Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Ophthalmology 1/2020

01-12-2020 | Macular Degeneration | Research article

Assessment of online patient education materials designed for people with age-related macular degeneration

Authors: Jennifer Fortuna, Anne Riddering, Linda Shuster, Cassie Lopez-Jeng

Published in: BMC Ophthalmology | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a chronic eye condition that leads to permanent vision loss in the central visual field. AMD makes reading challenging and inefficient. People with AMD often find it difficult to access, process and understand written patient education materials (PEMs). To promote health literacy, the demands of written PEMs must match the literacy capacities of the target audience. This study aims to evaluate the readability (grade level) and suitability (appropriateness) of online PEMs designed for people with AMD.

Methods

Online PEMs were sourced from websites of national organizations providing patient education materials designed for people with AMD. The Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level formula and the Suitability Assessment of Materials instrument were used to assess the readability and suitability of PEMs. Descriptive statistics were used to compare online PEMs by organization based on national guidelines for readability level (≤ sixth grade) and the recommended suitability score (≥ 70%) for “superior” material.

Results

One hundred online PEMs were evaluated from websites of 16 professional organizations. The mean readability level was 9.3 (range 5.0–16.6). The mean suitability score was 53% (range 18–78%). Only six (6%) of PEMs achieved the recommended guidelines for readability level and suitability score.

Conclusion

The majority of online PEMs designed for people with AMD were written above the recommended readability level, and below the suggested suitability score. To promote health literacy, the demands of written health information must match the reading capacities of the target audience. Heeding to evidence-based guidelines for providing written information to patients with low health literacy and low vision is beneficial for both patients and health care providers. Future research is warranted.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Owsley C, McGwin G, Lee PP, Wasserman N, Searcey K. Characteristics of low-vision rehabilitation services in the United States. Arch Ophthalmol. 2009;127:681–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Owsley C, McGwin G, Lee PP, Wasserman N, Searcey K. Characteristics of low-vision rehabilitation services in the United States. Arch Ophthalmol. 2009;127:681–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Warren M, DeCarlo DK, Dreer LE. Health literacy in older adults with and without low vision. Am J Occup Ther. 2016;70:1–7.CrossRef Warren M, DeCarlo DK, Dreer LE. Health literacy in older adults with and without low vision. Am J Occup Ther. 2016;70:1–7.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Chung STL. Reading in the presence of macular disease: a mini-review. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2020;40:1–16.CrossRef Chung STL. Reading in the presence of macular disease: a mini-review. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2020;40:1–16.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Ratzan SC, Parker RM. Introduction. In: National Library of medicine current bibliographies in medicine: health literacy. Bethesda: National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2000. Ratzan SC, Parker RM. Introduction. In: National Library of medicine current bibliographies in medicine: health literacy. Bethesda: National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2000.
8.
go back to reference Doak CC, Doak LG, Root JH. Assessing Suitability of Materials. Teaching Patients with Low Literacy Skills. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott; 1996. Doak CC, Doak LG, Root JH. Assessing Suitability of Materials. Teaching Patients with Low Literacy Skills. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott; 1996.
9.
go back to reference Weiss BD. Health literacy: a manual for clinicians. Chicago: American Medical Association Foundation and American Medical Association; 2007. Weiss BD. Health literacy: a manual for clinicians. Chicago: American Medical Association Foundation and American Medical Association; 2007.
10.
go back to reference Badarudeen S, Sabbharwal S. Assessing readability of patient education materials: current role in orthopaedics. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 2010;468:2572–80.CrossRef Badarudeen S, Sabbharwal S. Assessing readability of patient education materials: current role in orthopaedics. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 2010;468:2572–80.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Legge GE. Psychophysics of Reading in Normal and Low Vision. NJ & London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2007. Legge GE. Psychophysics of Reading in Normal and Low Vision. NJ & London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2007.
12.
go back to reference Wolf MS, King J, Wilson EA, Curtis LM, Bailey SC, Duhig J, Russell A, Bergeron A, Daly A, Parker RM, Davis TC, Shrank WH, Lambert B. Usability of FDA-approved medication guides. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27:1714–20.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Wolf MS, King J, Wilson EA, Curtis LM, Bailey SC, Duhig J, Russell A, Bergeron A, Daly A, Parker RM, Davis TC, Shrank WH, Lambert B. Usability of FDA-approved medication guides. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27:1714–20.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). OECD Skills Outlook 2013: First Results from the Survey of Adult Skills. France: OECD Publishing; 2013. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). OECD Skills Outlook 2013: First Results from the Survey of Adult Skills. France: OECD Publishing; 2013.
14.
go back to reference Kutner M, Greenberg E, Jin C. The health literacy of America’s adults: results from the 2003 National Assessment of adult literacy. Washington: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics; 2006. Kutner M, Greenberg E, Jin C. The health literacy of America’s adults: results from the 2003 National Assessment of adult literacy. Washington: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics; 2006.
17.
go back to reference Chaudry I, Brown GC, Brown MM. Medical student and patient perceptions of quality of life associated with vision loss. Can J Ophthalmol. 2015;50:217–23.PubMedCrossRef Chaudry I, Brown GC, Brown MM. Medical student and patient perceptions of quality of life associated with vision loss. Can J Ophthalmol. 2015;50:217–23.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Zhang S, Liang Y, Chen Y, Musch DC, Zhang C, Wang N. Utility analysis of vision related quality of life in patients with glaucoma and different perceptions from ophthalmologists. J Glaucoma. 2015;24:508–14.PubMedCrossRef Zhang S, Liang Y, Chen Y, Musch DC, Zhang C, Wang N. Utility analysis of vision related quality of life in patients with glaucoma and different perceptions from ophthalmologists. J Glaucoma. 2015;24:508–14.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Parker R. Health literacy: a challenge for American patients and their health care providers. Health Promot Int. 2000;15:278–83.CrossRef Parker R. Health literacy: a challenge for American patients and their health care providers. Health Promot Int. 2000;15:278–83.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Warren M. (2013). Promoting health literacy in older adults with low vision. Top Geriatr Rehabil. 2013;29:107–15.CrossRef Warren M. (2013). Promoting health literacy in older adults with low vision. Top Geriatr Rehabil. 2013;29:107–15.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Carrier ERJ. Expectations outpace reality: physicians’ use of care management tools for patients with chronic conditions. Issue Brief Center Stud Health Syst Change. 2009;129:1–4. Carrier ERJ. Expectations outpace reality: physicians’ use of care management tools for patients with chronic conditions. Issue Brief Center Stud Health Syst Change. 2009;129:1–4.
22.
go back to reference Kher A, Johnson S, Griffith R. Readability assessment of online patient education material on congestive heart failure. Adv Prev Med. 2017;9780317. Kher A, Johnson S, Griffith R. Readability assessment of online patient education material on congestive heart failure. Adv Prev Med. 2017;9780317.
23.
go back to reference Stossel LM, Segar N, Gliatto P, Fallar R, Karani R. Readability of patient education materials available at the point of care. J Gen Intern Med. 2011;27:1165–70.CrossRef Stossel LM, Segar N, Gliatto P, Fallar R, Karani R. Readability of patient education materials available at the point of care. J Gen Intern Med. 2011;27:1165–70.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Davis TC, Crouch MA, Wills G, Abdehou DM. The gap between patient reading comprehension and the readability of patient education materials. J Family Pract. 1990;31:533–8. Davis TC, Crouch MA, Wills G, Abdehou DM. The gap between patient reading comprehension and the readability of patient education materials. J Family Pract. 1990;31:533–8.
25.
go back to reference Kirsch IS, Jungeblut A, Jenkins L, Kolstad A. Adult literacy in America. Washington: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics; 1993. Kirsch IS, Jungeblut A, Jenkins L, Kolstad A. Adult literacy in America. Washington: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics; 1993.
27.
go back to reference Harrison TC, Mackert M, Watkins CA. Qualitative analysis of health literacy issues among women with visual impairments. Res Gerontol Nurs. 2010;3:49–60.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Harrison TC, Mackert M, Watkins CA. Qualitative analysis of health literacy issues among women with visual impairments. Res Gerontol Nurs. 2010;3:49–60.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Armstrong-Heimsoth A, Johnson ML, Carpenter M, Thomas T, Sinnappan A. Health management: occupational therapy’s key role in educating clients about reliable online health information. Open J Occup Ther. 2019;7:1–14.CrossRef Armstrong-Heimsoth A, Johnson ML, Carpenter M, Thomas T, Sinnappan A. Health management: occupational therapy’s key role in educating clients about reliable online health information. Open J Occup Ther. 2019;7:1–14.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference John AM, John ES, Hansberry DR, Prashant JT, Suqin G. Analysis of online patient education materials in pediatric ophthalmology. J AAPOS. 2015;19:430–4.PubMedCrossRef John AM, John ES, Hansberry DR, Prashant JT, Suqin G. Analysis of online patient education materials in pediatric ophthalmology. J AAPOS. 2015;19:430–4.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference D’Alessandro DM, Kingsley P, Johnson-West B. The readability of pediatric patient education materials on the world wide web. Arch Pediat Adol Med. 2001;155:807–12.CrossRef D’Alessandro DM, Kingsley P, Johnson-West B. The readability of pediatric patient education materials on the world wide web. Arch Pediat Adol Med. 2001;155:807–12.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Eltorai AEM, Ghanian S, Adams CA, Born CT, Daniels AH. Readability of patient education materials on the American Association for Surgery of trauma website. Arch Trauma Res. 2014;3:1–4.CrossRef Eltorai AEM, Ghanian S, Adams CA, Born CT, Daniels AH. Readability of patient education materials on the American Association for Surgery of trauma website. Arch Trauma Res. 2014;3:1–4.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Hansberry DR, Agarwal N, Shah R, Schmitt PJ, Baredes S, Setzen M, Carmel PW, Prestigiacomo CJ, Liu JK, Eloy JA. Analysis of readability of patient education materials from surgical subspecialties. Gene Otolaryngol. 2013;124:405–12. Hansberry DR, Agarwal N, Shah R, Schmitt PJ, Baredes S, Setzen M, Carmel PW, Prestigiacomo CJ, Liu JK, Eloy JA. Analysis of readability of patient education materials from surgical subspecialties. Gene Otolaryngol. 2013;124:405–12.
35.
go back to reference John AM, John ES, Hansberry DR, Lambert WC. Assessment of online patient education materials from major dermatologic associations. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2016;9:23–8.PubMedPubMedCentral John AM, John ES, Hansberry DR, Lambert WC. Assessment of online patient education materials from major dermatologic associations. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2016;9:23–8.PubMedPubMedCentral
36.
go back to reference Beverly CA, Bath PA, Booth A. Health information needs of visually impaired people: a systematic review of the literature. Health Soc Care Community. 2004;12:1–24.CrossRef Beverly CA, Bath PA, Booth A. Health information needs of visually impaired people: a systematic review of the literature. Health Soc Care Community. 2004;12:1–24.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Edmunds MR, Barry RJ, Denniston AK. Readability assessment of online ophthalmic patient information. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013;131:1610–6.PubMedCrossRef Edmunds MR, Barry RJ, Denniston AK. Readability assessment of online ophthalmic patient information. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013;131:1610–6.PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Huang G, Fang CH, Agarwal N, Bhagat N, Eloy JA, Langer PD. Assessment of online patient education materials form major ophthalmologic associations. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015;133:449–54.PubMedCrossRef Huang G, Fang CH, Agarwal N, Bhagat N, Eloy JA, Langer PD. Assessment of online patient education materials form major ophthalmologic associations. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015;133:449–54.PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference John ES, John AM, Hansberry DR, Patel C. Readability assessment of online ophthalmology information – a comprehensive comparison of education resources. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55:5337. John ES, John AM, Hansberry DR, Patel C. Readability assessment of online ophthalmology information – a comprehensive comparison of education resources. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55:5337.
41.
go back to reference Doak CC, Doak LG, Root JH. Assessing suitability of materials. Teaching patients with low literacy skills. 2nd ed: JB Lippincott; 1996. Doak CC, Doak LG, Root JH. Assessing suitability of materials. Teaching patients with low literacy skills. 2nd ed: JB Lippincott; 1996.
42.
go back to reference Kincaid JP. Derivation of new readability formulas for navy enlisted personnel. Springfield: National Technical Information Services; 1975.CrossRef Kincaid JP. Derivation of new readability formulas for navy enlisted personnel. Springfield: National Technical Information Services; 1975.CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Albright J, de Guzman C, Acebo P, Paiva D, Faulkner M, Swanson J. Readability of patient education materials: implications for clinical practice. Appl Nurs Res. 1996;9:139–43.PubMedCrossRef Albright J, de Guzman C, Acebo P, Paiva D, Faulkner M, Swanson J. Readability of patient education materials: implications for clinical practice. Appl Nurs Res. 1996;9:139–43.PubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Cooley ME, Moriarty H, Berger MS, Selm-Orr D, Coyle B, Short T. Patient literacy and the readability of written cancer educational materials. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1995;22:1345–51.PubMed Cooley ME, Moriarty H, Berger MS, Selm-Orr D, Coyle B, Short T. Patient literacy and the readability of written cancer educational materials. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1995;22:1345–51.PubMed
46.
go back to reference Eames S, McKenna K, Worrall L, Read S. The suitability of written education materials for stroke survivors and their carers. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2003;10:70–83.PubMedCrossRef Eames S, McKenna K, Worrall L, Read S. The suitability of written education materials for stroke survivors and their carers. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2003;10:70–83.PubMedCrossRef
47.
go back to reference Taylor-Clarke K, Henry-Okafor Q, Murphy C, Keyes M, Rothman R, Churchwell A, Mensah GA, Sawyer D, Sampson UKA. Assessment of commonly available educational materials in heart failure clinics. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2012;27:485–94.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Taylor-Clarke K, Henry-Okafor Q, Murphy C, Keyes M, Rothman R, Churchwell A, Mensah GA, Sawyer D, Sampson UKA. Assessment of commonly available educational materials in heart failure clinics. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2012;27:485–94.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
48.
go back to reference Weintraub D, Maliski SL, Fink A, Choe S, Litwin MS. Suitability of prostate cancer education materials: applying a standardized assessment tool to currently available materials. Patient Educat Couns. 2004;55:275–80.CrossRef Weintraub D, Maliski SL, Fink A, Choe S, Litwin MS. Suitability of prostate cancer education materials: applying a standardized assessment tool to currently available materials. Patient Educat Couns. 2004;55:275–80.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Assessment of online patient education materials designed for people with age-related macular degeneration
Authors
Jennifer Fortuna
Anne Riddering
Linda Shuster
Cassie Lopez-Jeng
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Ophthalmology / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2415
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-020-01664-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

BMC Ophthalmology 1/2020 Go to the issue