Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Skeletal Radiology 2/2011

01-02-2011 | Scientific Article

Magnetic resonance arthrography of the shoulder: accuracy of gadolinium versus saline for rotator cuff and labral pathology

Authors: Clyde A. Helms, Shane J. McGonegle, Emily N. Vinson, Michael B. Whiteside

Published in: Skeletal Radiology | Issue 2/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the necessity of intra-articular gadolinium versus saline alone in magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA) of the shoulder.

Materials and methods

Our database was reviewed for 100 consecutive shoulder MRA examinations performed between January 2007 and December 2007. Patient information was blinded and images were retrospectively reviewed by at least two radiologists with dedicated musculoskeletal training. T2-weighted (T2W) images were initially analyzed in isolation to simulate MRA with saline alone. After a delay, the full study was analyzed including T1-weighted (T1W) and T2W images. If there was a significant discordance between the two analyses with regard to rotator cuff or labral pathology, the study was again reviewed by all evaluators in consensus to determine if the T1W images offered additional diagnostic information and increased diagnostic confidence.

Results

Of the 100 MRA examinations, there were 15 discordant cases. Two cases were discordant with regard to rotator cuff pathology and 13 were discordant on the basis of labral pathology. When the discordant cases were reviewed in consensus, the T2W images appeared to display rotator cuff and labral pathology as definitively as the T1W images. Interobserver and intraobserver variability was favored to have played a role in causing the discordances.

Conclusions

MRA of the shoulder performed with joint distention provided by saline alone appears to offer equivalent diagnostic information to MRA performed with gadolinium enhancement. This protocol modification improves efficiency by eliminating several image series and provides a small cost savings by eliminating gadolinium.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Meister K, Thesing J, Montgomery WJ, Indelicato PA, Walczak S, Fontenot W. MR arthrography of partial thickness tears of the undersurface of the rotator cuff: an arthroscopic correlation. Skeletal Radiol. 2004;33(3):136–41.CrossRefPubMed Meister K, Thesing J, Montgomery WJ, Indelicato PA, Walczak S, Fontenot W. MR arthrography of partial thickness tears of the undersurface of the rotator cuff: an arthroscopic correlation. Skeletal Radiol. 2004;33(3):136–41.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Balich SM, Sheley RC, Brown TR, Sauser DD, Quinn SF. MR imaging of the rotator cuff tendon: interobserver agreement and analysis of interpretive errors. Radiology. 1997;204(1):191–4.PubMed Balich SM, Sheley RC, Brown TR, Sauser DD, Quinn SF. MR imaging of the rotator cuff tendon: interobserver agreement and analysis of interpretive errors. Radiology. 1997;204(1):191–4.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Palmer WE, Brown JH, Rosenthal DI. Rotator cuff: evaluation with fat-suppressed MR arthrography. Radiology. 1993;188(3):683–7.PubMed Palmer WE, Brown JH, Rosenthal DI. Rotator cuff: evaluation with fat-suppressed MR arthrography. Radiology. 1993;188(3):683–7.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Hodler J, Kursunoglu-Brahme S, Snyder SJ, et al. Rotator cuff disease: assessment with MR arthrography versus standard MR imaging in 36 patients with arthroscopic confirmation. Radiology. 1992;182(2):431–6.PubMed Hodler J, Kursunoglu-Brahme S, Snyder SJ, et al. Rotator cuff disease: assessment with MR arthrography versus standard MR imaging in 36 patients with arthroscopic confirmation. Radiology. 1992;182(2):431–6.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Flannigan B, Kursunoglu-Brahme S, Snyder S, Karzel R, Del Pizzo W, Resnick D. MR arthrography of the shoulder: comparison with conventional MR imaging. Am J Roentgenol. 1990;155(4):829–32. Flannigan B, Kursunoglu-Brahme S, Snyder S, Karzel R, Del Pizzo W, Resnick D. MR arthrography of the shoulder: comparison with conventional MR imaging. Am J Roentgenol. 1990;155(4):829–32.
6.
go back to reference Wagner SC, Schweitzer ME, Morrison WB, et al. Shoulder instability: accuracy of MR imaging performed after surgery in depicting recurrent injury—initial findings. Radiology. 2002;222:196–203.CrossRefPubMed Wagner SC, Schweitzer ME, Morrison WB, et al. Shoulder instability: accuracy of MR imaging performed after surgery in depicting recurrent injury—initial findings. Radiology. 2002;222:196–203.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Magee T, Williams D, Mani N. Shoulder MR arthrography: which patient group benefits most? Am J Roentgenol. 2004;183:969–74. Magee T, Williams D, Mani N. Shoulder MR arthrography: which patient group benefits most? Am J Roentgenol. 2004;183:969–74.
8.
go back to reference Willemsen UF, Wiedemann E, Brunner U, et al. Prospective evaluation of MR arthrography performed with high-volume intraarticular saline enhancement in patients with recurrent anterior dislocations of the shoulder. Am J Roentgenol. 1998;170:79–84. Willemsen UF, Wiedemann E, Brunner U, et al. Prospective evaluation of MR arthrography performed with high-volume intraarticular saline enhancement in patients with recurrent anterior dislocations of the shoulder. Am J Roentgenol. 1998;170:79–84.
9.
go back to reference Tirman PF, Stauffer AE, Crues III JV, et al. Saline magnetic resonance arthrography in the evaluation of glenohumeral instability. Arthroscopy. 1993;9:550–9.CrossRefPubMed Tirman PF, Stauffer AE, Crues III JV, et al. Saline magnetic resonance arthrography in the evaluation of glenohumeral instability. Arthroscopy. 1993;9:550–9.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Zanetti M, Hodler J. Contrast media in MR arthrography of the glenohumeral joint: intraarticular gadopentetate vs saline: preliminary results. Eur Radiol. 1997;7:498–502.CrossRefPubMed Zanetti M, Hodler J. Contrast media in MR arthrography of the glenohumeral joint: intraarticular gadopentetate vs saline: preliminary results. Eur Radiol. 1997;7:498–502.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Binkert CA, Zanetti M, Gerber C, Hodler J. MR arthrography of the glenohumeral joint: two concentrations of Gadoteridol versus Ringer solution as the intraarticular contrast material. Radiology. 2001;220:219–24.PubMed Binkert CA, Zanetti M, Gerber C, Hodler J. MR arthrography of the glenohumeral joint: two concentrations of Gadoteridol versus Ringer solution as the intraarticular contrast material. Radiology. 2001;220:219–24.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Farley TE, Neumann CH, Steinbach LS, Jahnke AJ, Petersen SS. Full-thickness tears of the rotator cuff of the shoulder: diagnosis with MR imaging. Am J Roentgenol. 1992;158(2):347–51. Farley TE, Neumann CH, Steinbach LS, Jahnke AJ, Petersen SS. Full-thickness tears of the rotator cuff of the shoulder: diagnosis with MR imaging. Am J Roentgenol. 1992;158(2):347–51.
13.
go back to reference Fukuda H, Hmada K, Nakajima T, Yamada N, Tomonaga A, Goto M. Partial-thickness tears of the rotator cuff: a clinicopathological review based on 66 surgically verified cases. Int Orthop. 1996;20:257–65.CrossRefPubMed Fukuda H, Hmada K, Nakajima T, Yamada N, Tomonaga A, Goto M. Partial-thickness tears of the rotator cuff: a clinicopathological review based on 66 surgically verified cases. Int Orthop. 1996;20:257–65.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Snyder SJ, Pachelli AF, Pizzo WD, Friedman MJ, Ferkel RD, Pattee G. Partial thickness rotator cuff tears: results of arthroscopic treatment. Arthroscopy. 1991;7(1):1–7.CrossRefPubMed Snyder SJ, Pachelli AF, Pizzo WD, Friedman MJ, Ferkel RD, Pattee G. Partial thickness rotator cuff tears: results of arthroscopic treatment. Arthroscopy. 1991;7(1):1–7.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Fukuda H. The management of partial-thickness tears of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;85:3–11.CrossRefPubMed Fukuda H. The management of partial-thickness tears of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;85:3–11.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Magnetic resonance arthrography of the shoulder: accuracy of gadolinium versus saline for rotator cuff and labral pathology
Authors
Clyde A. Helms
Shane J. McGonegle
Emily N. Vinson
Michael B. Whiteside
Publication date
01-02-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Skeletal Radiology / Issue 2/2011
Print ISSN: 0364-2348
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2161
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-010-0978-1

Other articles of this Issue 2/2011

Skeletal Radiology 2/2011 Go to the issue