Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Surgery International 1/2017

01-01-2017 | Original Article

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-assisted laparoscopic anorectoplasty for imperforate anus: a single center experience

Authors: Tina T. Thomas, Daniel H. Teitelbaum, Ethan A. Smith, Jonathan R. Dillman, Ranjith Vellody, Marcus D. Jarboe

Published in: Pediatric Surgery International | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Surgical procedures for high imperforate anus have ranged from the posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP) to laparoscopic-assisted anorectoplasty (LAARP). PSARP bisects the sphincter muscle complex, introducing muscle injury and scarring. LAARP uses a straight trocar to traverse an often non-linear sphincter muscle complex. MRI-assisted LAARP (MRI-LAARP) guides the neorectum precisely through the middle of the entire sphincter complex along its trajectory. We present our experience utilizing MRI intraoperatively during LAARP.

Methods/procedure

Ten children underwent MRI-LAARP procedures. Intraoperative MRI was performed to delineate the sphincter complex, and to guide the advancement of an MRI-compatible needle through the center of the complex from skin to the peritoneal cavity. The remainder of the procedure was completed using the standard LAARP technique.

Results

All had successful MRI needle placement through the sphincter complex. Nine patients had successful laparoscopic pull-through procedures; one was converted to open due to severe intraperitoneal adhesions. Postoperative stay averaged 5.4 ± 4.4 days. Out of the ten patients, one child had mild dehiscence of the anal anastomosis requiring revision 11 days postoperatively.

Conclusion

The theoretical advantage of the MRI-LAARP is placing the neorectum through the entire sphincter complex without transecting the muscle. Follow-up of these patients shows good short-term results; however, long-term follow-up will be needed to best assess sphincter and bowel function.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Dubreuilh M (1840) Case of imperforate anus, with absence of the rectum, in which the colon opened into the superior fundus of the bladder. Prov Med Surg J 2(46):397 Dubreuilh M (1840) Case of imperforate anus, with absence of the rectum, in which the colon opened into the superior fundus of the bladder. Prov Med Surg J 2(46):397
2.
go back to reference Pena A, Devries PA (1982) Posterior sagittal anorectoplasty: important technical considerations and new applications. J Pediatr Surg 17(6):796–811CrossRefPubMed Pena A, Devries PA (1982) Posterior sagittal anorectoplasty: important technical considerations and new applications. J Pediatr Surg 17(6):796–811CrossRefPubMed
3.
4.
go back to reference Raschbaum GR, Bleacher JC, Grattan-Smith JD, Jones RA (2010) Magnetic resonance imaging guided laparoscopic assisted anorectoplasty for imperforate anus. J Pediatr Surg 45:220–223CrossRefPubMed Raschbaum GR, Bleacher JC, Grattan-Smith JD, Jones RA (2010) Magnetic resonance imaging guided laparoscopic assisted anorectoplasty for imperforate anus. J Pediatr Surg 45:220–223CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Thomas T, Teitelbaum DH, Vellody R, Spremo D, Elkins S, Ladouceur B, Nagy D, Jarboe MD (2016) Development of an operative suspension system for the performance of MRI-OR guided laparoscopic anoplasty. Pediatr Surg Int 32(3):301–306CrossRefPubMed Thomas T, Teitelbaum DH, Vellody R, Spremo D, Elkins S, Ladouceur B, Nagy D, Jarboe MD (2016) Development of an operative suspension system for the performance of MRI-OR guided laparoscopic anoplasty. Pediatr Surg Int 32(3):301–306CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Koga H, Takanori O, Okawada M et al (2014) Comparison of outcomes between laparoscopy-assisted and posterior sagittal anorectoplasties for male imperforate anus with recto-bulbar fistula. J Pediatr Surg 49:1815–1817CrossRefPubMed Koga H, Takanori O, Okawada M et al (2014) Comparison of outcomes between laparoscopy-assisted and posterior sagittal anorectoplasties for male imperforate anus with recto-bulbar fistula. J Pediatr Surg 49:1815–1817CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Wong K, Wu X, Chan I (2011) Evaluation of defecative function 5 years or longer after laparoscopic-assisted pull through for imperforate anus. J Pediatr Surg 46:2313–2315CrossRefPubMed Wong K, Wu X, Chan I (2011) Evaluation of defecative function 5 years or longer after laparoscopic-assisted pull through for imperforate anus. J Pediatr Surg 46:2313–2315CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Hsu Y, Fenner DE, Weadock WJ, DeLancey JOL (2005) Magnetic resonance imaging and 3-dimensional analysis of external anal sphincter anatomy. Obstet Gynecol 106(6):1259–1265CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hsu Y, Fenner DE, Weadock WJ, DeLancey JOL (2005) Magnetic resonance imaging and 3-dimensional analysis of external anal sphincter anatomy. Obstet Gynecol 106(6):1259–1265CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Guo M, Gao C, Li D, Guo W, Shafik AA, Zbar AP et al (2010) MRI anatomy of the anal region. Dis Colon Rectum 53:1542–1548CrossRefPubMed Guo M, Gao C, Li D, Guo W, Shafik AA, Zbar AP et al (2010) MRI anatomy of the anal region. Dis Colon Rectum 53:1542–1548CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-assisted laparoscopic anorectoplasty for imperforate anus: a single center experience
Authors
Tina T. Thomas
Daniel H. Teitelbaum
Ethan A. Smith
Jonathan R. Dillman
Ranjith Vellody
Marcus D. Jarboe
Publication date
01-01-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Pediatric Surgery International / Issue 1/2017
Print ISSN: 0179-0358
Electronic ISSN: 1437-9813
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-016-3995-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Pediatric Surgery International 1/2017 Go to the issue