Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Japanese Journal of Radiology 9/2022

17-04-2022 | Magnetic Resonance Imaging | Original Article

Discrimination of lipoma from atypical lipomatous tumor/well-differentiated liposarcoma using magnetic resonance imaging radiomics combined with machine learning

Authors: Nurdan Cay, Bokebatur Ahmet Rasit Mendi, Halitcan Batur, Fazli Erdogan

Published in: Japanese Journal of Radiology | Issue 9/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the diagnostic capability of radiomics in distinguishing lipoma and Atypic Lipomatous Tumors/Well-Differentiated Liposarcomas (ALT/WDL) with Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI).

Materials and methods

Patients with a histopathologic diagnosis of lipoma (n = 45) and ALT/WDL (n = 20), who had undergone pre-surgery or pre-biopsy MRI, were enrolled. The MDM2 amplification was accepted as gold-standard test. The T1-weighted turbo spin echo images were used for radiomics analysis. Utility of a predefined standardized imaging protocol and a single type of 1.5 T scanner were sought as inclusion criteria. Radiomics parameters that show a certain level of reproducibility were included in the study and supplied to Support Vector Machine (SVM) as a machine learning method.

Results

No significant difference was found in terms of gender, location and age between the lipoma and ALT/WDL groups. Sixty-five parameters were accepted as reproducible. Fifty-seven parameters were able to distinguish the two groups significantly (AUC range 0.564–0.902). Diagnostic performance of the SVM was one of the highest among literature findings: sensitivity = 96.8% (95% CI 94.03–98.39%), specificity = 93.72% (95% CI 86.36–97.73%) and AUC = 0.987 (95% CI 0.972–0.999).

Conclusion

Although radiomics has been proven to be useful in previous literature regarding discrimination of lipomas and ALT/WDLs, we found that its accuracy could further be improved with utility of standardized hardware, imaging protocols and incorporation of machine learning methods.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Board WCoTE. Soft Tissue and Bone Tumours. 5th ed. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2020. Board WCoTE. Soft Tissue and Bone Tumours. 5th ed. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2020.
2.
go back to reference O’Donnell PW, Griffin AM, Eward WC, Sternheim A, White LM, Wunder JS, et al. Can experienced observers differentiate between lipoma and well-differentiated liposarcoma using only MRI? Sarcoma. 2013;2013:982784.CrossRef O’Donnell PW, Griffin AM, Eward WC, Sternheim A, White LM, Wunder JS, et al. Can experienced observers differentiate between lipoma and well-differentiated liposarcoma using only MRI? Sarcoma. 2013;2013:982784.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Doyle AJ, Pang AK, Miller MV, French JG. Magnetic resonance imaging of lipoma and atypical lipomatous tumour/well-differentiated liposarcoma: observer performance using T1-weighted and fluid-sensitive MRI. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2008;52(1):44–8.CrossRef Doyle AJ, Pang AK, Miller MV, French JG. Magnetic resonance imaging of lipoma and atypical lipomatous tumour/well-differentiated liposarcoma: observer performance using T1-weighted and fluid-sensitive MRI. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2008;52(1):44–8.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Gaskin CM, Helms CA. Lipomas, lipoma variants, and well-differentiated liposarcomas (atypical lipomas): results of MRI evaluations of 126 consecutive fatty masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;182(3):733–9.CrossRef Gaskin CM, Helms CA. Lipomas, lipoma variants, and well-differentiated liposarcomas (atypical lipomas): results of MRI evaluations of 126 consecutive fatty masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;182(3):733–9.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Ohguri T, Aoki T, Hisaoka M, Watanabe H, Nakamura K, Hashimoto H, et al. Differential diagnosis of benign peripheral lipoma from well-differentiated liposarcoma on MR imaging: is comparison of margins and internal characteristics useful? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;180(6):1689–94.CrossRef Ohguri T, Aoki T, Hisaoka M, Watanabe H, Nakamura K, Hashimoto H, et al. Differential diagnosis of benign peripheral lipoma from well-differentiated liposarcoma on MR imaging: is comparison of margins and internal characteristics useful? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;180(6):1689–94.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kransdorf MJ, Bancroft LW, Peterson JJ, Murphey MD, Foster WC, Temple HT. Imaging of fatty tumors: distinction of lipoma and well-differentiated liposarcoma. Radiology. 2002;224(1):99–104.CrossRef Kransdorf MJ, Bancroft LW, Peterson JJ, Murphey MD, Foster WC, Temple HT. Imaging of fatty tumors: distinction of lipoma and well-differentiated liposarcoma. Radiology. 2002;224(1):99–104.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Gupta P, Potti TA, Wuertzer SD, Lenchik L, Pacholke DA. Spectrum of fat-containing soft-tissue masses at MR imaging: the common, the uncommon, the characteristic, and the sometimes confusing. Radiographics. 2016;36(3):753–66.CrossRef Gupta P, Potti TA, Wuertzer SD, Lenchik L, Pacholke DA. Spectrum of fat-containing soft-tissue masses at MR imaging: the common, the uncommon, the characteristic, and the sometimes confusing. Radiographics. 2016;36(3):753–66.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Mashima E, Sawada Y, Nakamura M. Recent advancement in atypical lipomatous tumor research. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(3):994.CrossRef Mashima E, Sawada Y, Nakamura M. Recent advancement in atypical lipomatous tumor research. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(3):994.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Varghese BA, Cen SY, Hwang DH, Duddalwar VA. Texture analysis of imaging: what radiologists need to know. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019;212(3):520–8.CrossRef Varghese BA, Cen SY, Hwang DH, Duddalwar VA. Texture analysis of imaging: what radiologists need to know. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019;212(3):520–8.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Kocak B, Durmaz ES, Ates E, Kilickesmez O. Radiomics with artificial intelligence: a practical guide for beginners. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2019;25(6):485–95.CrossRef Kocak B, Durmaz ES, Ates E, Kilickesmez O. Radiomics with artificial intelligence: a practical guide for beginners. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2019;25(6):485–95.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Fletcher C, Bridge J, Antonescu C. WHO classification of tumours editorial board. WHO Classification of Tumors Soft Tissue and Bone Tumours. 2020:403–9. Fletcher C, Bridge J, Antonescu C. WHO classification of tumours editorial board. WHO Classification of Tumors Soft Tissue and Bone Tumours. 2020:403–9.
13.
go back to reference Juntu J, Sijbers J, De Backer S, Rajan J, Van Dyck D. Machine learning study of several classifiers trained with texture analysis features to differentiate benign from malignant soft-tissue tumors in T1-MRI images. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010;31(3):680–9.CrossRef Juntu J, Sijbers J, De Backer S, Rajan J, Van Dyck D. Machine learning study of several classifiers trained with texture analysis features to differentiate benign from malignant soft-tissue tumors in T1-MRI images. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010;31(3):680–9.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Murphey MD, Carroll JF, Flemming DJ, Pope TL, Gannon FH, Kransdorf MJ. From the archives of the AFIP: benign musculoskeletal lipomatous lesions. Radiographics. 2004;24(5):1433–66.CrossRef Murphey MD, Carroll JF, Flemming DJ, Pope TL, Gannon FH, Kransdorf MJ. From the archives of the AFIP: benign musculoskeletal lipomatous lesions. Radiographics. 2004;24(5):1433–66.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15(2):155–63.CrossRef Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15(2):155–63.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Borstelmann SM. Machine learning principles for radiology investigators. Acad Radiol. 2020;27(1):13–25.CrossRef Borstelmann SM. Machine learning principles for radiology investigators. Acad Radiol. 2020;27(1):13–25.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Vrigazova B, Ivanov I. Tenfold bootstrap procedure for support vector machines. Comput Sci. 2020;21:241–57.CrossRef Vrigazova B, Ivanov I. Tenfold bootstrap procedure for support vector machines. Comput Sci. 2020;21:241–57.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Vos M, Starmans MPA, Timbergen MJM, van der Voort SR, Padmos GA, Kessels W, et al. Radiomics approach to distinguish between well differentiated liposarcomas and lipomas on MRI. Br J Surg. 2019;106(13):1800–9.CrossRef Vos M, Starmans MPA, Timbergen MJM, van der Voort SR, Padmos GA, Kessels W, et al. Radiomics approach to distinguish between well differentiated liposarcomas and lipomas on MRI. Br J Surg. 2019;106(13):1800–9.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Pressney I, Khoo M, Endozo R, Ganeshan B, O’Donnell P. Pilot study to differentiate lipoma from atypical lipomatous tumour/well-differentiated liposarcoma using MR radiomics-based texture analysis. Skeletal Radiol. 2020;49(11):1719–29.CrossRef Pressney I, Khoo M, Endozo R, Ganeshan B, O’Donnell P. Pilot study to differentiate lipoma from atypical lipomatous tumour/well-differentiated liposarcoma using MR radiomics-based texture analysis. Skeletal Radiol. 2020;49(11):1719–29.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Malinauskaite I, Hofmeister J, Burgermeister S, Neroladaki A, Hamard M, Montet X, et al. Radiomics and machine learning differentiate soft-tissue lipoma and liposarcoma better than musculoskeletal radiologists. Sarcoma. 2020;2020:7163453.CrossRef Malinauskaite I, Hofmeister J, Burgermeister S, Neroladaki A, Hamard M, Montet X, et al. Radiomics and machine learning differentiate soft-tissue lipoma and liposarcoma better than musculoskeletal radiologists. Sarcoma. 2020;2020:7163453.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Leporq B, Bouhamama A, Pilleul F, Lame F, Bihane C, Sdika M, et al. MRI-based radiomics to predict lipomatous soft tissue tumors malignancy: a pilot study. Cancer Imaging. 2020;20(1):78.CrossRef Leporq B, Bouhamama A, Pilleul F, Lame F, Bihane C, Sdika M, et al. MRI-based radiomics to predict lipomatous soft tissue tumors malignancy: a pilot study. Cancer Imaging. 2020;20(1):78.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Papke DJ Jr, Jo VY. Practical application of cytology and core biopsy in the diagnosis of mesenchymal tumors. Surg Pathol Clin. 2019;12(1):227–48.CrossRef Papke DJ Jr, Jo VY. Practical application of cytology and core biopsy in the diagnosis of mesenchymal tumors. Surg Pathol Clin. 2019;12(1):227–48.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Renne SL, Iwenofu OH. Pathology of retroperitoneal sarcomas: a brief review. J Surg Oncol. 2018;117(1):12–24.CrossRef Renne SL, Iwenofu OH. Pathology of retroperitoneal sarcomas: a brief review. J Surg Oncol. 2018;117(1):12–24.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Pickles MD, Lowry M, Gibbs P. Pretreatment prognostic value of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging vascular, texture, shape, and size parameters compared with traditional survival indicators obtained from locally advanced breast cancer patients. Invest Radiol. 2016;51(3):177–85.CrossRef Pickles MD, Lowry M, Gibbs P. Pretreatment prognostic value of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging vascular, texture, shape, and size parameters compared with traditional survival indicators obtained from locally advanced breast cancer patients. Invest Radiol. 2016;51(3):177–85.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Nie K, Chen JH, Yu HJ, Chu Y, Nalcioglu O, Su MY. Quantitative analysis of lesion morphology and texture features for diagnostic prediction in breast MRI. Acad Radiol. 2008;15(12):1513–25.CrossRef Nie K, Chen JH, Yu HJ, Chu Y, Nalcioglu O, Su MY. Quantitative analysis of lesion morphology and texture features for diagnostic prediction in breast MRI. Acad Radiol. 2008;15(12):1513–25.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Cuocolo R, Stanzione A, Ponsiglione A, Romeo V, Verde F, Creta M, et al. Clinically significant prostate cancer detection on MRI: a radiomic shape features study. Eur J Radiol. 2019;116:144–9.CrossRef Cuocolo R, Stanzione A, Ponsiglione A, Romeo V, Verde F, Creta M, et al. Clinically significant prostate cancer detection on MRI: a radiomic shape features study. Eur J Radiol. 2019;116:144–9.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Yan PF, Yan L, Hu TT, Xiao DD, Zhang Z, Zhao HY, et al. The potential value of preoperative MRI texture and shape analysis in grading meningiomas: a preliminary investigation. Transl Oncol. 2017;10(4):570–7.CrossRef Yan PF, Yan L, Hu TT, Xiao DD, Zhang Z, Zhao HY, et al. The potential value of preoperative MRI texture and shape analysis in grading meningiomas: a preliminary investigation. Transl Oncol. 2017;10(4):570–7.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Gaskin CM, Helms CA. Lipomas, lipoma variants, and well-differentiated liposarcomas (atypical lipomas): results of MRI evaluations of 126 consecutive fatty masses. Am J Roentgenol. 2004;182(3):733–9.CrossRef Gaskin CM, Helms CA. Lipomas, lipoma variants, and well-differentiated liposarcomas (atypical lipomas): results of MRI evaluations of 126 consecutive fatty masses. Am J Roentgenol. 2004;182(3):733–9.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Discrimination of lipoma from atypical lipomatous tumor/well-differentiated liposarcoma using magnetic resonance imaging radiomics combined with machine learning
Authors
Nurdan Cay
Bokebatur Ahmet Rasit Mendi
Halitcan Batur
Fazli Erdogan
Publication date
17-04-2022
Publisher
Springer Nature Singapore
Published in
Japanese Journal of Radiology / Issue 9/2022
Print ISSN: 1867-1071
Electronic ISSN: 1867-108X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-022-01278-x

Other articles of this Issue 9/2022

Japanese Journal of Radiology 9/2022 Go to the issue