Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Quality of Life Research 12/2020

Open Access 01-12-2020 | Macular Degeneration

Six and eight weeks injection frequencies of bevacizumab are non-inferior to the current four weeks injection frequency for quality of life in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a randomized controlled trial

Authors: Martijn S. Visser, Sankha Amarakoon, Tom Missotten, Reinier Timman, Jan J. V. Busschbach

Published in: Quality of Life Research | Issue 12/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nARMD) will not deteriorate on visual acuity and retinal thickness when treated with bevacizumab injection frequencies of 6 or 8 weeks compared to 4 weeks. This study aimed to investigate this non-inferiority in quality of life (QoL). We hypothesized that less frequent bevacizumab injections are not inferior regarding patients reported QoL.

Methods

Patients were randomized to bevacizumab every 4 (n = 64), 6 (n = 63), and 8 weeks (n = 64). Patients were at least 65 years old, have a best-corrected visual acuity of 20/200 to 20/20, no previous ARMD treatment and active leakage. Vision-related QoL questionnaire NEI VFQ-39 was used to assess QoL at baseline and after 1 year. General QoL questionnaire SF-36 was included for secondary analysis. Multilevel analyses were performed, correcting for age, gender and baseline.

Results

The 6 (3.68; 95% CI − 0.63 to 8.00) and 8 (2.15; 95% CI − 2.26 to 6.56) weeks bevacizumab regimens resulted in non-inferior QoL differences compared to 4 weeks on the NEI VFQ-39. Also on the SF-36 the differences were well within the non-inferiority limits.

Conclusion

Non-inferiority of the 6 and 8 weeks frequencies was demonstrated compared to 4 weeks on vision-related and general QoL in patients with nARMD. These results are in line with previously published results of lower frequency injections regarding visual acuity and central retinal thickness. Lower injection frequency may reduce burden, side effects, and treatment costs. In consideration of these results, 8 weeks frequency injections of intravitreal bevacizumab could be considered in patients with nARMD.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bressler, N. M. (2004). Age-related macular degeneration is the leading cause of blindness. JAMA, 291, 1900–1901.CrossRef Bressler, N. M. (2004). Age-related macular degeneration is the leading cause of blindness. JAMA, 291, 1900–1901.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Klaver, C. C., Wolfs, R. C., Vingerling, J. R., Hofman, A., & de Jong, P. T. (1998). Age-specific prevalence and causes of blindness and visual impairment in an older population: The Rotterdam Study. Archives of Ophthalmology, 116, 653–658.CrossRef Klaver, C. C., Wolfs, R. C., Vingerling, J. R., Hofman, A., & de Jong, P. T. (1998). Age-specific prevalence and causes of blindness and visual impairment in an older population: The Rotterdam Study. Archives of Ophthalmology, 116, 653–658.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Taylor, D. J., Hobby, A. E., Binns, A. M., & Crabb, D. P. (2016). How does age-related macular degeneration affect real-world visual ability and quality of life? A systematic review. British Medical Journal Open, 6, e011504. Taylor, D. J., Hobby, A. E., Binns, A. M., & Crabb, D. P. (2016). How does age-related macular degeneration affect real-world visual ability and quality of life? A systematic review. British Medical Journal Open, 6, e011504.
4.
go back to reference Bird, A. C. (1993). Choroidal neovascularisation in age-related macular disease. The British Journal of Ophthalmology, 77, 614–615.CrossRef Bird, A. C. (1993). Choroidal neovascularisation in age-related macular disease. The British Journal of Ophthalmology, 77, 614–615.CrossRef
5.
6.
go back to reference McAlinden, C., Gothwal, V. K., Khadka, J., Wright, T. A., Lamoureux, E. L., & Pesudovs, K. (2011). A head-to-head comparison of 16 cataract surgery outcome questionnaires. Ophthalmology, 118, 2374–2381.CrossRef McAlinden, C., Gothwal, V. K., Khadka, J., Wright, T. A., Lamoureux, E. L., & Pesudovs, K. (2011). A head-to-head comparison of 16 cataract surgery outcome questionnaires. Ophthalmology, 118, 2374–2381.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Nilsson, E., Orwelius, L., & Kristenson, M. (2016). Patient-reported outcomes in the Swedish National Quality Registers. Journal of Internal Medicine, 279, 141–153.CrossRef Nilsson, E., Orwelius, L., & Kristenson, M. (2016). Patient-reported outcomes in the Swedish National Quality Registers. Journal of Internal Medicine, 279, 141–153.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Brown, D. M., Michels, M., Kaiser, P. K., et al. (2009). Ranibizumab versus verteporfin photodynamic therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: Two-year results of the ANCHOR study. Ophthalmology, 116(57–65), e5. Brown, D. M., Michels, M., Kaiser, P. K., et al. (2009). Ranibizumab versus verteporfin photodynamic therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: Two-year results of the ANCHOR study. Ophthalmology, 116(57–65), e5.
9.
go back to reference Heier, J. S., Brown, D. M., Chong, V., et al. (2012). Intravitreal aflibercept (VEGF trap-eye) in wet age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology, 119, 2537–2548.CrossRef Heier, J. S., Brown, D. M., Chong, V., et al. (2012). Intravitreal aflibercept (VEGF trap-eye) in wet age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology, 119, 2537–2548.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Regillo, C. D., Brown, D. M., Abraham, P., et al. (2008). Randomized, double-masked, sham-controlled trial of ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: PIER Study year 1. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 145, 239–248.CrossRef Regillo, C. D., Brown, D. M., Abraham, P., et al. (2008). Randomized, double-masked, sham-controlled trial of ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: PIER Study year 1. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 145, 239–248.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Rosenfeld, P. J., Brown, D. M., Heier, J. S., et al. (2006). Ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. New England Journal of Medicine, 355, 1419–1431.CrossRef Rosenfeld, P. J., Brown, D. M., Heier, J. S., et al. (2006). Ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. New England Journal of Medicine, 355, 1419–1431.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Schmidt-Erfurth, U., Eldem, B., Guymer, R., et al. (2011). Efficacy and safety of monthly versus quarterly ranibizumab treatment in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: The EXCITE study. Ophthalmology, 118, 831–839.CrossRef Schmidt-Erfurth, U., Eldem, B., Guymer, R., et al. (2011). Efficacy and safety of monthly versus quarterly ranibizumab treatment in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: The EXCITE study. Ophthalmology, 118, 831–839.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Stewart, M. W., Rosenfeld, P. J., Penha, F. M., et al. (2012). Pharmacokinetic rationale for dosing every 2 weeks versus 4 weeks with intravitreal ranibizumab, bevacizumab, and aflibercept (vascular endothelial growth factor Trap-eye). Retina, 32, 434–457.PubMed Stewart, M. W., Rosenfeld, P. J., Penha, F. M., et al. (2012). Pharmacokinetic rationale for dosing every 2 weeks versus 4 weeks with intravitreal ranibizumab, bevacizumab, and aflibercept (vascular endothelial growth factor Trap-eye). Retina, 32, 434–457.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Cohen, M. H., Gootenberg, J., Keegan, P., & Pazdur, R. (2007). FDA drug approval summary: Bevacizumab plus FOLFOX4 as second-line treatment of colorectal cancer. The Oncologist, 12, 356–361.CrossRef Cohen, M. H., Gootenberg, J., Keegan, P., & Pazdur, R. (2007). FDA drug approval summary: Bevacizumab plus FOLFOX4 as second-line treatment of colorectal cancer. The Oncologist, 12, 356–361.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Berg, K., Hadzalic, E., Gjertsen, I., et al. (2016). Ranibizumab or bevacizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration according to the Lucentis compared to Avastin study treat-and-extend protocol: Two-year results. Ophthalmology, 123, 51–59.CrossRef Berg, K., Hadzalic, E., Gjertsen, I., et al. (2016). Ranibizumab or bevacizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration according to the Lucentis compared to Avastin study treat-and-extend protocol: Two-year results. Ophthalmology, 123, 51–59.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Berg, K., Pedersen, T. R., Sandvik, L., & Bragadottir, R. (2015). Comparison of ranibizumab and bevacizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration according to LUCAS treat-and-extend protocol. Ophthalmology, 122, 146–152.CrossRef Berg, K., Pedersen, T. R., Sandvik, L., & Bragadottir, R. (2015). Comparison of ranibizumab and bevacizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration according to LUCAS treat-and-extend protocol. Ophthalmology, 122, 146–152.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference CATT Research Group, Martin, D. F., Maguire, M. G., et al. (2011). Ranibizumab and bevacizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. New England Journal of Medicine, 364, 1897–1908.CrossRef CATT Research Group, Martin, D. F., Maguire, M. G., et al. (2011). Ranibizumab and bevacizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. New England Journal of Medicine, 364, 1897–1908.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Investigators, I. S., Chakravarthy, U., Harding, S. P., et al. (2012). Ranibizumab versus bevacizumab to treat neovascular age-related macular degeneration: One-year findings from the IVAN randomized trial. Ophthalmology, 119, 1399–1411.CrossRef Investigators, I. S., Chakravarthy, U., Harding, S. P., et al. (2012). Ranibizumab versus bevacizumab to treat neovascular age-related macular degeneration: One-year findings from the IVAN randomized trial. Ophthalmology, 119, 1399–1411.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Kodjikian, L., Souied, E. H., Mimoun, G., et al. (2013). Ranibizumab versus bevacizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: Results from the GEFAL noninferiority randomized trial. Ophthalmology, 120, 2300–2309.CrossRef Kodjikian, L., Souied, E. H., Mimoun, G., et al. (2013). Ranibizumab versus bevacizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: Results from the GEFAL noninferiority randomized trial. Ophthalmology, 120, 2300–2309.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Martin, D. F., Maguire, M. G., & Fine, S. L. (2011). Bevacizumab: Not as good with more adverse reactions? Response. Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 39, 718–720.CrossRef Martin, D. F., Maguire, M. G., & Fine, S. L. (2011). Bevacizumab: Not as good with more adverse reactions? Response. Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 39, 718–720.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Dolan, P. (1997). Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Medical Care, 35, 1095–1108.CrossRef Dolan, P. (1997). Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Medical Care, 35, 1095–1108.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Mitchell, J., & Bradley, C. (2004). Design of an individualised measure of the impact of macular disease on quality of life (the MacDQoL). Quality of Life Research, 13, 1163–1175.CrossRef Mitchell, J., & Bradley, C. (2004). Design of an individualised measure of the impact of macular disease on quality of life (the MacDQoL). Quality of Life Research, 13, 1163–1175.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Mitchell, J., Brose, L., & Bradley, C. (2007). Design of a measure of satisfaction with treatment for macular degeneration (MacTSQ). Quality of Life Research, A120, 2. Mitchell, J., Brose, L., & Bradley, C. (2007). Design of a measure of satisfaction with treatment for macular degeneration (MacTSQ). Quality of Life Research, A120, 2.
24.
go back to reference Krohne, T. U., Eter, N., Holz, F. G., & Meyer, C. H. (2008). Intraocular pharmacokinetics of bevacizumab after a single intravitreal injection in humans. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 146, 508–512.CrossRef Krohne, T. U., Eter, N., Holz, F. G., & Meyer, C. H. (2008). Intraocular pharmacokinetics of bevacizumab after a single intravitreal injection in humans. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 146, 508–512.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Krohne, T. U., Liu, Z., Holz, F. G., & Meyer, C. H. (2012). Intraocular pharmacokinetics of ranibizumab following a single intravitreal injection in humans. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 154(682–6), e2. Krohne, T. U., Liu, Z., Holz, F. G., & Meyer, C. H. (2012). Intraocular pharmacokinetics of ranibizumab following a single intravitreal injection in humans. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 154(682–6), e2.
26.
go back to reference Lushchyk, T., Amarakoon, S., Martinez-Ciriano, J. P., van den Born, L. I., Baarsma, G. S., & Missotten, T. (2013). Bevacizumab in age-related macular degeneration: A randomized controlled trial on the effect of injections every 4 weeks, 6 weeks and 8 weeks. Acta Ophthalmologica, 91, e456–e461.CrossRef Lushchyk, T., Amarakoon, S., Martinez-Ciriano, J. P., van den Born, L. I., Baarsma, G. S., & Missotten, T. (2013). Bevacizumab in age-related macular degeneration: A randomized controlled trial on the effect of injections every 4 weeks, 6 weeks and 8 weeks. Acta Ophthalmologica, 91, e456–e461.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Mangione, C. M., Lee, P. P., Gutierrez, P. R., et al. (2001). Development of the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire. Archives of Ophthalmology, 119, 1050–1058.CrossRef Mangione, C. M., Lee, P. P., Gutierrez, P. R., et al. (2001). Development of the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire. Archives of Ophthalmology, 119, 1050–1058.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Aaronson, N. K., Muller, M., Cohen, P. D., et al. (1998). Translation, validation, and norming of the Dutch language version of the SF-36 Health Survey in community and chronic disease populations. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51, 1055–1068.CrossRef Aaronson, N. K., Muller, M., Cohen, P. D., et al. (1998). Translation, validation, and norming of the Dutch language version of the SF-36 Health Survey in community and chronic disease populations. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51, 1055–1068.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Ware, J. E., Jr. (2000). SF-36 health survey update. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 25, 3130–3139.CrossRef Ware, J. E., Jr. (2000). SF-36 health survey update. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 25, 3130–3139.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Lindblad, A. S., & Clemons, T. E. (2005). Responsiveness of the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire to progression to advanced age-related macular degeneration, vision loss, and lens opacity: AREDS Report no. 14. Archives of Ophthalmology, 123, 1207–1214.CrossRef Lindblad, A. S., & Clemons, T. E. (2005). Responsiveness of the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire to progression to advanced age-related macular degeneration, vision loss, and lens opacity: AREDS Report no. 14. Archives of Ophthalmology, 123, 1207–1214.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Miskala, P. H., Hawkins, B. S., Mangione, C. M., et al. (2003). Responsiveness of the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire to changes in visual acuity: Findings in patients with subfoveal choroidal neovascularization—SST Report No. 1. Archives of Ophthalmology, 121, 531–539.CrossRef Miskala, P. H., Hawkins, B. S., Mangione, C. M., et al. (2003). Responsiveness of the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire to changes in visual acuity: Findings in patients with subfoveal choroidal neovascularization—SST Report No. 1. Archives of Ophthalmology, 121, 531–539.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Clemons, T. E., Chew, E. Y., Bressler, S. B., McBee, W., & The Age-Related Eye Disease Study Research Group. (2003). National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire in the Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS): AREDS Report No. 10. Archives of Ophthalmology, 121, 211–217.CrossRef Clemons, T. E., Chew, E. Y., Bressler, S. B., McBee, W., & The Age-Related Eye Disease Study Research Group. (2003). National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire in the Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS): AREDS Report No. 10. Archives of Ophthalmology, 121, 211–217.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Revicki, D. A., Rentz, A. M., Harnam, N., Thomas, V. S., & Lanzetta, P. (2010). Reliability and validity of the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 in patients with age-related macular degeneration. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 51, 712–717.CrossRef Revicki, D. A., Rentz, A. M., Harnam, N., Thomas, V. S., & Lanzetta, P. (2010). Reliability and validity of the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 in patients with age-related macular degeneration. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 51, 712–717.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Ware, J. E., Kosinski, M., & Keller, S. D. (1994). SF-36 physical and mental health summary scales: A user's manual. Boston, MA: New England Medical Center, The Health Institute. Ware, J. E., Kosinski, M., & Keller, S. D. (1994). SF-36 physical and mental health summary scales: A user's manual. Boston, MA: New England Medical Center, The Health Institute.
35.
go back to reference Jacobson, N. S., & Truax, P. (1991). Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 12–19.CrossRef Jacobson, N. S., & Truax, P. (1991). Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 12–19.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Lesaffre, E. (2008). Superiority, equivalence, and non-inferiority trials. Bulletin of the NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, 66, 150–154.PubMed Lesaffre, E. (2008). Superiority, equivalence, and non-inferiority trials. Bulletin of the NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, 66, 150–154.PubMed
37.
go back to reference Obeid, A., Gao, X., Ali, F. S., et al. (2018). Loss to follow-up among patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration who received intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections. JAMA Ophthalmology, 136, 1251–1259.CrossRef Obeid, A., Gao, X., Ali, F. S., et al. (2018). Loss to follow-up among patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration who received intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections. JAMA Ophthalmology, 136, 1251–1259.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Piaggio, G., Elbourne, D. R., Pocock, S. J., Evans, S. J., Altman, D. G., & CONSORT Group. (2012). Reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials: Extension of the CONSORT 2010 statement. JAMA, 308, 2594–2604.CrossRef Piaggio, G., Elbourne, D. R., Pocock, S. J., Evans, S. J., Altman, D. G., & CONSORT Group. (2012). Reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials: Extension of the CONSORT 2010 statement. JAMA, 308, 2594–2604.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Amarakoon, S., Martinez-Ciriano, J. P., Ingeborg van den Born, L., Baarsma, S., & Missotten, T. (2019). Bevacizumab in age-related macular degeneration: a randomized controlled trial on the effect of on-demand therapy every 4 or 8 weeks. Acta Ophtalmologica, 97, 107–112.CrossRef Amarakoon, S., Martinez-Ciriano, J. P., Ingeborg van den Born, L., Baarsma, S., & Missotten, T. (2019). Bevacizumab in age-related macular degeneration: a randomized controlled trial on the effect of on-demand therapy every 4 or 8 weeks. Acta Ophtalmologica, 97, 107–112.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Six and eight weeks injection frequencies of bevacizumab are non-inferior to the current four weeks injection frequency for quality of life in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a randomized controlled trial
Authors
Martijn S. Visser
Sankha Amarakoon
Tom Missotten
Reinier Timman
Jan J. V. Busschbach
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Quality of Life Research / Issue 12/2020
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02580-9

Other articles of this Issue 12/2020

Quality of Life Research 12/2020 Go to the issue