Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 7/2021

01-07-2021 | Review Article

Macular microhole and foveal red spot syndrome: a critical review of the literature

Authors: James H. Garcia, Mark Johnson, Gaurav Shah, Carsten H. Meyer, Gustavo B. Melo, Eduardo B. Rodrigues

Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology | Issue 7/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this article is to review the literature on nomenclature, natural history, clinical features, diagnosis, management, and prognosis of both macular microhole (MMH) and foveal red spot syndrome (FRS).

Methods

A PubMed primary literature search (February 1, 2020) utilizing the terms macular microhole, foveal red spot syndrome, and outer retinal hole was conducted. All chosen articles were case reports or case series. Articles qualified for inclusion if they documented symptoms, imaging findings, or followed patients longitudinally.

Results

A total of 14 studies from 1988 to 2019 that evaluated either MMH, FRS, or both were included in the review. No comparative study between the two defects was found. Studies often used the terms FRS and MMH interchangeably to reference both partial- and full-thickness lesions of the macula. Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) was most frequently able to identify these lesions and revealed an absence of all neural retinal layers from the inner limiting membrane (ILM) to the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) in the full-thickness lesions while the partial-thickness lesions most often involved the photoreceptor layer (PRL) and less frequently the external limiting membrane (ELM). OCT revealed that vitreomacular traction (VMT) was involved in the natural history of both FRS and MMH for a significant subset of patients.

Conclusion

The terms MMH and FRS have been used interchangeably in the literature. Advances in OCT have revealed that MMHs and FRSs are distinct but sometimes overlapping entities. We suggest that MMH and FRS are similar entities defined as one or more sharply defined lesions in the fovea of the eye < 150 μm in size. MMHs are a full-thickness defect of the entire neuroretina at the center of the foveola while FRSs are partial-thickness lesions. Current literature suggests that there may be subtle differences in the pathogenesis, clinical features, and diagnosis between MMH and FRS; however, prognosis and management for both are favorable. Lastly, we suggest that the terms outer lamellar macular microholes and full-thickness macular microholes may be the more appropriate terminologies to refer to FRS and MMH, respectively.
Literature
7.
go back to reference Wolf S, Wolf-Schnurrbusch U (2010) Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography use in macular diseases: a review. Ophthalmologica 224(6):333–340CrossRef Wolf S, Wolf-Schnurrbusch U (2010) Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography use in macular diseases: a review. Ophthalmologica 224(6):333–340CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Gella L, Raman R, Pal SS, Nittala MG, Sharma T (2012) Morphological and functional changes in spectral domain optical coherence tomography and microperimetry in macular microhole variants: spectral domain optical coherence tomography and microperimetry correlation. Indian J Ophthalmol 60(1):53–56CrossRef Gella L, Raman R, Pal SS, Nittala MG, Sharma T (2012) Morphological and functional changes in spectral domain optical coherence tomography and microperimetry in macular microhole variants: spectral domain optical coherence tomography and microperimetry correlation. Indian J Ophthalmol 60(1):53–56CrossRef
16.
18.
go back to reference Caramoy A, Fauser S, Kirchhof B (2011). Spontaneous progression of a full-thickness macular microhole to a lamellar macular hole in spectral domain optical coherence tomography. GMS Ophthalmol Cases 1:Doc02 Caramoy A, Fauser S, Kirchhof B (2011). Spontaneous progression of a full-thickness macular microhole to a lamellar macular hole in spectral domain optical coherence tomography. GMS Ophthalmol Cases 1:Doc02
26.
go back to reference Kuhn F, Morris R, Mester V, Witherspoon CD (2001) Internal limiting membrane removal for traumatic macular holes. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers 32(4):308–315CrossRef Kuhn F, Morris R, Mester V, Witherspoon CD (2001) Internal limiting membrane removal for traumatic macular holes. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers 32(4):308–315CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Macular microhole and foveal red spot syndrome: a critical review of the literature
Authors
James H. Garcia
Mark Johnson
Gaurav Shah
Carsten H. Meyer
Gustavo B. Melo
Eduardo B. Rodrigues
Publication date
01-07-2021
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology / Issue 7/2021
Print ISSN: 0721-832X
Electronic ISSN: 1435-702X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-020-04995-z

Other articles of this Issue 7/2021

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 7/2021 Go to the issue