Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Ovarian Research 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research

Magnetic resonance imaging for distinguishing ovarian clear cell carcinoma from high-grade serous carcinoma

Authors: Feng-Hua Ma, Jin-Wei Qiang, Guo-Fu Zhang, Hai-Ming Li, Song-Qi Cai, Ya-Min Rao

Published in: Journal of Ovarian Research | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

To compare the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features of ovarian clear cell carcinoma (CCC) and high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC), to distinguish CCC from HGSC.

Methods

MRI features (laterality, shape, size, configuration, papillary projection, signal intensity, enhancement, peritoneal implant, lymphadenopathy, ascites) of 40 tumors in 37 patients with CCC, confirmed by surgery and pathology, were compared with those of 62 tumors in 40 patients with HGSC. Statistical analysis was performed using Mann-Whitney and Fisher’s exact tests.

Results

There was a statistically significant difference in the mean maximum diameter, laterality, and FIGO stage (P = 0.002, P < 0.001, P < 0.001, respectively) between CCC and HGSC. Compared to HGSCs, CCCs were more frequently oval (30/40, 75 % vs 12/62, 19 %; P < 0.001), more often cystic (21/40, 53 % vs 8/62, 13 %; P < 0.001) and unilocular (23/29, 79 % vs 7/31, 23 %; P < 0.001), had T1-hyperintense cystic components more often (18/29, 62 % vs 5/29, 17 %; P < 0.001), had larger papillary projections (5.13 ± 0.4 cm vs 2.91 ± 0.3 cm; P < 0.001), were peritoneally implanted less frequently (P = 0.001) and had fewer ascites (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

CCC typically showed an oval, unilocular cystic mass with large papillary projection and T1-hyperintense cystic components. MRI could be helpful for distinguishing CCC from HGSC.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Mccluggage WG. Morphological subtypes of ovarian carcinoma: a review with emphasison new developments and pathogenesis. Pathology. 2011;43(5):420–32.CrossRefPubMed Mccluggage WG. Morphological subtypes of ovarian carcinoma: a review with emphasison new developments and pathogenesis. Pathology. 2011;43(5):420–32.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Anglesio MS, Carey MS, Kӧbel M, et al. Clear cell carcinoma of the ovary: a report from the first ovarian clear cell symposium, June 24th, 2010. Gyneco Oncol. 2011;121(2):407–15.CrossRef Anglesio MS, Carey MS, Kӧbel M, et al. Clear cell carcinoma of the ovary: a report from the first ovarian clear cell symposium, June 24th, 2010. Gyneco Oncol. 2011;121(2):407–15.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Rauh-Hain AJ, Winograd D, Growdon WB, et al. Prognostic determinants in patients with uterine and ovarian clear cell carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;125(2):376–80.CrossRefPubMed Rauh-Hain AJ, Winograd D, Growdon WB, et al. Prognostic determinants in patients with uterine and ovarian clear cell carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;125(2):376–80.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference del Carmen MG, Birrer M, Schorge JO. Clear cell carcinoma of the ovary: a review of the literature. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;126(3):481–90.CrossRefPubMed del Carmen MG, Birrer M, Schorge JO. Clear cell carcinoma of the ovary: a review of the literature. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;126(3):481–90.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Chan JK, Teoh D, Hu JM, et al. Do clear cell ovarian carcinomas have poorer prognosis compared to other epithelial cell types? A study of 1411 clear cell cancers. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;109(3):370–6.CrossRefPubMed Chan JK, Teoh D, Hu JM, et al. Do clear cell ovarian carcinomas have poorer prognosis compared to other epithelial cell types? A study of 1411 clear cell cancers. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;109(3):370–6.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Lee YY, Kim TJ, Kim MJ, et al. Prognosis of ovarian clear cell carcinoma compared to other histological subtypes: A meta-analysis. Gynecol Oncol. 2011;122(3):541–7.CrossRefPubMed Lee YY, Kim TJ, Kim MJ, et al. Prognosis of ovarian clear cell carcinoma compared to other histological subtypes: A meta-analysis. Gynecol Oncol. 2011;122(3):541–7.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Glasspool RM, McNeish IA. Clear cell carcinoma of ovary and uterus. Curr Oncol Rep. 2013;15(6):566–72.CrossRefPubMed Glasspool RM, McNeish IA. Clear cell carcinoma of ovary and uterus. Curr Oncol Rep. 2013;15(6):566–72.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Kӧbel M, Kalloger SE, Santos JL, et al. Tumor type and substage predict survival in stage I and II ovarian carcinoma: Insights and implications. Gynecol Oncol. 2010;116(1):50–6.CrossRef Kӧbel M, Kalloger SE, Santos JL, et al. Tumor type and substage predict survival in stage I and II ovarian carcinoma: Insights and implications. Gynecol Oncol. 2010;116(1):50–6.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Morgan Jr RJ, Armstrong DK, Alvarez RD, et al. National Comprehensive Cancer Network Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Ovarian cancer: including fallopian tube cancer and primary peritoneal cancer. Version 3. 2014. Morgan Jr RJ, Armstrong DK, Alvarez RD, et al. National Comprehensive Cancer Network Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Ovarian cancer: including fallopian tube cancer and primary peritoneal cancer. Version 3. 2014.
10.
go back to reference McDermott S, Oei TN, Iyer VR, et al. MR imaging of malignancies arising in endometriomas and extra-ovarian endometriosis. RadioGraphics. 2012;32(3):845–63.CrossRefPubMed McDermott S, Oei TN, Iyer VR, et al. MR imaging of malignancies arising in endometriomas and extra-ovarian endometriosis. RadioGraphics. 2012;32(3):845–63.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Thomassin-Naggara I, Balvay D, Aubert E, et al. Quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging analysis of complex adnexal masses: a preliminary study. Eur Radiol. 2012;22(4):738–45.CrossRefPubMed Thomassin-Naggara I, Balvay D, Aubert E, et al. Quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging analysis of complex adnexal masses: a preliminary study. Eur Radiol. 2012;22(4):738–45.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Matsuoka Y, Ohtomo K, Araki T, et al. MR imaging of clear cell carcinoma of the ovary. Eur Radiol. 2001;11(6):946–51.CrossRefPubMed Matsuoka Y, Ohtomo K, Araki T, et al. MR imaging of clear cell carcinoma of the ovary. Eur Radiol. 2001;11(6):946–51.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Choi HJ, Lee JH, Lee JS, et al. CT findings of clear cell carcinoma of the ovary. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2006;30(6):875–9.CrossRefPubMed Choi HJ, Lee JH, Lee JS, et al. CT findings of clear cell carcinoma of the ovary. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2006;30(6):875–9.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Tothill RW, Tinker AV, George J, et al. Novel molecular subtypes of serous and endometrioid ovarian cancer linked to clinical outcome. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14(16):5198–208.CrossRefPubMed Tothill RW, Tinker AV, George J, et al. Novel molecular subtypes of serous and endometrioid ovarian cancer linked to clinical outcome. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14(16):5198–208.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Richard T, Penson DS, Michael JB. Clear cell cancer of the ovary. Curr Opin Oncol. 2013;25(5):553–7.CrossRef Richard T, Penson DS, Michael JB. Clear cell cancer of the ovary. Curr Opin Oncol. 2013;25(5):553–7.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Min KW, Park MH, Hong SR, et al. Clear cell adenocarcinoma of the ovary: a multi-institutional study of 129 cases in Korea with prognostic significance of emil and galectin-3. Inter J Gynecol Path. 2012;32(1):3–14.CrossRef Min KW, Park MH, Hong SR, et al. Clear cell adenocarcinoma of the ovary: a multi-institutional study of 129 cases in Korea with prognostic significance of emil and galectin-3. Inter J Gynecol Path. 2012;32(1):3–14.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Pather S, Quinn MA. Clear-cell cancer of the ovary—is it chemosensitive? Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2004;15(3):432–7.CrossRef Pather S, Quinn MA. Clear-cell cancer of the ovary—is it chemosensitive? Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2004;15(3):432–7.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Zeppernick F, Meinhold-Heerlein I, Shil IM. Precursors of ovarian cancer in the fallopian tube: Serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma-an update. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2015;41(1):6–11.CrossRefPubMed Zeppernick F, Meinhold-Heerlein I, Shil IM. Precursors of ovarian cancer in the fallopian tube: Serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma-an update. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2015;41(1):6–11.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Pearce CL, Templeman C, Rossing MA, et al. Association between endometriosis and risk of histological subtypes of ovarian cancer: a pooled analysis of case-control studies. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13(4):385–94.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pearce CL, Templeman C, Rossing MA, et al. Association between endometriosis and risk of histological subtypes of ovarian cancer: a pooled analysis of case-control studies. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13(4):385–94.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Hassen K, Ghossain MA, Rousset P, et al. Characterization of papillary projections in benign versus borderline and malignant ovarian masses on conventional and colar Doppler ultrasound. AJR. 2011;196(6):1444–9.CrossRefPubMed Hassen K, Ghossain MA, Rousset P, et al. Characterization of papillary projections in benign versus borderline and malignant ovarian masses on conventional and colar Doppler ultrasound. AJR. 2011;196(6):1444–9.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Saini A, Dina R, McIndoe GA, et al. Characterization of adnexal masses with MRI. AJR. 2005;184(3):1004–9.CrossRefPubMed Saini A, Dina R, McIndoe GA, et al. Characterization of adnexal masses with MRI. AJR. 2005;184(3):1004–9.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Offman SL, Longacre TA. Clear cell carcinoma of the female genital tract (not everything is as clear as it seems). Adv Anat Pathol. 2012;19(5):296–312.CrossRefPubMed Offman SL, Longacre TA. Clear cell carcinoma of the female genital tract (not everything is as clear as it seems). Adv Anat Pathol. 2012;19(5):296–312.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Magnetic resonance imaging for distinguishing ovarian clear cell carcinoma from high-grade serous carcinoma
Authors
Feng-Hua Ma
Jin-Wei Qiang
Guo-Fu Zhang
Hai-Ming Li
Song-Qi Cai
Ya-Min Rao
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Journal of Ovarian Research / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1757-2215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13048-016-0251-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

Journal of Ovarian Research 1/2016 Go to the issue