Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medical Imaging 1/2020

01-12-2020 | Magnetic Resonance Imaging | Research article

Association of gestational age with MRI-based biometrics of brain development in fetuses

Authors: Yuequan Shi, Yunjing Xue, Chunxia Chen, Kaiwu Lin, Zuofu Zhou

Published in: BMC Medical Imaging | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Reported date of last menstrual period and ultrasonography measurements are the most commonly used methods for determining gestational age in antenatal life. However, the mother cannot always determine the last menstrual period with certainty, and ultrasonography measurements are accurate only in the first trimester. We aimed to assess the ability of various biometric measurements on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in determining the accurate gestational age of an individual fetus in the second half of gestation.

Methods

We used MRI to scan a total of 637 fetuses ranging in age from 22 to 40 gestational weeks. We evaluated 9 standard fetal 2D biometric parameters, and regression models were fitted to assess normal fetal brain development. A stepwise linear regression model was constructed to predict gestational age, and measurement accuracy was determined in a held-out, unseen test sample (n = 49).

Results

A second-order polynomial regression model was found to be the best descriptor of biometric measures including brain bi-parietal diameter, head circumference, and fronto-occipital diameter in relation to normal fetal growth. Normal fetuses showed divergent growth patterns for the cerebrum and cerebellum, where the cerebrum undergoes rapid growth in the second trimester, while the cerebellum undergoes rapid growth in the third trimester. Moreover, a linear model based on biometrics of brain bi-parietal diameter, length of the corpus callosum, vermis area, transverse cerebellar diameter, and cerebellar area accurately predicted gestational age in the second and third trimesters (cross-validation R2 = 0.822, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

These results support the use of MRI biometry charts to improve MRI evaluation of fetal growth and suggest that MRI biometry measurements offer a potential estimation model of fetal gestational age in the second half of gestation, which is vital to any assessment of pregnancy, fetal development, and neonatal care.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Naidu K, Fredlund KL. Gestational age assessment. Treasure Island (FL); 2020. Naidu K, Fredlund KL. Gestational age assessment. Treasure Island (FL); 2020.
2.
go back to reference Qin C, Hsia J, Berg CJ. Variation between last-menstrual-period and clinical estimates of gestational age in vital records. Am J Epidemiol. 2008;167:646–52.PubMedCrossRef Qin C, Hsia J, Berg CJ. Variation between last-menstrual-period and clinical estimates of gestational age in vital records. Am J Epidemiol. 2008;167:646–52.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Dewhurst CJ, Beazley JM, Campbell S. Assessment of fetal maturity and dysmaturity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1972;113:141–9.PubMedCrossRef Dewhurst CJ, Beazley JM, Campbell S. Assessment of fetal maturity and dysmaturity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1972;113:141–9.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Benson CB, Doubilet PM. Sonographic prediction of gestational age: accuracy of second- and third-trimester fetal measurements. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1991;157:1275–7.PubMedCrossRef Benson CB, Doubilet PM. Sonographic prediction of gestational age: accuracy of second- and third-trimester fetal measurements. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1991;157:1275–7.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Butt K, Lim K, Lim K, Bly S, Butt K, Cargill Y, Davies G, Denis N, Hazlitt G, Morin L, et al. Determination of gestational age by ultrasound. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2014;36:171–81.PubMedCrossRef Butt K, Lim K, Lim K, Bly S, Butt K, Cargill Y, Davies G, Denis N, Hazlitt G, Morin L, et al. Determination of gestational age by ultrasound. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2014;36:171–81.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Hadlock FP, Deter RL, Harrist RB, Park SK. Estimating fetal age: computer-assisted analysis of multiple fetal growth parameters. Radiology. 1984;152:497–501.PubMedCrossRef Hadlock FP, Deter RL, Harrist RB, Park SK. Estimating fetal age: computer-assisted analysis of multiple fetal growth parameters. Radiology. 1984;152:497–501.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Falick Michaeli T, Spiro A, Sabag O, Karavani G, Yagel S, Eventov-Friedman S, Cedar H, Bergman Y, Gielchinsky Y. Determining gestational age using genome methylation profile: a novel approach for fetal medicine. Prenat Diagn. 2019;39:1005–10.PubMedCrossRef Falick Michaeli T, Spiro A, Sabag O, Karavani G, Yagel S, Eventov-Friedman S, Cedar H, Bergman Y, Gielchinsky Y. Determining gestational age using genome methylation profile: a novel approach for fetal medicine. Prenat Diagn. 2019;39:1005–10.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Chavez MR, Ananth CV, Kaminsky LM, Smulian JC, Yeo L, Vintzileos AM. Fetal transcerebellar diameter measurement for prediction of gestational age in twins. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195:1596–600.PubMedCrossRef Chavez MR, Ananth CV, Kaminsky LM, Smulian JC, Yeo L, Vintzileos AM. Fetal transcerebellar diameter measurement for prediction of gestational age in twins. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195:1596–600.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Chavez MR, Ananth CV, Smulian JC, Yeo L, Oyelese Y, Vintzileos AM. Fetal transcerebellar diameter measurement with particular emphasis in the third trimester: a reliable predictor of gestational age. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191:979–84.PubMedCrossRef Chavez MR, Ananth CV, Smulian JC, Yeo L, Oyelese Y, Vintzileos AM. Fetal transcerebellar diameter measurement with particular emphasis in the third trimester: a reliable predictor of gestational age. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191:979–84.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Wu J, Awate SP, Licht DJ, Clouchoux C, du Plessis AJ, Avants BB, Vossough A, Gee JC, Limperopoulos C. Assessment of MRI-based automated fetal cerebral cortical folding measures in prediction of gestational age in the third trimester. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015;36:1369–74.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Wu J, Awate SP, Licht DJ, Clouchoux C, du Plessis AJ, Avants BB, Vossough A, Gee JC, Limperopoulos C. Assessment of MRI-based automated fetal cerebral cortical folding measures in prediction of gestational age in the third trimester. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015;36:1369–74.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Tee LM, Kan EY, Cheung JC, Leung WC. Magnetic resonance imaging of the fetal brain. Hong Kong Med J. 2016;22:270–8.PubMed Tee LM, Kan EY, Cheung JC, Leung WC. Magnetic resonance imaging of the fetal brain. Hong Kong Med J. 2016;22:270–8.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Blondiaux E, Garel C. Fetal cerebral imaging—ultrasound vs. MRI: an update. Acta Radiol. 2013;54:1046–54.PubMedCrossRef Blondiaux E, Garel C. Fetal cerebral imaging—ultrasound vs. MRI: an update. Acta Radiol. 2013;54:1046–54.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Perrone A, Savelli S, Maggi C, Di Pietro L, Di Maurizio M, Tesei J, Ballesio L, De Felice C, Giancotti A, Di Iorio R, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging versus ultrasonography in fetal pathology. Radiol Med. 2008;113:225–41.PubMedCrossRef Perrone A, Savelli S, Maggi C, Di Pietro L, Di Maurizio M, Tesei J, Ballesio L, De Felice C, Giancotti A, Di Iorio R, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging versus ultrasonography in fetal pathology. Radiol Med. 2008;113:225–41.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Garel C. The role of MRI in the evaluation of the fetal brain with an emphasis on biometry, gyration and parenchyma. Pediatr Radiol. 2004;34:694–9.PubMedCrossRef Garel C. The role of MRI in the evaluation of the fetal brain with an emphasis on biometry, gyration and parenchyma. Pediatr Radiol. 2004;34:694–9.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Cai S, Zhang G, Zhang H, Wang J. Normative linear and volumetric biometric measurements of fetal brain development in magnetic resonance imaging. Childs Nerv Syst. 2020. Cai S, Zhang G, Zhang H, Wang J. Normative linear and volumetric biometric measurements of fetal brain development in magnetic resonance imaging. Childs Nerv Syst. 2020.
16.
go back to reference Griffiths PD, Bradburn M, Campbell MJ, Cooper CL, Graham R, Jarvis D, Kilby MD, Mason G, Mooney C, Robson SC, et al. Use of MRI in the diagnosis of fetal brain abnormalities in utero (MERIDIAN): a multicentre, prospective cohort study. The Lancet. 2017;389:538–46.CrossRef Griffiths PD, Bradburn M, Campbell MJ, Cooper CL, Graham R, Jarvis D, Kilby MD, Mason G, Mooney C, Robson SC, et al. Use of MRI in the diagnosis of fetal brain abnormalities in utero (MERIDIAN): a multicentre, prospective cohort study. The Lancet. 2017;389:538–46.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Hatab MR, Kamourieh SW, Twickler DM. MR volume of the fetal cerebellum in relation to growth. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008;27:840–5.PubMedCrossRef Hatab MR, Kamourieh SW, Twickler DM. MR volume of the fetal cerebellum in relation to growth. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008;27:840–5.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Jarvis D, Griffiths PD. Clinical applications of 3D volume MR imaging of the fetal brain in utero. Prenat Diagn. 2017;37:556–65.PubMedCrossRef Jarvis D, Griffiths PD. Clinical applications of 3D volume MR imaging of the fetal brain in utero. Prenat Diagn. 2017;37:556–65.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Jarvis DA, Finney CR, Griffiths PD. Normative volume measurements of the fetal intra-cranial compartments using 3D volume in utero MR imaging. Eur Radiol. 2019;29:3488–95.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Jarvis DA, Finney CR, Griffiths PD. Normative volume measurements of the fetal intra-cranial compartments using 3D volume in utero MR imaging. Eur Radiol. 2019;29:3488–95.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Kyriakopoulou V, Vatansever D, Davidson A, Patkee P, Elkommos S, Chew A, Martinez-Biarge M, Hagberg B, Damodaram M, Allsop J, et al. Normative biometry of the fetal brain using magnetic resonance imaging. Brain Struct Funct. 2017;222:2295–307.PubMedCrossRef Kyriakopoulou V, Vatansever D, Davidson A, Patkee P, Elkommos S, Chew A, Martinez-Biarge M, Hagberg B, Damodaram M, Allsop J, et al. Normative biometry of the fetal brain using magnetic resonance imaging. Brain Struct Funct. 2017;222:2295–307.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Harreld JH, Bhore R, Chason DP, Twickler DM. Corpus callosum length by gestational age as evaluated by fetal MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011;32:490–4.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Harreld JH, Bhore R, Chason DP, Twickler DM. Corpus callosum length by gestational age as evaluated by fetal MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011;32:490–4.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Katorza E, Bertucci E, Perlman S, Taschini S, Ber R, Gilboa Y, Mazza V, Achiron R. Development of the fetal vermis: new biometry reference data and comparison of 3 diagnostic modalities-3D ultrasound, 2D ultrasound, and MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016;37:1359–66.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Katorza E, Bertucci E, Perlman S, Taschini S, Ber R, Gilboa Y, Mazza V, Achiron R. Development of the fetal vermis: new biometry reference data and comparison of 3 diagnostic modalities-3D ultrasound, 2D ultrasound, and MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016;37:1359–66.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Yaniv G, Katorza E, Tsehmaister Abitbol V, Eisenkraft A, Bercovitz R, Bader S, Hoffmann C. Discrepancy in fetal head biometry between ultrasound and MRI in suspected microcephalic fetuses. Acta Radiol. 2017;58:1519–27.PubMedCrossRef Yaniv G, Katorza E, Tsehmaister Abitbol V, Eisenkraft A, Bercovitz R, Bader S, Hoffmann C. Discrepancy in fetal head biometry between ultrasound and MRI in suspected microcephalic fetuses. Acta Radiol. 2017;58:1519–27.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Scheinost D, Noble S, Horien C, Greene AS, Lake EM, Salehi M, Gao S, Shen X, O’Connor D, Barron DS, et al. Ten simple rules for predictive modeling of individual differences in neuroimaging. Neuroimage. 2019;193:35–45.PubMedCrossRef Scheinost D, Noble S, Horien C, Greene AS, Lake EM, Salehi M, Gao S, Shen X, O’Connor D, Barron DS, et al. Ten simple rules for predictive modeling of individual differences in neuroimaging. Neuroimage. 2019;193:35–45.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Tilea B, Alberti C, Adamsbaum C, Armoogum P, Oury JF, Cabrol D, Sebag G, Kalifa G, Garel C. Cerebral biometry in fetal magnetic resonance imaging: new reference data. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;33:173–81.PubMedCrossRef Tilea B, Alberti C, Adamsbaum C, Armoogum P, Oury JF, Cabrol D, Sebag G, Kalifa G, Garel C. Cerebral biometry in fetal magnetic resonance imaging: new reference data. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;33:173–81.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Ye J, Rong R, Dou Y, Jiang J, Wang X. Evaluation of the development of the posterior fossa in normal Chinese fetuses by using magnetic resonance imaging. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020;99:e19786.CrossRef Ye J, Rong R, Dou Y, Jiang J, Wang X. Evaluation of the development of the posterior fossa in normal Chinese fetuses by using magnetic resonance imaging. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020;99:e19786.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Jung SI, Lee YH, Moon MH, Song MJ, Min JY, Kim JA, Park JH, Yang JH, Kim MY, Chung JH, et al. Reference charts and equations of Korean fetal biometry. Prenat Diagn. 2007;27:545–51.PubMedCrossRef Jung SI, Lee YH, Moon MH, Song MJ, Min JY, Kim JA, Park JH, Yang JH, Kim MY, Chung JH, et al. Reference charts and equations of Korean fetal biometry. Prenat Diagn. 2007;27:545–51.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Leung TN, Pang MW, Daljit SS, Leung TY, Poon CF, Wong SM, Lau TK. Fetal biometry in ethnic Chinese: biparietal diameter, head circumference, abdominal circumference and femur length. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;31:321–7.PubMedCrossRef Leung TN, Pang MW, Daljit SS, Leung TY, Poon CF, Wong SM, Lau TK. Fetal biometry in ethnic Chinese: biparietal diameter, head circumference, abdominal circumference and femur length. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;31:321–7.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Vinkesteijn AS, Mulder PG, Wladimiroff JW. Fetal transverse cerebellar diameter measurements in normal and reduced fetal growth. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2000;15:47–51.PubMedCrossRef Vinkesteijn AS, Mulder PG, Wladimiroff JW. Fetal transverse cerebellar diameter measurements in normal and reduced fetal growth. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2000;15:47–51.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Leto K, Arancillo M, Becker EB, Buffo A, Chiang C, Ding B, Dobyns WB, Dusart I, Haldipur P, Hatten ME, et al. Consensus paper: cerebellar development. Cerebellum. 2016;15:789–828.PubMedCrossRef Leto K, Arancillo M, Becker EB, Buffo A, Chiang C, Ding B, Dobyns WB, Dusart I, Haldipur P, Hatten ME, et al. Consensus paper: cerebellar development. Cerebellum. 2016;15:789–828.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Scott JA, Hamzelou KS, Rajagopalan V, Habas PA, Kim K, Barkovich AJ, Glenn OA, Studholme C. 3D morphometric analysis of human fetal cerebellar development. Cerebellum. 2012;11:761–70.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Scott JA, Hamzelou KS, Rajagopalan V, Habas PA, Kim K, Barkovich AJ, Glenn OA, Studholme C. 3D morphometric analysis of human fetal cerebellar development. Cerebellum. 2012;11:761–70.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Limperopoulos C, Soul JS, Gauvreau K, Huppi PS, Warfield SK, Bassan H, Robertson RL, Volpe JJ, du Plessis AJ. Late gestation cerebellar growth is rapid and impeded by premature birth. Pediatrics. 2005;115:688–95.PubMedCrossRef Limperopoulos C, Soul JS, Gauvreau K, Huppi PS, Warfield SK, Bassan H, Robertson RL, Volpe JJ, du Plessis AJ. Late gestation cerebellar growth is rapid and impeded by premature birth. Pediatrics. 2005;115:688–95.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Clouchoux C, Guizard N, Evans AC, du Plessis AJ, Limperopoulos C. Normative fetal brain growth by quantitative in vivo magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206(173):e1-8. Clouchoux C, Guizard N, Evans AC, du Plessis AJ, Limperopoulos C. Normative fetal brain growth by quantitative in vivo magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206(173):e1-8.
34.
go back to reference Brossard-Racine M, Limperopoulos C. Normal cerebellar development by qualitative and quantitative MR imaging: from the fetus to the adolescent. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2016;26:331–9.PubMedCrossRef Brossard-Racine M, Limperopoulos C. Normal cerebellar development by qualitative and quantitative MR imaging: from the fetus to the adolescent. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2016;26:331–9.PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Koning IV, Dudink J, Groenenberg IAL, Willemsen SP, Reiss IKM, Steegers-Theunissen RPM. Prenatal cerebellar growth trajectories and the impact of periconceptional maternal and fetal factors. Hum Reprod. 2017;32:1230–7.PubMedCrossRef Koning IV, Dudink J, Groenenberg IAL, Willemsen SP, Reiss IKM, Steegers-Theunissen RPM. Prenatal cerebellar growth trajectories and the impact of periconceptional maternal and fetal factors. Hum Reprod. 2017;32:1230–7.PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Andescavage NN, du Plessis A, McCarter R, Serag A, Evangelou I, Vezina G, Robertson R, Limperopoulos C. Complex trajectories of brain development in the healthy human fetus. Cereb Cortex. 2017;27:5274–83.PubMed Andescavage NN, du Plessis A, McCarter R, Serag A, Evangelou I, Vezina G, Robertson R, Limperopoulos C. Complex trajectories of brain development in the healthy human fetus. Cereb Cortex. 2017;27:5274–83.PubMed
37.
go back to reference Rizzo G, Prefumo F, Ferrazzi E, Zanardini C, Di Martino D, Boito S, Aiello E, Ghi T, et al. The effect of fetal sex on customized fetal growth charts. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29:3768–75.PubMedCrossRef Rizzo G, Prefumo F, Ferrazzi E, Zanardini C, Di Martino D, Boito S, Aiello E, Ghi T, et al. The effect of fetal sex on customized fetal growth charts. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29:3768–75.PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Lund N, Sandager P, Leonhard AK, Vogel I, Petersen OB. Second-trimester fetal head circumference in more than 350 000 pregnancies: Outcome and suggestion for sex-dependent cutoffs for small heads. Prenat Diagn. 2019;39:910–20.PubMedCrossRef Lund N, Sandager P, Leonhard AK, Vogel I, Petersen OB. Second-trimester fetal head circumference in more than 350 000 pregnancies: Outcome and suggestion for sex-dependent cutoffs for small heads. Prenat Diagn. 2019;39:910–20.PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Tich SN, Anderson PJ, Hunt RW, Lee KJ, Doyle LW, Inder TE. Neurodevelopmental and perinatal correlates of simple brain metrics in very preterm infants. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2011;165:216–22.PubMedCrossRef Tich SN, Anderson PJ, Hunt RW, Lee KJ, Doyle LW, Inder TE. Neurodevelopmental and perinatal correlates of simple brain metrics in very preterm infants. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2011;165:216–22.PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Broere-Brown ZA, Baan E, Schalekamp-Timmermans S, Verburg BO, Jaddoe VW, Steegers EA. Sex-specific differences in fetal and infant growth patterns: a prospective population-based cohort study. Biol Sex Differ. 2016;7:65.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Broere-Brown ZA, Baan E, Schalekamp-Timmermans S, Verburg BO, Jaddoe VW, Steegers EA. Sex-specific differences in fetal and infant growth patterns: a prospective population-based cohort study. Biol Sex Differ. 2016;7:65.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Committee on Obstetric Practice tAIoUiM, the Society for Maternal-Fetal M. Committee opinion no 700: methods for estimating the due date. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;129:e150–e54. Committee on Obstetric Practice tAIoUiM, the Society for Maternal-Fetal M. Committee opinion no 700: methods for estimating the due date. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;129:e150–e54.
42.
go back to reference Hohler CW, Quetel TA. Comparison of ultrasound femur length and biparietal diameter in late pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1981;141:759–62.PubMedCrossRef Hohler CW, Quetel TA. Comparison of ultrasound femur length and biparietal diameter in late pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1981;141:759–62.PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Chavez MR, Ananth CV, Smulian JC, Vintzileos AM. Fetal transcerebellar diameter measurement for prediction of gestational age at the extremes of fetal growth. J Ultrasound Med. 2007;26:1167–71 (quiz 73–4).PubMedCrossRef Chavez MR, Ananth CV, Smulian JC, Vintzileos AM. Fetal transcerebellar diameter measurement for prediction of gestational age at the extremes of fetal growth. J Ultrasound Med. 2007;26:1167–71 (quiz 73–4).PubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Co E, Raju TN, Aldana O. Cerebellar dimensions in assessment of gestational age in neonates. Radiology. 1991;181:581–5.PubMedCrossRef Co E, Raju TN, Aldana O. Cerebellar dimensions in assessment of gestational age in neonates. Radiology. 1991;181:581–5.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Association of gestational age with MRI-based biometrics of brain development in fetuses
Authors
Yuequan Shi
Yunjing Xue
Chunxia Chen
Kaiwu Lin
Zuofu Zhou
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Imaging / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2342
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-020-00525-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

BMC Medical Imaging 1/2020 Go to the issue