Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medical Imaging 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Magnetic Resonance Imaging | Research article

Differentiating T1a–T1b from T2 in gastric cancer lesions with three different measurement approaches based on contrast-enhanced T1W imaging at 3.0 T

Authors: Yuan Yuan, Shengnan Ren, Tiegong Wang, Fu Shen, Qiang Hao, Jianping Lu

Published in: BMC Medical Imaging | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

To explore the diagnostic value of three different measurement approaches in differentiating T1a–T1b from T2 gastric cancer (GC) lesions.

Methods

A total of 95 consecutive patients with T1a–T2 stage of GC who performed preoperative MRI were retrospectively enrolled between January 2017 and November 2020. The parameters MRI T stage (subjective evaluation), thickness, maximum area and volume of the lesions were evaluated by two radiologists. Specific indicators including AUC, optimal cutoff, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of MRI T stage, thickness, maximum area and volume for differentiating T1a–T1b from T2 stage lesions were calculated. The ROC curves were compared by the Delong test. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to evaluate the clinical benefit.

Results

The ROC curves for thickness (AUC = 0.926), maximum area (AUC = 0.902) and volume (AUC = 0.897) were all significantly better than those of the MRI T stage (AUC = 0.807) in differentiating T1a–T1b from T2 lesions, with p values of 0.004, 0.034 and 0.041, respectively. The values corresponding to the thickness (including AUC, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV, NPV, PLR and NLR) were all higher than those corresponding to the MRI T stage, maximum area and volume. The DCA curves indicated that the parameter thickness could provide the highest clinical benefit if the threshold probability was above 35%.

Conclusions

Thickness may provide an efficient approach to rapidly distinguish T1a–T1b from T2 stage GC lesions.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:394–424.CrossRef Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:394–424.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Song Z, Wu Y, Yang J, Yang D, Fang X. Progress in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. Tumour Biol. 2017;39:1010428317714626.PubMed Song Z, Wu Y, Yang J, Yang D, Fang X. Progress in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. Tumour Biol. 2017;39:1010428317714626.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Smyth EC, Nilsson M, Grabsch HI, et al. Gastric cancer. Lancet. 2020;396:635–48.CrossRef Smyth EC, Nilsson M, Grabsch HI, et al. Gastric cancer. Lancet. 2020;396:635–48.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Yang L, Li Y, Zhou T, et al. Effect of the degree of gastric filling on the measured thickness of advanced gastric cancer by computed tomography. Oncol Lett. 2018;16:2335–43.PubMedPubMedCentral Yang L, Li Y, Zhou T, et al. Effect of the degree of gastric filling on the measured thickness of advanced gastric cancer by computed tomography. Oncol Lett. 2018;16:2335–43.PubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Park KJ, Lee MW, Koo JH, et al. Detection of early gastric cancer using hydro-stomach CT: blinded vs unblinded analysis. World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17:1051–7.CrossRef Park KJ, Lee MW, Koo JH, et al. Detection of early gastric cancer using hydro-stomach CT: blinded vs unblinded analysis. World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17:1051–7.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Yu JS, Choi SH, Choi WH, et al. Value of nonvisualized primary lesions of gastric cancer on preoperative MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;189:W315-319.CrossRef Yu JS, Choi SH, Choi WH, et al. Value of nonvisualized primary lesions of gastric cancer on preoperative MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;189:W315-319.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Zhang Y, Yu J. The role of MRI in the diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2020;26:176–82.CrossRef Zhang Y, Yu J. The role of MRI in the diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2020;26:176–82.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Borggreve AS, Goense L, HJF B, et al. Imaging strategies in the management of gastric cancer: current role and future potential of MRI. Br J Radiol. 2019;92:20181044. Borggreve AS, Goense L, HJF B, et al. Imaging strategies in the management of gastric cancer: current role and future potential of MRI. Br J Radiol. 2019;92:20181044.
10.
go back to reference Kang BC, Kim JH, Kim KW, et al. Value of the dynamic and delayed MR sequence with Gd-DTPA in the T-staging of stomach cancer: correlation with the histopathology. Abdom Imaging. 2000;25:14–24.CrossRef Kang BC, Kim JH, Kim KW, et al. Value of the dynamic and delayed MR sequence with Gd-DTPA in the T-staging of stomach cancer: correlation with the histopathology. Abdom Imaging. 2000;25:14–24.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Wang CK, Kuo YT, Liu GC, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction and delayed MRI of gastric tumors: radiologic-pathologic correlation. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2000;24:872–7.CrossRef Wang CK, Kuo YT, Liu GC, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction and delayed MRI of gastric tumors: radiologic-pathologic correlation. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2000;24:872–7.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Lei C, Huang L, Wang Y, et al. Comparison of MRI and endoscope ultrasound detection in preoperative T/N staging of gastric cancer. Mol Clin Oncol. 2013;1:699–702.CrossRef Lei C, Huang L, Wang Y, et al. Comparison of MRI and endoscope ultrasound detection in preoperative T/N staging of gastric cancer. Mol Clin Oncol. 2013;1:699–702.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Huo X, Yuan K, Shen Y, et al. Clinical value of magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative T staging of gastric cancer and postoperative pathological diagnosis. Oncol Lett. 2014;8:275–80.CrossRef Huo X, Yuan K, Shen Y, et al. Clinical value of magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative T staging of gastric cancer and postoperative pathological diagnosis. Oncol Lett. 2014;8:275–80.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Liang J, Lv H, Liu Q, et al. Role of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient values in the detection of gastric carcinoma. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8:15639–47.PubMedPubMedCentral Liang J, Lv H, Liu Q, et al. Role of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient values in the detection of gastric carcinoma. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8:15639–47.PubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Anzidei M, Napoli A, Zaccagna F, et al. Diagnostic performance of 64-MDCT and 1.5-T MRI with high-resolution sequences in the T staging of gastric cancer: a comparative analysis with histopathology. Radiol Med. 2009;114:1065–79.CrossRef Anzidei M, Napoli A, Zaccagna F, et al. Diagnostic performance of 64-MDCT and 1.5-T MRI with high-resolution sequences in the T staging of gastric cancer: a comparative analysis with histopathology. Radiol Med. 2009;114:1065–79.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Liu S, He J, Guan W, et al. Added value of diffusion-weighted MR imaging to T2-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in T staging of gastric cancer. Clin Imaging. 2014;38:122–8.CrossRef Liu S, He J, Guan W, et al. Added value of diffusion-weighted MR imaging to T2-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in T staging of gastric cancer. Clin Imaging. 2014;38:122–8.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Sohn KM, Lee JM, Lee SY, et al. Comparing MR imaging and CT in the staging of gastric carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;174:1551–7.CrossRef Sohn KM, Lee JM, Lee SY, et al. Comparing MR imaging and CT in the staging of gastric carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;174:1551–7.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Hallinan JT, Venkatesh SK, Peter L, et al. CT volumetry for gastric carcinoma: association with TNM stage. Eur Radiol. 2014;24:3105–14.CrossRef Hallinan JT, Venkatesh SK, Peter L, et al. CT volumetry for gastric carcinoma: association with TNM stage. Eur Radiol. 2014;24:3105–14.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Chen XL, Pu H, Yin LL, et al. CT volumetry for gastric adenocarcinoma: association with lymphovascular invasion and T-stages. Oncotarget. 2018;9:12432–42.CrossRef Chen XL, Pu H, Yin LL, et al. CT volumetry for gastric adenocarcinoma: association with lymphovascular invasion and T-stages. Oncotarget. 2018;9:12432–42.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Amin MB, Edge S, Greene F, Byrd DR, Brookland RK, Washington MK. AJCC cancer staging manual. 8th ed. New York: Springer; 2017.CrossRef Amin MB, Edge S, Greene F, Byrd DR, Brookland RK, Washington MK. AJCC cancer staging manual. 8th ed. New York: Springer; 2017.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–74.CrossRef Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–74.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15:155–63.CrossRef Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15:155–63.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Huang Z, Xie DH, Guo L, et al. The utility of MRI for pre-operative T and N staging of gastric carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Radiol. 2015;88:20140552.CrossRef Huang Z, Xie DH, Guo L, et al. The utility of MRI for pre-operative T and N staging of gastric carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Radiol. 2015;88:20140552.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Caivano R, Rabasco P, Lotumolo A, et al. Gastric cancer: the role of diffusion weighted imaging in the preoperative staging. Cancer Invest. 2014;32(5):184–90.CrossRef Caivano R, Rabasco P, Lotumolo A, et al. Gastric cancer: the role of diffusion weighted imaging in the preoperative staging. Cancer Invest. 2014;32(5):184–90.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Jang KM, Kim SH, Lee SJ, et al. Upper abdominal gadoxetic acid-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MRI for the detection of gastric cancer: comparison with two-dimensional multidetector row CT. Clin Radiol. 2014;69:827–35.CrossRef Jang KM, Kim SH, Lee SJ, et al. Upper abdominal gadoxetic acid-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MRI for the detection of gastric cancer: comparison with two-dimensional multidetector row CT. Clin Radiol. 2014;69:827–35.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Yamada I, Miyasaka N, Hikishima K, et al. Gastric carcinoma: ex vivo MR imaging at 7.0 T-correlation with histopathologic findings. Radiology. 2015;275:841–8.CrossRef Yamada I, Miyasaka N, Hikishima K, et al. Gastric carcinoma: ex vivo MR imaging at 7.0 T-correlation with histopathologic findings. Radiology. 2015;275:841–8.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Yamada I, Hikishima K, Miyasaka N, et al. Gastric carcinoma: evaluation with diffusion-tensor MR imaging and tractography ex vivo. Magn Reson Imaging. 2016;34:144–51.CrossRef Yamada I, Hikishima K, Miyasaka N, et al. Gastric carcinoma: evaluation with diffusion-tensor MR imaging and tractography ex vivo. Magn Reson Imaging. 2016;34:144–51.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Yamada I, Takeshita K, Saito N, et al. Evaluation of gastric cancer by high-resolution three-dimensional CISS MR imaging in vitro. Clin Imaging. 2009;33:354–60.CrossRef Yamada I, Takeshita K, Saito N, et al. Evaluation of gastric cancer by high-resolution three-dimensional CISS MR imaging in vitro. Clin Imaging. 2009;33:354–60.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Qiao X, Li Z, Li L, et al. Preoperative T2-weighted MR imaging texture analysis of gastric cancer: prediction of TNM stages. Abdom Radiol. 2020. Qiao X, Li Z, Li L, et al. Preoperative T2-weighted MR imaging texture analysis of gastric cancer: prediction of TNM stages. Abdom Radiol. 2020.
30.
go back to reference Arslan H, Fatih ÖM, Çallı İ, et al. Contribution of diffusion weighted MRI to diagnosis and staging in gastric tumors and comparison with multi-detector computed tomography. Radiol Oncol. 2017;51:23–9.CrossRef Arslan H, Fatih ÖM, Çallı İ, et al. Contribution of diffusion weighted MRI to diagnosis and staging in gastric tumors and comparison with multi-detector computed tomography. Radiol Oncol. 2017;51:23–9.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Differentiating T1a–T1b from T2 in gastric cancer lesions with three different measurement approaches based on contrast-enhanced T1W imaging at 3.0 T
Authors
Yuan Yuan
Shengnan Ren
Tiegong Wang
Fu Shen
Qiang Hao
Jianping Lu
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Imaging / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2342
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-021-00672-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BMC Medical Imaging 1/2021 Go to the issue