Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 5/2021

01-05-2021 | Magnetic Resonance Imaging | Musculoskeletal

Normal subchondral high T2 signal on MRI mimicking sacroiliitis in children: frequency, age distribution, and relationship to skeletal maturity

Authors: Nele Herregods, Lennart B. O. Jans, Min Chen, Joel Paschke, Stefanie L. De Buyser, Thomas Renson, Joke Dehoorne, Rik Joos, Robert G. W. Lambert, Jacob L. Jaremko

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 5/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

To determine patterns of variation of subchondral T2 signal changes in pediatric sacroiliac joints (SIJ) by location, age, sex, and sacral apophyseal closure.

Methods

MRI of 502 SIJ in 251 children (132 girls), mean age 12.4 years (range 6.1–18.0), was obtained with parental informed consent. One hundred twenty-seven out of 251 had asymptomatic joints and were imaged for non-rheumatologic reasons, and 124 had low back pain but no sign of sacroiliitis on initial clinical MRI review. After calibration, three subspecialist radiologists independently scored subchondral signal changes on fat-suppressed fluid-sensitive sequences from 0 to 3 in 4 locations, and graded the degree of closure of sacral segmental apophyses. Associations between patient age, sex, signal changes, and apophyseal closure were analyzed.

Results

Rim-like subchondral increased T2 signal or “flaring” was much more common at sacral than iliac SIJ margins (72% vs 16%, p < 0.001) and was symmetrical in > 90% of children. Iliac flaring scores were always lower than sacral, except for 1 child. Signal changes decreased as sacral apophyses closed, and were seen in < 20% of subjects with fully closed apophyses. Signal changes were more frequent in boys, and peaked in intensity later than for girls (ages 8–12 vs. 7–10). Subchondral signal in iliac crests was high throughout childhood and did not correlate with other locations.

Conclusions

Subchondral T2 “flaring” is common at SIJ of prepubertal children and is generally sacral-predominant and symmetrical. Flaring that is asymmetrical, greater in ilium than sacrum, or intense in a teenager with closed apophyses, is unusual for normal children and raises concern for pathologic bone marrow edema.

Key Points

• A rim of subchondral high T2 signal is commonly observed on MRI at pediatric sacroiliac joints, primarily on the sacral side before segmental apophyseal closure, and should not be confused with pathology.
• Unlike subchondral signal changes elsewhere, high T2 signal underlying the iliac crest apophyses is a near-universal normal finding in children that usually persists throughout adolescence.
• The following patterns are unusual in normal children and are suspicious for pathology: definite iliac flaring, iliac flaring more intense than sacral flaring, left-right difference in flaring, definite flaring of any pattern in teenagers after sacral apophyseal closure.
Literature
23.
go back to reference Oudjhane K (2015) Normal development. In: Stein-Wexler R, Wootton-Gorges S, Ozonoff M (eds) Pediatric orthopedic imaging, 1st edn. Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer, New York, pp 25–39CrossRef Oudjhane K (2015) Normal development. In: Stein-Wexler R, Wootton-Gorges S, Ozonoff M (eds) Pediatric orthopedic imaging, 1st edn. Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer, New York, pp 25–39CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Risser JC (1958) The iliac apophysis: an invaluable sign in the management of scoliosis. Clin Orthop 11:111–119PubMed Risser JC (1958) The iliac apophysis: an invaluable sign in the management of scoliosis. Clin Orthop 11:111–119PubMed
Metadata
Title
Normal subchondral high T2 signal on MRI mimicking sacroiliitis in children: frequency, age distribution, and relationship to skeletal maturity
Authors
Nele Herregods
Lennart B. O. Jans
Min Chen
Joel Paschke
Stefanie L. De Buyser
Thomas Renson
Joke Dehoorne
Rik Joos
Robert G. W. Lambert
Jacob L. Jaremko
Publication date
01-05-2021
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 5/2021
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07328-0

Other articles of this Issue 5/2021

European Radiology 5/2021 Go to the issue