Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Insights into Imaging 1/2020

01-12-2020 | Magnetic Resonance Imaging | Original Article

Diffusion processes modeling in magnetic resonance imaging

Authors: Sergey Morozov, Kristina Sergunova, Alexey Petraikin, Ekaterina Akhmad, Stanislav Kivasev, Dmitry Semenov, Ivan Blokhin, Igor Karpov, Anton Vladzymyrskyy, Alexander Morozov

Published in: Insights into Imaging | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The paper covers modern approaches to the evaluation of neoplastic processes with diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and proposes a physical model for monitoring the primary quantitative parameters of DWI and quality assurance. Models of hindered and restricted diffusion are studied.

Material and method

To simulate hindered diffusion, we used aqueous solutions of polyvinylpyrrolidone with concentrations of 0 to 70%. We created siloxane-based water-in-oil emulsions that simulate restricted diffusion in the intracellular space. To obtain a high signal on DWI in the broadest range of b values, we used silicon oil with high T2: cyclomethicone and caprylyl methicone. For quantitative assessment of our phantom, we performed DWI on 1.5T magnetic resonance scanner with various fat suppression techniques. We assessed water-in-oil emulsion as an extracorporeal source signal by simultaneously scanning a patient in whole-body DWI sequence.

Results

We developed phantom with control substances for apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements ranging from normal tissue to benign and malignant lesions: from 2.29 to 0.28 mm2/s. The ADC values of polymer solutions are well relevant to the mono-exponential equation with the mean relative difference of 0.91%.

Conclusion

The phantom can be used to assess the accuracy of the ADC measurements, as well as the effectiveness of fat suppression. The control substances (emulsions) can be used as a body marker for quality assurance in whole-body DWI with a wide range of b values.
Literature
7.
go back to reference Chandarana H, Lee VS, Hecht E, Taouli B, Sigmund EE (2010) Comparison of biexponential and monoexponential model of miffusion weighted imaging in evaluation of renal lesions. Invest Radiol 46(5):285–291 Chandarana H, Lee VS, Hecht E, Taouli B, Sigmund EE (2010) Comparison of biexponential and monoexponential model of miffusion weighted imaging in evaluation of renal lesions. Invest Radiol 46(5):285–291
10.
go back to reference Sеrgeev NI, Kotlyarov PM, Solodky VA (2012) Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance image in diagnosis of metastatic cancer of the spinal column and pelvic bones. The Siberian J of Oncology 54(6):68–72 Sеrgeev NI, Kotlyarov PM, Solodky VA (2012) Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance image in diagnosis of metastatic cancer of the spinal column and pelvic bones. The Siberian J of Oncology 54(6):68–72
14.
go back to reference Turkin AM, Dolgushin MB, Podoprigora AY et al (2009) Brain edema: capacities of magnetic resonance imaging. J Radiol Nucl Med 4-6:4–11 Turkin AM, Dolgushin MB, Podoprigora AY et al (2009) Brain edema: capacities of magnetic resonance imaging. J Radiol Nucl Med 4-6:4–11
16.
go back to reference Ailianou A, Mundada P, De Perrot T, Pusztaszieri M, Poletti PA, Becker M (2018) MRI with DWI for the detection of posttreatment head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: why morphologic MRI criteria matter. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 39(4):748–755 https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5548 Ailianou A, Mundada P, De Perrot T, Pusztaszieri M, Poletti PA, Becker M (2018) MRI with DWI for the detection of posttreatment head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: why morphologic MRI criteria matter. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 39(4):748–755 https://​doi.​org/​10.​3174/​ajnr.​A5548
Metadata
Title
Diffusion processes modeling in magnetic resonance imaging
Authors
Sergey Morozov
Kristina Sergunova
Alexey Petraikin
Ekaterina Akhmad
Stanislav Kivasev
Dmitry Semenov
Ivan Blokhin
Igor Karpov
Anton Vladzymyrskyy
Alexander Morozov
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Insights into Imaging / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1869-4101
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-020-00863-w

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

Insights into Imaging 1/2020 Go to the issue