Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Geriatrics
Published in: BMC Geriatrics 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Magnetic Resonance Imaging | Research

A pilot voxel-based morphometry study of older adults after the PICMOR intervention program

Authors: Hikaru Sugimoto, Mihoko Otake-Matsuura

Published in: BMC Geriatrics | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Age-related decline in cognitive function, such as executive function, is associated with structural changes in the neural substrates, such as volume reductions in the lateral prefrontal cortex. To prevent or delay age-related changes in cognitive function, cognitive intervention methods that employ social activity, including conversations, have been proposed in some intervention studies. Interestingly, previous studies have consistently reported that verbal fluency ability can be trained by conversation-based interventions in healthy older adults. However, little is known about the neural substrates that underlie the beneficial effect of conversation-based interventions on cognitive function. In this pilot study, we aimed to provide candidate brain regions that are responsible for the enhancement of cognitive function, by analyzing structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data that were additionally obtained from participants in our previous intervention study.

Methods

A voxel-based morphometric analysis was applied to the structural MRI data. In the analysis, the regional brain volume was compared between the intervention group, who participated in a group conversation-based intervention program named Photo-Integrated Conversation Moderated by Robots (PICMOR), and the control group, who joined in a control program based on unstructured free conversations. Furthermore, regions whose volume was positively correlated with an increase in verbal fluency task scores throughout the intervention period were explored.

Results

Results showed that the volume of several regions, including the superior frontal gyrus, parahippocampal gyrus/hippocampus, posterior middle temporal gyrus, and postcentral gyrus, was greater in the intervention group than in the control group. In contrast, no regions showed greater volume in the control group than in the intervention group. The region whose volume showed a positive correlation with the increased task scores was identified in the inferior parietal lobule.

Conclusions

Although definitive conclusions cannot be drawn from this study due to a lack of MRI data from the pre-intervention period, it achieved the exploratory purpose by successfully identifying candidate brain regions that reflect the beneficial effect of conversation-based interventions on cognitive function, including the lateral prefrontal cortex, which plays an important role in executive functions.

Trial registration

The trial was retrospectively registered on 7 May 2019 (UMIN Clinical Trials Registry number: UMIN000036667).
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
2.
3.
Park DC, Lautenschlager G, Hedden T, Davidson NS, Smith AD, Smith PK. Models of visuospatial and verbal memory across the adult life span. Psychol Aging. 2002;17(2):299–320.PubMedCrossRef
4.
5.
6.
7.
Antonenko D, Floel A. Healthy aging by staying selectively connected: a mini-review. Gerontology. 2014;60(1):3–9.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Goh JO, Park DC. Neuroplasticity and cognitive aging: the scaffolding theory of aging and cognition. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2009;27(5):391–403.PubMedPubMedCentral
9.
10.
Greenwood PM. Functional plasticity in cognitive aging: review and hypothesis. Neuropsychology. 2007;21(6):657–73.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Hedden T, Gabrieli JD. Insights into the ageing mind: a view from cognitive neuroscience. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2004;5(2):87–96.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Nyberg L, Lovden M, Riklund K, Lindenberger U, Backman L. Memory aging and brain maintenance. Trends Cogn Sci. 2012;16(5):292–305.PubMedCrossRef
13.
14.
Reuter-Lorenz PA, Park DC. Human neuroscience and the aging mind: a new look at old problems. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2010;65(4):405–15.PubMedCrossRef
15.
16.
Lemaitre H, Goldman AL, Sambataro F, Verchinski BA, Meyer-Lindenberg A, Weinberger DR, et al. Normal age-related brain morphometric changes: nonuniformity across cortical thickness, surface area and gray matter volume? Neurobiol Aging. 2012;33(3):617 e1–9.CrossRef
17.
Manard M, Bahri MA, Salmon E, Collette F. Relationship between grey matter integrity and executive abilities in aging. Brain Res. 2016;1642:562–80.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Nyberg L, Salami A, Andersson M, Eriksson J, Kalpouzos G, Kauppi K, et al. Longitudinal evidence for diminished frontal cortex function in aging. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(52):22682–6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
19.
Ramanoel S, Hoyau E, Kauffmann L, Renard F, Pichat C, Boudiaf N, et al. Gray matter volume and cognitive performance during normal aging. A voxel-based morphometry study. Front Aging Neurosci. 2018;10:235.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
20.
Raz N, Lindenberger U, Rodrigue KM, Kennedy KM, Head D, Williamson A, et al. Regional brain changes in aging healthy adults: general trends, individual differences and modifiers. Cereb Cortex. 2005;15(11):1676–89.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Tisserand DJ, van Boxtel MP, Pruessner JC, Hofman P, Evans AC, Jolles J. A voxel-based morphometric study to determine individual differences in gray matter density associated with age and cognitive change over time. Cereb Cortex. 2004;14(9):966–73.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Kelly ME, Duff H, Kelly S, McHugh Power JE, Brennan S, Lawlor BA, et al. The impact of social activities, social networks, social support and social relationships on the cognitive functioning of healthy older adults: a systematic review. Syst Rev. 2017;6(1):259.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
23.
Shao Z, Janse E, Visser K, Meyer AS. What do verbal fluency tasks measure? Predictors of verbal fluency performance in older adults. Front Psychol. 2014;5:772.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
24.
Dodge HH, Zhu J, Mattek N, Bowman M, Ybarra O, Wild K, et al. Web-enabled conversational interactions as a means to improve cognitive functions: results of a 6-week randomized controlled trial. Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2015;1(1):1–12.CrossRef
25.
Otake-Matsuura M, Tokunaga S, Watanabe K, Abe MS, Sekiguchi T, Sugimoto H, et al. Cognitive intervention through Photo-Integrated Conversation Moderated by Robots (PICMOR) program: a randomized controlled trial. Front Robot AI. 2021;8:633076.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
26.
Fujiwara Y, Suzuki H, Yasunaga M, Sugiyama M, Ijuin M, Sakuma N, et al. Brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment in older Japanese: validation of the Japanese version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2010;10(3):225–32.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Lezak MD, Howieson DB, Bigler ED, Tranel D. Neuropsychological assessment. New York: Oxford University Press; 2012.
28.
Miro-Padilla A, Bueicheku E, Ventura-Campos N, Palomar-Garcia MA, Avila C. Functional connectivity in resting state as a phonemic fluency ability measure. Neuropsychologia. 2017;97:98–103.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Sala-Llonch R, Bartres-Faz D, Junque C. Reorganization of brain networks in aging: a review of functional connectivity studies. Front Psychol. 2015;6:663.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
30.
Sugimoto H, Kawagoe T, Otake-Matsuura M. Characteristics of resting-state functional connectivity in older adults after the PICMOR intervention program: a preliminary report. BMC Geriatr. 2020;20(1):486.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
31.
Alvarez JA, Emory E. Executive function and the frontal lobes: a meta-analytic review. Neuropsychol Rev. 2006;16(1):17–42.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Blumenfeld RS, Ranganath C. Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex promotes long-term memory formation through its role in working memory organization. J Neurosci. 2006;26(3):916–25.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
33.
Buchsbaum BR, Greer S, Chang WL, Berman KF. Meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies of the Wisconsin Card-Sorting task and component processes. Hum Brain Mapp. 2005;25(1):35–45.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
34.
Friedman NP, Robbins TW. The role of prefrontal cortex in cognitive control and executive function. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2022;47(1):72–89.PubMedCrossRef
35.
Laird AR, McMillan KM, Lancaster JL, Kochunov P, Turkeltaub PE, Pardo JV, et al. A comparison of label-based review and ALE meta-analysis in the Stroop task. Hum Brain Mapp. 2005;25(1):6–21.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
36.
Owen AM, McMillan KM, Laird AR, Bullmore E. N-back working memory paradigm: a meta-analysis of normative functional neuroimaging studies. Hum Brain Mapp. 2005;25(1):46–59.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
37.
Steele VR, Aharoni E, Munro GE, Calhoun VD, Nyalakanti P, Stevens MC, et al. A large scale (N=102) functional neuroimaging study of response inhibition in a Go/NoGo task. Behav Brain Res. 2013;256:529–36.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
38.
Varjacic A, Mantini D, Demeyere N, Gillebert CR. Neural signatures of Trail Making Test performance: evidence from lesion-mapping and neuroimaging studies. Neuropsychologia. 2018;115:78–87.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
39.
Yuan P, Raz N. Prefrontal cortex and executive functions in healthy adults: a meta-analysis of structural neuroimaging studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014;42:180–92.PubMedCrossRef
40.
West GL, Zendel BR, Konishi K, Benady-Chorney J, Bohbot VD, Peretz I, et al. Playing Super Mario 64 increases hippocampal grey matter in older adults. PLoS One. 2017;12(12):e0187779.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
41.
Ashburner J, Friston KJ. Voxel-based morphometry--the methods. Neuroimage. 2000;11(6 Pt 1):805–21.PubMedCrossRef
42.
Sugishita M, Koshizuka Y, Sudou S, Sugishita K, Hemmi I, Karasawa H, et al. The validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE-J) with the original procedure of the Attention and Calculation Task (2001). Japan J Cogn Neurosci. 2018;20(2):91–110.
43.
44.
45.
Ridgway GR, Omar R, Ourselin S, Hill DL, Warren JD, Fox NC. Issues with threshold masking in voxel-based morphometry of atrophied brains. Neuroimage. 2009;44(1):99–111.PubMedCrossRef
46.
Slotnick SD. Cluster success: fMRI inferences for spatial extent have acceptable false-positive rates. Cogn Neurosci. 2017;8(3):150–5.PubMedCrossRef
47.
Eickhoff SB, Heim S, Zilles K, Amunts K. Testing anatomically specified hypotheses in functional imaging using cytoarchitectonic maps. Neuroimage. 2006;32(2):570–82.PubMedCrossRef
48.
Eickhoff SB, Paus T, Caspers S, Grosbras MH, Evans AC, Zilles K, et al. Assignment of functional activations to probabilistic cytoarchitectonic areas revisited. Neuroimage. 2007;36(3):511–21.PubMedCrossRef
49.
Eickhoff SB, Stephan KE, Mohlberg H, Grefkes C, Fink GR, Amunts K, et al. A new SPM toolbox for combining probabilistic cytoarchitectonic maps and functional imaging data. Neuroimage. 2005;25(4):1325–35.PubMedCrossRef
50.
Gurd JM, Amunts K, Weiss PH, Zafiris O, Zilles K, Marshall JC, et al. Posterior parietal cortex is implicated in continuous switching between verbal fluency tasks: an fMRI study with clinical implications. Brain. 2002;125(Pt 5):1024–38.PubMedCrossRef
51.
Hirshorn EA, Thompson-Schill SL. Role of the left inferior frontal gyrus in covert word retrieval: neural correlates of switching during verbal fluency. Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(12):2547–57.PubMedCrossRef
52.
Scheuringer A, Harris TA, Pletzer B. Recruiting the right hemisphere: sex differences in inter-hemispheric communication during semantic verbal fluency. Brain Lang. 2020;207:104814.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
53.
Troyer AK, Moscovitch M, Winocur G. Clustering and switching as two components of verbal fluency: evidence from younger and older healthy adults. Neuropsychology. 1997;11(1):138–46.PubMedCrossRef
54.
Engvig A, Fjell AM, Westlye LT, Skaane NV, Dale AM, Holland D, et al. Effects of cognitive training on gray matter volumes in memory clinic patients with subjective memory impairment. J Alzheimers Dis. 2014;41(3):779–91.PubMedCrossRef
55.
Lovden M, Schaefer S, Noack H, Bodammer NC, Kuhn S, Heinze HJ, et al. Spatial navigation training protects the hippocampus against age-related changes during early and late adulthood. Neurobiol Aging. 2012;33(3):620 e9–22.CrossRef
56.
Davachi L. Item, context and relational episodic encoding in humans. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2006;16(6):693–700.PubMedCrossRef
57.
Diana RA, Yonelinas AP, Ranganath C. Imaging recollection and familiarity in the medial temporal lobe: a three-component model. Trends Cogn Sci. 2007;11(9):379–86.PubMedCrossRef
58.
Eichenbaum H, Sauvage M, Fortin N, Komorowski R, Lipton P. Towards a functional organization of episodic memory in the medial temporal lobe. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2012;36(7):1597–608.PubMedCrossRef
59.
Rugg MD, Vilberg KL, Mattson JT, Yu SS, Johnson JD, Suzuki M. Item memory, context memory and the hippocampus: fMRI evidence. Neuropsychologia. 2012;50(13):3070–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
60.
Wechsler D. WMS-R: Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised Manual. San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation; 1987.
61.
Ardila A, Bernal B, Rosselli M. How localized are language brain areas? A review of Brodmann areas involvement in oral language. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2016;31(1):112–22.PubMedCrossRef
62.
Dronkers NF, Wilkins DP, Van Valin RD, Jr., Redfern BB, Jaeger JJ. Lesion analysis of the brain areas involved in language comprehension. Cognition. 2004;92(1–2):145–77.PubMedCrossRef
63.
Kertesz A, Sheppard A, MacKenzie R. Localization in transcortical sensory aphasia. Arch Neurol. 1982;39(8):475–8.PubMedCrossRef
64.
Robson H, Sage K, Ralph MA. Wernicke’s aphasia reflects a combination of acoustic-phonological and semantic control deficits: a case-series comparison of Wernicke’s aphasia, semantic dementia and semantic aphasia. Neuropsychologia. 2012;50(2):266–75.PubMedCrossRef
65.
Kemmerer D. Cognitive neuroscience of language. New York: Psychology Press; 2015.
66.
Hickok G, Poeppel D. Towards a functional neuroanatomy of speech perception. Trends Cogn Sci. 2000;4(4):131–8.PubMedCrossRef
67.
Hickok G, Poeppel D. Dorsal and ventral streams: a framework for understanding aspects of the functional anatomy of language. Cognition. 2004;92(1–2):67–99.PubMedCrossRef
68.
Hickok G, Poeppel D. The cortical organization of speech processing. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007;8(5):393–402.PubMedCrossRef
69.
Fjell AM, Walhovd KB, Fennema-Notestine C, McEvoy LK, Hagler DJ, Holland D, et al. One-year brain atrophy evident in healthy aging. J Neurosci. 2009;29(48):15223–31.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
70.
Gorbach T, Pudas S, Lundquist A, Oradd G, Josefsson M, Salami A, et al. Longitudinal association between hippocampus atrophy and episodic-memory decline. Neurobiol Aging. 2017;51:167–76.PubMedCrossRef
71.
Leong RLF, Lo JC, Sim SKY, Zheng H, Tandi J, Zhou J, et al. Longitudinal brain structure and cognitive changes over 8 years in an East Asian cohort. Neuroimage. 2017;147:852–60.PubMedCrossRef
72.
Sugishita K, Sugishita M, Hemmi I, Asada T, Tanigawa T. A validity and reliability study of the Japanese version of the Geriatric Depression Scale 15 (GDS-15-J). Clin Gerontol. 2017;40(4):233–40.PubMedCrossRef
73.
Tokunaga S, Tamura K, Otake-Matsuura M. A dialogue-based system with photo and storytelling for older adults: toward daily cognitive training. Front Robot AI. 2021;8:644964.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Metadata
Title
A pilot voxel-based morphometry study of older adults after the PICMOR intervention program
Authors
Hikaru Sugimoto
Mihoko Otake-Matsuura
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Geriatrics / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2318
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-021-02669-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

BMC Geriatrics 1/2022 Go to the issue

Research

Community-based group physical activity and/or nutrition interventions to promote mobility in older adults: an umbrella review

Research

Managing abusive experiences: a qualitative study among older adults in Sweden

Research

A theory of change of an innovation for therapeutic care and meaningful living in a German nursing home

Research article

Propensity score weighted associations between financial strain and subsequent inflammatory biomarkers of aging among a representative sample of U.S. older adults

Research

Dignity and psychosocial related variables in elderly advanced cancer patients

Research

Systemic immune-inflammation index predicts postoperative delirium in elderly patients after surgery: a retrospective cohort study
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Reserve your place

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

Read more

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine
Image Credits