. Depress Anxiety. 2005;21(4):178–84.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Altamura AC, Dell’osso B, D’Urso N, Russo M, Fumagalli S, Mundo E. Duration of untreated illness as a predictor of treatment response and clinical course in generalized anxiety disorder. CNS Spectr. 2008;13(5):415–22.CrossRefPubMed Altamura AC, Dell’osso B, D’Urso N, Russo M, Fumagalli S, Mundo E. Duration of untreated illness as a predictor of treatment response and clinical course in generalized anxiety disorder. CNS Spectr. 2008;13(5):415–22.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Aupperle RL, Paulus MP. Neural systems underlying approach and avoidance in anxiety disorders. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2010;12(4):517–31.PubMed Aupperle RL, Paulus MP. Neural systems underlying approach and avoidance in anxiety disorders. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2010;12(4):517–31.PubMed
21.
25.
go back to reference Craske MG, Barlow DH. Mastery of your anxiety and worry. 2nd ed. San Antonio: Psychological Corp.; 2006.CrossRef Craske MG, Barlow DH. Mastery of your anxiety and worry. 2nd ed. San Antonio: Psychological Corp.; 2006.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Martell CR, Dimidjian S, Herman-Dunn R. Behavioral activation for depression: a clinician’s guide. New York: Guilford Press; 2013. Martell CR, Dimidjian S, Herman-Dunn R. Behavioral activation for depression: a clinician’s guide. New York: Guilford Press; 2013.
30.
go back to reference Sheehan DV, Harnett-Sheehan K, Raj BA. The measurement of disability. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 1996;11 Suppl 3:89–95.CrossRefPubMed Sheehan DV, Harnett-Sheehan K, Raj BA. The measurement of disability. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 1996;11 Suppl 3:89–95.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5®). 5th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2013.CrossRef American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5®). 5th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2013.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Norman SB, Hami Cissell S, Means-Christensen AJ, Stein MB. Development and validation of an overall anxiety severity and impairment scale (OASIS). Depress Anxiety. 2006;23(4):245–9.CrossRefPubMed Norman SB, Hami Cissell S, Means-Christensen AJ, Stein MB. Development and validation of an overall anxiety severity and impairment scale (OASIS). Depress Anxiety. 2006;23(4):245–9.CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Sheehan DV, Lecrubier Y, Sheehan KH, Amorim P, Janavs J, Weiller E, et al. The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview. J Clin Psychiatry. 1998;59 Suppl 20:22–33.PubMed Sheehan DV, Lecrubier Y, Sheehan KH, Amorim P, Janavs J, Weiller E, et al. The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview. J Clin Psychiatry. 1998;59 Suppl 20:22–33.PubMed
42.
go back to reference Spielberger C. State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (Form Y) manual. Palo Alto: Mind Garden; 1983. Spielberger C. State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (Form Y) manual. Palo Alto: Mind Garden; 1983.
43.
go back to reference Taylor S, Koch WJ, McNally RJ, Crockett DJ. Conceptualizations of anxiety sensitivity. Psychol Assess. 1992;4(2):245.CrossRef Taylor S, Koch WJ, McNally RJ, Crockett DJ. Conceptualizations of anxiety sensitivity. Psychol Assess. 1992;4(2):245.CrossRef
46.
go back to reference Baker SL, Heinrichs N, Kim HJ, Hofmann SG. The Liebowitz social anxiety scale as a self-report instrument: a preliminary psychometric analysis. Behav Res Ther. 2002;40(6):701–15.CrossRefPubMed Baker SL, Heinrichs N, Kim HJ, Hofmann SG. The Liebowitz social anxiety scale as a self-report instrument: a preliminary psychometric analysis. Behav Res Ther. 2002;40(6):701–15.CrossRefPubMed
51.
go back to reference Vrana S, Lauterbach D. Prevalence of traumatic events and post-traumatic psychological symptoms in a nonclinical sample of college students. J Trauma Stress. 1994;7(2):289–302.CrossRefPubMed Vrana S, Lauterbach D. Prevalence of traumatic events and post-traumatic psychological symptoms in a nonclinical sample of college students. J Trauma Stress. 1994;7(2):289–302.CrossRefPubMed
54.
go back to reference Carver CS, White TL. Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: the BIS/BAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1994;67(2):319.CrossRef Carver CS, White TL. Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: the BIS/BAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1994;67(2):319.CrossRef
55.
go back to reference Burns GL, Keortge SG, Formea GM, Sternberger LG. Revision of the Padua Inventory of obsessive compulsive disorder symptoms: distinctions between worry, obsessions, and compulsions. Behav Res Ther. 1996;34(2):163–73.CrossRefPubMed Burns GL, Keortge SG, Formea GM, Sternberger LG. Revision of the Padua Inventory of obsessive compulsive disorder symptoms: distinctions between worry, obsessions, and compulsions. Behav Res Ther. 1996;34(2):163–73.CrossRefPubMed
56.
go back to reference John OP, Srivastava S. The Big Five trait taxonomy: history, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. Handbook of personality: Theory and research. 1999;2(1999):102–38. John OP, Srivastava S. The Big Five trait taxonomy: history, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. Handbook of personality: Theory and research. 1999;2(1999):102–38.
60.
go back to reference Devilly GJ, Borkovec TD. Psychometric properties of the credibility/expectancy questionnaire. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2000;31(2):73–86.CrossRefPubMed Devilly GJ, Borkovec TD. Psychometric properties of the credibility/expectancy questionnaire. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2000;31(2):73–86.CrossRefPubMed
66.
go back to reference Matsumoto D, Ekman P. Japanese and Caucasian facial expressions of emotion (JACFEE). San Francisco: Intercultural and Emotion Research Laboratory, Department of Psychology, San Francisco State University; 1988. Matsumoto D, Ekman P. Japanese and Caucasian facial expressions of emotion (JACFEE). San Francisco: Intercultural and Emotion Research Laboratory, Department of Psychology, San Francisco State University; 1988.
67.
go back to reference Wilkinson GS, Robertson GJ. Wide Range Achievement Test 4 professional manual. Lutz: Psychological Assessment Resources; 2006. Wilkinson GS, Robertson GJ. Wide Range Achievement Test 4 professional manual. Lutz: Psychological Assessment Resources; 2006.
68.
go back to reference Delis DC, Kaplan E. Delis-Kaplan Executive Function battery. San Antonio: Psychological Corpor.; 2001. Delis DC, Kaplan E. Delis-Kaplan Executive Function battery. San Antonio: Psychological Corpor.; 2001.
69.
go back to reference Wechsler D, Coalson DL, Raiford SE. WAIS-IV technical and interpretive manual. San Antonio: Psychological Corp.; 2008. Wechsler D, Coalson DL, Raiford SE. WAIS-IV technical and interpretive manual. San Antonio: Psychological Corp.; 2008.
70.
go back to reference Delis DC, Kramer JH, Kaplan E, Ober BA. The California Verbal Learning Test. Second ed. San Antonio: The Psychological Corp.; 2000. Delis DC, Kramer JH, Kaplan E, Ober BA. The California Verbal Learning Test. Second ed. San Antonio: The Psychological Corp.; 2000.
72.
go back to reference Lang PJ, Bradley MM, Cuthbert BN. International Affective Picture System (IAPS): affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual. Technical Report A-8. Gainesville: University of Florida; 2008. Lang PJ, Bradley MM, Cuthbert BN. International Affective Picture System (IAPS): affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual. Technical Report A-8. Gainesville: University of Florida; 2008.
73.
go back to reference Bradley MM, Lang PJ. International Affective Digitized Sounds (IADS): stimuli, instruction manual, and affective ratings. Tech. Rep. No. B-2. Gainesville: Center for Research in Psychophysiology, University of Florida; 1999. Bradley MM, Lang PJ. International Affective Digitized Sounds (IADS): stimuli, instruction manual, and affective ratings. Tech. Rep. No. B-2. Gainesville: Center for Research in Psychophysiology, University of Florida; 1999.
75.
go back to reference Tibshirani R. Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol. 1996;58(1):267–88. Tibshirani R. Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol. 1996;58(1):267–88.
76.
go back to reference Ramsay J, Silverman BW. Functional data analysis. New York: Springer Science + Business; 2005.CrossRef Ramsay J, Silverman BW. Functional data analysis. New York: Springer Science + Business; 2005.CrossRef
77.
go back to reference MacKinnon DP, Lockwood CM, Hoffman JM, West SG, Sheets V. A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychol Methods. 2002;7(1):83–104.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral MacKinnon DP, Lockwood CM, Hoffman JM, West SG, Sheets V. A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychol Methods. 2002;7(1):83–104.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
78.
go back to reference Bureau A, Dupuis J, Falls K, Lunetta KL, Hayward B, Keith TP, et al. Identifying SNPs predictive of phenotype using random forests. Genet Epidemiol. 2005;28(2):171–82.CrossRefPubMed Bureau A, Dupuis J, Falls K, Lunetta KL, Hayward B, Keith TP, et al. Identifying SNPs predictive of phenotype using random forests. Genet Epidemiol. 2005;28(2):171–82.CrossRefPubMed
86.
go back to reference Choi DC, Rothbaum BO, Gerardi M, Ressler KJ. Pharmacological enhancement of behavioral therapy: focus on posttraumatic stress disorder. In: Stein M, Steckler T, editors. Behavioral neurobiology of anxiety and its treatment. Vol. 2. Berlin: Springer; 2009. p. 279–99.CrossRef Choi DC, Rothbaum BO, Gerardi M, Ressler KJ. Pharmacological enhancement of behavioral therapy: focus on posttraumatic stress disorder. In: Stein M, Steckler T, editors. Behavioral neurobiology of anxiety and its treatment. Vol. 2. Berlin: Springer; 2009. p. 279–99.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Protocol for a randomized controlled trial examining multilevel prediction of response to behavioral activation and exposure-based therapy for generalized anxiety disorder
Authors
J. Santiago
E. Akeman
N. Kirlic
A. N. Clausen
K. T. Cosgrove
T. J. McDermott
B. Mathis
M. Paulus
M. G. Craske
J. Abelson
C. Martell
K. Wolitzky-Taylor
J. Bodurka
W. K. Thompson
Robin L. Aupperle
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3802-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

Trials 1/2020 Go to the issue