Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 9/2022

Open Access 02-04-2022 | Magnetic Resonance Imaging | Breast

Automated artifact detection in abbreviated dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI-derived maximum intensity projections (MIPs) of the breast

Authors: Lorenz A. Kapsner, Sabine Ohlmeyer, Lukas Folle, Frederik B. Laun, Armin M. Nagel, Andrzej Liebert, Hannes Schreiter, Matthias W. Beckmann, Michael Uder, Evelyn Wenkel, Sebastian Bickelhaupt

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 9/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

To automatically detect MRI artifacts on dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) maximum intensity projections (MIPs) of the breast using deep learning.

Methods

Women who underwent clinically indicated breast MRI between October 2015 and December 2019 were included in this IRB-approved retrospective study. We employed two convolutional neural network architectures (ResNet and DenseNet) to detect the presence of artifacts on DCE MIPs of the left and right breasts. Networks were trained on images acquired up to and including the year 2018 using a 5-fold cross-validation (CV). Ensemble classifiers were built with the resulting CV models and applied to an independent holdout test dataset, which was formed by images acquired in 2019.

Results

Our study sample contained 2265 examinations from 1794 patients (median age at first acquisition: 50 years [IQR: 17 years]), corresponding to 1827 examinations of 1378 individuals in the training dataset and 438 examinations of 416 individuals in the holdout test dataset with a prevalence of image-level artifacts of 53% (1951/3654 images) and 43% (381/876 images), respectively. On the holdout test dataset, the ResNet and DenseNet ensembles demonstrated an area under the ROC curve of 0.92 and 0.94, respectively.

Conclusion

Neural networks are able to reliably detect artifacts that may impede the diagnostic assessment of MIPs derived from DCE subtraction series in breast MRI. Future studies need to further explore the potential of such neural networks to complement quality assurance and improve the application of DCE MIPs in a clinical setting, such as abbreviated protocols.

Key Points

• Deep learning classifiers are able to reliably detect MRI artifacts in dynamic contrast-enhanced protocol-derived maximum intensity projections of the breast.
• Automated quality assurance of maximum intensity projections of the breast may be of special relevance for abbreviated breast MRI, e.g., in high-throughput settings, such as cancer screening programs.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Veronesi U, Boyle P, Goldhirsch A, Orecchia R, Viale G (2005) Breast cancer. Lancet 365:1727–1741CrossRef Veronesi U, Boyle P, Goldhirsch A, Orecchia R, Viale G (2005) Breast cancer. Lancet 365:1727–1741CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Oeffinger KC, Fontham ET, Etzioni R et al (2015) Breast cancer screening for women at average risk: 2015 guideline update from the American Cancer Society. JAMA 314:1599–1614CrossRef Oeffinger KC, Fontham ET, Etzioni R et al (2015) Breast cancer screening for women at average risk: 2015 guideline update from the American Cancer Society. JAMA 314:1599–1614CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Untch M, Fasching PA, Brucker SY et al (2021) Treatment of patients with early breast cancer: evidence, controversies, consensus: German Expert Opinions on the 17th International St. Gallen Consensus Conference. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 81:637–653CrossRef Untch M, Fasching PA, Brucker SY et al (2021) Treatment of patients with early breast cancer: evidence, controversies, consensus: German Expert Opinions on the 17th International St. Gallen Consensus Conference. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 81:637–653CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kriege M, Brekelmans CTM, Zonderland HM, Kok T, Meijer S (2004) Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition. N Engl J Med 351:427–437CrossRef Kriege M, Brekelmans CTM, Zonderland HM, Kok T, Meijer S (2004) Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition. N Engl J Med 351:427–437CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Leutner CC et al (2005) Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:8469–8476CrossRef Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Leutner CC et al (2005) Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:8469–8476CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Peters NH, Borel Rinkes IH, Zuithoff NP, Mali WP, Moons KG, Peeters PH (2008) Meta-analysis of MR imaging in the diagnosis of breast lesions. Radiology 246:116–124CrossRef Peters NH, Borel Rinkes IH, Zuithoff NP, Mali WP, Moons KG, Peeters PH (2008) Meta-analysis of MR imaging in the diagnosis of breast lesions. Radiology 246:116–124CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Weinstein SP, Localio AR, Conant EF, Rosen M, Thomas KM, Schnall MD (2009) Multimodality screening of high-risk women: a prospective cohort study. J Clin Oncol 27:6124–6128CrossRef Weinstein SP, Localio AR, Conant EF, Rosen M, Thomas KM, Schnall MD (2009) Multimodality screening of high-risk women: a prospective cohort study. J Clin Oncol 27:6124–6128CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Evans A, Vinnicombe S (2017) Overdiagnosis in breast imaging. Breast 31:270–273CrossRef Evans A, Vinnicombe S (2017) Overdiagnosis in breast imaging. Breast 31:270–273CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Jatoi I, Pinsky PF (2021) Breast cancer screening trials: endpoints and overdiagnosis. J Natl Cancer Inst 113:1131–1135CrossRef Jatoi I, Pinsky PF (2021) Breast cancer screening trials: endpoints and overdiagnosis. J Natl Cancer Inst 113:1131–1135CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Morrow M, Waters J, Morris E (2011) MRI for breast cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment. Lancet 378:1804–1811CrossRef Morrow M, Waters J, Morris E (2011) MRI for breast cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment. Lancet 378:1804–1811CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Bakker MF, de Lange SV, Pijnappel RM et al (2019) Supplemental MRI screening for women with extremely dense breast tissue. N Engl J Med 381:2091–2102CrossRef Bakker MF, de Lange SV, Pijnappel RM et al (2019) Supplemental MRI screening for women with extremely dense breast tissue. N Engl J Med 381:2091–2102CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Mann RM, Kuhl CK, Moy L (2019) Contrast-enhanced MRI for breast cancer screening: breast MRI for Screening. J Magn Reson Imaging 50:377–390CrossRef Mann RM, Kuhl CK, Moy L (2019) Contrast-enhanced MRI for breast cancer screening: breast MRI for Screening. J Magn Reson Imaging 50:377–390CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Krassuski LM, Kautz-Freimuth S, Vennedey V, Rhiem K, Schmutzler RK, Stock S (2021) Decision aids for preventive treatment alternatives for BRCA1/2 mutation carriers: a systematic review. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 81:679–698CrossRef Krassuski LM, Kautz-Freimuth S, Vennedey V, Rhiem K, Schmutzler RK, Stock S (2021) Decision aids for preventive treatment alternatives for BRCA1/2 mutation carriers: a systematic review. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 81:679–698CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Strobel K, Schild HH, Hilgers R-D, Bieling HB (2014) Abbreviated breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): first postcontrast subtracted images and maximum-intensity projection - a novel approach to breast cancer screening with MRI. J Clin Oncol 32:2304–2310CrossRef Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Strobel K, Schild HH, Hilgers R-D, Bieling HB (2014) Abbreviated breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): first postcontrast subtracted images and maximum-intensity projection - a novel approach to breast cancer screening with MRI. J Clin Oncol 32:2304–2310CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Grimm LJ, Soo MS, Yoon S, Kim C, Ghate SV, Johnson KS (2015) Abbreviated screening protocol for breast MRI. Acad Radiol 22:1157–1162CrossRef Grimm LJ, Soo MS, Yoon S, Kim C, Ghate SV, Johnson KS (2015) Abbreviated screening protocol for breast MRI. Acad Radiol 22:1157–1162CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Chen S-Q, Huang M, Shen Y-Y, Liu C-L, Xu C-X (2017) Abbreviated MRI protocols for detecting breast cancer in women with dense breasts. Korean J Radiol 18:470–475CrossRef Chen S-Q, Huang M, Shen Y-Y, Liu C-L, Xu C-X (2017) Abbreviated MRI protocols for detecting breast cancer in women with dense breasts. Korean J Radiol 18:470–475CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Chhor CM, Mercado CL (2017) Abbreviated MRI protocols: wave of the future for breast cancer screening. AJR Am J Roentgenol 208:284–289CrossRef Chhor CM, Mercado CL (2017) Abbreviated MRI protocols: wave of the future for breast cancer screening. AJR Am J Roentgenol 208:284–289CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Deike-Hofmann K, Koenig F, Paech D et al (2019) Abbreviated MRI protocols in breast cancer diagnostics: abbreviated breast MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 49:647–658CrossRef Deike-Hofmann K, Koenig F, Paech D et al (2019) Abbreviated MRI protocols in breast cancer diagnostics: abbreviated breast MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 49:647–658CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Harvey JA, Hendrick RE, Coll JM, Nicholson BT, Burkholder BT, Cohen MA (2007) Breast MR imaging artifacts: how to recognize and fix them. Radiographics 27:131–145CrossRef Harvey JA, Hendrick RE, Coll JM, Nicholson BT, Burkholder BT, Cohen MA (2007) Breast MR imaging artifacts: how to recognize and fix them. Radiographics 27:131–145CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Zhuo J, Gullapalli RP (2006) MR artifacts, safety, and quality control. Radiographics 26:275–297CrossRef Zhuo J, Gullapalli RP (2006) MR artifacts, safety, and quality control. Radiographics 26:275–297CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Smith TB, Nayak KS (2010) MRI artifacts and correction strategies. Imaging Med 2:445–457 Smith TB, Nayak KS (2010) MRI artifacts and correction strategies. Imaging Med 2:445–457
24.
go back to reference Krupa K, Bekiesinska-Figatowska M (2015) Artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging. Pol J Radiol 80:93–106CrossRef Krupa K, Bekiesinska-Figatowska M (2015) Artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging. Pol J Radiol 80:93–106CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Budrys T, Veikutis V, Lukosevicius S, Gleizniene R, Monastyreckiene E, Kulakiene I (2018) Artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging: how it can really affect diagnostic image quality and confuse clinical diagnosis? Journal of Vibroengineering 20:1202–1213CrossRef Budrys T, Veikutis V, Lukosevicius S, Gleizniene R, Monastyreckiene E, Kulakiene I (2018) Artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging: how it can really affect diagnostic image quality and confuse clinical diagnosis? Journal of Vibroengineering 20:1202–1213CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Yaniv Z, Lowekamp BC, Johnson HJ, Beare R (2018) SimpleITK image-analysis notebooks: a collaborative environment for education and reproducible research. J Digit Imaging 31:290–303CrossRef Yaniv Z, Lowekamp BC, Johnson HJ, Beare R (2018) SimpleITK image-analysis notebooks: a collaborative environment for education and reproducible research. J Digit Imaging 31:290–303CrossRef
32.
go back to reference J. Kittler, and F. Roli, eds. (2000) Multiple classifier systems. Springer Berlin J. Kittler, and F. Roli, eds. (2000) Multiple classifier systems. Springer Berlin
34.
go back to reference Bauer DF (1972) Constructing confidence sets using rank statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association 67:687–690CrossRef Bauer DF (1972) Constructing confidence sets using rank statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association 67:687–690CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Saito T, Rehmsmeier M (2017) Precrec: fast and accurate precision-recall and ROC curve calculations in R. Bioinformatics 33:145–147CrossRef Saito T, Rehmsmeier M (2017) Precrec: fast and accurate precision-recall and ROC curve calculations in R. Bioinformatics 33:145–147CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Cohen J (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement 20:37–46CrossRef Cohen J (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement 20:37–46CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Chattopadhay A, Sarkar A, Howlader P, Balasubramanian VN (2018) Grad-CAM++: generalized gradient-based visual explanations for deep convolutional networks, in: 2018 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV). IEEE Lake Tahoe, NV. https://doi.org/10.1109/WACV.2018.00097 Chattopadhay A, Sarkar A, Howlader P, Balasubramanian VN (2018) Grad-CAM++: generalized gradient-based visual explanations for deep convolutional networks, in: 2018 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV). IEEE Lake Tahoe, NV. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1109/​WACV.​2018.​00097
46.
go back to reference Carbonaro LA, Schiaffino S, Clauser P et al (2021) Side of contrast injection and breast size correlate with motion artifacts grade and image quality on breast MRI. Acta Radiol 62:19–26CrossRef Carbonaro LA, Schiaffino S, Clauser P et al (2021) Side of contrast injection and breast size correlate with motion artifacts grade and image quality on breast MRI. Acta Radiol 62:19–26CrossRef
47.
go back to reference Clauser P, Dietzel M, Weber M, Kaiser CG, Baltzer PA (2019) Motion artifacts, lesion type, and parenchymal enhancement in breast MRI: what does really influence diagnostic accuracy? Acta Radiol 60:19–27CrossRef Clauser P, Dietzel M, Weber M, Kaiser CG, Baltzer PA (2019) Motion artifacts, lesion type, and parenchymal enhancement in breast MRI: what does really influence diagnostic accuracy? Acta Radiol 60:19–27CrossRef
48.
go back to reference Fiaschetti V, Pistolese C, Funel V et al (2013) Breast MRI artefacts: evaluation and solutions in 630 consecutive patients. Clin Radiol 68:601–608CrossRef Fiaschetti V, Pistolese C, Funel V et al (2013) Breast MRI artefacts: evaluation and solutions in 630 consecutive patients. Clin Radiol 68:601–608CrossRef
50.
go back to reference Bickelhaupt S, Laun FB, Tesdorff J et al (2016) Fast and noninvasive characterization of suspicious lesions detected at breast cancer X-ray screening: capability of diffusion-weighted MR Imaging with MIPs. Radiology 278:689–697CrossRef Bickelhaupt S, Laun FB, Tesdorff J et al (2016) Fast and noninvasive characterization of suspicious lesions detected at breast cancer X-ray screening: capability of diffusion-weighted MR Imaging with MIPs. Radiology 278:689–697CrossRef
52.
go back to reference Adachi M, Fujioka T, Mori M et al (2020) Detection and diagnosis of breast cancer using artificial intelligence based assessment of maximum intensity projection dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance images. Diagnostics (Basel) 10:330CrossRef Adachi M, Fujioka T, Mori M et al (2020) Detection and diagnosis of breast cancer using artificial intelligence based assessment of maximum intensity projection dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance images. Diagnostics (Basel) 10:330CrossRef
53.
go back to reference Hu Q, Whitney HM, Li H, Yu J, Liu P, Giger ML (2021) Improved classification of benign and malignant breast lesions using deep feature maximum intensity projection MRI in breast cancer diagnosis using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Radiol Artif Intell. https://doi.org/10.1148/ryai.2021200159 Hu Q, Whitney HM, Li H, Yu J, Liu P, Giger ML (2021) Improved classification of benign and malignant breast lesions using deep feature maximum intensity projection MRI in breast cancer diagnosis using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Radiol Artif Intell. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1148/​ryai.​2021200159
Metadata
Title
Automated artifact detection in abbreviated dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI-derived maximum intensity projections (MIPs) of the breast
Authors
Lorenz A. Kapsner
Sabine Ohlmeyer
Lukas Folle
Frederik B. Laun
Armin M. Nagel
Andrzej Liebert
Hannes Schreiter
Matthias W. Beckmann
Michael Uder
Evelyn Wenkel
Sebastian Bickelhaupt
Publication date
02-04-2022
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 9/2022
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-08626-5

Other articles of this Issue 9/2022

European Radiology 9/2022 Go to the issue