Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Radiology 4/2019

01-04-2019 | Magnetic Resonance Imaging | Minisymposium: Quality and safety

Practical considerations for establishing and maintaining a magnetic resonance imaging safety program in a pediatric practice

Authors: Tushar Chandra, Govind B. Chavhan, Raymond W. Sze, David Swenson, Stephanie Holowka, Stanley Fricke, Scott Davidson, Ramesh S. Iyer

Published in: Pediatric Radiology | Issue 4/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging is a multipurpose imaging modality that is largely safe, given the lack of ionizing radiation. However there are electromagnetic and biological effects on human tissue when exposed to magnetic environments, and hence there is a risk of adverse events occurring with these exams. It is imperative to understand these risks and develop methods to minimize them and prevent consequent adverse events. Implementing these safety practices in pediatric MR imaging has been somewhat limited because of gaps in information and knowledge among the personnel who are closely involved in the MR environment. The American College of Radiology has provided guidelines on MR safety practices that are helpful in minimizing such adverse events. This article provides an overview of the issues related to MR safety and practical ways to implement them across different health care facilities.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Mellon RD, Simone AF, Rappaport BA (2007) Use of anesthetic agents in neonates and young children. Anesth Analg 104:509–520CrossRefPubMed Mellon RD, Simone AF, Rappaport BA (2007) Use of anesthetic agents in neonates and young children. Anesth Analg 104:509–520CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Rappaport BA, Suresh S, Hertz S et al (2015) Anesthetic neurotoxicity — clinical implications of animal models. N Engl J Med 372:796–797CrossRefPubMed Rappaport BA, Suresh S, Hertz S et al (2015) Anesthetic neurotoxicity — clinical implications of animal models. N Engl J Med 372:796–797CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Durand DJ, Young M, Nagy P et al (2015) Mandatory child life consultation and its impact on pediatric MRI workflow in an academic medical center. J Am Coll Radiol 12:594–598CrossRefPubMed Durand DJ, Young M, Nagy P et al (2015) Mandatory child life consultation and its impact on pediatric MRI workflow in an academic medical center. J Am Coll Radiol 12:594–598CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Jaimes C, Gee MS (2016) Strategies to minimize sedation in pediatric body magnetic resonance imaging. Pediatr Radiol 46:916–927CrossRefPubMed Jaimes C, Gee MS (2016) Strategies to minimize sedation in pediatric body magnetic resonance imaging. Pediatr Radiol 46:916–927CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference De Bie HM, Boersma M, Wattjes MP et al (2010) Preparing children with a mock scanner training protocol results in high quality structural and functional MRI scans. Eur J Pediatr 169:1079–1085CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral De Bie HM, Boersma M, Wattjes MP et al (2010) Preparing children with a mock scanner training protocol results in high quality structural and functional MRI scans. Eur J Pediatr 169:1079–1085CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Barnea-Goraly N, Weinzimer SA, Ruedy KJ et al (2014) High success rates of sedation-free brain MRI scanning in young children using simple subject preparation protocols with and without a commercial mock scanner — the diabetes research in children network (DirecNet) experience. Pediatr Radiol 44:181–186CrossRefPubMed Barnea-Goraly N, Weinzimer SA, Ruedy KJ et al (2014) High success rates of sedation-free brain MRI scanning in young children using simple subject preparation protocols with and without a commercial mock scanner — the diabetes research in children network (DirecNet) experience. Pediatr Radiol 44:181–186CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Edwards AD, Arthurs OJ (2011) Paediatric MRI under sedation: is it necessary? What is the evidence for the alternatives? Pediatr Radiol 41:1353–1364CrossRefPubMed Edwards AD, Arthurs OJ (2011) Paediatric MRI under sedation: is it necessary? What is the evidence for the alternatives? Pediatr Radiol 41:1353–1364CrossRefPubMed
8.
9.
go back to reference Tsai LL, Grant AK, Mortele KJ et al (2015) A practical guide to MR imaging safety: what radiologists need to know. Radiographics 35:1722–1737CrossRefPubMed Tsai LL, Grant AK, Mortele KJ et al (2015) A practical guide to MR imaging safety: what radiologists need to know. Radiographics 35:1722–1737CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Shellock FG, Crues JV (2004) MR procedures: biologic effects, safety, and patient care. Radiology 232:635–652CrossRefPubMed Shellock FG, Crues JV (2004) MR procedures: biologic effects, safety, and patient care. Radiology 232:635–652CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Formica D, Silvestri S (2004) Biological effects of exposure to magnetic resonance imaging: an overview. Biomed Eng Online 3:1–12CrossRef Formica D, Silvestri S (2004) Biological effects of exposure to magnetic resonance imaging: an overview. Biomed Eng Online 3:1–12CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Hartwig V, Giovannetti G, Vanello N et al (2009) Biological effects and safety in magnetic resonance imaging: a review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 6:1778–1798CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hartwig V, Giovannetti G, Vanello N et al (2009) Biological effects and safety in magnetic resonance imaging: a review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 6:1778–1798CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Heintz PH, Sandoval DJ, Chambers GD, Adolphi NL (2018) Biological effects of magnetic resonance imaging. In: Kelsey CA, Heintz PH, Sandoval MS et al (eds) Text radiation biology of medical imaging. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 281–295 Heintz PH, Sandoval DJ, Chambers GD, Adolphi NL (2018) Biological effects of magnetic resonance imaging. In: Kelsey CA, Heintz PH, Sandoval MS et al (eds) Text radiation biology of medical imaging. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 281–295
15.
go back to reference Kanal E, Barkovich AJ, Bell C et al (2013) ACR guidance document on MR safe practices: 2013. J Magn Reson Imaging 37:501–530CrossRefPubMed Kanal E, Barkovich AJ, Bell C et al (2013) ACR guidance document on MR safe practices: 2013. J Magn Reson Imaging 37:501–530CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Shellock FG, Karacozoff AM (2013) Detection of implants and other objects using a ferromagnetic detection system: implications for patient screening prior to MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 201:720–725CrossRefPubMed Shellock FG, Karacozoff AM (2013) Detection of implants and other objects using a ferromagnetic detection system: implications for patient screening prior to MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 201:720–725CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Avery JK (1988) Loss prevention case of the month. Not my responsibility! J Tenn Med Assoc 81:523PubMed Avery JK (1988) Loss prevention case of the month. Not my responsibility! J Tenn Med Assoc 81:523PubMed
20.
go back to reference Ferris NJ, Kavnoudias H, Thiel C, Stuckey S (2007) The 2005 Australian MRI safety survey. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:1388–1394CrossRefPubMed Ferris NJ, Kavnoudias H, Thiel C, Stuckey S (2007) The 2005 Australian MRI safety survey. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:1388–1394CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Camacho JC, Moreno CC, Shah AD et al (2016) Safety and quality of 1.5-T MRI in patients with conventional and MRI-conditional cardiac implantable electronic devices after implementation of a standardized protocol. AJR Am J Roentgenol 207:599–604CrossRefPubMed Camacho JC, Moreno CC, Shah AD et al (2016) Safety and quality of 1.5-T MRI in patients with conventional and MRI-conditional cardiac implantable electronic devices after implementation of a standardized protocol. AJR Am J Roentgenol 207:599–604CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Levine GN, Gomes AS, Arai AE et al (2007) Safety of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiovascular devices: an American Heart Association scientific statement from the Committee on Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiac Catheterization, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention — endorsed by the American College of Cardiology Foundation, the North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. Circulation 116:2878–2891 Levine GN, Gomes AS, Arai AE et al (2007) Safety of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiovascular devices: an American Heart Association scientific statement from the Committee on Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiac Catheterization, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention — endorsed by the American College of Cardiology Foundation, the North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. Circulation 116:2878–2891
23.
go back to reference Verma A, Ha AC, Dennie C et al (2014) Canadian Heart Rhythm Society and Canadian Association of Radiologists consensus statement on magnetic resonance imaging with cardiac implantable electronic devices. Can Assoc Radiol J 65:290–300CrossRefPubMed Verma A, Ha AC, Dennie C et al (2014) Canadian Heart Rhythm Society and Canadian Association of Radiologists consensus statement on magnetic resonance imaging with cardiac implantable electronic devices. Can Assoc Radiol J 65:290–300CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Practical considerations for establishing and maintaining a magnetic resonance imaging safety program in a pediatric practice
Authors
Tushar Chandra
Govind B. Chavhan
Raymond W. Sze
David Swenson
Stephanie Holowka
Stanley Fricke
Scott Davidson
Ramesh S. Iyer
Publication date
01-04-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Pediatric Radiology / Issue 4/2019
Print ISSN: 0301-0449
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1998
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-019-04359-8

Other articles of this Issue 4/2019

Pediatric Radiology 4/2019 Go to the issue

Hermes

Hermes