Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 4/2022

01-04-2022 | Magnetic Resonance Imaging | Oncology

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-derived radiomics for the prediction of disease-free survival in early-stage squamous cervical cancer

Authors: Yan Zhou, Hai-Lei Gu, Xin-Lu Zhang, Zhong-Fu Tian, Xiao-Quan Xu, Wen-Wei Tang

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 4/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To conduct multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-derived radiomics based on multi-scale tumor region for predicting disease-free survival (DFS) in early-stage squamous cervical cancer (ESSCC).

Methods

A total of 191 ESSCC patients (training cohort, n = 135; validation cohort, n = 56) from March 2016 to September 2019 were retrospectively recruited. Radiomics features were derived from the T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging (CET1WI), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map for each patient. DFS-related radiomics features were selected in 3 target tumor volumes (VOIentire, VOI+5 mm, and VOI−5 mm) to build 3 rad-scores using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox regression analysis. Logistic regression was applied to build combined model incorporating rad-scores with clinical risk factors and compared with clinical model alone. Kaplan–Meier analysis was used to further validate prognostic value of selected clinical and radiomics characteristics.

Results

Three radiomics scores all showed favorable performances in DFS prediction. Rad-score (VOI+5 mm) performed best with a C-index of 0.750 in the training set and 0.839 in the validation set. Combined model was constructed by incorporating age categorized by 55, Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (Figo) stage, and lymphovascular space invasion with rad-score (VOI+5 mm). Combined model performed better than clinical model in DFS prediction in both the training set (C-index 0.815 vs 0.709; p = 0.024) and the validation set (C-index 0.866 vs 0.719; p = 0.001).

Conclusion

Multiparametric MRI-derived radiomics based on multi-scale tumor region can aid in the prediction of DFS for ESSCC patients, thereby facilitating clinical decision-making.

Key Points

Three radiomics scores based on multi-scale tumor region all showed favorable performances in DFS prediction. Rad-score (VOI+5 mm) performed best with favorable C-index values.
Combined model incorporating multiparametric MRI-based radiomics with clinical risk factors performed significantly better in DFS prediction than the clinical model.
Combined model presented as a nomogram can be easily used to predict survival, thereby facilitating clinical decision-making.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Cohen PA, Jhingran A, Oaknin A, Denny L (2019) Cervical cancer. Lancet 393:169–182CrossRef Cohen PA, Jhingran A, Oaknin A, Denny L (2019) Cervical cancer. Lancet 393:169–182CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Banerjee S (2017) Bevacizumab in cervical cancer: a step forward for survival. Lancet 390:1626–1628CrossRef Banerjee S (2017) Bevacizumab in cervical cancer: a step forward for survival. Lancet 390:1626–1628CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Vanichtantikul A, Tantbirojn P, Manchana T (2017) Parametrial involvement in women with low-risk, early-stage cervical cancer. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 26:1–5CrossRef Vanichtantikul A, Tantbirojn P, Manchana T (2017) Parametrial involvement in women with low-risk, early-stage cervical cancer. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 26:1–5CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Bhatla N, Berek JS, Cuello Fredes M et al (2019) Natarajan J. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the cervix uteri. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 145:129–135CrossRef Bhatla N, Berek JS, Cuello Fredes M et al (2019) Natarajan J. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the cervix uteri. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 145:129–135CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Biewenga P, van der Velden J, Mol BW et al (2011) Prognostic model for survival in patients with early stage cervical cancer. Cancer 117:768–776CrossRef Biewenga P, van der Velden J, Mol BW et al (2011) Prognostic model for survival in patients with early stage cervical cancer. Cancer 117:768–776CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Weyl A, Illac C, Lusque A et al (2020) Prognostic value of lymphovascular space invasion in early-stage cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 30:1493–1499CrossRef Weyl A, Illac C, Lusque A et al (2020) Prognostic value of lymphovascular space invasion in early-stage cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 30:1493–1499CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Manganaro L, Lakhman Y, Bharwani N et al (2021) Staging, recurrence and follow-up of uterine cervical cancer using MRI: updated guidelines of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology after revised FIGO staging 2018. Eur Radiol 31(10):7802–7816CrossRef Manganaro L, Lakhman Y, Bharwani N et al (2021) Staging, recurrence and follow-up of uterine cervical cancer using MRI: updated guidelines of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology after revised FIGO staging 2018. Eur Radiol 31(10):7802–7816CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Xiao M, Yan B, Li Y, Lu J, Qiang J (2020) Diagnostic performance of MR imaging in evaluating prognostic factors in patients with cervical cancer: a meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 30:1405–1418CrossRef Xiao M, Yan B, Li Y, Lu J, Qiang J (2020) Diagnostic performance of MR imaging in evaluating prognostic factors in patients with cervical cancer: a meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 30:1405–1418CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Wang YT, Li YC, Yin LL, Pu H (2016) Can diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging predict survival in patients with cervical cancer? A meta-analysis. Eur J Radiol 85:2174–2181CrossRef Wang YT, Li YC, Yin LL, Pu H (2016) Can diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging predict survival in patients with cervical cancer? A meta-analysis. Eur J Radiol 85:2174–2181CrossRef
10.
go back to reference O’Connor JP, Rose CJ, Waterton JC, Carano RA, Parker GJ, Jackson A (2015) Imaging intratumor heterogeneity: role in therapy response, resistance, and clinical outcome. Clin Cancer Res 21:249–257CrossRef O’Connor JP, Rose CJ, Waterton JC, Carano RA, Parker GJ, Jackson A (2015) Imaging intratumor heterogeneity: role in therapy response, resistance, and clinical outcome. Clin Cancer Res 21:249–257CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Savadjiev P, Chong J, Dohan A et al (2019) Image-based biomarkers for solid tumor quantification. Eur Radiol 29:5431–5440CrossRef Savadjiev P, Chong J, Dohan A et al (2019) Image-based biomarkers for solid tumor quantification. Eur Radiol 29:5431–5440CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Umutlu L, Nensa F, Demircioglu A et al (2020) Radiomics analysis of multiparametric PET/MRI for N- and M-staging in patients with primary cervical cancer. Rofo 192:754–763CrossRef Umutlu L, Nensa F, Demircioglu A et al (2020) Radiomics analysis of multiparametric PET/MRI for N- and M-staging in patients with primary cervical cancer. Rofo 192:754–763CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Wang T, Gao T, Guo H et al (2020) Preoperative prediction of parametrial invasion in early-stage cervical cancer with MRI-based radiomics nomogram. Eur Radiol 30:3585–3593CrossRef Wang T, Gao T, Guo H et al (2020) Preoperative prediction of parametrial invasion in early-stage cervical cancer with MRI-based radiomics nomogram. Eur Radiol 30:3585–3593CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Li Z, Li H, Wang S et al (2019) MR-based radiomics nomogram of cervical cancer in prediction of the lymph-vascular space invasion preoperatively. J Magn Reson Imaging 49:1420–1426CrossRef Li Z, Li H, Wang S et al (2019) MR-based radiomics nomogram of cervical cancer in prediction of the lymph-vascular space invasion preoperatively. J Magn Reson Imaging 49:1420–1426CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Xiao M, Ma F, Li Y et al (2020) Multiparametric MRI-based radiomics nomogram for predicting lymph node metastasis in early-stage cervical cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging 52:885–896CrossRef Xiao M, Ma F, Li Y et al (2020) Multiparametric MRI-based radiomics nomogram for predicting lymph node metastasis in early-stage cervical cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging 52:885–896CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Fang J, Zhang B, Wang S et al (2020) Association of MRI-derived radiomic biomarker with disease-free survival in patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Theranostics 10:2284–2292CrossRef Fang J, Zhang B, Wang S et al (2020) Association of MRI-derived radiomic biomarker with disease-free survival in patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Theranostics 10:2284–2292CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Hu Y, Xie C, Yang H et al (2020) Assessment of intratumoral and peritumoral computed tomography radiomics for predicting pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. JAMA Netw Open 3:e2015927CrossRef Hu Y, Xie C, Yang H et al (2020) Assessment of intratumoral and peritumoral computed tomography radiomics for predicting pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. JAMA Netw Open 3:e2015927CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Xu X, Zhang HL, Liu QP et al (2019) Radiomic analysis of contrast-enhanced CT predicts microvascular invasion and outcome in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 70:1133–1144CrossRef Xu X, Zhang HL, Liu QP et al (2019) Radiomic analysis of contrast-enhanced CT predicts microvascular invasion and outcome in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 70:1133–1144CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Wels MG, Lades F, Muehlberg A, Suehling M (2019) General purpose radiomics for multi-modal clinical research. Proc SPIE 1095046 Wels MG, Lades F, Muehlberg A, Suehling M (2019) General purpose radiomics for multi-modal clinical research. Proc SPIE 1095046
20.
go back to reference Moltz JH, Bornemann L, Kuhnigk JM et al (2009) Advanced segmentation techniques for lung nodules, liver metastases, and enlarged lymph nodes in CT scans. IEEE J Sel Top Sign Proces 3:122–134CrossRef Moltz JH, Bornemann L, Kuhnigk JM et al (2009) Advanced segmentation techniques for lung nodules, liver metastases, and enlarged lymph nodes in CT scans. IEEE J Sel Top Sign Proces 3:122–134CrossRef
21.
go back to reference van Griethuysen JJM, Fedorov A, Parmar C et al (2017) Computational radiomics system to decode the radiographic phenotype. Cancer Res 77:e104–e107CrossRef van Griethuysen JJM, Fedorov A, Parmar C et al (2017) Computational radiomics system to decode the radiographic phenotype. Cancer Res 77:e104–e107CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Zhang Z (2016) Variable selection with stepwise and best subset approaches. Ann Transl Med 4:136CrossRef Zhang Z (2016) Variable selection with stepwise and best subset approaches. Ann Transl Med 4:136CrossRef
23.
go back to reference O’brien RM, (2007) A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Qual Quant 41:673–690CrossRef O’brien RM, (2007) A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Qual Quant 41:673–690CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Bland JM, Altman DG (1998) Survival probabilities (the Kaplan-Meier method). BMJ 317:1572CrossRef Bland JM, Altman DG (1998) Survival probabilities (the Kaplan-Meier method). BMJ 317:1572CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Schröder MS, Culhane AC, Quackenbush J, Haibe-Kains B (2011) survcomp: an R/Bioconductor package for performance assessment and comparison of survival models. Bioinformatics 27:3206–3208CrossRef Schröder MS, Culhane AC, Quackenbush J, Haibe-Kains B (2011) survcomp: an R/Bioconductor package for performance assessment and comparison of survival models. Bioinformatics 27:3206–3208CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Heagerty PJ, Lumley T, Pepe MS (2000) Time-dependent ROC curves for censored survival data and a diagnostic marker. Biometrics 56:337–344 CrossRef Heagerty PJ, Lumley T, Pepe MS (2000) Time-dependent ROC curves for censored survival data and a diagnostic marker. Biometrics 56:337–344 CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Fitzgerald M, Saville BR, Lewis RJ (2015) Decision curve analysis. JAMA 313:409–410CrossRef Fitzgerald M, Saville BR, Lewis RJ (2015) Decision curve analysis. JAMA 313:409–410CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Xie G, Wang R, Shang L et al (2020) Calculating the overall survival probability in patients with cervical cancer: a nomogram and decision curve analysis-based study. BMC Cancer 20:833CrossRef Xie G, Wang R, Shang L et al (2020) Calculating the overall survival probability in patients with cervical cancer: a nomogram and decision curve analysis-based study. BMC Cancer 20:833CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Lucia F, Visvikis D, Desseroit MC et al (2018) Prediction of outcome using pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT and MRI radiomics in locally advanced cervical cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 45:768–786CrossRef Lucia F, Visvikis D, Desseroit MC et al (2018) Prediction of outcome using pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT and MRI radiomics in locally advanced cervical cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 45:768–786CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Willmott LJ, Monk BJ (2009) Cervical cancer therapy: current, future and anti-angiogensis targeted treatment. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 9:895–903CrossRef Willmott LJ, Monk BJ (2009) Cervical cancer therapy: current, future and anti-angiogensis targeted treatment. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 9:895–903CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Hauge A, Wegner CS, Gaustad JV, Simonsen TG, Andersen LMK, Rofstad EK (2017) DCE-MRI of patient-derived xenograft models of uterine cervix carcinoma: associations with parameters of the tumor microenvironment. J Transl Med 15:225CrossRef Hauge A, Wegner CS, Gaustad JV, Simonsen TG, Andersen LMK, Rofstad EK (2017) DCE-MRI of patient-derived xenograft models of uterine cervix carcinoma: associations with parameters of the tumor microenvironment. J Transl Med 15:225CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-derived radiomics for the prediction of disease-free survival in early-stage squamous cervical cancer
Authors
Yan Zhou
Hai-Lei Gu
Xin-Lu Zhang
Zhong-Fu Tian
Xiao-Quan Xu
Wen-Wei Tang
Publication date
01-04-2022
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 4/2022
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08326-6

Other articles of this Issue 4/2022

European Radiology 4/2022 Go to the issue